Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language Detected language: English [00:00.000 --> 00:03.760] Warning, the following show contains explicit language. [00:03.760 --> 00:07.880] Certain people should not listen to this show, such as children and panty waste adults who [00:07.880 --> 00:15.640] cry like 12-year-old little girls when they hear profanity. [00:15.640 --> 00:18.960] Welcome back, my friends, to the Dr. Reality Podcast. [00:18.960 --> 00:27.800] I'm Dave Champion, and I want to tell you straight up, without equivocation, pro-maskers, [00:27.800 --> 00:38.440] people who believe masks actually work to slow or halt the spread of a virus are science [00:38.440 --> 00:39.440] deniers. [00:39.440 --> 00:43.120] Now, that's a pretty bold statement, right? [00:43.120 --> 00:47.160] And right now, I'm going to prove it to you. [00:47.160 --> 00:50.400] Before I get into proving it to you, why am I doing this today? [00:50.400 --> 00:56.400] Well, I've had some rather unpleasant discussions with people on social media about the issue [00:56.400 --> 01:00.960] of mask efficacy, and here's the way this works. [01:00.960 --> 01:06.640] The people who are science deniers, who believe masks actually accomplish something in the [01:06.640 --> 01:16.440] context of a viral outbreak, they always reference laboratory experiments, things done in contrived, [01:16.440 --> 01:23.560] isolated environment in a laboratory, and they say, see, it actually works. [01:23.560 --> 01:29.600] Even when I say, okay, so that's cute, a contrived, isolated laboratory setting produced [01:29.600 --> 01:36.200] a result you like, that's cute, however, let's take a look at what's happening in the real [01:36.200 --> 01:40.280] world, and then I start laying out the real world facts. [01:40.280 --> 01:47.960] To that, they usually start insulting me because they cannot get around the real world facts, [01:47.960 --> 01:48.960] which I find mind-blowing. [01:49.840 --> 01:56.120] If you're preaching that something is science, but that outcome only exists in the laboratory, [01:56.120 --> 01:58.960] when you get out in the real world, that outcome does not exist. [01:58.960 --> 02:05.520] Okay, so they start hurling insults because they can't get past the data I'm presenting, [02:05.520 --> 02:11.000] and those insults typically are things like, oh, well, I guess you're probably an anti-vaxxer, [02:11.000 --> 02:14.680] maybe even a flat-earther, oh, I know, you're a Trump supporter. [02:14.680 --> 02:17.120] Okay, so of course, none of those things are true. [02:17.280 --> 02:20.840] It goes without saying, but I'll throw it out there in case somebody's watching this [02:20.840 --> 02:22.680] or listening to this for the very first time. [02:22.680 --> 02:29.080] No, I'm not anti-vaxx generally, although I have grave concerns about sticking mRNA [02:29.080 --> 02:38.000] technology into human bodies with zero, let me repeat that, zero long-term studies. [02:38.000 --> 02:42.640] I'll leave the flat-earth thing aside, and as far as Trump is concerned, because that's [02:42.640 --> 02:45.520] one of the big accusations, oh, you're obviously a Trump supporter. [02:45.920 --> 02:52.640] So I'm very libertarian-minded, I detest the two-party system, and I did not vote for [02:52.640 --> 02:57.040] Donald Trump either election, and I'll just leave that there. [02:57.040 --> 03:05.360] But those are the insults that are hurled at me by the science deniers who are pro-maskers. [03:05.360 --> 03:07.360] Now, onto the evidence. [03:07.360 --> 03:12.720] I'm not going to direct you to any number of studies that show in a contrived, isolated [03:12.720 --> 03:16.000] laboratory environment that masks work. [03:16.640 --> 03:18.080] You can Google that shit, right? [03:18.080 --> 03:24.560] There's oodles of them, but they are all contrived, isolated laboratory experiments. [03:24.560 --> 03:29.120] I'm going to talk to you about what we can see in the real world. [03:29.840 --> 03:35.920] Let's start out with a couple of examples of new daily infections exploding in states [03:35.920 --> 03:40.320] with mask orders and where the residents of those states will tell you straight up compliance [03:40.320 --> 03:41.680] was near 100 percent. [03:41.680 --> 03:48.480] First of all, California, Governor Newsom, nobody could be more tyrannical, more oppressive [03:48.480 --> 03:51.840] concerning SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 than has been Gavin Newsom. [03:51.840 --> 03:58.160] They've had a state mask mandate since, I believe it was March 2020, with a state [03:58.160 --> 04:00.160] mask mandate in place. [04:00.160 --> 04:03.600] And by the way, I lived in California the first 47 years of my life, so I still have [04:03.600 --> 04:08.720] a ton of friends there, and they tell me that compliance with Newsom's mask mandate has [04:08.720 --> 04:11.600] been about as close to 100 percent as humanly possible. [04:11.600 --> 04:23.840] And despite that, new daily infections in California grows more than 1100 percent with [04:23.840 --> 04:24.960] a mask mandate in place. [04:25.760 --> 04:32.400] Michigan, starting on February 18th and running for the next seven weeks, Michigan experienced [04:33.040 --> 04:37.840] a 1400 percent increase in new daily infections. [04:38.320 --> 04:41.680] Yeah, she's another oppressive one like Newsom, and she had a mask order in place. [04:41.680 --> 04:44.240] And you can ask anybody that you know who happens to live in Michigan. [04:44.240 --> 04:47.600] Compliance is about as close to 100 percent as humanly possible. [04:47.600 --> 04:54.960] And with that 100 percent compliance, they had a 1400 percent leap in new daily infections [04:54.960 --> 04:56.320] with everybody wearing masks. [04:56.960 --> 05:02.720] And this is why the pro-maskers start insulting me, because when I throw these numbers out, [05:03.360 --> 05:05.920] there's absolutely no answer to this, right? [05:05.920 --> 05:08.640] They cannot explain California 1100 percent. [05:08.640 --> 05:14.160] They cannot explain Michigan 1400 percent with their dearly beloved masks on everybody's [05:14.160 --> 05:17.360] face, and yet the number of new daily infections exploded. [05:17.360 --> 05:18.960] They can't explain that. [05:18.960 --> 05:20.720] So I'm an anti-vaxxer. [05:20.720 --> 05:21.840] I'm a flat-earther. [05:21.840 --> 05:22.960] I'm a Trump supporter. [05:23.600 --> 05:29.840] And really what that is, is they feel the need to attack the person who's bringing [05:29.840 --> 05:31.440] facts to the table. [05:31.440 --> 05:34.560] Yeah, like I said, science deniers. [05:35.280 --> 05:41.200] You may be aware that Arizona and Nevada, I live in Nevada, share a common border. [05:41.200 --> 05:47.440] Arizona has never had a statewide mask mandate, and it was nine weeks ago or so, [05:47.440 --> 05:54.560] the governor of Arizona prohibited local jurisdictions from enforcing any mask mandates. [05:54.560 --> 06:01.680] Nevada, on the other hand, has had since April of 2020 a mask mandate in place. [06:01.680 --> 06:07.200] So we've got one state no mask mandate, another state mask mandate that share a common border. [06:07.200 --> 06:12.880] Both have high population, large urban centers, and a lot of rural settings. [06:12.880 --> 06:14.800] So they are similar in nature. [06:15.440 --> 06:17.840] So Arizona, no mask mandate. [06:17.840 --> 06:20.320] New daily infections, flat and steady. [06:20.320 --> 06:23.040] Nevada does have a mask order. [06:23.040 --> 06:26.240] New daily infections, flat and steady. [06:26.240 --> 06:31.600] In other words, two different approaches to masks, no masks versus mandated masks, [06:31.680 --> 06:34.480] and yet they have the exact same outcome. [06:35.280 --> 06:38.000] How can you say masks are doing jack shit? [06:38.560 --> 06:43.120] I will also toss out that as a percentage of the population, [06:43.120 --> 06:50.160] Arizona's new daily infections are half that of Nevada's with a mask mandate in place. [06:50.880 --> 06:54.480] Two and a half months ago, Texas got rid of its mask mandate [06:54.480 --> 06:57.280] and reopened the state to 100% capacity. [06:57.840 --> 07:04.240] Two and a half months ago, Fauci said that that was, quote, ill-advised, close quote. [07:05.360 --> 07:14.240] In the time since Texas got rid of its mask mandate, new daily infections have fallen 92%. [07:16.240 --> 