Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language
Detected language: English
[00:00.960 --> 00:07.360]  A researcher who was part of the team that created the AstraZeneca vaccine said recently that she
[00:07.360 --> 00:16.240]  needs more of your money in order to keep you safe. On December 6, 2021, when giving the Richard
[00:16.240 --> 00:22.000]  Dembleby lecture at Oxford, Professor Sarah Gilbert, who is a professor of vaccinology said,
[00:22.000 --> 00:29.360]  and I quote, the truth is the next one could be worse. It could be more contagious or more
[00:29.360 --> 00:36.480]  lethal or both, close quote, to which I have to say, what's your point?
[00:41.840 --> 00:44.720]  The Dr. Reality Vodcast with Dave Champion.
[00:53.200 --> 00:57.520]  California could have a massive earthquake tomorrow. There could be a huge tornado in
[00:57.520 --> 01:05.920]  the Midwest. A hurricane could hit Florida. In other words, anything could be worse tomorrow.
[01:06.480 --> 01:10.640]  So what is Professor Gilbert's point? What is she trying to accomplish?
[01:11.200 --> 01:14.480]  We don't have to just ponder what could happen tomorrow to know that it could be worse. We can
[01:14.480 --> 01:18.960]  look back at history, which informs us how bad it can be. Let me give you a few examples.
[01:18.960 --> 01:26.160]  The Irish famine of 1845 through 1849 killed a million people. A million people. We're talking
[01:26.160 --> 01:31.280]  about Ireland, not like the North American continent. So essentially, it killed 12% of
[01:31.280 --> 01:38.720]  the Irish population. The Great Plague of London, 20% of the population of London died. The Black
[01:38.720 --> 01:43.520]  Plague in the mid 14th century killed up to, they're not exactly sure because of what happened,
[01:43.520 --> 01:49.520]  not a lot of great written records were kept, but it is said that it killed up to 60% of the
[01:49.520 --> 01:55.040]  European population. Ancient Egypt before the Common Era is thought to have gone through a
[01:55.040 --> 02:02.080]  pandemic that killed 90% of its population. So we hear numbers like that and we say if something
[02:02.080 --> 02:07.440]  like that repeated itself, clearly that would be worse. Although I should add the things like the
[02:07.440 --> 02:11.040]  Black Plague, that was bacteria driven and today we have antibiotics. So something like that could
[02:11.040 --> 02:19.440]  never happen. Today it would almost certainly be viral. But with that said, if you could imagine
[02:19.440 --> 02:23.600]  the best kind of pandemic, and we don't want to have a pandemic at all, right? But if you say,
[02:23.600 --> 02:28.560]  okay, so we're going to have a pandemic in the future, we absolutely know we are, and somebody
[02:28.560 --> 02:36.560]  could let you design the most desirable pandemic, in other words, the least injurious, how would you
[02:36.560 --> 02:42.240]  design it? Well, you would design it to do exactly what SARS-CoV-2 has done. The example of that is
[02:42.240 --> 02:47.040]  here in the United States as of December 4th using the CDC's provisional death count,
[02:47.840 --> 02:56.800]  the United States death toll is just a bit over two tenths of 1%. Compare that to the Black Plague,
[02:56.800 --> 03:02.880]  up to 60%, 12% of Ireland, 20% of London. Yeah, we're two tenths of 1%. So if you could choose
[03:02.880 --> 03:07.200]  the kind of pandemic you would want, yeah, the one we have now is the one you would want.
[03:07.200 --> 03:12.400]  And then it looks like Omicron is going to displace Delta and Omicron, yeah, if you get
[03:12.400 --> 03:17.040]  COVID at all, it's like, I have a sore throat and a headache. Like I said, if you could choose
[03:17.040 --> 03:22.640]  your pandemic, this would be it. I should also add that under the World Health Organization's
[03:23.280 --> 03:27.840]  former definition of pandemic, what we're living through right now, the SARS-CoV-2 event
[03:27.840 --> 03:34.320]  would not have been able to be classified as a pandemic. So what exactly is Professor Gilbert
[03:34.320 --> 03:38.960]  talking about when she says the next one could be worse? Yeah, maybe this will help. This is from
[03:38.960 --> 03:47.440]  her comments. Quote, we cannot allow the enormous economic losses we have sustained to mean there is
[03:47.440 --> 03:53.440]  no funding for pandemic preparedness. The advances we have made and the knowledge we have gained
[03:53.440 --> 03:59.760]  must not be lost. Lost. How is she or any of her peers going to lose anything? You know,
[03:59.760 --> 04:05.840]  I've learned many things in my life and I haven't lost any of the knowledge that I've gained. So,
[04:06.720 --> 04:12.400]  Sarah, how would you or your peers lose the knowledge you've gained? But of course,
[04:12.400 --> 04:16.960]  the key part of Sarah's presentation are these words, we cannot allow the enormous economic
[04:16.960 --> 04:26.880]  losses we have sustained to mean there is no funding for pandemic preparedness. Did I mention
[04:26.880 --> 04:31.840]  that Professor Gilbert is the co-founder and majority shareholder in a company called Vaxatec,
[04:31.840 --> 04:36.880]  which partnered with AstraZeneca to create the vaccine that bears the AstraZeneca name?
