Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language Detected language: English [00:00.560 --> 00:05.520] Welcome to the third installment of my series on SARS-CoV-2 and its vaccines. [00:05.520 --> 00:08.880] I've decided to break it down into multiple installments for a couple of reasons. Number [00:08.880 --> 00:14.240] one, the amount of data is voluminous. If I sat here and laid it all out, it would be an [00:14.240 --> 00:18.880] hours-long presentation. Most people don't have the time to either listen to or watch [00:18.880 --> 00:25.920] a presentation that is hours long. Secondly, on social media, whether it be Twitter, [00:26.000 --> 00:33.760] whether it be Apple Podcasts, whether it be YouTube or Facebook, you cannot state a conclusion [00:34.400 --> 00:41.040] that the establishment doesn't want stated. They will suspend you. They will deplatform you. [00:41.040 --> 00:46.080] So if I were to lay this all out in an hours-long presentation and then say at the very end, [00:46.720 --> 00:54.320] so the conclusions are, and then state the conclusions, I would be suspended or deplatformed. [00:54.320 --> 00:59.280] So in the alternative, because the information is the information is like when Galileo was [00:59.280 --> 01:05.280] accused of heresy for saying that the earth actually orbited the sun rather than the other [01:05.280 --> 01:10.160] way around, his answer was, I'll say whatever you want me to say. I'll admit that it wasn't true. [01:10.160 --> 01:14.640] I'll admit that it was heresy, whatever you want, because in the end, it's science and it's going [01:14.640 --> 01:19.120] to come out in the wash anyway. Well, I feel the same way about this. So what I can do is break [01:19.120 --> 01:25.040] it down into multiple installments. You can watch all the various installments, and at the end, [01:25.920 --> 01:32.400] we can kick around the possible conclusions, but I can't state them definitively [01:33.520 --> 01:37.840] because they are in contrast with the establishment narrative. [01:37.840 --> 01:45.680] The Dr. Reality Vodcast with Dave Champion. [01:53.680 --> 02:00.880] Today in installment number three, we're going to discuss the concerns expressed by MRNA expert, [02:00.880 --> 02:07.360] Dr. Robert Malone. Let's start with who Dr. Malone is because if he's not important, [02:07.360 --> 02:15.040] why are we talking about him? Dr. Malone is a virologist and immunologist. He has spent the [02:15.040 --> 02:23.200] lion's share of his professional life developing vaccines. In the 1980s, Malone was the scientist [02:23.200 --> 02:30.400] who discovered that it was possible for an MRNA protected by liposomes to be placed into cultured [02:30.400 --> 02:35.600] cells and then signal for the information needed for the production of a protein. [02:36.240 --> 02:43.520] For those who aren't aware, that is the core, the core foundational bedrock of the current [02:43.520 --> 02:50.800] MRNA vaccines. In other words, it was Malone's discovery that's made MRNA vaccines possible. [02:51.440 --> 02:58.240] In the early 90s, in collaboration with two other scientists, Malone theorized how to synthesize [02:58.240 --> 03:06.400] MRNA in a laboratory to trigger the production of the desired protein. This is the second [03:06.400 --> 03:14.160] foundational element of the current MRNA type vaccines. So again, Malone had the first core [03:14.800 --> 03:21.280] foundational discovery that has enabled MRNA vaccines to exist and then he theorized the [03:21.280 --> 03:27.520] second principle that allowed them to exist. So I think in a way, it's quite fair to say that [03:27.520 --> 03:33.520] Dr. Malone is the father of the MRNA vaccines. The current establishment narrative here in 2021 [03:33.520 --> 03:40.400] is to attempt to diminish Malone's reputation, claiming that it was the people who came later [03:40.400 --> 03:47.440] who commercialized, who monetized his discoveries that they're the ones that actually discovered [03:47.440 --> 03:53.760] the MRNA vaccine. So no, without Malone, there would not be an MRNA vaccine. [03:54.400 --> 03:58.080] Wikipedia is one of the primary tools used by the establishment to try and [03:58.080 --> 04:04.640] diminish Malone's reputation. Paint him as some sort of a whack job. Here's a quote from Wikipedia [04:04.640 --> 04:12.320] concerning Malone. Malone received criticism for propagating COVID-19 misinformation, including [04:12.320 --> 04:17.760] making unsupported claims about the alleged toxicity of spike proteins generated by some [04:17.760 --> 04:27.840] COVID-19 vaccines. However, the reference links to those claims don't say that about Malone. They [04:27.840 --> 04:31.440] wrote it out in the text that everybody reads, but then when you go down to the reference links, [04:31.440 --> 04:38.720] it doesn't say that. As an example, in a politifact fact check, why is politifact [04:39.360 --> 04:46.960] politifact fact checking the guy who is the expert, the guy who invented the damn [04:46.960 --> 04:55.840] MRNA technology? How in the world is politifact qualified to fact check Malone? Nevertheless, [04:56.400 --> 05:02.240] here's what they said about Malone. Quote, Malone said he sent manuscripts months ago to the U.S. [05:02.240 --> 05:07.600] Food and Drug Administration asserting the spike protein posed a health risk, according to Malone. [05:08.240 --> 05:13.680] Their determination was that they didn't think there was sufficient documentation of the risk [05:13.680 --> 05:21.440] that the spike was biologically active. How is that a falsehood? He simply said, [05:21.440 --> 05:25.440] I sent a bunch of information to the FDA. They sent something back saying they didn't think it [05:25.440 --> 05:32.000] was sufficient. That's not a falsehood, as it claims in the Wikipedia narrative. Another link [05:32.000 --> 05:38.480] in the reference section of that Wikipedia section on Malone is Reuters fact checking, [05:38.480 --> 05:43.120] which is essentially the majority of it is cut and paste from politifact. Now, honestly, [05:43.120 --> 05:47.920] I don't know which came first. I don't know who's copying who, because the Reuters page doesn't have [05:47.920 --> 05:54.720] a date on it. Nevertheless, the Reuters fact checking says Malone was on a show with two [05:54.720 --> 06:00.000] other doctors asserting that the spike protein is cytotoxic. Cytotoxic means that there's some [06:00.000 --> 06:06.160] level of toxicity to a cell or to a group of cells or to all cells relevant to whatever you're [06:06.160 --> 06:12.080] talking about. That's what cytotoxicity is. In the Reuters fact checking, Anne Durbin, [06:12.640 --> 06:17.760] professor of international health at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health said, [06:17.760 --> 06:25.040] quote, the spike protein does not kill those cells. It's not cytotoxic. So that's a bait and switch [06:25.680 --> 06:32.640] because cytotoxic does not mean it kills the cells. It simply means there's some level of toxicity. [06:32.640 --> 06:40.320] If the level of toxicity is great enough, it can kill the cells, but cytotoxicity is not synonymous [06:40.320 --> 06:49.120] with cell death. In other words, Malone never said it kills cells. He said the spike protein can be [06:49.120 --> 06:56.080] toxic to cells. So in order to claim he's wrong in the fact checking, they had to go beyond what he [06:56.080 --> 07:01.760] said, fabricate this story about cell death, and then say, well, it doesn't kill the cells. [07:02.560 --> 07:08.640] He didn't say it does. Speaking of Reuters fact checking, how much should we trust Reuters? Well, [07:09.600 --> 07:16.240] Jim Smith, who is on the board of directors of Pfizer, he just left a couple of years ago as [07:16.240 --> 07:24.400] the president and CEO of Reuters. Oh, that's almost like a conflict of interest. Another [07:24.400 --> 07:31.600] referenced link in that Wikipedia piece was to a piece of clickbait that appeared on Slate written [07:31.600 --> 07:38.560] by an author named Nicole Carlos. She says in her article, the claims about the effectiveness of [07:38.560 --> 07:49.920] ivermectin is a right-wing conspiracy theory. So