Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language Detected language: English [00:00.000 --> 00:02.840] I'm Dave Champion. [00:02.840 --> 00:09.600] Because I do a lot of research, I have for decades, I hold a lot of views concerning [00:09.600 --> 00:15.400] various things that we have all seen occur over the course of history, a different opinion [00:15.400 --> 00:19.880] than say the masses, perhaps a different opinion than the official government narrative or [00:19.880 --> 00:22.280] the establishment narrative. [00:22.280 --> 00:26.560] So, am I a conspiracy theorist? [00:34.560 --> 00:39.640] Before we can even begin to determine whether I or you are a conspiracy theorist, we need [00:39.640 --> 00:44.240] to find out exactly what this thing is called a conspiracy theory. [00:44.240 --> 00:45.520] And here's the meaning. [00:45.520 --> 00:51.800] A conspiracy theory is an explanation for an event or situation that invokes a conspiracy [00:51.800 --> 00:56.480] by sinister and powerful groups, often political in motivation. [00:56.480 --> 00:59.200] Okay, so it invokes a conspiracy. [00:59.200 --> 01:01.840] What's a conspiracy? [01:01.840 --> 01:08.680] A conspiracy, also known as a plot, is a secret plan or agreement between persons for an unlawful [01:08.680 --> 01:13.200] or harmful purpose, especially with political motivation. [01:13.200 --> 01:17.080] So do conspiracies exist? [01:17.080 --> 01:18.760] Well, yeah. [01:18.760 --> 01:23.240] We know they do because prosecutors accuse thousands of people all across the United [01:23.240 --> 01:28.600] States every single day of having committed conspiracies to commit a crime. [01:28.600 --> 01:34.840] But that's government accusing ordinary people of conspiracy. [01:34.840 --> 01:38.640] Are there conspiracies conducted by the government? [01:38.640 --> 01:42.600] Well, yeah, and it's not even difficult to prove. [01:42.600 --> 01:46.980] If you want to take a look at conspiracies overseas, you can look at Operation Ajax. [01:47.020 --> 01:51.420] If you want to look at a conspiracy that was planned by the Defense Department here domestically, [01:51.420 --> 01:53.640] you can Google Operation Northwoods. [01:53.640 --> 01:59.100] There was a case, I can't remember the name now, it took place in roughly 1953. [01:59.100 --> 02:04.940] There was an engineer working on a bomb site for the Pentagon to create a better bomb site. [02:04.940 --> 02:09.820] So they would go up in this plane and test the different designs for these bomb sites. [02:09.820 --> 02:12.220] And the engineer would come home and tell his wife, he says, I think I'm going to die [02:12.220 --> 02:16.820] because the planes they're sending us up in are so rickety, they're falling apart, they're [02:16.820 --> 02:18.100] having engine problems. [02:18.100 --> 02:20.500] I think one of these planes is going to crash. [02:20.500 --> 02:22.180] Yeah, so guess what happened? [02:22.180 --> 02:28.580] Yeah, the plane crashed, he died, and so the widow sued the Defense Department. [02:28.580 --> 02:33.020] The Department of Justice walked into that federal court with an affidavit signed by, [02:33.020 --> 02:37.980] I believe it was the Secretary of Defense, saying they could not move forward with trial [02:37.980 --> 02:42.860] because in the course of the trial they would have to divulge classified national security [02:42.860 --> 02:44.380] information, right? [02:44.500 --> 02:48.940] Okay, so the judge looked at that and he said to the lady, the widow, I'm sorry, we can't [02:48.940 --> 02:49.940] move forward. [02:49.940 --> 02:58.060] The federal law says we cannot hear a case if in the course of that case national security [02:58.060 --> 03:02.420] classified information will be divulged, so I'm sorry, you have no remedy. [03:02.420 --> 03:10.460] Something like 52 or 53 years later when those papers were declassified and the widow and [03:10.460 --> 03:18.020] her family got ahold of them, it literally said in the case