Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language Detected language: English [00:00.000 --> 00:05.800] Welcome to the vodcast. I'm about as pro-gun as a perskin can get. I've served as an army [00:05.800 --> 00:10.280] ranger, law enforcement, and taught firearms tactics and use of force most of my adult [00:10.280 --> 00:16.760] life. With that said, I believe America has a mass shooting problem. I don't know anybody [00:16.760 --> 00:21.820] who would disagree with that. What we disagree on is how to address the problem. What does [00:21.820 --> 00:28.820] not help in any way, shape, or form is anti-gunners offering absurdly childish rhetoric and uninformed [00:29.120 --> 00:35.620] nonsense. [00:35.620 --> 00:42.620] The Dr. Reality Vodcast with Dave Champion. [00:46.980 --> 00:52.980] Let's start with this. Michael Tomasky, editor of the New Republic, is a blithering idiot [00:52.980 --> 00:58.780] whose incendiary false claims only make finding a solution to the problem more difficult and [00:58.780 --> 01:04.060] less likely. We'll look at his false incendiary statements and then move on to his abject [01:04.060 --> 01:08.140] ignorance on the subject upon which he is speaking. I'll put the link to him saying [01:08.140 --> 01:15.140] those things in the notes. Tomasky recently wrote that quote, the gun industry wants America's [01:15.220 --> 01:22.220] malls and schools to be war zones. Close quote. This is what I mean by a blithering idiot [01:22.220 --> 01:27.180] making incendiary false claims. I know the vast majority of those hearing his words are [01:27.180 --> 01:32.740] rolling their eyes at the stupidity and the childishness of his assertions. I was in the [01:32.740 --> 01:38.140] firearms industry for years. There are few people more dedicated to the idea that firearms [01:38.140 --> 01:44.580] should never be misused than those within the industry. I'm 63 years old and I have [01:44.580 --> 01:50.100] never once heard anyone in the industry even make a cavalier comment about people rolling [01:51.100 --> 01:57.420] wrongfully using firearms to harm the innocent. In fact, there are few things that infuriate [01:57.420 --> 02:03.780] people within the industry more than the products they sell being misused to harm the innocent. [02:03.780 --> 02:10.700] But to more directly address Tomasky's infantile assertion. For anyone to believe the gun industry [02:10.700 --> 02:15.100] wants America's malls and schools to be war zones, one would have to believe that the [02:15.100 --> 02:19.700] men and women who are executives at companies in the firearms industry don't send their [02:19.700 --> 02:24.940] children to school and their spouses and kids are prohibited from ever going to the mall. [02:24.940 --> 02:30.780] Both of these points are, of course, nonsensical. Then we come to Tomasky's display of profound [02:30.780 --> 02:35.340] ignorance. Or maybe he's not ignorant. Maybe he's just an out and out liar. That's for [02:35.340 --> 02:41.020] you to decide. Tomasky writes that the firearms industry continues to release ever more deadly [02:41.980 --> 02:46.700] To support that idiotic claim, he references SIG Sauer releasing its XCM Spear, which is a [02:46.700 --> 02:53.660] semi-automatic version of the Army's new XM7 rifle. Virtually all rifle manufacturers in the U.S. [02:53.660 --> 02:58.940] produce a semi-automatic version of various military rifles. There's nothing new or unusual [02:58.940 --> 03:03.500] about it. It has been the practice since long before mass shootings became a thing. [03:04.220 --> 03:09.420] Further, the functionality of the SIG rifle is identical to the AR. There are literally no [03:09.420 --> 03:14.700] differences. A person presses the trigger and a single round is fired. To fire another round, [03:14.700 --> 03:19.900] the shooter must let off the trigger until it reaches its reset point. Only then can the [03:19.900 --> 03:26.300] shooter fire the next round. The XCM Spear and the AR have the exact same functionality. [03:26.300 --> 03:31.740] If the XCM Spear and the AR have the exact same functionality, why would Tomasky claim the XCM [03:31.740 --> 03:37.740] Spear is proof that the firearms industry just keeps putting out ever more deadly weapons? [03:38.380 --> 03:44.060] I'm confident that if Tomasky was asked that question directly, he couldn't answer it because [03:44.060 --> 03:50.140] he knows nothing about firearms. Decades ago, you bought a rifle in the caliber you wanted, [03:50.140 --> 03:55.340] and that was the only caliber that rifle would ever fire. Over time, consumers expressed an [03:55.340 --> 03:59.820] interest to purchase a single rifle and enjoy the benefits of being able to swap out certain [03:59.820 --> 04:05.900] parts and have it fire a different caliber round. In short, instead of buying, as an example, [04:05.900 --> 04:11.500] three rifles, a person could buy one rifle that could be converted to fire three different calibers. [04:12.140 --> 04:17.020] One might think this would thrill Tomasky because people would be buying fewer rifles, [04:17.020 --> 04:21.740] but since he hasn't a clue about firearms, that thought would never cross his mind. [04:22.460 --> 04:27.340] In the early iterations, changing calibers was cumbersome, but over time, consumer demand for [04:27.340 --> 04:32.780] these convertible units drove innovation and most rifles you buy today, if they offer a caliber [04:32.780 --> 04:38.780] conversion, the conversion is quick and simple. SIG's CXM Spear is an example of that modern [04:38.780 --> 04:43.660] reality. It can be converted to various calibers easily and quickly with just a few common tools. [04:44.300 --> 04:49.740] The issue of caliber brings us to what has Tomasky concerned, even though he's too ignorant about [04:49.740 --> 04:55.980] firearms to understand the issue. The SIG XCM Spear can run a number of calibers, including [04:55.980 --> 05:02.300] 300 Blackout, 5.56, which is the traditional AR-15 round, 7.62x39, which is best known as [05:02.300 --> 05:09.100] the round traditionally fired from an AK-47, 7.62x51, which has been around forever and is [05:09.100 --> 05:17.980] sometimes referred to as the 308, the 277 SIG Fury, and 6.5 Creedmoor. I could get into the [05:17.980 --> 05:23.260] external ballistics of each of these rounds, but why? You'll have the answer to that shortly. [05:23.980 --> 05:28.940] Decades ago, when I was in a law enforcement class to become a Glock law enforcement handgun [05:28.940 --> 05:35.740] instructor, the head instructor of that class was slender about 5'8", since I know his background, [05:35.740 --> 05:41.980] including but not limited to his being a Green Beret in Vietnam. He's probably killed more people [05:41.980 --> 05:48.700] than you've ever met. He was a chill guy with an unassuming demeanor. During the course, someone [05:48.700 --> 05:52.860] asked what handgun caliber he thought was best. Before he got into answering the question in [05:52.860 --> 05:58.620] earnest, he said, I don't want to get shot by a .22. For those who understand fighting with a [05:58.620 --> 06:04.620] handgun rather than merely doing range time, the issue is far more about shot placement than caliber. [06:04.620 --> 06:09.740] His point that day to a room full of cops was that getting shot by any bullet of any caliber [06:09.740 --> 06:14.460] hurts like a motherfucker and often degrades your ability to fight at your full potential. [06:15.420 --> 06:20.860] Before I continue, please take a moment to subscribe to the channel and hit the like button. [06:20.860 --> 06:26.540] If you aren't yet on the free speech platform Rumble, this is a perfect time to get on board. [06:26.540 --> 06:32.380] A platform that permits a free exchange of ideas rather than censoring open debate is where every [06:32.380 --> 06:37.740] American should want to be. Let's examine Tomaski's statement about the Sig XCM Spear [06:37.740 --> 06:44.460] in the context of mass shootings. Tomaski brings up that the Sig Fury round, which he didn't name [06:44.460 --> 06:50.060] because he doesn't know the name, is better at penetrating body armor. Remember that list of [06:50.060 --> 06:58.140] calibers we discussed a moment ago, 300 Blackout, 5.56, 7.62x39, 7.62x51, Sig Fury, and the 6.5 [06:58.140 --> 07:04.620] Creedmoor? Every single one of those rounds will go through soft body armor like a hot knife through [07:04.620 --> 07:11.340] butter. So in terms of soft body armor, there is absolutely no difference between, as an example, [07:11.340 --> 07:19.340] the 7.62x51 first introduced in 1952 and the Sig Fury that was introduced in 2019. [07:19.900 --> 07:25.660] Phrased another way, although those rounds were introduced 67 years apart, in terms of penetrating [07:25.660 --> 07:32.380] soft body armor, both do the exact same job. So Tomaski's claim that the Sig XCM Spear is [07:32.380 --> 07:39.740] more deadly than its predecessors is false and idiotic. Where did Tomaski get the notion that [07:39.740 --> 07:45.420] the XCM is better at penetrating body armor? Some foreign troops are now wearing body armor [07:45.420 --> 07:50.700] that's more protective against rifle rounds than they were years