Nicole Carlos is what? She's a physiologist. [07:50.560 --> 08:00.480] She's an MD. She's an immunologist. No. She has a degree in journalism. She used to write about [08:00.480 --> 08:08.000] love, fashion, travel, young women's lifestyle choices. Oh yeah, she claimed to fame as she was [08:08.000 --> 08:16.080] at hollywoodlife.com and then ended up at Slate, which is a hard left publication. And if you look [08:16.080 --> 08:22.640] at her stories over the last year, again, having absolutely no expertise in anything that would [08:22.640 --> 08:29.600] bear upon SARS-CoV-2 or its vaccines, she is a cheerleader for the vaccines. Completely biased. [08:30.240 --> 08:35.520] So those are some pretty great reference links for Wikipedia, right? But I'm not surprised [08:35.520 --> 08:39.680] because I discuss Wikipedia in my book, Body Science, and here's what I say in Body Science [08:39.680 --> 08:47.680] about Wikipedia. Wikipedia is the poster child for supporting anything and everything the authorities [08:47.680 --> 08:52.640] say, no matter how plainly nonfactual, while disparaging any information that runs counter [08:52.640 --> 08:57.600] to what the authorities say, no matter how obviously factual. In short, while Wikipedia [08:57.600 --> 09:04.800] may be useful for mundane inquiries, if one is seeking factual data concerning an emerging [09:04.800 --> 09:13.200] truth that is opposed by an establishment lie, Wikipedia is worthless. In short, when it comes [09:13.200 --> 09:19.840] to SARS-CoV-2 and its vaccines, Wikipedia is utterly useless. All right, so now that we know [09:19.840 --> 09:25.040] a little bit about Dr. Robert Malone and the hatchet job that the establishment has attempted [09:25.040 --> 09:31.440] to do on him for speaking publicly about his concerns, even though he is the father of mRNA [09:31.440 --> 09:36.960] technology, let's take a look at some of the comments, the concerns that Dr. Malone has [09:36.960 --> 09:44.400] actually stated. Malone references a statement by Fauci, where Fauci said that nasal titers are [09:44.400 --> 09:51.440] higher in vaccinated persons than in unvaccinated persons, and Malone makes the point that that is a [09:51.440 --> 09:58.480] key indicator that antibody-dependent enhancement is taking place. A couple of installments down [09:58.480 --> 10:03.040] the road in this series, I'm going to be talking exclusively about antibody-dependent enhancements, [10:03.040 --> 10:07.760] so you'll have a much fuller understanding of that when you see that particular installment. [10:08.320 --> 10:13.360] But for today, Malone's description of antibody-dependent enhancement is as follows. [10:13.920 --> 10:20.640] The vaccine causes the virus to become more infectious than would happen in the absence [10:20.640 --> 10:27.680] of vaccination. Let me read that again. The vaccine causes the virus to become more infectious than [10:27.680 --> 10:35.600] would happen in the absence of vaccination. Clearly, that is a bad thing. Malone points out [10:35.600 --> 10:44.160] that prior to SARS-CoV-2, every single attempt at a coronavirus vaccine was halted because the [10:44.160 --> 10:50.240] trials showed that they created ADE, antibody-dependent enhancement. I'll give you a little [10:50.240 --> 10:55.440] glimpse into what the future ADE installment is going to discuss by saying this. So if all of the [10:55.440 --> 11:00.400] prior attempts at creating a coronavirus vaccine were stopped because of ADE, [11:01.360 --> 11:07.600] why was this particular vaccine, the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, why was that not stopped for the same [11:07.600 --> 11:15.200] reason? Because they didn't test for it. If you were facing the largest financial reward in your [11:15.200 --> 11:20.320] corporate history, billions upon billions upon billions of dollars, and you knew that you would [11:20.320 --> 11:28.000] have to stop, you could not move forward with that if you tested for that thing right there that [11:28.000 --> 11:36.560] stopped every previous attempt. So we just won't test for that. Here's