Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language Detected language: English [00:00.960 --> 00:08.000] As I'm recording this earlier today, Pfizer's mRNA vaccine received full approval, [00:08.000 --> 00:14.480] no longer being used under its former emergency use authorization. Intergovernmental panel on [00:14.480 --> 00:21.680] climate change, known as IPCC, likes to claim there is scientific consensus concerning [00:22.240 --> 00:28.560] man-made global warming, which is euphemistically these days called climate change. IPCC makes the [00:28.640 --> 00:35.040] claim that there is scientific consensus because it bans all highly credentialed professionals who [00:35.040 --> 00:42.160] hold a view contrary to IPCC's predetermined position. Obviously, claiming the scientific [00:42.160 --> 00:48.720] consensus exists when you have banned all the scientists who don't agree is corrupt. [00:49.360 --> 00:56.480] And that's exactly how the FDA approved Pfizer-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. It excluded consideration [00:56.480 --> 01:00.320] of all the data that raises troubling concerns about the vaccine. [01:00.880 --> 01:05.200] The good news is the FDA's corruption doesn't stop you and I from discussing the vaccine. [01:10.320 --> 01:13.200] The Dr. Reality Vodcast with Dave Champion. [01:13.280 --> 01:26.880] Welcome to the fifth installment of my series, SARS-CoV-2 and its vaccines. In the fourth [01:26.880 --> 01:31.520] installment, I discussed the overwhelming evidence that the mRNA vaccines are not activating [01:31.520 --> 01:36.400] production of memory T cells, which is why we're seeing a reinfection rate in those who have been [01:36.400 --> 01:43.440] vaxxed of 50 to 80 percent. Today, in this fifth installment, I want to discuss the possible [01:43.440 --> 01:48.720] consequences of a vaccine that does not activate production of memory T cells. [01:49.360 --> 01:54.640] Why are memory T cells so critical? First, I encourage you to watch my earlier presentation [01:54.640 --> 02:00.240] installment number four concerning missing memory T cells. I'll put the link down in the notes. [02:00.240 --> 02:05.440] For today, I'll just quickly run through how the body's natural immune process works, [02:05.440 --> 02:10.560] which is it detects a pathogen. In response to the pathogen, there is an adaptive immune response [02:11.760 --> 02:16.320] which produces and then sends out neutralizing antibodies, which those who will call them the [02:16.320 --> 02:21.760] infantry, they go out and attack the pathogen, the invader. When they're done with that and they [02:21.760 --> 02:28.560] defeated the pathogen, the neutralizing antibodies fade away. What allows your body to immediately [02:28.560 --> 02:34.480] marshal the necessary resources to slap that pathogen down instantly if you come in contact [02:34.480 --> 02:43.600] with it again is memory T cells. In the absence of memory T cells, every contact with that pathogen [02:43.600 --> 02:51.040] is viewed by the body as a novel contact. It's like the first time over and over and over again. [02:51.040 --> 02:57.600] It's your body's immune process version of the movie Groundhog Day just without the happy ending. [02:57.600 --> 03:03.440] In reference to SARS-CoV-2 specifically, how well do our memory T cells work? Well, data out of [03:03.440 --> 03:11.360] Israel shows that reinfection rate in those who have prior infection immunity and have not been [03:11.360 --> 03:19.360] vaccinated is eight one-thousandths of one percent. Statistically insignificant in terms of quantifying [03:19.360 --> 03:26.720] it in any meaningful sense, it is zero. A quick recap on how the mRNA vaccine works in the absence [03:26.720 --> 03:33.440] of activating production of memory T cells. The person gets the jab. What happens is [03:33.440 --> 03:38.320] the body's immunogenic response occurs, neutralizing antibodies are produced, [03:38.320 --> 03:44.800] they go and they contact the spike protein, and they do their thing presumptively destroying the [03:44.800 --> 03:50.560] evil invader. After the evil invader has been destroyed, then over time, typically about five [03:50.560 --> 03:55.040] to eight months, neutralizing antibodies fade away, which is exactly how it's designed to work [03:55.040 --> 03:58.960] because obviously they already defeated the pathogen, they are no longer needed, so [03:58.960 --> 04:04.720] their numbers begin to dwindle, and some place between five to eight months, they are no longer [04:04.720 --> 04:10.000] detectable by a standard antibody test. That phenomenon I just described, where they [04:10.640 --> 04:13.920] decrease to the point where they're no longer detectable by a standard antibody test, [04:13.920 --> 04:20.400] that is what you hear in the media all the time about the vaccine protection wanes over a period [04:20.400 --> 04:26.240] of time. That word they use waning, it simply means that the neutralizing antibodies produced [04:26.240 --> 04:30.160] originally by the vaccine have