Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language Detected language: English [00:00.000 --> 00:02.280] Welcome to the show. [00:02.280 --> 00:08.560] You're likely aware that New Mexico Governor Michelle Grisham has lost her mind and declared [00:08.560 --> 00:13.960] that she has the power to suspend the constitutional right of American citizens living in Albuquerque [00:13.960 --> 00:15.920] to carry firearms. [00:15.920 --> 00:21.080] And she has issued an order as governor doing just that. [00:21.080 --> 00:27.040] I have a few things to say about her actions that are not being said in the dominant media, [00:27.040 --> 00:33.480] left or right. [00:33.480 --> 00:44.760] The Doctor Reality Vodcast with Dave Champion. [00:44.760 --> 00:45.760] Let's start with this. [00:45.760 --> 00:49.460] Nine months ago, I put out a presentation explaining that those who oppose the right [00:49.460 --> 00:54.280] of self-defense and the defense of other innocent people were actively planning to impose gun [00:54.280 --> 00:57.600] control via public health emergency declarations. [00:57.600 --> 01:01.880] If you watched or listened to that presentation, then Governor Grisham's actions shouldn't [01:01.880 --> 01:03.920] come as a surprise to you. [01:03.920 --> 01:08.560] While it is not a surprise, it is nevertheless shocking to witness a public official blatantly [01:08.560 --> 01:12.160] ignore the unalienable rights of Americans in New Mexico. [01:12.160 --> 01:17.400] I should also point out that the right to keep and bear arms is not established by the [01:17.400 --> 01:18.560] Constitution. [01:18.560 --> 01:23.360] Unalienable rights pre-exist the formation of the states and the federal government, [01:23.440 --> 01:28.920] and therefore neither the states nor the federal government have the authority to alter, modify [01:28.920 --> 01:30.880] or abolish them. [01:30.880 --> 01:33.180] So says the U.S. Supreme Court. [01:33.180 --> 01:38.680] A federal court has temporarily blocked the governor's order from being enforced. [01:38.680 --> 01:39.880] But that's temporary. [01:39.880 --> 01:44.540] The federal case may not end up as many people think it will. [01:44.540 --> 01:49.040] The facts and law may also not be what you think they are. [01:49.040 --> 01:50.680] So let's take a look at them. [01:50.680 --> 01:55.640] We'll begin by examining how Grisham has gone about doing what she's done. [01:55.640 --> 02:03.440] She has suspended the right to bear arms within the city of Albuquerque via an executive order. [02:03.440 --> 02:06.420] Executive orders have no effect on the public. [02:06.420 --> 02:11.580] Executive orders only command officers and employees within the executive branch. [02:11.580 --> 02:12.760] No one else. [02:12.760 --> 02:18.080] Furthermore, an executive order must clarify how the executive branch officers and employees [02:18.080 --> 02:23.040] are to carry into effect the will of the people as expressed in a statute enacted [02:23.040 --> 02:24.040] by the legislature. [02:24.040 --> 02:29.200] In other words, an executive order has to live within the boundaries of the statute [02:29.200 --> 02:33.400] or statutes it is intended to carry into effect. [02:33.400 --> 02:38.560] That brings us to the two New Mexico laws Governor Grisham cited as her authority to [02:38.560 --> 02:41.000] issue her executive order. [02:41.000 --> 02:47.840] The first is the Public Health Emergency Response Act, which is codified as Article [02:47.840 --> 02:50.120] 10 of the New Mexico statutes. [02:50.120 --> 02:56.280] Remember, this is one of the two laws the governor is relying on for her authority to [02:56.280 --> 03:00.200] declare a public health emergency. [03:00.200 --> 03:07.800] So in the Public Health Emergency Response Act, how is public health emergency defined? [03:07.800 --> 03:13.240] It is defined thusly, quote, public health emergency means the occurrence or imminent [03:13.240 --> 03:20.000] threat of exposure to an extremely dangerous condition or a highly infectious or toxic [03:20.000 --> 03:26.240] agent, including a threatening communicable disease that poses an imminent threat of substantial [03:26.240 --> 03:32.520] harm