an exact quote from Dr. [11:36.560 --> 11:44.240] Malone. What the vaccine is causing in the waning phase is the virus to replicate more efficiently [11:44.240 --> 11:50.160] than it would otherwise, which is what we call antibody-dependent enhancement. [11:51.920 --> 11:58.240] Here's a particularly revealing statement. He says, if the concentration in the blood, [11:58.240 --> 12:02.240] that's what titers actually means. If the concentration in the blood, if SARS-CoV-2 [12:02.960 --> 12:08.320] are higher in vaccinated people than in unvaccinated people, that would be the smoking [12:08.320 --> 12:16.000] gun that the Pfizer vaccine in particular is creating ADE. So you might be shocked to know [12:16.960 --> 12:22.560] that the medical establishment, National Institutes of Health, CDC, Johns Hopkins, [12:22.560 --> 12:29.360] you name it, so how many of them have taken blood samples from vaccinated and unvaccinated people [12:29.920 --> 12:37.040] and compared the titers, the concentration of SARS-CoV-2 in the blood? That would be [12:37.840 --> 12:44.720] none. Malone inferentially suggests that if the needed blood sampling was performed [12:45.280 --> 12:51.920] and its results were consistent with antibody-dependent enhancement, vaccine distribution [12:51.920 --> 12:58.400] should stop immediately. When you understand that if this blood sampling was done and the [12:58.400 --> 13:03.520] results indicated ADE was occurring, that the necessary step would be to stop distributing the [13:03.520 --> 13:09.760] vaccine and to stop promoting everyone in the planet getting the vaccine, then you understand [13:09.760 --> 13:16.640] why these establishment experts, again, such as NIH and CDC and Johns Hopkins, [13:16.640 --> 13:22.880] why they will not touch this particular simple blood test with a 10-foot pole. Because no matter [13:22.880 --> 13:26.880] what is happening to the people who are getting vaccinated, they have no intention of stopping it, [13:26.880 --> 13:31.760] even if ADE is occurring, which is obviously a horrible thing that is detrimental to people's [13:31.760 --> 13:35.440] health, but they have no intention of testing for it because they don't want to find it. [13:36.160 --> 13:44.960] Here's some irony for you. Despite Dr. Malone having a lifetime of professional experience [13:44.960 --> 13:55.120] as a developer of vaccines, he is now branded as an anti-vaxxer. People are actually calling him [13:55.200 --> 14:01.840] an anti-vaxxer because he's looking at the vaccine, in particular the Pfizer vaccine, [14:01.840 --> 14:09.520] and he's saying, based on the data, it suggests that there's a problem here. [14:09.520 --> 14:15.120] Perhaps we should verify. We should take the next step, which is simple. We should take the next [14:15.120 --> 14:22.720] step to verify or not that this is happening. If it is happening, we need to stop distribution [14:22.720 --> 14:30.080] of this vaccine because it's harming people. How a guy who spent his entire professional career [14:30.080 --> 14:36.800] developing vaccines can be called an anti-vaxxer because he expresses his concerns over one [14:36.800 --> 14:43.360] particular vaccine in his history of working with vaccine development is just insane. [14:43.360 --> 14:49.440] It's kind of mind-blowing to imagine that there's a relatively large percentage of the American [14:49.440 --> 14:59.840] public that is, indeed, exactly that stupid. Here's a question for you. Who do you think [14:59.840 --> 15:08.560] should be, in your mind, more trustworthy? Those that stand to make billions and billions and [15:08.560 --> 15:12.400] billions of dollars, and they're minions in government. By the way, I've already reported [15:12.400 --> 15:18.720] on the fact that Pfizer and its European subsidiary have, in the first six months of the vaccine [15:18.720 --> 15:27.840] rollout, have generated more than $35 billion, $35 billion in six months. Think about that. [15:28.960 --> 15:35.520] Do you trust the people who speak on the behalf of those making $35-plus billion dollars, [15:36.240 --> 15:42.960] or