margins, if we claim this [03:18.020 --> 03:22.260] is a national security issue, we won't have to go to trial and we won't have to pay this [03:22.260 --> 03:25.180] woman damages for sending her husband up in a rickety. [03:25.180 --> 03:26.980] You get the draft. [03:26.980 --> 03:31.100] The attorneys who had reviewed the case literally wrote that in the margin. [03:31.100 --> 03:35.100] The answer to not having to go to trial and pay this woman for the death of her husband [03:35.100 --> 03:38.260] is to falsely claim it was a national security issue. [03:38.300 --> 03:41.180] Now, how many attorneys do you think sat and discussed that? [03:41.180 --> 03:43.940] Yeah, that's called a criminal conspiracy. [03:43.940 --> 03:51.860] I think perhaps one of the most famous well-known conspiracies is 9-11 and it doesn't matter [03:51.860 --> 03:55.060] what side of the aisle you are concerning what happened that day. [03:55.060 --> 03:59.180] Whether you actually believe the government's narrative that 19 idiots with towels on their [03:59.180 --> 04:03.180] heads conducted 9-11 or whether you go all the way to the other side and believe, you [04:03.180 --> 04:06.780] know, the fix was in, it's an inside job, it doesn't matter where on the spectrum you [04:06.780 --> 04:17.340] fall because no matter where people conspired together to make it happen, right, so if you [04:17.340 --> 04:20.220] say it was an inside job, the people in the government conspired to make it happen. [04:20.220 --> 04:23.500] If you say that that's nonsense and it was 9-11 with towels on their heads, then they [04:23.500 --> 04:24.820] conspired to do it. [04:24.820 --> 04:29.500] So that's got to be one of the most famous near-term conspiracies that every single American [04:29.500 --> 04:30.500] knows about. [04:30.500 --> 04:35.180] So the end result here is we know that there are conspiracies by average Joe on the street [04:35.580 --> 04:37.060] and we know there are conspiracies by government. [04:37.060 --> 04:39.660] This should not be a controversial concept. [04:39.660 --> 04:45.340] While the term conspiracy theory came around in the mid to late 1800s, the first time it [04:45.340 --> 04:52.060] was used by the United States government to say the citizens who don't trust and believe [04:52.060 --> 04:58.580] us are conspiracy theorists was in a report the CIA put out in the wake of the JFK assassination [04:58.740 --> 05:05.380] and in that report the CIA referred to people who thought the CIA may have had some role [05:05.380 --> 05:09.340] in the assassination of JFK, that they were conspiracy theorists. [05:09.340 --> 05:15.100] So suddenly now citizens who said, wait a second, wait, wait, wait, wait, I'm not buying [05:15.100 --> 05:16.940] the government narrative. [05:16.940 --> 05:22.060] Suddenly now government agencies were saying that guy is a conspiracy theorist. [05:22.060 --> 05:25.780] Personally, I think the government should stay away from that completely. [05:25.780 --> 05:31.660] One might even say I would support a statute that the government cannot claim citizens' [05:31.660 --> 05:37.820] disbelieving government narrative, which might be truthful and might not be truthful, that [05:37.820 --> 05:42.220] citizens who do not believe the government's narrative is truthful, the government should [05:42.220 --> 05:44.500] never call those people conspiracy theorists. [05:44.500 --> 05:48.620] This is a nation where we judge the government, not the government judge us. [05:48.620 --> 05:54.100] Now I'm going to tell you a story about me and something that I know to be true, but [05:54.580 --> 05:58.700] a lot of people would look at me and say, oh my God, that guy is such a conspiracy theorist. [05:58.700 --> 06:01.500] But before we go there, let's take a look at my history. [06:01.500 --> 06:08.980] So I would say my very first sort of real job, not a teenage job, was, yeah, as a United [06:08.980 --> 06:11.420] States Army Airborne Ranger. [06:11.420 --> 06:19.260] So