Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language
Detected language: English
[00:00.880 --> 00:09.200]  I'm Dave Champion. I want to talk with you again about the media completely mischaracterizing
[00:09.200 --> 00:18.000]  people who are dying of COVID-19 as being healthy. Now, I think that's objectionable enough,
[00:18.000 --> 00:26.400]  just as it stands, but that's not the whole agenda. That's not the overarching reason that
[00:26.400 --> 00:34.880]  they're mischaracterizing. What they're doing is they are part of a complete media blackout
[00:35.760 --> 00:42.560]  on the connection between COVID-19 deaths and chronic disease in the United States.
[00:50.000 --> 00:54.480]  I'm not going to get into the whole issue of chronic disease and how it's actually
[00:54.480 --> 01:00.400]  far more so. Far more so. Chronic disease is killing people who develop COVID-19 than
[01:00.400 --> 01:04.960]  it is the actual COVID-19 itself. Instead of getting into that and covering that material,
[01:04.960 --> 01:10.160]  again, I'll put a link down in the notes. I have to be circumspect in what I say today because
[01:10.160 --> 01:21.840]  Facebook has gone off the rails, completely lost its mind about anyone saying anything
[01:22.560 --> 01:28.240]  about somebody who has died from COVID-19. I'll give you an example. Somebody posted
[01:28.240 --> 01:36.960]  on my Facebook page, and it was a link to an article about a supposedly completely
[01:36.960 --> 01:43.120]  healthy young man who dropped dead of COVID-19. Now, I'm going to tell you that story in more
[01:43.120 --> 01:49.440]  detail here in a moment, but this part about Facebook, I found a picture of the young man
[01:49.440 --> 01:57.120]  who had passed away just on an internet search, and it was clear just from the picture was from
[01:57.120 --> 02:04.080]  perhaps just a few inches above the sternum to the top of his head, but it was clear from what you
[02:04.080 --> 02:10.720]  could see here and here that he was obese. When I responded to the commenter on my page,
[02:12.320 --> 02:18.400]  I used the word blubber. I didn't mean that in any sort of a negative way. I wasn't attacking him.
[02:18.400 --> 02:30.240]  I wasn't mocking him, but the neck, it looked like gelatinous blubber. I was being descriptive.
[02:30.240 --> 02:38.720]  I wasn't being harsh or insulting. As soon as I hit the button to post that, within less than a
[02:38.720 --> 02:44.320]  second, a dialogue window opened from Facebook and said, it looks like you have violated our
[02:44.320 --> 02:51.440]  community standards. Would you like to change this comment? On my own page, because I used the word
[02:51.440 --> 02:55.760]  blubber rather than, I don't know what they want me to use, fat cells, white fat cells,
[02:56.960 --> 03:05.600]  excess body fat, but how Orwellian, how 1984, because you remember in 1984, the agency was
[03:05.600 --> 03:10.960]  actually removing words from the dictionary, so you couldn't use them anymore. So Facebook,
[03:10.960 --> 03:14.960]  they're still in the dictionary, but you can't use them on Facebook. If you use those words on
[03:14.960 --> 03:20.480]  Facebook, then you can't function on Facebook anymore. Facebook will punish you for use of
[03:20.480 --> 03:26.960]  those words. That's why I have to be a little bit discreet about what I say today. I wish I could be
[03:26.960 --> 03:33.600]  more forthcoming. If I offer the names of the people and I show photographs, Facebook is
[03:33.600 --> 03:39.760]  probably going to suspend me because I'm going to be making the case that they are obese.
[03:41.120 --> 03:48.400]  And they are. In the world of Facebook, for me to say, this person died, and the media said this
[03:48.400 --> 03:56.480]  person is healthy, look at this picture, the person is obese, and obesity, you can go to any website
[03:56.480 --> 04:03.680]  of any medical organization that keeps track of chronic disease in the world, and obesity is listed
[04:03.680 --> 04:10.080]  as a chronic disease. So if I say, look at the picture, it's obese, the person was not healthy,
[04:10.080 --> 04:16.160]  they have a chronic disease, then Facebook will say, I am potentially hurting the feelings of
[04:16.160 --> 04:20.880]  the decedent's family and therefore I need to be suspended. Okay, you asked me how I know that one.