do you trust somebody who has no dog in the fight? He's not against the vaccine per se. He's [15:42.960 --> 15:49.840] a professional vaccine developer as his long-term career. He's a virologist and an immunologist with [15:49.840 --> 15:57.840] no dog in the fight, and he says, look, I think there's basis for a concern, and whether or not [15:57.840 --> 16:05.280] I'm right can be verified by this very simple research process, and the establishment narrative [16:05.280 --> 16:10.800] in response to that is to try and diminish his reputation and brand him with kooky labels like [16:10.800 --> 16:18.320] anti-vaxxer. Sadly, this really doesn't surprise me because in body science, I discuss decades upon [16:18.320 --> 16:27.840] decades upon decades of falsehoods that have knowingly and intentionally led the American [16:27.840 --> 16:38.880] people to be the most unhealthy society in the history of the planet, and just like with SARS [16:38.880 --> 16:44.720] CoV-2 and its vaccines, those falsehoods, they didn't begin with Joe the auto mechanic or Fred [16:44.720 --> 16:53.440] the accountant. The falsehoods were created and promoted and distributed by the so-called experts [16:53.440 --> 16:59.360] who stood to make billions of dollars or they worked for the people who are going to be making [16:59.360 --> 17:05.360] billions of dollars. So I'm well familiar with this phenomenon and how it works and what we're [17:05.440 --> 17:12.160] seeing right now. So based on my research concerning physiology and nutritional falsehoods, [17:12.160 --> 17:19.360] I will tell you that billion dollar or trillion dollar industries just spewing lies wholesale [17:19.360 --> 17:26.160] coast to coast from Canada to the Mexican border, from the Pacific to the Atlantic, that this is not [17:26.160 --> 17:33.840] the exception. It is the rule. I just mentioned that the people of the United States are the most [17:33.840 --> 17:40.720] unhealthy people as a society in the history of the world, and that's not hyperbole. That is a [17:40.720 --> 17:47.360] factually accurate, statistically accurate statement that Americans today are the most [17:47.360 --> 17:54.080] unhealthy society in the history of the world. So I want to encourage you to go to DrReality.News, [17:54.080 --> 18:01.360] pick yourself up a copy of Body Science, which will detail those six decades of corruption that [18:01.360 --> 18:06.800] I've discussed, and then it will lay out for you what that was meant to mask, what the true [18:06.800 --> 18:12.720] physiology is of the human body, and being able to understand the sophistry and then being able [18:12.720 --> 18:17.760] to understand the truth, the reality, the science. Follow the science has become such a phrase, [18:17.760 --> 18:20.880] right? But most of the people who say follow the science, what they really mean is they're [18:20.880 --> 18:24.240] following somebody they're emotionally connected to or they're watching the news at night. That's [18:24.240 --> 18:28.640] following the science. I, on the other hand, am a scientist, so I want to encourage you to read [18:28.640 --> 18:35.120] Body Science, learn something rather than believing what you see online or in magazines or on the news, [18:35.120 --> 18:42.240] learn some science, actually do really follow the science, and get amazingly healthy. [18:42.880 --> 18:49.280] This is just a fanciful thing, but if all 333 million Americans read Body Science tomorrow [18:49.280 --> 18:53.200] and adopted it, what they learn in there, the science, the science, that's the key. [18:53.840 --> 19:00.480] The medical profession would go, for the most part, bankrupt. The processed food industry, [19:01.120 --> 19:08.160] toast. Big Pharma, toast. Their income would probably drop somewhere in the range of [19:08.960 --> 19:17.600] 75 to 90 percent if Americans understood true human physiology. Huh, so if they were going to [19:17.600 --> 19:22.720] lose literally trillions of dollars, do you think they might lie to you to keep it? [19:23.680 --> 19:33.200] Especially considering they lied to you to get it.