that's like not somebody as a member of the public having some wild, crazy conspiracy [06:19.260 --> 06:23.060] theory about the government, that's being in the government, right? [06:23.060 --> 06:25.780] So then I got out of the military, and where did I go from there? [06:25.780 --> 06:27.620] Yeah, to law enforcement. [06:27.620 --> 06:31.460] Not exactly the thing conspiracy theorists are made of, right? [06:31.460 --> 06:35.180] I wasn't accusing the government, I was an agent of the government. [06:35.180 --> 06:38.940] From there I went into corporate America and became a business owner of a corporation [06:38.940 --> 06:42.500] that dealt in high-tech items with medium and large corporations throughout the Southern [06:42.500 --> 06:43.660] California area. [06:43.660 --> 06:47.540] Again, not exactly the profile of a conspiracy theorist. [06:47.540 --> 06:52.420] And that brings me to the story I want to share with you today. [06:52.460 --> 06:55.140] I walked into the bank one day and I'm standing in line, there's a couple of people in front [06:55.140 --> 06:59.700] of me, and as I get to the front of the line and then I move towards the teller window, [06:59.700 --> 07:05.700] and it was a small bank and I knew everybody well, the teller literally starts crying. [07:05.700 --> 07:09.740] She says, I'm sorry, Dave, I had to do it. [07:09.740 --> 07:12.620] I'm like, do what? [07:12.620 --> 07:16.900] Well it turns out she was literally tears running down her face because she had been [07:16.980 --> 07:25.700] forced, from her point of view, to give the Internal Revenue Service $32,000 out of a [07:25.700 --> 07:27.220] payroll account of mine. [07:27.220 --> 07:32.900] Now that was disturbing enough, except like in 48 or 72 hours I owed paychecks to all [07:32.900 --> 07:37.180] the people who in good faith had come to work for me, they had spent their time working, [07:37.180 --> 07:39.900] they had earned that money, and now I had to pay them. [07:39.900 --> 07:45.020] So my first priority was like a moral one, it's like okay, so like in 48 or 72 hours [07:45.020 --> 07:51.380] I have to have money available to cut checks to these men who put their faith in me when [07:51.380 --> 07:53.040] they showed up and did what I asked them to. [07:53.040 --> 07:55.260] So that was a huge issue. [07:55.260 --> 08:00.780] But then there was the issue of, wait a second, because of my law enforcement background, [08:00.780 --> 08:09.500] I knew that there's only three ways that government can seize your property. [08:09.500 --> 08:13.700] Number one is they have to have some sort of court order, whether they're seizing property [08:13.700 --> 08:18.060] in a criminal matter, or whether it's in a civil matter, the federal court issues a [08:18.060 --> 08:23.140] warrant of restraint, since we're talking about the IRS and the federal court. [08:23.140 --> 08:31.100] There's exigent circumstances where your property can be seized by law enforcement, if not doing [08:31.100 --> 08:35.780] so would cause the evidence to be destroyed in short order, like if they walked out of [08:35.780 --> 08:37.400] the room you'd destroy the evidence. [08:37.400 --> 08:42.060] They can take possession, they can't take it and leave the building and go to the police [08:43.020 --> 08:46.820] but they can take physical possession of it until a warrant arrives. [08:46.820 --> 08:51.340] And the last one is asset forfeiture, which back in the days concerning the story I'm [08:51.340 --> 08:53.060] telling you wasn't a thing yet. [08:53.060 --> 08:57.860] So I knew that none of those were the case. [08:57.860 --> 09:02.420] So I was like, wait a second, I've read the Constitution, I'm very familiar with the Fourth [09:02.420 --> 09:08.280] Amendment, and as many times as I've read the Constitution I have never seen this thing, [09:08.280 --> 09:13.080] this exception to the Fourth Amendment for taxation. [09:13.080 --> 09:20.480] So there's all these restrictions on how government