diminished to the point where they're no longer effective and that [04:30.160 --> 04:35.600] person no longer has protection. The problem is in the absence of having any memory T cells, [04:36.400 --> 04:41.280] then there's no protection left. People who have not been vaccinated, who have prior infection [04:41.280 --> 04:45.920] immunity, they have protection even after the neutralizing antibodies fade. People who've [04:45.920 --> 04:51.600] gotten the vaccine do not, so this sets up a pendulum effect where they get the injection, [04:51.600 --> 04:57.120] the neutralizing antibodies go up, then the pathogen is defeated, and over a period of months they go [04:57.120 --> 05:02.080] back down, now they don't have any more in protection, so they need another injection. Oh look, [05:02.080 --> 05:08.080] the antibodies rise and of course they defeat the spike proteins from the vaccine and then [05:08.080 --> 05:12.320] the neutralizing antibodies begin to decrease, and now it's waning and there's no more protection, [05:12.320 --> 05:16.000] so you need another injection and up go the neutralizing antibodies and they go after the [05:16.000 --> 05:20.400] spike protein again and when they have in theory defeated the spike protein, then down they come [05:20.400 --> 05:26.400] again. You get how this goes, right? You can swing a pendulum and eventually it'll zero out. This [05:26.400 --> 05:30.880] process never zeros out. As long as the virus is on the planet, that's how it goes with people who've [05:30.880 --> 05:38.000] been vaccinated and have no memory T cells. It's injection, up, down, injection, up, down, injection, [05:38.000 --> 05:42.880] up, down, injection, up, down, yes, obnoxious, right? Imagine how obnoxious it is if you have [05:42.880 --> 05:48.160] to live that way for the rest of your life. Given what I just described, it's disturbing, [05:48.160 --> 05:55.360] doesn't even come close to describing the obscenity of government and media claiming that immunity from [05:55.360 --> 06:05.040] the vaccine is as good as or superior to our natural prior infection immunity. With that said, [06:06.000 --> 06:12.000] there are some questions, and they are just that at this point, questions about the potential [06:12.000 --> 06:18.400] consequences of that cycle I just described in the absence of memory T cells. The questions [06:18.400 --> 06:22.400] we're going to kick around today have not been answered because the government knowingly, [06:22.400 --> 06:30.080] willfully, and intentionally chose not to pursue any research that would answer these questions [06:30.160 --> 06:37.760] until after the Pfizer mRNA vaccine or the Moderna mRNA vaccine or both received full approval. [06:38.320 --> 06:42.320] In other words, the government said, hey, these are very, very critical questions. [06:42.960 --> 06:49.360] If we get an answer that we don't like, which we suspect we will, and we have to publish that, [06:50.080 --> 06:54.800] a lot of people aren't going to get vaccinated. Here's what we're going to do. We're not going [06:54.800 --> 07:00.000] to address any of this. We're going to just look the other way, and then once the vaccines have [07:00.000 --> 07:07.680] received full approval and hundreds of millions of Americans have already gotten the jab, then [07:07.680 --> 07:12.560] we'll look at these questions and see if and how badly they're harming the American people. [07:13.200 --> 07:18.640] I'm guessing, like me, that seems backwards to you. If there was going to be any harm done by [07:18.640 --> 07:24.800] these mRNA vaccines, we should have known about it before hundreds of millions of people got the [07:24.800 --> 07:32.160] jab, not after. Lest you think I'm just making this up out of thin air that the government chose to [07:32.160 --> 07:39.440] put off investigating all sorts of potential problems with the mRNA vaccines until after [07:39.440 --> 07:44.640] everybody was injected with them, I want to share with you something from the FDA technical briefing [07:44.640 --> 07:47.760] document that was used to obtain emergency use authorization. [07:48.320 --> 07:54.720] In that document, down at the very, very end of where they're discussing potential adverse [07:54.720 --> 08:01.520] consequences of the vaccine, it says, risk of vaccine-enhanced disease over time—vaccine [08:01.520 --> 08:10.240] enhanced disease is one aspect of antibody-dependent enhancement, ADE—remains unknown. Let me read that [08:10.240 --> 08:20.240] again. Risk of vaccine-enhanced disease over time remains unknown and needs to be evaluated [08:20.240 --> 08:28.000] further in ongoing clinical trials and in observational studies that could be conducted [08:28.880 --> 08:35.600] following authorization and or licensure. In other words, again, once it's approved and everybody's [08:35.600 --> 08:40.800] vaccinated, these things then that we don't know that could be really harmful, we'll check it out [08:40.800 --> 08:46.400] then. So in the last 12 months that Americans have been getting injected with