to the population of New Mexico or any portion thereof, close quote. [03:32.520 --> 03:39.400] Preceding that definition are the definitions of health facility, health care supplies, [03:39.400 --> 03:42.480] and isolation. [03:42.480 --> 03:47.640] After the definition of public health emergency are the definitions of quarantine and threatening [03:47.640 --> 03:49.880] communicable disease. [03:49.880 --> 03:58.360] In fact, after you move on from the definition section, 100% of the act addresses isolation, [03:58.600 --> 04:05.240] quarantining, medical supplies, medical examinations, medical testing, and vaccination. [04:05.240 --> 04:10.120] In other words, the power being granted to the governor in the act pertains without equivocation [04:10.120 --> 04:13.640] exclusively to infection and disease. [04:13.640 --> 04:19.520] Phrased another way, the New Mexico legislature limited the governor's emergency power authority [04:19.520 --> 04:24.360] in the act to infection and disease. [04:24.360 --> 04:29.360] But Dave, the anti-Gunners cry, it's only for 30 days. [04:29.360 --> 04:33.840] If you're saying that, it shows you have no idea how the Public Health Emergency Response [04:33.840 --> 04:35.520] Act operates. [04:35.520 --> 04:41.280] Under the act, the declaration is only good for 30 days, but, and this is a huge but, [04:41.280 --> 04:46.040] it is renewable every 30 days by the governor solely at the governor's discretion. [04:46.040 --> 04:53.120] What Gershom is doing is a natural follow-up to what was done in 2020 and 2021. [04:53.120 --> 04:58.780] Gershom's 30-day declaration is reminiscent of two weeks to flatten the curve, which turned [04:58.780 --> 05:05.480] into three years of insane, worthless government bullshit. [05:05.480 --> 05:09.880] And let me be clear, there is nothing in New Mexico law that can stop Gershom from renewing [05:09.880 --> 05:14.280] her order every 30 days for as long as she remains in office. [05:14.280 --> 05:20.120] The other statutory support Gershom cites in her executive order is the, quote, all-hazard [05:20.120 --> 05:22.920] Emergency Management Act. [05:22.920 --> 05:29.400] In that act, its purpose is described as, quote, provide an emergency operations plan [05:29.400 --> 05:35.960] for the protection of life and property adequate to cope with disasters, close quote. [05:35.960 --> 05:42.360] That section goes on to state that such a disaster may be the result of acts of war [05:42.360 --> 05:48.680] or sabotage or from nature or man-made causes other than acts of war. [05:49.560 --> 05:56.760] No matter how the disaster occurs, it must, in fact, be a disaster in order for the governor [05:56.760 --> 05:59.320] to exercise emergency powers. [05:59.320 --> 06:04.600] Disaster is defined in Article 10B and reads, quote, disaster means the occurrence or eminent [06:04.600 --> 06:09.880] threat of widespread or severe damage, injury or loss of life or property resulting from [06:09.880 --> 06:16.000] a natural or artificial cause, including tornadoes, windstorms, snowstorms, wind-driven water, [06:16.000 --> 06:22.200] high water, floods, earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, and volcanic action, fires, explosions, [06:22.200 --> 06:27.360] air or water contamination, blight, drought, infestation, riots, sabotage, hostile military [06:27.360 --> 06:32.920] or paramilitary actions, disruption of state services, accidents involving radioactive [06:32.920 --> 06:39.800] or hazardous material, bioterrorism, or incidents involving weapons of mass destruction, close [06:39.800 --> 06:42.320] quote. [06:42.320 --> 06:48.520] You may have noticed that what does not appear in the definition of disaster is ordinary [06:48.520 --> 06:52.920] street thugs engaged in acts of violence. [06:52.920 --> 06:58.620] That's just everyday life and not a part of the definition of disaster. [06:58.620 --> 07:03.720] The important part of this is that the governor only has emergency powers under the All Hazard [07:03.720 --> 07:10.540] Emergency Management Act to prepare for or respond to disasters, and ordinary run-of-the-mill [07:10.540 --> 07:14.180] criminal violence is not part of the definition of