can come and take somebody's property [09:20.480 --> 09:25.200] concerning income tax and then none of that applies, yet there's no written exemption [09:25.200 --> 09:28.600] or exception. [09:28.600 --> 09:32.440] I knew something was amiss. [09:32.440 --> 09:37.720] A couple days after that I'm sitting having dinner with a couple of friends in a restaurant. [09:37.720 --> 09:40.880] Such a vivid memory of this, I could take you to the exact restaurant, to the exact [09:40.880 --> 09:43.720] table where this conversation took place. [09:43.720 --> 09:46.960] So I'm sitting there with two guys who are buddies of mine. [09:46.960 --> 09:51.640] I'm telling them about this traumatic story where $32,000 of my money got taken. [09:51.640 --> 09:56.640] By the way, this was, I don't know, 30 years ago, so $32,000, it would be a lot more today. [09:56.640 --> 10:02.160] So I'm telling them the story and they both start chuckling. [10:02.160 --> 10:05.200] These are my friends, right? [10:05.280 --> 10:07.520] I'm telling them this horrific story and they start chuckling. [10:07.520 --> 10:14.280] I'm like, hey guys, whatever the joke is, let me in on it because I'd really like to [10:14.280 --> 10:18.160] laugh too and I'm not really laughing. [10:18.160 --> 10:26.720] And they said to me, if you knew what we know, you'd be laughing too. [10:26.720 --> 10:30.400] I'm like, bring it on, tell me what you know. [10:30.400 --> 10:39.240] These two gentlemen began to tell me what their research into the actual law concerning [10:39.240 --> 10:44.520] income tax, federal income tax, what it really said. [10:44.520 --> 10:49.800] Now I'm going to tell you straight up, I was non-committal during that dinner. [10:49.800 --> 10:51.160] I listened, right? [10:51.160 --> 10:57.200] Had my catcher's mitt for data out and I was catching the data, putting it up here. [10:57.200 --> 11:06.320] But that whole thing with the bank, knowing there was no Fourth Amendment exception, something [11:06.320 --> 11:07.520] was amiss. [11:07.520 --> 11:08.520] So I didn't dismiss it. [11:08.520 --> 11:10.920] I didn't buy into what they said, nor did I dismiss it. [11:10.920 --> 11:14.520] I started doing my own research. [11:14.520 --> 11:25.280] That evening was the beginning of 17 years of hardcore, in-depth research that eventually [11:25.280 --> 11:27.640] produced Income Tax Shattering the Mist. [11:27.640 --> 11:34.720] However, I started and stopped writing it multiple times, probably six different times. [11:34.720 --> 11:36.200] I started to write it and then stopped. [11:36.200 --> 11:42.440] And the reason I stopped is I had a standard, what for me is a gold standard because I fancy [11:42.440 --> 11:44.560] myself an ethical individual. [11:44.560 --> 11:54.600] So I thought until I know this material so thoroughly, I have nailed down every single [11:54.600 --> 11:56.680] tiny thing. [11:56.680 --> 12:02.240] And I know this material so well that if you lined up 100 attorneys from the Department [12:02.240 --> 12:06.840] of Justice and each one of them, we sat in a line, and each one of them stepped up and [12:06.840 --> 12:11.680] challenged me on a point of income tax law, I could slap the hell out of all 100 of them. [12:11.680 --> 12:15.720] Until I knew that, not 100 of them, every single one of them that works there. [12:15.720 --> 12:22.440] So until I could do that ethically, I didn't feel I could go out and tell my fellow Americans [12:22.440 --> 12:24.800] what the truth is about the income tax. [12:24.800 --> 12:27.760] The day I said to myself, you know what? [12:27.760 --> 12:28.980] I am that guy now. [12:28.980 --> 12:30.660] I have that level of expertise. [12:30.660 --> 12:33.120] I am the expert in the field. [12:33.120 --> 12:40.560] And I could take on and slap down every single attorney that DOJ tax division could throw [12:41.560 --> 12:44.520] on me and do it with one hand high in my back. [12:44.520 --> 12:48.720] Only then did I move forward in writing