[04:20.880 --> 04:27.280]  I'm going to share with you, as far as I can within this Orwellian 1984 Facebook construct
[04:28.240 --> 04:34.160]  that suppresses free expression, I'm not going to say free speech, free expression, how you express
[04:34.160 --> 04:39.920]  this. Here's the situation. So this is how I see it. This is how I'm going to express it. No,
[04:39.920 --> 04:44.080]  you can't do that. Okay, so that's Facebook right now. So I apologize that I have to be
[04:44.080 --> 04:49.440]  circumspect. I'm going to start with a photograph with no name. Okay, that's one way I could do
[04:49.440 --> 04:55.440]  this is to disassociate the photo from a name. I know the name, but I'm going to disassociate it
[04:55.440 --> 05:01.040]  so that Facebook won't punish me for sharing both with you to make this point. Okay, so this gal
[05:01.040 --> 05:07.920]  right here was featured in an article from the Washington Post where the Washington Post
[05:08.480 --> 05:15.680]  referred to her as a healthy young person. Now, you just saw the photograph. Clearly,
[05:15.680 --> 05:22.560]  she is not healthy. She is seriously obese. Obesity, it's been classified as a chronic disease
[05:22.560 --> 05:28.320]  for many, many years now. So she's not healthy. She has a chronic disease. I told you the story
[05:28.320 --> 05:34.000]  about the gentleman who posted the article within a thread on my personal Facebook page.
[05:34.000 --> 05:40.960]  And his point was, look at this nonsense right there. So again, I tracked down a photograph
[05:40.960 --> 05:46.800]  of the decedent, the young man who had died. And as I said, it was just a couple inches above the
[05:46.800 --> 05:53.440]  sternum up to the top of the head and his face and his neck. I mean, I don't want to use language
[05:53.440 --> 06:01.040]  that's insulting. I'll just say he was obese. I'll just leave it there. And you could tell
[06:01.040 --> 06:06.000]  from the article, it was just like there was a face shot from apparently years earlier before
[06:06.000 --> 06:11.280]  he gained all the weight. But the more recent picture, yeah, he was obese. There was another
[06:11.280 --> 06:16.560]  similar story a couple months back because I don't have the photograph and I'm not going to
[06:16.560 --> 06:22.880]  share the last name. The young man's first name was Andre. And so this was Andre was a completely
[06:22.880 --> 06:28.400]  healthy young man who died of COVID-19. Well, when I tracked down Andre's photograph,
[06:29.360 --> 06:36.800]  the same as the other young man, his face is like this big, his neck is this big, seriously obese.
[06:37.600 --> 06:42.000]  A week or so ago, I did a somewhat similar story where I talked about young people,
[06:42.000 --> 06:48.720]  where young healthy people were not dropping dead of COVID-19. Somebody gave me a couple of names.
[06:48.720 --> 06:53.040]  Oh, you're wrong. Here's these people. Okay. So again, I'm just going to feature one of them
[06:53.040 --> 06:56.800]  as the first name on the list. So this young man, I'm not going to say his name for the whole
[06:56.800 --> 07:00.640]  Facebook reasons, because then they'll say, oh, you're attacking him. You're harming the family.
[07:00.640 --> 07:09.200]  You're insulting. Okay. So unnamed 18 year old boy, according to the family, totally healthy,
[07:09.200 --> 07:18.400]  no health issues. Okay. He goes to the hospital, COVID-19. He's in there for a while. He dies.
[07:19.520 --> 07:26.000]  So the inference there is that he died of COVID-19. Because his mother had made a statement
[07:26.000 --> 07:30.240]  to the press saying he was a completely healthy 18 year old, then you would imagine he died of
[07:30.240 --> 07:34.720]  COVID-19, right? But then you ask yourself, a completely healthy 18 year old, how is that
[07:34.720 --> 07:40.560]  even possible? So I finally found an article, and I'm so thankful for these kind of reporters
[07:40.560 --> 07:45.680]  who want to do a more thorough job. They don't want to just parrot the establishment narrative.
[07:46.160 --> 07:53.040]  So this one reporter, he has a timeline. So this 18 year old young man, he wasn't sick.
