Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language Detected language: English [00:00.000 --> 00:02.760] Welcome to the show. [00:02.760 --> 00:08.060] There is a phenomenon in the United States that astounds me. [00:08.060 --> 00:12.200] Polls show that the American people's confidence in the media is the lowest it's been since [00:12.200 --> 00:14.200] such data was first collected. [00:14.200 --> 00:21.280] Phrased another way, it's at an all-time low, yet, weirdly, when the press runs a headline [00:21.280 --> 00:26.820] that titillates people, they have no problem rushing to social media to show how smart [00:26.820 --> 00:32.540] they are by repeating the media headline that, in a general sense, they've already said they [00:32.540 --> 00:34.820] do not trust. [00:34.820 --> 00:40.620] Making it even worse, while they parrot the headline, they rarely actually read the article. [00:40.620 --> 00:46.380] And since headlines are usually created to get clicks rather than being factually accurate, [00:46.380 --> 00:52.060] pretending to know a thing after reading only the headline is pretty fucking stupid. [00:52.060 --> 00:56.700] Yet it's done by millions of Americans every day. [00:56.700 --> 01:00.940] Today, I want to have a quick conversation with you, showing how that phenomenon can [01:00.940 --> 01:12.620] have an effect of making a really good idea look like a really bad idea. [01:12.620 --> 01:23.980] The Dr. Reality Vodcast with Dave Champion. [01:23.980 --> 01:25.300] Let's start with this. [01:25.300 --> 01:28.420] The following are real headlines. [01:28.420 --> 01:34.500] From the Wall Street Journal, Elon Musk floats charging users for X. [01:34.500 --> 01:40.060] From Sky News, Elon Musk says he will start charging people to use X. [01:40.060 --> 01:46.380] From Axios, Musk says X will charge everyone to use the platform. [01:46.620 --> 01:54.500] From Yahoo News, Elon Musk suggests he will charge all X users a fee to be on the platform. [01:54.500 --> 01:56.440] Wow. [01:56.440 --> 02:00.380] The impression these headlines give is that Elon Musk is planning to begin charging users [02:00.380 --> 02:02.420] to be on X. [02:02.420 --> 02:09.140] That would make X the only meaningful social media platform that charges users to use the [02:09.140 --> 02:10.420] platform. [02:11.340 --> 02:17.060] If the implied message of those headlines was factual, it would also mean the nearly [02:17.060 --> 02:22.180] immediate end of the X platform. [02:22.180 --> 02:26.500] Because Musk has big plans for X, he obviously has no intention of doing anything that would [02:26.500 --> 02:33.620] kill the platform virtually overnight, which charging every user a fee would do. [02:33.620 --> 02:37.780] Since Musk has no intention of killing the X platform, it's safe to say those headlines [02:38.020 --> 02:41.940] are, at best, misleading. [02:41.940 --> 02:46.540] Before we get into the truth of the matter, let's deviate for a moment and discuss social [02:46.540 --> 02:49.100] media bots. [02:49.100 --> 02:54.060] While there are benign bots today, we're talking about malicious bots. [02:54.060 --> 02:57.760] Malicious bots pretend to be humans for nefarious purposes. [02:57.760 --> 03:03.400] Some bots merely post content, others are AI-based and can carry on a conversation with a human [03:03.400 --> 03:09.240] user without the human knowing they are conversing with a computer program. [03:09.240 --> 03:14.320] No one knows exactly how many bots infest any particular social media platform, but [03:14.320 --> 03:18.840] the volume of bots that infect social media sites is shockingly high. [03:18.840 --> 03:25.520] The best estimate to date is that roughly 15% of social media accounts are bots. [03:25.520 --> 03:31.560] One study estimated that in the run-up to the 2016 election, 20% of all political discussions [03:31.560 --> 03:37.440] on social media sites were engaged in by 400,000 bots. [03:37.440 --> 03:43.600] Making things more challenging is that some bots operate through a hacked account of a [03:43.600 --> 03:44.600] real human. [03:44.600 --> 03:50.080] Here's a partial list of problematic things bots do. [03:50.080 --> 03:55.360] Artificially amplifying the popularity of a person or movement. [03:55.360 --> 03:57.840] Influencing elections. [03:57.840 --> 03:59.940] Manipulating financial