ago. I've heard it said that the [07:50.700 --> 07:57.340] Sig Fury is better at penetrating the newer body armor worn by some foreign troops, but the assertion [07:57.340 --> 08:03.340] that it's better has to be taken in context. The main U.S. battle rifle for the last 60 years has [08:03.340 --> 08:12.380] been the M16 in its M4 variant, which fires the anemic 5.56x45 round. In my opinion, that decision [08:12.380 --> 08:17.820] was not a brilliant one, but it was made by government, so there's that. The M16 was never [08:17.820 --> 08:21.900] intended to be a main battle rifle. It was originally designed by legendary firearms designer [08:21.900 --> 08:28.380] Eugene Stoner as a lightweight weapon that could be used in a pinch by pilots whose aircraft had [08:28.380 --> 08:33.660] gone down behind enemy lines. In other words, it was lightweight enough to be secured in a compartment [08:33.660 --> 08:38.620] of the plane along with a couple of magazines. A downed pilot would be able to fight a defensive [08:38.620 --> 08:43.900] action for a short period of time until Air Force para rescues could extract him. That was its [08:43.900 --> 08:51.340] intended purpose. Stoner never envisioned it as a main battle rifle. Anyway, the context is that some [08:51.340 --> 08:58.700] foreign soldiers are now wearing improved body armor the anemic 5.56 can't penetrate. That said, [08:58.700 --> 09:04.380] it's a virtual certainty any of the other rounds we've discussed today will defeat the newer combat [09:04.380 --> 09:10.140] body armor. By comparison, what is the context of a criminal psychopath shooting a bunch of innocent [09:10.140 --> 09:15.580] people at a bowling alley, post office, grocery store, factory, mall, or school? Is anyone wearing [09:15.580 --> 09:20.780] the newest generation of advanced battlefield body armor issued to foreign troops? Is anyone [09:20.780 --> 09:27.980] wearing any body armor at all? Of course not. The point is, in that context, it doesn't matter what [09:28.060 --> 09:35.260] the caliber is. In that context, all calibers are the same. Accordingly, the Sig XCM is no more or [09:35.260 --> 09:44.300] less deadly than a rifle manufactured as an example 70 years ago. And Tomaski is a moron. [09:45.180 --> 09:49.020] Now I'm going to say something that may cause some folks to feel uncomfortable. [09:49.580 --> 09:56.540] It is nevertheless true. The statement is this. If I was so inclined, I could take this [09:56.540 --> 10:03.340] 45 caliber handgun that I carry every day and kill a lot more people in a public space [10:03.340 --> 10:09.500] in a much shorter period of time than do mass shooters with rifles. Why? Because I'm a [10:09.500 --> 10:14.380] professional and the mass shooters are buffoons. But the larger point I'm making by sharing that [10:14.380 --> 10:19.820] information with you is the caliber isn't the critical factor and we should all be thankful [10:19.820 --> 10:26.300] these mentally ill murderers have no skills. During an MSNBC appearance to highlight and [10:26.300 --> 10:31.980] promote his absurd claims, Tomaski was asked what can be done to stop the firearms industry. His [10:31.980 --> 10:38.380] answer was that in 2024, Democrats have to take all three houses. And again, he's either an idiot, [10:39.500 --> 10:45.900] he's lying, or he's knowingly manipulating those who watch MSNBC because the Supreme Court's Bruin [10:45.900 --> 10:50.380] decision prevents lawmakers from interfering with our inalienable right to keep their arms. [10:50.380 --> 10:55.340] The Bruin decision does that by applying the standard that if legislation would not have [10:55.340 --> 11:00.700] passed muster with the founding generation who wrote the Second Amendment, then such legislation [11:00.700 --> 11:06.700] cannot be considered constitutional today. With that standard in place, it wouldn't matter if [11:06.700 --> 11:12.300] 100% of the House and Senate were anti-gun dems and the President was the same. Whatever laws might [11:12.300 --> 11:16.540] come out of such a construct would be struck down by the Supreme Court in short order under the [11:16.540 --> 11:22.540] Bruin standard. One of the things that concerns me about Tomaski's appearance on MSNBC is that [11:22.540 --> 11:28.940] because people who are knowledgeable about firearms don't watch MSNBC, Tomaski is spewing [11:28.940 --> 11:35.340] his bullshit to an audience that doesn't know any of the things we've discussed today and therefore [11:35.340 --> 11:41.980] likely believe him. And that brings me back to the point of this presentation. How does spewing [11:41.980 --> 11:48.540] ignorance or lies to millions of people who are too uninformed to know they're being fed BS [11:49.180 --> 11:56.060] help America effectively address mass shootings? Answer. It doesn't. In fact, it makes it harder [11:56.060 --> 12:03.020] to effectively address mass shootings. Why? Because people who buy Tomaski's bullshit become [12:03.020 --> 12:09.340] incapable of having a dialogue with someone like me. Why? Because guys like Tomaski program them [12:09.340 --> 12:14.860] to believe that people with my background want malls and schools to be war zones. In other words, [12:14.860 --> 12:20.620] they've been programmed to believe that I am the enemy when in fact on the subject of mass shootings [12:20.620 --> 12:25.740] we both want the same thing. While I say we both want the same thing, I think it obvious our thoughts [12:25.740 --> 12:31.580] on how to get there are quite different. Because the Bruin standard effectively shuts down their [12:31.580 --> 12:37.020] dream of banning guns or even certain types of guns, I would suggest to anti-gunners that they [12:37.020 --> 12:42.700] start talking with people like me about how best to address mass shootings, at least if they have [12:42.700 --> 12:47.340] any real interest in addressing them rather than using dead Americans as talking points. [12:48.140 --> 12:54.620] Back in 2022, I did a presentation discussing what works and what doesn't work in terms of addressing [12:54.620 --> 12:59.340] the mass shooting problem. I'll put a link to that down in the notes. Remember a moment ago, [12:59.340 --> 13:06.460] I mentioned that I carry a handgun every day. Why do I do that? I think the best way to answer that [13:06.460 --> 13:11.980] in context of today's discussion is to point out that at the most fundamental level there is a [13:11.980 --> 13:17.900] significant difference in the moral compass of people like myself and Tomaskey. While Tomaskey [13:17.900 --> 13:24.300] asks, how many children have to die before you'll give up your guns? I ask, how many children have [13:24.300 --> 13:30.860] to die before you'll pick up a gun to protect them? Destructive disinformation like Tomaskey [13:30.860 --> 13:35.740] is spreading isn't limited to just guns. The US government and trillion dollar industries have [13:35.740 --> 13:40.540] been spreading disinformation about human physiology for decades. Their disinformation [13:40.540 --> 13:46.700] has resulted in the American people being the most ill society in all of human history. If you think [13:46.700 --> 13:52.940] that's just coincidence, you're wrong. I know it may be hard for some people to accept, but the [13:52.940 --> 13:59.660] disinformation has been put out to achieve exactly that result. In body science, I detail how going [13:59.660 --> 14:04.860] back all the way to the early 1960s, the narrative fed to the public about nutrition and human [14:04.860 --> 14:13.900] physiology was false. And to be clear, it wasn't mistaken. It was knowingly false. They knew it was [14:13.900 --> 14:19.980] false when they put it out. I give examples, including naming the conspirators who accepted [14:19.980 --> 14:25.420] industry money to falsify science in such a way that the health of the American people would be [14:25.420 --> 14:29.980] harmed. After the government joined the disinformation campaign in 1980, you can [14:29.980 --> 14:34.780] literally chart the dramatic increase in chronic disease that has led Americans to be the most [14:34.940 --> 14:42.140] ill people on the planet. I wrote body science because America is in the midst of a health crisis [14:42.700 --> 14:46.940] that has been manufactured. I don't mean that the stories about the explosion of illness and [14:46.940 --> 14:51.820] premature death in the US have been manufactured. Those stories are very real. I mean that the [14:51.820 --> 14:59.740] massive level of illness in the United States has been created by so-called trusted sources knowingly, [14:59.740 --> 15:05.020] willfully, and intentionally lying to the American people about nutritional physiology [15:05.020 --> 15:11.740] for 60 years. In addition, Americans are the most ill people on the planet because they believed [15:11.740 --> 15:19.500] people who were lying to them and continue to do so to this very day. As horrendous as that is, [15:19.500 --> 15:25.500] the good news is reading one book will forever sweep away their disinformation and make it [15:25.500 --> 15:33.260] crystal clear how every American can live a wonderfully healthy life. What could it hurt [15:33.260 --> 15:39.820] to read body