07:20.160] I actually keep just a couple of Fauci's quotes on my computer. [07:20.880 --> 07:25.280] One of them is when he was asked to explain the phenomenon in Texas, he said, [07:25.280 --> 07:26.800] I don't know. I don't have an answer. [07:28.320 --> 07:37.040] He has no answer for a dramatic success story, and yet people still worship him like he knows [07:37.040 --> 07:38.320] what the fuck he's talking about. [07:39.040 --> 07:45.200] Florida. Governor DeSantis ended nearly all mitigation measures in the state of Florida [07:45.200 --> 07:52.640] November of 2020, including prohibiting local jurisdictions from enforcing mask mandates. [07:52.640 --> 07:55.760] In other words, they could have one, but they couldn't enforce it. [07:55.760 --> 08:02.560] So what happened in Florida with no enforceable mask mandates, no statewide mask mandate, [08:02.560 --> 08:06.160] virtually all of the mitigation measures gone as of November 2020? [08:06.160 --> 08:07.120] What has happened in Florida? [08:07.120 --> 08:11.280] Well, starting on January 8th, cases began to fall. [08:11.280 --> 08:14.080] And as I'm sitting here talking to you today, well, it would actually be, [08:14.080 --> 08:19.440] we have the numbers from yesterday, Florida's new daily infections have fallen 88%. [08:19.760 --> 08:25.840] These are the facts that when I bring them up to the science deniers, the mask promoters, [08:25.840 --> 08:31.360] the mask holes who say that you're killing, literally, I've had them tell me you're killing [08:31.360 --> 08:37.760] people, Dave. So when I, yeah, because I control people's actions, right? All I do is provide data. [08:37.760 --> 08:45.040] It's a testament to the emotionalism and lack of intellect that they say you're killing people. [08:45.760 --> 08:50.400] And it is also a testament to their emotionalism and their lack of intellect that they begin [08:50.400 --> 08:53.760] insulting me when I share with them the facts that I've just shared with you now, [08:54.400 --> 08:57.520] because there's no way around it. Here's the way they see this. [08:58.800 --> 09:05.600] They see something that happens in a sterile, isolated laboratory setting. They see that. [09:05.600 --> 09:22.880] That's not science. That takes a mind-blowing amount of stupidity. And I want to talk to you [09:22.880 --> 09:28.960] about the idea of studies for a moment, because we've seen more crap science in the last 15 months [09:28.960 --> 09:33.760] than I've seen in my lifetime, probably. It's just junk science being distributed to the public in [09:33.760 --> 09:42.080] order to manipulate and push the public this way or that. So I want to tackle the issue of scientific [09:42.080 --> 09:47.200] lab study reports by bringing up something that's going to seem a little odd, and that is [09:48.400 --> 09:56.960] the audit of the November 2020 election results from Maricopa County, Arizona, that the Arizona [09:56.960 --> 10:02.160] Senate, controlled by the Republicans, has tasked a company to perform, by the name of cyberjunkies, [10:02.160 --> 10:09.280] who have no election or ballot experience whatsoever. At first, we didn't know who was [10:09.280 --> 10:17.120] funding this audit being performed by cyberjunkies. We have since found out. And it is a [10:17.840 --> 10:24.480] list of very well-to-do people who, from the first week after Trump lost the election, [10:24.560 --> 10:34.320] started screaming that what happened on election day was a coordinated, widespread, secret plan [10:34.320 --> 10:38.400] of election fraud controlled by the Democratic Party, and that's why Donald Trump lost the [10:38.400 --> 10:50.240] election. These people that I just described, they are funding cyberjunkies' audit. So what do you [10:50.240 --> 10:56.720] think the outcome cyberjunkies is going to put out is going to be? Do you think cyberjunkies is [10:56.720 --> 11:01.760] going to take, I don't know what it is, probably a couple million dollars? At least that's the [11:01.760 --> 11:06.160] estimates I see bandied about. I don't know that's accurate. But someplace in that range, right? [11:06.160 --> 11:10.800] So does anybody really believe cyberjunkies, by the way, the owner of the