markets. [03:59.940 --> 04:01.940] Providing phishing attacks. [04:01.940 --> 04:03.740] Spreading spam. [04:03.740 --> 04:06.140] Shutting down free speech. [04:06.140 --> 04:10.540] Cloudfair, a company that, among other things, provides services to detect and minimize malicious [04:10.540 --> 04:17.540] bots, says there is no easy way for platforms to rid themselves of bots. [04:17.540 --> 04:22.300] During the last few years, malicious bots have been employed by certain big pharma companies [04:22.300 --> 04:28.580] to automatically and rapidly swarm the post of a social media user who provides facts, [04:28.580 --> 04:34.300] data, and evidence that contradicts the claims made about a big pharma product by the manufacturer [04:34.300 --> 04:36.020] or the government. [04:36.020 --> 04:41.140] In other words, certain big pharma companies employ malicious bots for the purpose of controlling [04:41.140 --> 04:47.700] the social media narrative by spreading falsehoods to combat the truth. [04:47.700 --> 04:51.940] A disturbing question to consider is how many malicious bots are being operated by federal [04:51.940 --> 04:59.380] agencies such as the CDC, the National Institutes of Health, the IRS, the CIA, and others? [04:59.380 --> 05:04.260] While we don't know, I would imagine the vast majority of Americans don't want the US government [05:04.260 --> 05:08.540] employing malicious bots on US social media platforms. [05:08.540 --> 05:13.980] It should be clear that malicious bots are a blight that needs to end. [05:13.980 --> 05:17.780] The big question is how to accomplish that. [05:17.780 --> 05:22.140] To answer that, let's circle back to the misleading headlines about Musk making every [05:22.140 --> 05:25.900] user pay a fee to be on the X platform. [05:25.900 --> 05:30.180] Before I jump into what is really happening, let me make clear that what we're about to [05:30.180 --> 05:37.060] discuss is not the $8 a month fee an X user can pay to have a verified account. [05:37.060 --> 05:40.060] I pay the $8 a month fee for two reasons. [05:40.060 --> 05:44.100] First, verified accounts have access to more and better features. [05:44.100 --> 05:50.540] And second, I see $8 a month as my contribution to support the only major free speech platform [05:50.540 --> 05:51.700] in America. [05:51.700 --> 05:55.980] But again, the $8 a month verified account fee is not involved in what we're about to [05:55.980 --> 05:57.860] discuss. [05:57.860 --> 06:04.260] As you may be aware, US banks adhere to a federal law known commonly as the Know Your [06:04.260 --> 06:06.080] Customer law. [06:06.080 --> 06:10.580] That means banks must have a system in place that reasonably ensures they know the true [06:10.580 --> 06:13.300] identity of anyone who opens an account. [06:13.300 --> 06:18.580] The government's stated reason for passing the Know Your Customer law is to reduce money [06:18.580 --> 06:22.940] laundering, drug trafficking, and other illegal acts concerning which criminals may use the [06:22.940 --> 06:25.460] US banking system. [06:25.460 --> 06:31.940] Musk's idea for eradicating malicious bots is indeed to charge every X user a monthly [06:31.940 --> 06:37.380] fee but not remotely in the way the headlines would cause people to believe or as douche [06:37.380 --> 06:41.100] bags on social media are saying. [06:41.100 --> 06:43.860] Can a bot open a bank account? [06:43.860 --> 06:44.860] No. [06:44.860 --> 06:48.820] It is impossible for a bot to open a bank account. [06:48.820 --> 06:57.220] Accordingly, if X electronically debits a fee from every user's bank account each month, [06:57.220 --> 07:03.100] X knows every user is a real person, not a bot. [07:03.100 --> 07:06.260] So how would Musk's plan play out? [07:06.260 --> 07:07.260] Simple. [07:07.260 --> 07:10.660] Let's do some math to illustrate Musk's intention. [07:10.660 --> 07:19.660] If Musk bills an X user's account one penny a month, two things will be true. [07:19.660 --> 07:23.980] The first is that there will be no more malicious bots on X. [07:23.980 --> 07:30.620] The second is that each user will be out 12 cents for the year. [07:30.620 --> 07:34.860] I suppose there are some users who are too stupid to understand the blight that bots [07:35.740 --> 07:43.380] media, but every intelligent person would be happy to pay 12 cents a year to get rid [07:43.380 --> 07:46.100] of the scourge of malicious bots. [07:46.100 --> 07:51.180] No one who uses a platform should want bots on the platform. [07:51.180 --> 07:54.380] Will X charge verified users a penny a month? [07:54.380 --> 07:55.380] Nope. [07:55.380 --> 08:00.260] Because verified users already pay $8 a month, thus fulfilling the goal of being certain [08:00.260 --> 08:02.060] the user is not a bot. [08:02.060 --> 08:07.500] Now that you know the truth, it should be crystal clear that the media headlines are [08:07.500 --> 08:10.500] intentionally misleading. [08:10.500 --> 08:13.180] But why are they intentionally misleading? [08:13.180 --> 08:17.500] Because the media wants X out of business. [08:17.500 --> 08:22.060] That has been the media's goal from the day Musk took ownership and made it a free speech [08:22.060 --> 08:24.320] platform. [08:24.320 --> 08:27.220] Media in the U.S. is in a unique position. [08:27.220 --> 08:32.200] While they can't be censored because of the First Amendment, they want every single [08:32.200 --> 08:37.420] social media platform to engage in suppressing your free speech. [08:37.420 --> 08:41.700] They find free speech on X intolerable. [08:41.700 --> 08:46.820] From their point of view, it cannot be permitted to continue. [08:46.820 --> 08:51.820] While we understand why the media is misleading the public about what Musk is proposing concerning [08:51.820 --> 08:58.780] bots, why do ordinary Americans make idiotic claims about it on social media? [08:58.780 --> 09:00.980] That's a complex question. [09:00.980 --> 09:03.020] Here are some reasons I see. [09:03.020 --> 09:05.900] Well, not really reasons. [09:05.900 --> 09:09.340] More like lame ass justifications. [09:09.340 --> 09:13.740] First, people are incredibly lazy. [09:13.740 --> 09:18.540] That means they'd rather mindlessly repeat something they saw in a headline than spend [09:18.540 --> 09:21.380] five minutes finding out the facts. [09:21.380 --> 09:27.060] Ironically, many of those folks rail against social media censorship, but then mindlessly [09:27.060 --> 09:31.540] attack the only guy who made a major platform of bastion-free speech. [09:31.540 --> 09:36.200] Second, people love to appear in the know. [09:36.200 --> 09:40.940] They want others to perceive them as knowing all the latest happenings. [09:40.940 --> 09:46.740] That said, they're often too lazy to really know anything, so they run with misleading [09:46.740 --> 09:47.740] headlines. [09:48.220 --> 09:51.740] It's probably safe for them to do that because their friends are likely just as ignorant [09:51.740 --> 09:53.060] as they are. [09:53.060 --> 09:57.180] Ignorant douchebags usually don't have well-informed friends who value facts. [09:57.180 --> 10:03.980] Third, in some social media circles it's considered chic to criticize Musk for pretty much anything [10:03.980 --> 10:04.980] he does. [10:04.980 --> 10:08.620] It's sort of a, we hate Musk club. [10:08.620 --> 10:13.140] People who want to be popular in that tribe have to condemn Musk whenever possible. [10:13.140 --> 10:17.660] Then there are some stuff I really don't get. [10:17.660 --> 10:23.940] One guy said he doesn't trust Musk to stick to several pennies a year because, are you [10:23.940 --> 10:26.220] ready? [10:26.220 --> 10:30.860] Because Nintendo recently increased its price. [10:30.860 --> 10:35.220] That's like saying you don't trust Ford or Nissan or Volvo because of what a go-kart [10:35.220 --> 10:37.260] manufacturer did. [10:37.260 --> 10:39.220] It's just nutty. [10:39.220 --> 10:41.740] We really shouldn't be surprised. [10:41.740 --> 10:47.620] Americans absolutely love to sound knowledgeable by telling other people things that are 100% [10:47.620 --> 10:49.460] false. [10:49.460 --> 10:54.940] Remember when adults were telling you that masks stop or slow the spread of a virus? [10:54.940 --> 11:00.340] Now we have the Cochrane Collaboration Report, which is the world's most authoritative retrospective [11:00.340 --> 11:05.660] meta-analysis of mask-wearing studies, concluding that in terms of the spread of a virus, wearing [11:05.660 --> 11:10.540] a mask has, and I quote, little to no effect. [11:10.540 --> 11:15.500] Remember when some expositors, myself included, said there was no credibility to the claim [11:15.740 --> 11:21.380] made by these so-called