science? It's not an expensive book. If I'm wrong, you blew a few bucks. If I'm right, [15:39.820 --> 15:44.780] your entire view of nutritional physiology will do a 180 and you will be one of the people living [15:44.780 --> 15:50.220] a wonderfully healthy life. I should point out that in the years since body science was released, [15:50.220 --> 15:55.260] it has never received anything less than five star reader reviews so you can be assured your [15:55.260 --> 16:01.100] money will be well spent. Another area where Americans have been horrifically harmed by [16:01.100 --> 16:06.140] government disinformation is the false narrative that everyone who earns a living owes income tax [16:06.140 --> 16:12.700] to the government. That narrative is the result of yet another 60-year disinformation campaign by [16:12.700 --> 16:18.940] the US government. When I say that narrative has resulted in horrific harm, I'm talking about the [16:18.940 --> 16:26.780] US government scamming the American people out of trillions of dollars every year. That's trillions [16:26.780 --> 16:33.900] of dollars that belong to you that the government has never had any legal right to and which should [16:33.900 --> 16:39.020] have remained in your possession being used by you for the benefit of yourself and your family. [16:39.820 --> 16:45.020] But instead, you were scammed out of it by the government and what I refer to in income tax [16:45.020 --> 16:51.420] Shattering the Mists as the largest financial crime in world history and the victims are the [16:51.420 --> 16:59.100] working men and women of America. In all my works, I ask people not to believe me but to challenge [16:59.100 --> 17:04.860] and test the information I present to see if it's factual, if it's credible. I always appreciate when [17:04.860 --> 17:09.340] people do exactly that because it is one of the best ways to learn what is true and what is not [17:09.980 --> 17:16.220] or phrased another way. Who's telling the truth and who's lying to you? A reader recently shared [17:16.220 --> 17:22.620] this comment with me, quote, I use both your books and both booklets to debate with everyone [17:22.620 --> 17:29.260] in a friendly manner. At first, I tried to prove you wrong, which led me to see you are correct, [17:29.260 --> 17:34.380] close quote. I don't know about you, but I see our servant governments stealing the property of [17:34.380 --> 17:41.420] American families by scamming we the people out with disinformation to be morally unacceptable. [17:42.220 --> 17:45.980] Apparently, I'm not alone in that because here's what another reader recently shared. [17:46.540 --> 17:54.540] Thanks, Dr. Dave. I'm walking the walk on taxes thanks to you and as what I call a moral obligation, [17:54.540 --> 18:00.460] I've given five copies out to my family members as well as body science. I can't thank you enough, [18:00.460 --> 18:05.980] close quote. You might think a book on the income tax is dry and boring. Nothing could [18:05.980 --> 18:10.700] be further from the truth. Readers have repeatedly referred to it as a page turner because it's [18:10.700 --> 18:14.940] written like a mystery tale. With each revelation of how the scam has been established and placed [18:14.940 --> 18:22.940] into effect, you want to know more. The story is truly amazing and it's a story every American [18:22.940 --> 18:29.660] should read and know. Income tax shattering the mist is the result of 17 years of research broken [18:29.660 --> 18:35.020] down in a way that every American can readily understand. What the law really says as opposed [18:35.020 --> 18:40.460] to what you've been told it says is why I haven't filed a tax return or paid a penny of income tax [18:40.460 --> 18:47.100] for 30 years and thousands of your fellow Americans have safely walked away from the income tax scam. [18:47.100 --> 18:53.340] But you can't even contemplate that until you stop listening to what others have told you about the [18:53.340 --> 18:59.340] income tax and discover the truth for yourself. Only then can you decide what you want to do [18:59.340 --> 19:09.100] about it. If you're a truth seeker, please go to drreality.news and pick up a copy of income tax [19:09.100 --> 19:17.020] shattering the mist and or body science. You have my word, they will change your life. Also, by [19:17.020 --> 19:21.820] purchasing income tax shattering the mist and or body science, you help me to continue to be here [19:21.820 --> 19:29.020] for you with these thought-provoking presentations. Please share this vodcast. Thanks for being here. [19:29.020 --> 19:36.700] Take care.