[07:53.040 --> 07:58.480]  He didn't go to the hospital because he was sick. This totally healthy 18 year old
[08:00.640 --> 08:06.160]  had a heart attack. Yeah. He had a heart attack. He was transported to the hospital,
[08:06.800 --> 08:12.080]  whereas part of the normal admissions protocol in 2020, he was tested for SARS-CoV-2 and he came
[08:12.080 --> 08:18.320]  up positive. He then was in the hospital for a very, very, very, very long time, and he died
[08:19.920 --> 08:26.000]  of COVID-19, don't you know? So you look at that timeline that he wasn't sick, and suddenly he had
[08:26.000 --> 08:30.320]  a heart attack, and he was transported to the hospital, and then he was tested. He came up
[08:30.320 --> 08:37.680]  positive for SARS-CoV-2. So I mean, I don't have the medical record, but I am absolutely confident,
[08:37.680 --> 08:41.840]  I think it'll make perfect sense to you when I share it. He had some sort of congenital heart
[08:41.840 --> 08:49.040]  defect that had not been discovered as of being 18. He had gotten all the way to 18 without anyone,
[08:49.040 --> 08:51.600]  including his family, his mother, because his mother said he was completely healthy.
[08:52.240 --> 09:00.000]  Nobody knew he had a congenital heart problem. So here at 18, boom, suddenly it strikes. He has a
[09:00.000 --> 09:04.400]  heart attack. He goes down. Paramedics arrive. This is the timeline. Paramedics arrive. They
[09:04.400 --> 09:09.520]  transport him to the hospital. When he is being admitted to the hospital and they are keeping him
[09:09.520 --> 09:14.880]  alive through his heart attack, they test him for SARS-CoV-2, and he comes up positive.
[09:14.880 --> 09:24.800]  If you have had some sort of traumatic heart episode, your odds of surviving COVID-19 are
[09:24.800 --> 09:34.240]  reduced by 40%, just like that. And I'm going to guess that this young man at 18, when his
[09:34.880 --> 09:43.280]  pre-existing cardiac problem finally jumped off and manifested itself, I'm guessing he went down
[09:43.280 --> 09:51.680]  hard. He had a serious cardiac event. If there was damage to his heart, which I'm guessing there was,
[09:51.680 --> 09:58.400]  if there was damage to his heart, his odds of continuing on with SARS-CoV-2 not developing
[09:58.400 --> 10:05.120]  into COVID-19 would be slim. And then his odds of surviving COVID-19 would be dramatically reduced
[10:05.120 --> 10:10.720]  because he had damage to his heart. And those are medical statistics based on the medical industry
[10:10.720 --> 10:15.920]  now looking at SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 for the last year with people who have had serious cardiac
[10:15.920 --> 10:22.240]  incidents and then they get COVID-19. So all these articles never ever, never ever,
[10:22.240 --> 10:30.880]  let me repeat that again, never ever tell you the truth about these people's prior medical condition.
[10:32.000 --> 10:37.200]  It's a blackout. And I find that offensive because the media is supposed to be giving
[10:37.200 --> 10:42.000]  us information, right? But what the media is really doing is it's saying,
[10:42.960 --> 10:50.240]  so we've got all these people who died with pre-existing medical problems.
[10:50.880 --> 10:57.680]  We're going to keep that to ourselves. We're either going to not say anything at all about
[10:57.680 --> 11:01.920]  their health condition or in a majority of these cases, we're going to refer to them both in the
[11:01.920 --> 11:11.840]  headlines and in the text as a healthy young person. That's called lying. That's called
[11:12.400 --> 11:18.240]  yellow journalism. That's called being non-credible. And it's happening far too
[11:18.240 --> 11:25.920]  often for me to say it's just poor reporting. It's something more than that. There is,
[11:25.920 --> 11:33.440]  in my opinion, there is a media blackout. There is an agreement across the board with the media
[11:33.440 --> 11:40.160]  that they will not reveal to you when younger people have pre-existing chronic disease and they
[11:40.160 --> 11:48.960]  go down either from or with COVID-19. There is a, I hate to use this word, there is a conspiracy
[11:48.960 --> 11:54.880]  taking place within the media that you will not tell the public that these people had chronic
[11:54.880 --> 11:59.680]  disease because then people could say, well, of course they're dying. They had pre-existing
[11:59.680 --> 12:04.560]  conditions. They had comorbidities. They had an existing chronic disease. We know that. That's
[12:04.560 --> 12:10.400]  what's actually killing people. The COVID-19 is just the trigger, if you will. We don't want
[12:10.400 --> 12:14.800]  that to be the message. We don't want anyone to know the chronic disease is what's really killing
[12:14.800 --> 12:21.040]  people. We want everyone to be terrified of this fucking virus. That's what we want and that's what
[12:21.040 --> 12:32.800]  we're going to promote and we're going to promote it by lying to the American people.
[12:34.560 --> 12:35.360]  you