experts that the mRNA jab would stay localized at the injection [11:21.380 --> 11:23.100] site. [11:23.100 --> 11:29.140] And tons of our fellow citizens screamed that we were conspiracy theorists. [11:29.140 --> 11:34.060] Yet today, scientific studies have confirmed that the lipid nanoparticles did not stay [11:34.060 --> 11:39.700] put at the injection site and, in fact, do have systemic distribution throughout the [11:39.700 --> 11:41.180] body. [11:41.180 --> 11:47.180] My point is those folks were, and are, far more interested in being right in an egotistical [11:47.180 --> 11:51.140] sense than being factually accurate. [11:51.140 --> 11:55.740] In America, the citizens are supposed to be the masters and the government is to be the [11:55.740 --> 11:57.980] servant. [11:57.980 --> 11:59.980] So I have a question. [11:59.980 --> 12:04.860] How can Americans engage in meaningful self-governance when a large percentage of the population [12:04.860 --> 12:13.500] are fools who repeat to others as truthful whatever stupid shit they hear? [12:13.500 --> 12:18.340] Some of the ignorant shit they repeat is more or less harmless. [12:18.340 --> 12:22.820] But some of the ignorant things they repeat are incredibly harmful. [12:22.820 --> 12:28.340] An example of a falsehood spread by mental midgets that is incredibly harmful to the [12:28.340 --> 12:33.700] American people is when they say ordinary working Americans owe income tax. [12:33.700 --> 12:38.580] As you may know, I'm the author of Income Tax Shattering the Mist and the national expert [12:38.580 --> 12:41.900] on the question of who owes income tax and who does not. [12:41.900 --> 12:45.300] Now, I'm going to surprise you. [12:45.300 --> 12:47.140] Let me ask you a question. [12:47.140 --> 12:58.140] Do you know who has never said Congress imposed the income tax on ordinary working Americans? [12:58.140 --> 13:03.940] The highest ranking tax authority in the United States is the Secretary of the Treasury. [13:03.940 --> 13:09.980] In the 110 years since Congress enacted the income tax, no Secretary of the Treasury has [13:09.980 --> 13:14.300] ever said the income tax has been imposed on ordinary working Americans. [13:14.300 --> 13:20.200] No commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service has ever made that claim. [13:20.200 --> 13:24.300] Under the commissioner are a number of assistant commissioners. [13:24.380 --> 13:29.580] None of them have ever asserted that the income tax has been imposed on ordinary working Americans. [13:29.580 --> 13:35.780] No chief counsel of the Internal Revenue Service has ever said that. [13:35.780 --> 13:40.540] No director of the IRS's criminal investigation has said it. [13:40.540 --> 13:45.960] No U.S. attorney in charge of the Department of Justice's tax division has said it. [13:45.960 --> 13:50.620] Why have none of those officials ever said the income tax has been imposed on ordinary [13:50.620 --> 13:53.540] working Americans? [13:53.540 --> 13:58.660] As government officials, they can be put on trial and sentenced to prison for making a [13:58.660 --> 14:03.700] false statement of law that adversely affects your rights. [14:03.700 --> 14:08.780] As an example, imagine the Secretary of Energy stated publicly that while Americans have [14:08.780 --> 14:13.860] the right to free speech, that right does not extend to criticizing the Department of [14:13.860 --> 14:14.860] Energy. [14:14.860 --> 14:19.720] Shortly thereafter, someone criticizes the Energy Department and criminal investigators [14:19.720 --> 14:23.600] from the Energy Department arrest that person for doing so. [14:23.600 --> 14:26.400] In the subsequent lawsuit, who do you think would be named? [14:26.400 --> 14:28.520] It wouldn't just be the arresting agents. [14:28.520 --> 14:32.760] The suit would include the Energy Secretary because she has authority over the Energy [14:32.760 --> 14:37.440] Department investigators and her public statement would be seen as communicating to those investigators [14:37.440 --> 14:43.240] that their actions, which violated the unalienable right of the American citizen they arrested, [14:43.240 --> 14:46.240] were authorized by the Secretary. [14:46.240 --> 14:51.900] Furthermore, the Energy Secretary's public statement could be used as the basis for criminal [14:51.900 --> 14:59.000] prosecution under 