disaster. [07:14.180 --> 07:18.540] In other words, this is the second statutory provision in the executive order that does [07:18.540 --> 07:22.380] not grant Governor Grisham the authority she claims. [07:22.380 --> 07:27.380] Phrased another way, the legislature never granted her the authority she is attempting [07:27.380 --> 07:29.600] to exercise. [07:29.600 --> 07:36.240] In summary, Grisham's executive order relies on two statutes, neither of which grants her [07:36.240 --> 07:40.920] authority to issue her executive order or exercise emergency powers. [07:40.920 --> 07:45.280] The point of sharing the pivotal elements of the executive order with you is to demonstrate [07:45.280 --> 07:50.160] how simple it would be to have a New Mexico court strike down Grisham's order based on [07:50.160 --> 07:56.240] the legal reality that neither act grants her authority to have issued the order. [07:56.240 --> 08:05.000] Obviously, that's the correct legal path to end this illegal, dictatorial crap. [08:05.000 --> 08:06.600] But that's not what people are doing. [08:06.600 --> 08:10.720] What they're doing is going to the federal courts arguing that the order infringes on [08:10.720 --> 08:13.080] a constitutional right. [08:13.080 --> 08:18.040] I consider that a dangerous path to take. [08:18.040 --> 08:23.840] Grisham has said she, quote, welcomes the fight about making New Mexicans safer, close [08:23.840 --> 08:25.200] quote. [08:25.200 --> 08:30.480] Why would she welcome the kind of legal challenge I believe is a danger to the citizens of New [08:30.480 --> 08:32.500] Mexico? [08:32.500 --> 08:38.580] Because her action is supported by court precedent. [08:38.580 --> 08:40.740] Many of you are probably shocked to hear that. [08:40.740 --> 08:42.680] It is nevertheless true. [08:42.680 --> 08:47.460] That precedent was set in 2020 and 2021 with the public health emergencies declared by [08:47.460 --> 08:49.780] governors across the nation. [08:49.780 --> 08:53.420] Under the authority of those public health emergency declarations, governors suspended [08:53.420 --> 08:57.480] various unalienable rights of the citizens of their states. [08:57.520 --> 09:03.600] The rights governors suspended include but are not limited to the following, they suspended [09:03.600 --> 09:08.780] the well-established, unalienable right to leave your home whenever you see fit. [09:08.780 --> 09:13.680] They suspended the well-established and unalienable right to earn a living. [09:13.680 --> 09:18.660] They suspended the well-established and unalienable right to freely associate. [09:18.660 --> 09:24.700] They suspended the well-established and unalienable right to worship together as a community. [09:24.700 --> 09:28.420] So what did the federal courts do [09:28.420 --> 09:32.020] to stop these outrageous and shameful deprivations [09:32.020 --> 09:34.620] of the rights of the American people? [09:34.620 --> 09:37.100] In the main, nothing. [09:37.100 --> 09:38.420] In the majority of cases, [09:38.420 --> 09:40.380] they held that it was not within the court's purview [09:40.380 --> 09:41.740] to supplant its own reasoning [09:41.740 --> 09:43.500] in place of a governor's judgment [09:43.500 --> 09:47.900] during a declared public health emergency. [09:47.900 --> 09:50.300] In other words, in federal court, [09:50.300 --> 09:54.060] Grisham is going to present a shit-ton of case law [09:54.060 --> 09:57.020] confirming that the federal courts must not interfere [09:57.020 --> 10:00.020] with the governor's exercising emergency powers [10:00.020 --> 10:03.860] in the course of a declared public health emergency. [10:03.860 --> 10:06.820] And to be clear, the weight of decisional law [10:06.820 --> 10:09.060] in this matter favors Grisham. [10:09.060 --> 10:10.300] We should also keep in mind [10:10.300 --> 10:13.180] the vast majority of those decisions are not ancient history [10:13.180 --> 10:16.020] but were decided in just the last few years. [10:16.020 --> 10:17.820] In federal court against Grisham, [10:17.820 --> 10:18.980] plaintiffs are going to argue [10:18.980 --> 10:22.580] her actions improperly suppress an unalienable right. [10:22.580 --> 10:24.180] If I'm reading the tea