company, he's one of [11:10.800 --> 11:14.160] those same people that was making those claims right after the election that it was all rigged [11:14.160 --> 11:19.040] and the Democratic Party managed to cheat everybody. Okay. So he's the owner of the company. [11:19.040 --> 11:25.120] It's being funded by people who are like-minded to the tune of apparently a couple million dollars. [11:25.120 --> 11:31.600] So who is it on the face of the planet who has a brain in their head, who imagines cyberjunkies [11:31.600 --> 11:38.160] is going to come out with any other conclusion than what its sponsors paid for? And yeah, it [11:38.160 --> 11:44.800] works just like that with scientific research. Now, in scientific research, they hide that [11:44.880 --> 11:50.000] much better. The connections are not quite as apparent as it is in this cyberjunky thing from [11:50.000 --> 11:59.200] Arizona. But nevertheless, I've reviewed 60 years worth of scientific research concerning physiology [12:00.080 --> 12:06.400] and found just huge amounts of it were just completely bogus and funded by industry, [12:06.400 --> 12:10.640] even if surreptitiously, in other words, the payments weren't directly recognized or made [12:10.640 --> 12:17.360] directly. And that was just to benefit industry. Now, in the last 15 months, it has been to [12:17.360 --> 12:24.880] manipulate several hundred million people. So if you want to exert that sort of power, [12:24.880 --> 12:30.560] that sort of influence, yeah, you make sure that the researchers know what side of the bread is [12:30.560 --> 12:36.080] buttered and what they can look forward to in future years, and you make it clear what outcome [12:36.080 --> 12:41.040] they need to produce. And so they dutifully go into the laboratory. They're like, yeah, [12:41.040 --> 12:45.120] I'm going to be a name. I'm going to be somebody in the future because they're going to back me [12:45.120 --> 12:50.720] if I give them what they want. They go into the lab. As I said, it's an isolated, sterile [12:50.720 --> 12:56.960] environment with a contrived set of particulars. And then they come back and say, look, what we [12:56.960 --> 13:02.960] found. Oh, that's a fucking shock. But guess what? That cannot happen. That cannot happen in the real [13:02.960 --> 13:10.560] world. Nobody, no billionaire, no multi-billionaire, no Bill Gates, no Jeff Bezos, [13:10.560 --> 13:17.200] the president of the United States, nobody can reach out across the United States and rig the [13:17.200 --> 13:24.000] numbers of new daily infections going up or down. Now, what I'm saying is there is a standard. You [13:24.000 --> 13:28.560] might not like the standard, but there is a standard. And that standard shows numbers going [13:28.560 --> 13:34.560] up or shows numbers going down. And guess what? Billionaires, the National Institutes of Health, [13:34.560 --> 13:41.360] the CDC, the president, nobody can change the trajectory of those numbers. The numbers go up [13:41.360 --> 13:47.360] and the numbers go down. We have hundreds of thousands of people across the country keeping [13:47.360 --> 13:51.840] track of these numbers. If these numbers were being rigged, then we would know it. Somebody [13:51.840 --> 13:58.320] would go public with that. So we know that in California, new daily infections rose 1,100%. [13:59.040 --> 14:05.760] We know that in Michigan, they rose 1,400% in seven weeks. This is not arguable. We know that [14:05.760 --> 14:10.080] numbers have decreased 92% in Texas since they opened up and got rid of the mass mandate. [14:10.080 --> 14:15.440] We know all of these. We know Florida is down 88% with no mitigation measures in place. [14:15.440 --> 14:23.680] We know all of this. These are statistical realities. And my point being the reason that [14:23.680 --> 14:31.600] these mass calls are science deniers is because they take this known group of facts, which cannot [14:31.600 --> 14:39.680] be and has not been manipulated, and they say that isn't science. Only what happens in the sterile, [14:39.680 --> 14:44.160] contrived, isolated environment of a laboratory constitutes science, [14:44.160 --> 14:55.920] and there is no science on the planet that works like that.