18 U.S.C. Section 242 entitled Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Authority. [14:59.000 --> 15:06.960] I encourage you to spend as many hours of research as it takes for you to be certain [15:06.960 --> 15:13.120] that government tax officials I listed a moment ago have never once said the income tax applies [15:13.120 --> 15:15.960] to ordinary working Americans. [15:15.960 --> 15:22.120] Not only have those officials never said any such thing, but I have invited every one of [15:22.120 --> 15:30.000] them to join me in an open public debate about the proper application of the income tax. [15:30.000 --> 15:34.360] Every single one has refused to debate. [15:34.360 --> 15:38.000] Here's the list of those I have invited to debate me. [15:38.000 --> 15:45.340] The U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, Assistant [15:45.340 --> 15:51.420] Commissioners of the Internal Revenue Service, the Chief Counsel of the Internal Revenue [15:51.420 --> 15:58.180] Service, the National Director of the IRS's Criminal Investigation Division, a Regional [15:58.180 --> 16:03.620] Director of the IRS's Criminal Investigation Division, the U.S. Attorney in Charge of the [16:03.620 --> 16:07.460] Department of Justice's Tax Division. [16:07.460 --> 16:12.500] I've also challenged to debate me a number of private sector so-called tax experts who [16:12.500 --> 16:17.380] have condemned Americans who are telling their fellow citizens the truth about the [16:17.380 --> 16:18.740] income tax. [16:18.740 --> 16:22.860] I started putting out those invitations about 20 years ago. [16:22.860 --> 16:29.860] Not a single so-called tax professional has been willing to debate me. [16:29.860 --> 16:35.420] That said, I understand why so-called tax professionals condemn Americans who are telling [16:35.420 --> 16:37.220] the truth. [16:37.220 --> 16:39.580] It's self-preservation. [16:39.580 --> 16:45.900] Once the truth goes viral, they know those so-called tax experts are going to be financially [16:45.900 --> 16:49.860] devastated and have to go get a real job. [16:49.860 --> 16:54.680] In fact, I've estimated that when Americans know the truth and act upon it, nine out of [16:54.680 --> 16:57.340] ten accountants will be out of work. [16:57.340 --> 17:01.620] Plus, the remaining 10% will make a lot less money because their value will be greatly [17:01.620 --> 17:05.060] diminished instead of making the lion's share of their money from income tax. [17:05.060 --> 17:09.020] They'll end up being a little more than glorified bookkeepers. [17:09.020 --> 17:13.900] I should also mention that just as the income tax has never been imposed on ordinary working [17:13.900 --> 17:19.780] Americans, it also has never been imposed on ordinary domestic businesses whose revenue [17:19.780 --> 17:22.260] comes from within the states of the union. [17:22.260 --> 17:28.460] In other words, if you own a mechanic shop, a real estate firm, clothing store, dog grooming [17:28.460 --> 17:35.340] business, computer repair, a consulting service, construction firm, and on and on, Congress [17:35.340 --> 17:40.860] has never imposed the income tax on your business and you've never been required to [17:40.860 --> 17:45.540] file a Form 1120 or pay a penny of income tax. [17:45.540 --> 17:49.740] Every small and medium business person knows the drill. [17:49.740 --> 17:54.660] You decide to open your own business so you reach out to other business people or an accountant [17:54.660 --> 18:02.340] and they share completely ignorant shit with you about getting an employer identification [18:02.340 --> 18:08.180] number, filing quarterly tax returns, annual returns, withholding from your workers' paychecks, [18:08.180 --> 18:12.100] filing 941s, W2s, blah blah blah. [18:12.100 --> 18:18.220] And you do it all because people told you that's the right way to run a business. [18:18.220 --> 18:21.060] But you never read the law, did you? [18:21.060 --> 18:23.580] You just did what they said. [18:23.580 --> 18:24.940] How do I know that? [18:24.940 --> 18:30.380] Not only have I seen it done thousands of times, but before I read the law myself and [18:30.380 --> 18:34.180] learned the truth, I did the exact same thing. [18:34.180 --> 18:38.940] Looking back, I feel like an ass for having done it that way. [18:38.940 --> 18:43.500] It was foolish of me