Shattering the Mess. [12:48.720 --> 12:51.280] This is about conspiracies, right? [12:51.280 --> 12:57.800] So how many Americans believe the government's narrative, the income tax applies to everybody. [12:57.800 --> 13:01.440] You go out, you get up in the morning, have a cup of coffee, you take the kids to school, [13:01.440 --> 13:05.320] you go off to work and you put in your 40 hours a week and after a couple of weeks you [13:05.320 --> 13:06.680] get a paycheck. [13:06.680 --> 13:13.560] How many Americans believe that having done that, living that life, it is mandatory upon [13:13.560 --> 13:17.200] them under the law to give the government so? [13:17.200 --> 13:18.200] Okay. [13:18.200 --> 13:24.480] Hundreds of millions, there's what, 322 million Americans in the United States right now? [13:24.480 --> 13:27.680] How many of those believe the government narrative? [13:27.680 --> 13:35.540] So I think in the eyes of a lot of people, I would be a conspiracy theorist because they [13:35.540 --> 13:37.620] don't know the facts. [13:37.620 --> 13:38.900] They don't know the law. [13:38.900 --> 13:44.020] So to them, I look like a complete idiot. [13:44.020 --> 13:51.300] But if you're reading Shattering the Mess, then you say, holy cow, man, was Dave spot [13:51.300 --> 13:57.620] on and he showed page, 408 pages, page after page after page after page after page after [13:57.620 --> 14:03.940] page 408 pages that prove it, that doesn't say it, that doesn't assert it, that doesn't [14:03.940 --> 14:08.180] allude to it, but proves it. [14:08.180 --> 14:11.540] Conspiracy theory number two, true story. [14:11.540 --> 14:15.940] I was at the gym and I saw this guy across the gym, this is years ago now. [14:15.940 --> 14:18.540] I said, that looks like Sean. [14:18.540 --> 14:22.620] No, that can't be Sean because that guy's like half the size of Sean. [14:22.620 --> 14:24.300] Sean was a big boy and I'm not talking muscular. [14:24.300 --> 14:29.140] I mean, he was muscular, but his big boyness came from body fat, right? [14:29.140 --> 14:33.220] So I'm seeing this guy, I'm like, no, it looks like Sean kind of, he's back is to me, but [14:33.220 --> 14:35.300] it can't be because this guy's half the size of Sean. [14:35.300 --> 14:38.540] So I'm doing my thing at the gym and I glance over and the guy turns around. [14:38.540 --> 14:40.020] It's Sean, right? [14:40.020 --> 14:42.180] So I go over there and I have a discussion with him. [14:42.180 --> 14:46.340] I'm like, dude, I haven't seen you in like five and a half months and where's the other [14:46.340 --> 14:47.340] half of you? [14:47.340 --> 14:49.780] Wow, you look great, right? [14:49.780 --> 14:52.540] So he starts telling me about this diet he's on. [14:52.540 --> 14:55.900] This is not about the keto diet, let me be very clear about that. [14:55.900 --> 14:59.860] He tells me about this diet he's on, this keto diet, and I'm like, I don't know anything [14:59.860 --> 15:00.860] about that, tell me about it. [15:00.860 --> 15:05.340] And he gives me his spiel on the keto diet, just like sitting having dinner with those [15:05.340 --> 15:08.340] guys all those years before, decades before. [15:08.340 --> 15:10.740] My information catcher's mitt is up. [15:10.740 --> 15:14.220] I'm taking the information in, putting it here and I'm going to go. [15:14.220 --> 15:16.580] I didn't buy into it and I didn't dismiss it. [15:16.580 --> 15:22.740] I thought it sounded pretty damn kooky, honestly, but I'm looking at the results right in front [15:22.740 --> 15:23.740] of me, right? [15:23.740 --> 15:28.140] So I go home and I start researching. [15:28.380 --> 15:35.540] Sometimes being like a researcher, being a part of who I am, yeah, it's not always a [15:35.540 --> 15:36.740] great thing. [15:36.740 --> 15:44.180] So I start tearing into the data behind his representation about the keto diet, right? [15:44.180 --> 15:48.460] And again, nothing in this conversation is about the keto diet. [15:48.460 --> 