leaves correctly, [10:24.180 --> 10:26.180] Grisham isn't going to bother arguing [10:26.180 --> 10:27.860] whether her executive order does [10:27.860 --> 10:30.820] or does not suppress an unalienable right. [10:30.820 --> 10:32.660] Instead, she's going to provide the court [10:32.660 --> 10:34.580] with hundreds of federal court citations [10:34.580 --> 10:36.660] holding that the court cannot interfere [10:36.660 --> 10:39.700] with her actions, period. [10:39.700 --> 10:42.540] Why argue about the suppression of a right [10:42.540 --> 10:44.980] when the weight of federal decisional law [10:44.980 --> 10:48.580] says the court cannot interfere with whatever a governor does [10:48.580 --> 10:52.540] when acting under a public health emergency declaration. [10:53.460 --> 10:56.260] I'm confident the governor will point out to the court [10:56.260 --> 11:01.260] that the plaintiff's argument in those 2020 and 2021 cases [11:01.380 --> 11:04.620] was a deprivation of rights by governors [11:04.620 --> 11:06.460] and the court still held [11:06.460 --> 11:09.420] that it was not their place to interfere. [11:10.340 --> 11:13.700] Let me explain the way courts work. [11:13.700 --> 11:16.940] The well-settled doctrine of our judicial system [11:16.940 --> 11:20.260] is that if there is any other way to resolve a case [11:20.260 --> 11:23.620] rather than to reach a question of constitutionality, [11:23.620 --> 11:25.980] courts are expected to do so. [11:25.980 --> 11:28.740] Accordingly, if the federal court determines [11:28.740 --> 11:31.620] the weight of case law prevents it from interfering [11:31.620 --> 11:33.020] with a governor's actions [11:33.020 --> 11:36.340] pursuant to a health emergency declaration, [11:36.340 --> 11:39.180] then the court will never reach the question [11:39.180 --> 11:42.260] of whether unalienable rights are being suppressed. [11:42.260 --> 11:45.580] Like it or not, that's how the courts work. [11:46.580 --> 11:48.300] Perhaps you can see why I'm concerned [11:48.300 --> 11:51.260] about taking this matter to federal court. [11:51.260 --> 11:54.020] In federal court, the question of whether New Mexico law [11:54.020 --> 11:57.420] actually grants Grisham the authority she is exercising [11:57.420 --> 12:00.780] won't even be raised because that's a state matter. [12:01.660 --> 12:05.180] I hear a lot of people saying that the Bruin test [12:05.180 --> 12:07.780] will shut down Grisham's executive order, [12:07.780 --> 12:10.260] but I find it unlikely that a trial court [12:10.260 --> 12:12.980] would make its decision based on Bruin [12:12.980 --> 12:14.820] because Bruin doesn't address [12:14.820 --> 12:18.020] how the right to keep and bear arms can, perhaps, [12:18.020 --> 12:20.500] be impacted by a public health emergency. [12:21.540 --> 12:22.740] Think about it. [12:22.740 --> 12:26.340] If a public health emergency justifies depriving citizens [12:26.340 --> 12:28.580] of the right to leave their homes, earn a living, [12:28.580 --> 12:32.140] or freely assemble, what would be the legal rationale [12:32.140 --> 12:35.340] to say a public health emergency does not also justify [12:35.340 --> 12:38.100] depriving citizens of the right to keep and bear arms? [12:38.100 --> 12:42.380] Further, what does Bruin have to do with anything [12:42.420 --> 12:45.580] if the weight of case law says the court cannot interfere [12:45.580 --> 12:48.300] with Grisham's emergency powers? [12:48.300 --> 12:49.780] As I've spoken to people about this, [12:49.780 --> 12:53.020] they've essentially said what Grisham is doing [12:53.020 --> 12:55.580] is unconstitutional, so the federal court [12:55.580 --> 12:58.420] should do the right thing. [12:58.420 --> 13:01.420] So law doesn't work that way. [13:01.420 --> 13:05.860] Courts adjudicate law not the right thing, [13:05.860 --> 13:09.780] primarily because the right thing is subjective. [13:09.820 --> 13:12.900] Do you think Michael Bloomberg sees Grisham's actions [13:12.900 --> 13:15.460] as the right thing? [13:15.460 --> 13:17.180] I assure you he does. [13:18.100 --> 13:20.140] What is the track record of the federal courts [13:20.140 --> 13:22.940] in these kinds of matters? [13:22.940 --> 13:26.140] From the 1970s onward, gun control laws proliferated [13:26.140 --> 13:27.540] at an ever-increasing pace, [13:27.540 --> 13:29.540] and courts routinely upheld those measures. [13:29.540 --> 13:32.620] It wasn't until the Heller decision in 2008 [13:32.620 --> 13:34.540] that the Supreme Court confirmed the right [13:34.540 --> 13:36.740] to keep and bear arms is an individual right, [13:36.740 --> 13:39.700] the enjoyment of which is constitutionally protected. [13:39.700 --> 13:43.660] In other words, it was basically 40 years [13:43.660 --> 13:46.460] from the time gun control laws started proliferating [13:46.460 --> 13:48.820] until SCOTUS made a meaningful decision [13:48.820 --> 13:51.500] about the right to keep and bear arms. [13:51.500 --> 13:54.620] Yet Heller did not stop gun control laws [13:54.620 --> 13:57.420] from continuing to be upheld by the courts. [13:57.420 --> 14:00.300] While acknowledging that it was an individual right, [14:00.300 --> 14:03.020] courts simply held that gun control measures [14:03.020 --> 14:06.380] weren't acceptable infringement on the right [14:06.380 --> 14:08.300] if the government's action was intended [14:08.300 --> 14:12.620] to achieve a, quote, public good. [14:12.620 --> 14:17.620] That agenda-driven, malleable, nonsense standard [14:17.860 --> 14:20.100] was only corrected in 2022 [14:20.100 --> 14:22.380] by the Supreme Court's Bruin decision [14:22.380 --> 14:25.980] that repudiated the public good standard [14:25.980 --> 14:29.060] by replacing it with an originalist standard. [14:29.060 --> 14:31.060] In other words, while every American [14:31.060 --> 14:33.100] who was focused on the unalienable rights [14:33.100 --> 14:35.500] of the individual rather than collectivism [14:35.500 --> 14:37.700] knew that the vast majority of gun control laws [14:37.700 --> 14:40.100] were blatantly unconstitutional, [14:40.100 --> 14:44.380] it took the Supreme Court 50 years to put an end to it [14:44.380 --> 14:48.420] by establishing a standard which, over time, [14:48.420 --> 14:50.340] will result in most gun control laws [14:50.340 --> 14:52.820] being declared unconstitutional. [14:52.820 --> 14:56.460] My point is that you believe you know what is right [14:56.460 --> 14:58.740] in no way translates into a court [14:58.740 --> 15:01.060] doing what you believe is correct. [15:01.060 --> 15:03.980] If I may be blunt, the perspective that a court [15:04.020 --> 15:08.140] should do what you are 100% convinced is the right thing [15:08.140 --> 15:10.780] is a fallacy driven by the absence of understanding [15:10.780 --> 15:13.380] of how the law and the courts work. [15:14.580 --> 15:18.860] What are the stakes of failing in federal court [15:18.860 --> 15:21.100] concerning Gershom's executive order? [15:22.620 --> 15:24.820] If that happens, there will be a stampede [15:24.820 --> 15:27.300] in every blue state, county, and city [15:27.300 --> 15:30.460] to declare the actions of criminals who use guns [15:30.460 --> 15:33.580] to be a public health emergency, [15:33.580 --> 15:37.380] and then restrict the rights of law-abiding Americans. [15:37.380 --> 15:38.980] Because, of course, we all know that restricting [15:38.980 --> 15:41.900] the rights of the law-abiding reduces crime. [15:42.820 --> 15:47.580] This is why it's important to argue the matter correctly. [15:47.580 --> 15:51.380] So then, what is the correct way to argue this matter? [15:51.380 --> 15:55.540] In my opinion, the correct approach is to file a case [15:55.540 --> 16:00.540] with a New Mexico state court and argue the factual position [16:00.700 --> 16:03.420] that in neither of the statutes Gershom cited [16:03.420 --> 16:05.780] in her executive order did the legislature [16:05.780 --> 16:08.180] grant her authority to declare an emergency [16:08.180 --> 16:10.700] over the actions of run-of-the-mill criminals [16:10.700 --> 16:14.220] using firearms to commit acts of violence. [16:14.220 --> 16:17.620] The limits of authority granted to a New Mexico governor [16:17.620 --> 16:19.780] in the Public Health Emergency Response Act [16:19.780 --> 16:22.980] and the All Hazards Emergency Management Act [16:22.980 --> 