and it was foolish of you. [18:43.500 --> 18:46.940] It was all we knew at that time, right? [18:46.940 --> 18:50.020] But it's not all we know today. [18:50.020 --> 18:56.700] Today thanks to income tax shattering the mist giving you a crystal clear detailed look [18:56.860 --> 19:01.180] At the indisputable truth that Congress has never imposed the income tax on you or your [19:01.180 --> 19:07.780] business, we know that none of that was or is required. [19:07.780 --> 19:14.040] The kicker is how to correct all that so you and your business can keep 100% of the profits [19:14.040 --> 19:19.180] rather than giving the government a cut to which it is not legally entitled. [19:19.180 --> 19:24.180] Income tax shattering the mist gives you the tools to do just that. [19:24.180 --> 19:26.980] One of the many things that will surprise you when you read income tax shattering the [19:26.980 --> 19:33.540] mist is how childishly simple the scam really is and how easy it is for you to safely walk [19:33.540 --> 19:34.780] away. [19:34.780 --> 19:40.780] For the last few months, I've been offering 15% off income tax shattering the mist, but [19:40.780 --> 19:42.780] that is just about to end. [19:42.780 --> 19:48.340] So this is a great time to choose to discover the truth about the income tax. [19:48.340 --> 19:53.420] Every single person who reads income tax shattering the mist knows the indisputable truth of [19:53.420 --> 19:57.380] the income tax when they close the final page. [19:57.380 --> 20:00.300] There is no doubt or equivocation. [20:00.300 --> 20:04.340] When readers complete income tax shattering the mist, they are as certain that the tax [20:04.340 --> 20:11.260] has not been imposed on them as that the sun will rise in the east tomorrow morning. [20:11.260 --> 20:15.460] It provides that level of knowledge. [20:15.460 --> 20:20.740] Once you have that knowledge and certainty, then you can decide what you want to do. [20:20.740 --> 20:26.360] Thousands of thousands of Americans have already safely left the income tax behind. [20:26.360 --> 20:30.380] Do you want to be the chump who just keeps letting them steal from you? [20:30.380 --> 20:36.220] After reading income tax shattering the mist, you'll be able to make an informed decision. [20:36.220 --> 20:45.780] To get 15% off income tax shattering the mist, go to drreality.news and use the coupon code [20:46.780 --> 20:49.940] I'll put the link in the code down in the notes. [20:49.940 --> 20:54.100] While you're there, consider also picking up a copy of Body Science. [20:54.100 --> 20:58.340] Same story, massive government and industry disinformation has resulted in the American [20:58.340 --> 21:04.820] people being the most chronically ill society in all of human history. [21:04.820 --> 21:09.380] That's been done intentionally to the American people in order to increase the revenue of [21:09.380 --> 21:12.020] several trillion dollar industries. [21:12.020 --> 21:16.180] Body Science shows you how the scam has been run on you and then lays out the truth of [21:16.180 --> 21:21.580] how your body's physiology actually works, which is dramatically different than what [21:21.580 --> 21:23.420] you've been told. [21:23.420 --> 21:28.460] That false establishment narrative is why over 70% of the US population is overweight [21:28.460 --> 21:35.260] or obese and why we are the sickest people in all human history. [21:35.260 --> 21:39.600] The good news is you can get deprogrammed simply by reading Body Science. [21:39.600 --> 21:45.960] The information is so compelling that it literally eviscerates all the inaccurate things you've [21:45.960 --> 21:48.040] been told for the last several decades. [21:48.040 --> 21:52.880] To give you some idea of how readers react to it, it has never gotten anything less than [21:52.880 --> 21:57.280] five out of five stars in review and it is not uncommon for me to receive emails from [21:57.280 --> 22:01.360] readers telling me they believe Body Science saved their life. [22:01.360 --> 22:06.240] Also, by purchasing income tax shattering the mist and or Body Science, you helped me [22:06.480 --> 22:11.440] to continue to be here for you with these revealing and thought provoking presentations. [22:11.440 --> 22:15.080] Please share this presentation with everyone and thanks for being here. [22:15.080 --> 22:15.440] Take care.