the mRNA vaccine, [08:47.040 --> 08:54.080] how many studies have anyone—FDA, CDC, National Institutes of Health, any of them—initiated to [08:54.080 --> 08:58.320] determine if these vaccines are causing antibody-dependent enhancement in the people [08:58.320 --> 09:05.840] who've been vaccinated? That would be zero. In other words, they said, we can look at that [09:05.840 --> 09:11.600] later. Well, apparently, a couple hundred million people being injected isn't later enough. And [09:11.600 --> 09:15.760] perhaps you think there's some sort of disconnect between the FDA technical briefing document—I [09:15.760 --> 09:20.720] just share a portion of it that I just shared with you—and what people like CDC Director Rochelle [09:20.720 --> 09:27.440] Walensky know now. There is no disconnect. On August 18th at a White House briefing, [09:27.440 --> 09:34.720] Walensky acknowledged that people who have gotten vaccinated and then the vaccine protection has [09:34.720 --> 09:40.480] waned—we discussed that a few minutes ago—how the neutralizing antibodies diminish. Those people, [09:40.480 --> 09:48.480] when they come in contact with the wild virus, they have more severe COVID-19 than somebody who [09:48.480 --> 09:55.120] has not been vaccinated. And do you know what that is? That is the quintessential sign that [09:55.200 --> 10:03.520] antibody-dependent enhancement is occurring, and yet no studies. So what other very critical [10:03.520 --> 10:08.480] questions have not been looked at, research has not been formed, and answers have not been obtained [10:08.480 --> 10:14.800] besides things like antibody-dependent enhancement? There are two that are of immediate concern to me. [10:15.760 --> 10:22.720] One is, if a person had never been infected—this is a timeline I'm sharing with you—they'd never [10:22.720 --> 10:30.320] been infected, then they got vaccinated, then they come in contact with the wild virus, [10:30.320 --> 10:36.880] and they become infected. Does the fact that they've been vaccinated somehow disable their [10:36.880 --> 10:43.600] body's immune system from activating the production of memory T cells? Keep in mind that getting [10:43.600 --> 10:50.640] vaccinated is seen by your body as the initial infection, despite proteins constituting the [10:50.720 --> 10:55.040] pathogen for which your body creates the neutralizing antibodies. Yet we know the [10:55.040 --> 11:00.160] evidence is overwhelming that the body does not activate production of memory T cells. [11:00.720 --> 11:07.440] But if we take the timeline, never infected, then got vaccinated, then contact with the wild virus, [11:08.000 --> 11:14.000] does the vaccine disable your body's ability to produce memory T cells? What is the answer to that? [11:14.800 --> 11:19.520] That would require research that should have been done more than a year ago and never was. [11:19.520 --> 11:24.960] I should point out that if that scenario turns out to be true, that the vaccination disables [11:24.960 --> 11:29.760] your body's ability to produce its own memory T cells even in subsequent wild virus infections, [11:30.400 --> 11:34.960] then the only option for that person, they have to keep getting the jab again and again [11:34.960 --> 11:42.000] and again and again because the virus is always there somewhere. Here's question number two. [11:42.000 --> 11:48.720] If a person was infected by SARS-CoV-2, perhaps asymptomatically they don't even know, [11:48.720 --> 11:55.120] or perhaps they had a case of COVID-19, so their body developed memory T cells. As we discussed [11:55.120 --> 12:02.240] with the 1,000th of 1% reinfection rate from prior infection immunity, they are essentially [12:02.880 --> 12:08.320] bulletproof as far as protecting from subsequent infection. However, they go out and they get the [12:08.320 --> 12:17.040] vaccine anyway. Does the vaccine disable their existing SARS-CoV-2 specific memory T cells? [12:17.760 --> 12:24.240] Imagine having essentially zero chance of reinfection. Then you get a pharmaceutical product [12:24.240 --> 12:32.000] put inside you and suddenly you go from zero chance of reinfection to 50 to 80% chance of [12:32.000 --> 12:38.960] reinfection. Imagine if 80 million Americans who had perfect immunity from prior infection [12:39.520 --> 12:44.960] and suddenly they get vaccinated and they go to now their chance of reinfection is 50 to 80%. [12:44.960 --> 12:47.920] By the way, I'm not saying this scenario is true. I'm saying it is a possible scenario, [12:47.920 --> 12:51.760] and we don't have the data, but let's just run and say it's true for the sake of this illustration [12:51.760 --> 13:00.720] that 80 million Americans had their perfect prior infection immunity disabled by the vaccine. Now [13:00.720 --> 13:07.040] this pool of 80 million people can get reinfected. If they don't keep getting shots, they can keep [13:07.040 --> 13:13.120] getting reinfected again and again and again because the only thing that stops a pathogen [13:13.120 --> 13:17.840] from reinfecting the human body