15:54.100] In order to determine whether the keto diet was safe, whether the things he was presenting [15:54.100 --> 16:00.020] to me was factual, or maybe he had lost weight because something else of which he was unaware. [16:00.020 --> 16:03.260] Like I'm doing this and I'm attributing the responsibility here, but it's actually the [16:03.260 --> 16:06.420] responsibilities over there and I don't see that. [16:06.420 --> 16:09.420] So what I did is I started this research. [16:09.420 --> 16:18.500] The interesting thing was I found that much of the establishment narrative opposed the [16:18.500 --> 16:23.380] principles, not the keto diet, but the principles, the physiological principles that undergird [16:23.380 --> 16:32.380] the keto diet, and that I would go to establishment websites and their information was like 180 [16:32.380 --> 16:36.180] degrees opposed to this other physiology over here. [16:36.180 --> 16:39.580] So at this point, in my mind, you could take the keto diet and throw it out the window [16:39.580 --> 16:42.020] because I couldn't care less about that. [16:42.020 --> 16:48.220] What became important to me was the science versus what was on the establishment's website, [16:48.220 --> 16:49.220] right? [16:49.220 --> 16:53.620] To be clear, the keto diet was just the thing that introduced me to the science and the [16:53.620 --> 16:58.060] physiology and the nutritional aspects and so forth, and what our body does with macros [16:58.060 --> 17:01.820] and how it does it, when it does it, none of it, okay, yeah. [17:01.820 --> 17:04.780] Versus the establishment's narrative. [17:04.780 --> 17:14.660] So down the rabbit hole I went, and again, just like with the income tax, what I found [17:15.660 --> 17:26.300] was that the establishment's narrative was not rooted in facts, science, or reality. [17:26.300 --> 17:31.660] In investigative work, there's a mantra I'm sure you've heard, follow the money, and after [17:31.660 --> 17:36.640] months and months and months and months and months of research, it became very, very clear [17:36.640 --> 17:42.260] to me, looking at the constellation of all of the facts and the data, see this will connect [17:42.260 --> 17:45.100] to that one and that one and that one and that one, we pull these all together, we see [17:45.100 --> 17:48.020] a timeline, we see the same players and so forth. [17:48.020 --> 17:52.860] And what became crystal clear to me was the reason that the establishment's narrative [17:52.860 --> 17:57.660] was not science-based, although everyone on the planet believes it is, right, they see [17:57.660 --> 18:03.660] things published by various large, auspicious, respectable organizations, they automatically [18:03.660 --> 18:10.220] presume it's true, or the guy who's in charge of such an organization, government or private, [18:10.220 --> 18:13.960] that person speaks, and people go, oh, that's the truth, okay. [18:13.960 --> 18:19.100] So I found out, no, at least in regard to the issues I was researching, none of it was [18:19.100 --> 18:25.980] true, it was all BS, and best case scenario was some of them, they might have been unaware [18:25.980 --> 18:29.740] that what they were saying was BS, but the vast majority of them, they knew, because [18:29.740 --> 18:34.340] they were scientists, right, so they knew the science wasn't there, they were lying. [18:34.340 --> 18:36.100] So why would they be doing that? [18:36.100 --> 18:37.380] Well, follow the money. [18:37.380 --> 18:46.200] What became crystal clear to me was that 60 years of false establishment narrative was [18:46.200 --> 18:56.780] based on one thing and one thing only, protecting the revenue of large trillion, what are today, [18:56.780 --> 19:01.540] trillion-dollar industries and multi-million-dollar businesses. [19:01.540 --> 19:03.060] That's what the agenda was. [19:03.060 --> 19:11.460] If you got sick and died, nobody in those auspicious, respectable organizations cared. [19:11.460 --> 19:15.060] The people who