[04:37.680 --> 04:44.480]  What precisely does Professor Gilbert mean by pandemic, quote, preparedness? Well, that's
[04:44.480 --> 04:50.240]  easily discernible by looking at who funded her company's work to produce the vaccine known as
[04:50.240 --> 04:57.520]  AstraZeneca. And those funds came from the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations.
[04:58.400 --> 05:05.520]  So to Gilbert, preparedness just means more money in her pocket. Did I mention who is the
[05:05.520 --> 05:12.080]  primary founder of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations? Yeah, it's Bill Gates.
[05:12.720 --> 05:18.960]  In other words, Professor Gilbert trying to gin up fear about the next one could be worse is really
[05:18.960 --> 05:24.480]  all about more money for Vaxatec in which she's the primary shareholder. With all that said,
[05:24.480 --> 05:28.800]  let's take a moment to talk about the next possible pandemic because there certainly
[05:28.800 --> 05:34.560]  will be one. The only question is when and what. As I said a moment ago, there will never again be
[05:34.560 --> 05:40.640]  a bacteriological pandemic because we have antibiotics. So we can anticipate the next
[05:40.640 --> 05:46.480]  pandemic like this one would be viral. Accordingly, let's look at SARS-CoV-2 to determine how
[05:47.280 --> 05:53.120]  we can protect ourselves if we want to do that rather than giving people like Sarah Gilbert
[05:53.120 --> 05:59.200]  billions of dollars more. If we just want to protect ourselves, how might we go about that?
[05:59.200 --> 06:05.360]  As you probably know, deaths from COVID-19 are highly associated with chronic disease, what we
[06:05.360 --> 06:11.760]  now call comorbidities. So I'm going to take just a moment to look at what the numbers are with
[06:11.760 --> 06:18.240]  comorbidities, chronic disease, and what the likely death numbers would have been absent
[06:18.320 --> 06:23.600]  chronic disease. According to the CDC's provisional death count as of this week,
[06:23.600 --> 06:32.320]  the total number of Americans who died with COVID-19 is 787,000. Now, Italy reported that 99%
[06:32.800 --> 06:39.120]  of those who died died with comorbidities, chronic disease. I think the number, I'm going back
[06:39.120 --> 06:45.680]  many, many months now from memory, the number in New York State, their health agency fixed at 86%.
[06:45.760 --> 06:53.200]  Let's just kind of average that and call it 92% of people who died with COVID-19 also had
[06:53.200 --> 06:56.560]  comorbidities. Well, I personally think the percentage is much higher than 92%.
[06:57.440 --> 07:07.040]  Nevertheless, let's run with 92%. That means that 747,500 people died because with comorbidities,
[07:07.040 --> 07:12.400]  their bodies could not fight off SARS-CoV-2. The next number we have to look at is how much
[07:12.400 --> 07:16.320]  chronic disease could have been avoided. In other words, what percentage is lifestyle-oriented
[07:16.320 --> 07:20.800]  versus what percentage is genetic? The closest number we have to that, because there is no
[07:20.800 --> 07:25.120]  exact number, the closest number we have to that is that lifestyle choice chronic disease
[07:25.120 --> 07:34.640]  constitutes 97.5% of all chronic disease. If we back that percentage out of 747,500,
[07:34.640 --> 07:41.680]  we are left with 728,800 deaths that were preventable even though the person developed
[07:41.680 --> 07:49.280]  COVID-19. In other words, it is entirely likely that 728,800 people would still be alive today
[07:50.320 --> 08:00.000]  if they didn't have chronic disease. In other words, only 58,200 Americans would have died from
[08:00.000 --> 08:08.000]  COVID-19 if the number of Americans who have lifestyle chronic disease was zero. Or phrased
[08:08.000 --> 08:15.520]  another way, if the American people made the choice to have eliminated lifestyle-based chronic
[08:15.520 --> 08:26.720]  disease, deaths from COVID-19 would have been reduced 93%. I should also point out that with
[08:26.720 --> 08:34.800]  787,000 deaths with COVID-19 in the United States over the last 23 months, governments across the
[08:34.800 --> 08:42.000]  United States have used that to impose dictatorial rules and restrictions. Perhaps that wouldn't have
[08:42.000 --> 08:50.320]  been as prevalent if instead of 787,000 people dying, 58,000 people died. And let me give you
[08:50.320 --> 08:58.400]  a comparison, right? 787,000 people over almost just shy of two years, 787,000 people died.