16:26.500] are so clear that I'm confident there isn't a judge [16:26.500 --> 16:28.220] in New Mexico who wouldn't immediately declare [16:28.220 --> 16:31.140] Gershom's order void due to an absence [16:31.140 --> 16:33.980] of legislatively granted authority. [16:35.180 --> 16:37.460] I bet there's a lot of material in this presentation [16:37.460 --> 16:39.500] of which you were previously unaware. [16:40.380 --> 16:43.700] For that reason, I'm going to encourage you to read [16:43.700 --> 16:46.060] Income Tax Shattering the Mist, [16:46.060 --> 16:48.020] which will tell you all the things you never knew [16:48.020 --> 16:49.860] about the income tax because the government [16:49.860 --> 16:52.380] has knowingly, willfully, and intentionally lied to you [16:52.380 --> 16:54.340] about it your entire life. [16:54.340 --> 16:56.740] The key aspect they lied to you about [16:56.740 --> 16:59.500] is that it applies to ordinary working Americans. [16:59.500 --> 17:02.980] It doesn't, and it never has. [17:02.980 --> 17:04.980] But much like many of the things you learned [17:04.980 --> 17:08.860] in today's presentation, knowing what the law actually says [17:08.860 --> 17:11.740] stops the liars from depriving you of your rights [17:11.740 --> 17:14.460] due to your ignorance. [17:14.460 --> 17:16.420] One of your well-settled unalienable rights [17:16.420 --> 17:18.420] is to keep what you earn. [17:18.420 --> 17:21.500] Another way to say it is you have an unalienable right [17:21.500 --> 17:23.940] to the fruits of your labor and the government [17:23.940 --> 17:27.500] cannot impose a tax on the fruits of your labor. [17:27.500 --> 17:31.180] And in fact, the government has not done so. [17:31.180 --> 17:34.820] You were simply told it did, and you believed it [17:34.820 --> 17:36.980] without ever looking into it for yourself. [17:37.940 --> 17:40.780] Income Tax Shattering the Mist takes what would otherwise [17:40.780 --> 17:43.700] be a lot of lengthy legal research [17:43.700 --> 17:46.460] and hands you everything you need to know [17:46.460 --> 17:50.180] in a way every American can readily understand. [17:50.180 --> 17:51.980] What will shock you most as you read [17:51.980 --> 17:53.260] Income Tax Shattering the Mist [17:53.260 --> 17:54.980] is that the primary source material [17:54.980 --> 17:59.980] has said the exact same thing for 110 years. [18:00.740 --> 18:03.300] For 110 years, it has consistently said [18:03.300 --> 18:04.940] the income tax has never been imposed [18:04.940 --> 18:07.140] on ordinary working Americans. [18:07.140 --> 18:09.380] In other words, if you're an American citizen [18:09.380 --> 18:11.820] living and working in one of the 50 states [18:11.820 --> 18:14.540] earning your own domestic income, [18:14.540 --> 18:16.540] you're not required to file an income tax return [18:16.540 --> 18:20.420] or pay a penny of income tax, and never have been. [18:20.420 --> 18:25.060] You simply believed the government's con job. [18:25.060 --> 18:27.180] Isn't it time to correct that? [18:27.180 --> 18:28.540] I haven't filed an income tax return [18:28.540 --> 18:30.460] or paid a penny of income tax in 30 years, [18:30.460 --> 18:32.540] but it's not just me. [18:32.540 --> 18:35.140] Hundreds of thousands of Americans [18:35.140 --> 18:37.980] have safely left the government's income tax scam behind [18:37.980 --> 18:41.660] with the knowledge, the facts, the law [18:41.660 --> 18:44.740] you'll find in Income Tax Shattering the Mist. [18:44.740 --> 18:49.180] The evidence, the truth is right here. [18:50.180 --> 18:54.020] All you have to do is read it. [18:54.020 --> 18:55.740] The good news is that for a limited time, [18:55.740 --> 18:58.420] you can save 15% on Income Tax Shattering the Mist, [18:58.420 --> 19:02.500] simply use the coupon code OWNIT at checkout. [19:02.500 --> 19:05.060] You have my word that what you will find [19:05.060 --> 19:09.580] in Income Tax Shattering the Mist will blow your mind. [19:09.580 --> 19:10.420] Once you know the truth, [19:10.420 --> 19:12.620] then you can decide what you want to do about it. [19:12.620 --> 19:15.820] I'll put the link and the code down in the notes. [19:15.860 --> 