were standing up, the executive directors and so forth, who stood up and made [19:15.060 --> 19:20.220] these statements, if you, your whole family died of illness, preventable illness and disease [19:20.220 --> 19:22.660] because of their lives, they didn't care. [19:22.660 --> 19:32.580] They were promoting the narrative that protected the revenues of trillion-dollar industries. [19:32.580 --> 19:36.180] That's the kind of shit I can't tolerate. [19:36.180 --> 19:42.420] That resulted in me busting out Body Science, which is a book on physiology, but I have [19:42.420 --> 19:46.900] to get into the history, the kind of things we're talking about right now, because virtually [19:46.900 --> 19:52.500] everyone who cracks open the cover of Body Science and begins to read, virtually everybody [19:53.140 --> 19:56.300] is brainwashed by the 60 years of falsehood. [19:56.300 --> 20:01.460] There's even a chapter where I specifically go through some myths and I ask people to [20:01.460 --> 20:06.100] step away from what they think they know. [20:06.100 --> 20:09.380] More than enough time to go back through the book and verify it against all these myths [20:09.380 --> 20:11.300] that are in your head after 60 years of lies. [20:11.300 --> 20:12.300] That's fine. [20:12.300 --> 20:13.300] I encourage research, right? [20:13.300 --> 20:16.060] So if you can prove anything wrong in the book, by all means let me know. [20:16.060 --> 20:17.340] No one ever has. [20:17.340 --> 20:25.620] But the point being, every single person who cracks open the book is a victim of 60 years [20:25.620 --> 20:32.020] of falsehoods, brainwashing, by the entire nutritional and science and research establishment. [20:32.020 --> 20:39.500] So I needed, not not I wanted, I needed to divulge the history of all this corruption [20:39.500 --> 20:45.900] in order that people can read the physiology and say, yeah, okay, that conflicts with what [20:45.900 --> 20:54.140] I heard 27 years ago on this particular point, but I now understand why it's in conflict. [20:54.140 --> 21:01.020] I now understand that that was non-factual and I explain why that 60 years with the various [21:01.020 --> 21:04.500] representations are and were non-factual. [21:04.500 --> 21:11.620] So then people having seen the lies, having had the mask ripped off the lies and the liars, [21:11.620 --> 21:18.380] then when the actual real-life physiology is presented, they're like, oh, I totally [21:18.380 --> 21:19.900] get it now. [21:19.900 --> 21:27.180] Now that I'm not brainwashed by all that crap, now the real physiology makes sense. [21:27.180 --> 21:30.340] So again, back to the conspiracy theory thing. [21:30.340 --> 21:31.700] It's sort of like income tax shattering. [21:31.700 --> 21:33.500] Am I a conspiracy theorist? [21:33.500 --> 21:39.520] Well, to the minds again of probably 94, 95% of the American public, yeah, I am because [21:39.520 --> 21:46.160] of their ignorance, because they remain brainwashed by the 60 years of falsehoods, the false [21:46.160 --> 21:48.600] establishment narrative. [21:48.600 --> 21:54.920] So in the eyes of a lot of people, and I imagine certainly Facebook fact checkers, yeah, I'm [21:54.920 --> 21:57.000] a conspiracy theorist. [21:57.000 --> 22:03.640] In this world where the establishment and the government lies, lies all the time and [22:04.640 --> 22:11.260] Even when the truth would serve it well, why don't you join me in being a conspiracy theorist? [22:11.260 --> 22:16.160] Get yourself a copy of Income Tax Shattering the Mist, and then find out for yourself, [22:16.160 --> 22:18.080] are we conspiracy theorists? [22:18.080 --> 22:22.000] Get yourself a copy of Body Science, whichever one is your thing, or both of them, and read [22:22.000 --> 22:30.800] it and find out, are we both conspiracy theorists, or do we just value truth more than perhaps [22:30.800 --> 22:31.720] our countrymen do? [22:33.640 --> 22:39.120] Let me know in the comments below, and I'll see you next time.