[08:59.680 --> 09:07.360]  How many people die every year, not two years, every year in the United States from chronic disease?
[09:08.400 --> 09:16.640]  1.9 million. And the government takes zero action about that because that would be financially
[09:16.640 --> 09:22.480]  disadvantageous to big food, big pharma, and big med. The bottom line is being healthy is the best
[09:22.480 --> 09:28.880]  protection that anybody can have from a viral infection becoming serious and potentially deadly.
[09:29.440 --> 09:37.360]  When I wrote Body Science, I absolutely did not have a pandemic in mind. What I had in mind was
[09:37.360 --> 09:46.560]  giving every one of the 7.2 billion people on the planet the knowledge, the tools to live an amazing
[09:46.880 --> 09:53.600]  healthy life and eradicate lifestyle chronic disease from their future. And lifestyle chronic
[09:53.600 --> 10:01.760]  disease, man, not only are they needless, but they're miserable, ugly forms of death and often
[10:01.760 --> 10:08.400]  kill people decades before they would otherwise die. And yet people still make the decision to
[10:08.400 --> 10:14.560]  get sick and die like that. I totally don't get it. But the purpose of writing Body Science was
[10:14.560 --> 10:20.480]  for the people who don't want to go there, the people who, as I said, want to be amazingly healthy,
[10:20.480 --> 10:26.880]  feel great, not ever have to worry about chronic disease, and live the full duration of their life
[10:26.880 --> 10:35.600]  feeling great and being healthy. Body Science gives them 100% of the knowledge, the mental tools
[10:35.600 --> 10:41.040]  to do that. I really think the big challenge is for people to unlearn the garbage that's been put
[10:41.040 --> 10:44.800]  in their head. And that's another reason that I wrote Body Science, because it's not enough
[10:45.360 --> 10:49.520]  just to take the garbage that one has been programmed with over decades and say,
[10:49.520 --> 10:54.080]  you know what, that might not be true, and throw it out. You have to have quality information to
[10:54.080 --> 11:00.080]  replace it with. So Body Science does two things. Number one, once you've consumed the amazing
[11:00.080 --> 11:04.320]  information of Body Science, you can readily identify all the crap that you've been, all the
[11:04.320 --> 11:10.240]  erroneous crap that you've been programmed with and toss it out. And then Body Science also gives
[11:10.240 --> 11:15.840]  you the factual knowledge to work from moving forward so that the establishment can never
[11:15.840 --> 11:21.200]  buffalo you again about any matters of health, at least in terms of nutrition and physiology,
[11:21.200 --> 11:27.120]  which is really the knowledge it takes to live a healthy disease-free life. And on the matter of
[11:27.120 --> 11:32.080]  law and income tax, the very same dynamic is true of income tax shattering the mess.
[11:32.080 --> 11:37.200]  Also, because tis the season, running a bit of a Christmas special right now,
[11:37.200 --> 11:43.360]  if you purchase both Body Science and income tax shattering the mess together, I will inscribe
[11:43.360 --> 11:47.840]  and autograph both copies for you, whether it's for you or you plan to give it to somebody who
[11:47.840 --> 11:51.760]  will appreciate it for a gift. Maybe you want one, you're going to give the other one to somebody
[11:51.760 --> 11:56.560]  else. They will be inscribed and autographed. And I'll put the link to that combination product,
[11:56.560 --> 12:01.280]  both books down in the notes. Then finally, by purchasing Body Science and or income tax
[12:01.280 --> 12:06.960]  shattering the mess, that allows me to continue to be here for you. Thank you.