again and again and again is memory T cells. If it turns out the [13:17.840 --> 13:26.160] scenario we're discussing right now is factual, how long do you think the SARS-CoV-2 event is [13:26.160 --> 13:32.480] going to drag on? Because what ends these events, what has ended them throughout all of mankind's [13:32.480 --> 13:39.360] history, is herd immunity. Now if you have people who never develop any natural immunity in their [13:39.360 --> 13:44.080] bodies, their immunity comes solely from a jab again and again and again and again and again with [13:44.080 --> 13:47.920] a needle. If they stop getting that jab, they're still going to get infected. They're still going [13:47.920 --> 13:55.440] to infect others. How long does this event continue? Years? Decades? I don't know because [13:55.440 --> 13:59.920] this never happened in all of mankind's history. So we have two groups we've been talking about in [13:59.920 --> 14:07.440] these scenarios. One is never been infected, got the vaccine, doesn't have memory T cells. [14:07.440 --> 14:15.280] The other scenario we're talking about is has been infected, did have memory T cells, got vaccinated [14:15.280 --> 14:21.760] and under this scenario then those memory T cells were disabled. To be clear, if either of those is [14:21.760 --> 14:29.360] true or both, it would be the first time in the history of humankind that man's blundering would [14:29.360 --> 14:36.160] have allowed a virus to run wild virtually indefinitely. Do I know that either of these [14:36.160 --> 14:43.440] scenarios is factual? I don't. The problem is neither does the government because as we discussed [14:43.440 --> 14:49.040] before, the government has knowingly, intentionally and willfully chosen not to conduct any research [14:49.040 --> 14:56.800] that would answer these critical questions. Do I imagine Pfizer knows the answer, Moderna knows [14:56.800 --> 15:03.120] the answer, CDC's Walensky or National Institutes of Health, Fauci knows the answer. I imagine they [15:03.120 --> 15:09.040] do because there's a huge difference between unofficial gathering of data that's kept close [15:09.040 --> 15:14.720] to the vest and only certain people at the top of the food chain know about it. That's one form of, [15:14.720 --> 15:18.160] I don't even know if I call it research, we'll call it data gathering, but data gathering can [15:18.160 --> 15:22.960] give you a lot of information. Then on the other side of the coin, there's official sanctioned [15:22.960 --> 15:27.760] research where you actually, you say, okay, you tell the public we're going to start this study [15:27.760 --> 15:33.520] and in this study our goals are to determine if this or such is so or is not so. As I mentioned, [15:33.520 --> 15:39.120] there is no official studies for any of these things and I suspect the reason there's a complete [15:39.120 --> 15:43.680] blackout on these studies is because people like Walensky and Fauci already know the answer [15:43.680 --> 15:48.720] and they don't want the answers to become public until the maximum amount of people have been [15:48.720 --> 15:53.520] injured, I mean vaccinated. And remember on August 18th, Walensky essentially admitted [15:53.520 --> 15:57.280] that the vaccines are resulting in antibody-dependent enhancement. [15:57.840 --> 16:04.480] So with that admission, eight months into the emergency use authorization distribution of the [16:04.480 --> 16:11.200] mRNA vaccines, how likely or unlikely is it that either of these scenarios that we've discussed [16:11.200 --> 16:16.400] today or both of them could also turn out to be factual and Walensky just simply hasn't acknowledged [16:16.400 --> 16:23.360] that publicly yet. If one or both of these scenarios we've discussed today is accurate, [16:23.920 --> 16:32.640] the people who've been vaccinated can never undo that. And I look at that possibility and I feel [16:32.640 --> 16:38.560] bad for the people who are vaccinated. Perhaps it would have been prudent of them to wait until [16:38.560 --> 16:44.240] all these critical questions were answered before volunteering to get vaccinated. [16:44.960 --> 16:49.520] If this sort of logical analysis is something you really appreciate and enjoy, I'd like you to do [16:49.520 --> 16:57.600] me a favor and go to DrReality.News. Help me be here for you by picking up a copy of Body Science [16:57.600 --> 17:04.480] or Income Tax Shattering the Mist. Selling my books is what allows me to survive financially [17:04.480 --> 17:09.600] and be here to do this with you. So instead of something like Patreon or something like that, [17:09.600 --> 17:13.840] please run over to the website, grab a copy of Body Science or Income Tax Shattering the Mist [17:13.840 --> 17:19.440] or a couple of other publications that are there. They will absolutely be the most fascinating [17:19.440 --> 17:26.080] things you've read, probably ever, but certainly in the top 1%. So I would appreciate it if you'd [17:26.080 --> 17:37.680] help me be here for you. DrReality.News and thank you.