19:18.340] In a similar vein, the American people [19:19.460 --> 19:23.900] are the most chronically ill society on the planet. [19:23.900 --> 19:25.580] To put an even finer point on it, [19:25.580 --> 19:28.980] the American public is the most chronically ill society [19:28.980 --> 19:32.620] in all of human history. [19:33.580 --> 19:35.540] That's quite an achievement. [19:35.540 --> 19:37.220] How did we get here? [19:37.220 --> 19:38.660] We got here for the same reason [19:38.660 --> 19:40.020] ordinary working Americans believe [19:40.020 --> 19:41.860] the income tax applies to them. [19:41.860 --> 19:44.220] The American people just keep believing [19:44.220 --> 19:46.100] whatever the government says. [19:46.940 --> 19:48.780] A good many Americans believe the government [19:48.780 --> 19:52.060] would never lie to them about matters of health. [19:52.060 --> 19:53.540] It may lie about some things, [19:53.540 --> 19:55.140] but it wouldn't lie about things [19:55.140 --> 19:56.980] that would make you diseased. [19:59.260 --> 20:01.580] The last time I ran the numbers, [20:01.580 --> 20:04.300] the combined revenue of the medical industry, [20:04.300 --> 20:05.740] the pharmaceutical industry, [20:05.740 --> 20:07.260] and the processed food industry [20:07.260 --> 20:11.540] comprised roughly 30% of the US economy. [20:11.540 --> 20:13.500] Here's a scenario for you. [20:13.500 --> 20:18.500] If tomorrow all 340 million Americans read body science [20:19.060 --> 20:20.740] and applied what they learned [20:20.740 --> 20:24.340] about how their physiology really works, [20:24.340 --> 20:29.340] within two years, that 30% would shrink to about 5%. [20:29.700 --> 20:33.260] In other words, that gigantic portion of the US economy [20:33.260 --> 20:38.260] would shrink by almost 85% within 24 months. [20:39.460 --> 20:41.860] So let me ask you a question. [20:41.860 --> 20:42.940] What do you think is important [20:42.940 --> 20:45.100] to the US power brokers and elites? [20:45.100 --> 20:48.420] The continued growth of that massive block [20:48.420 --> 20:52.780] of the US economy or your health? [20:52.780 --> 20:54.380] The bottom line is Americans [20:54.380 --> 20:56.540] are the most diseased people in history [20:56.540 --> 20:58.460] because they bought the false narrative [20:58.460 --> 21:01.420] about human physiology put up by the US government [21:01.420 --> 21:05.060] in trillion dollar industries, hook, line, and sinker. [21:05.060 --> 21:07.180] They bought it hook, line, and sinker [21:07.180 --> 21:09.780] because they firmly believed the government [21:09.780 --> 21:12.340] would not lie to them about health matters. [21:13.540 --> 21:15.260] And they were wrong. [21:15.260 --> 21:17.820] So what are you going to do about that? [21:17.820 --> 21:20.380] I might suggest a wise course of action [21:20.380 --> 21:24.300] is to learn the truth and compare it to the lies [21:24.300 --> 21:27.620] that you've been fed for 60 years. [21:27.620 --> 21:32.620] It's not difficult at all to determine which is factual [21:32.820 --> 21:34.620] when you see them side by side. [21:34.620 --> 21:37.300] In fact, it's pretty damn easy. [21:37.300 --> 21:39.260] Sometimes when I see someone make a comment [21:39.260 --> 21:41.940] on social media about one of my books, [21:41.940 --> 21:43.460] I'll screenshot it. [21:43.460 --> 21:46.100] This one by Mark is about a week old. [21:46.100 --> 21:49.940] Mark said, body science is a legit game changer. [21:49.940 --> 21:51.580] Highly recommended. [21:51.580 --> 21:54.020] He's 100% correct. [21:54.020 --> 21:55.700] It is a game changer. [21:55.700 --> 21:59.940] But for it to change your life, you have to read it. [21:59.940 --> 22:01.860] I'll put the link down in the notes. [22:01.860 --> 22:03.300] Also, by purchasing income tax, [22:03.300 --> 22:05.300] Shattering the Mist and or Body Science, [22:05.300 --> 22:08.780] you help me to continue to be here for you [22:08.820 --> 22:11.620] with these revealing and thought-provoking presentations. [22:11.620 --> 22:14.820] Please share this presentation with everyone [22:14.820 --> 22:15.860] and thank you for being here. [22:15.860 --> 22:17.260] Take care.