Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language Detected language: English [00:00.000 --> 00:07.120] Lots of media attention being paid to Omicron by the media, and the vast majority of that [00:07.120 --> 00:08.840] is complete nonsense. [00:08.840 --> 00:13.840] There is, however, one thing we do know about Omicron, and that is that it appears overwhelmingly [00:13.840 --> 00:20.400] true that Omicron causes serious illness in almost no one. [00:20.400 --> 00:25.000] When I say most of the media stories are nonsensical, let me give you an example. [00:25.120 --> 00:32.200] A story recently ran that said the two shots of the Pfizer vaccine provide a 70% reduction [00:32.200 --> 00:36.280] in the odds of being hospitalized from Omicron. [00:36.280 --> 00:43.960] So first, there is nowhere near enough data accumulation to make that statement. [00:43.960 --> 00:50.760] And secondly, are they really trying to claim a 70% reduction in hospitalizations from a [00:50.760 --> 00:55.560] variant that has almost no hospitalizations? [01:12.080 --> 01:16.320] Leaving aside media's nonsense, let's talk about what we know. [01:16.320 --> 01:23.360] The United Kingdom has recently rolled out military units to assist in giving another [01:23.360 --> 01:34.280] jab to 18 million British residents, and they hope to accomplish this in 19 days, 18 million [01:34.280 --> 01:35.280] people in 19 days. [01:35.280 --> 01:36.680] You do the math on that. [01:36.680 --> 01:41.400] And they're doing this in reference to a variant for which the Pfizer vaccine, which is the [01:41.480 --> 01:48.960] one that's predominant in the UK, has very, very low efficacy against Omicron, and almost [01:48.960 --> 01:53.240] no one is being hospitalized from Omicron. [01:53.240 --> 01:59.440] So in light of what we do know about Omicron at this time, why would the UK prime minister [01:59.440 --> 02:03.160] be taking these astounding actions? [02:03.160 --> 02:07.400] Well, perhaps this will help, you understand. [02:07.400 --> 02:16.200] If the UK gives 18 million residents an additional jab, at the cost of the jab, which is $19.50 [02:16.200 --> 02:24.360] per dose, then the UK has put $350 million in Big Pharma's pocket, most particularly [02:24.360 --> 02:27.800] Pfizer, in less than three weeks. [02:27.800 --> 02:32.120] But I'm sure that has absolutely nothing to do with it, because as you well know, companies [02:32.120 --> 02:37.120] that are worth hundreds of billions of dollars have absolutely no sway with politicians who [02:37.120 --> 02:42.960] are looking for campaign funds and backing for their party in the future, none, zero. [02:42.960 --> 02:47.200] That said, I'm sure that what we're seeing in the UK has absolutely nothing to do with [02:47.200 --> 02:49.640] power and politics and money. [02:49.640 --> 02:54.640] And that's made clear by the number of people who have died in the UK with Omicron. [02:54.640 --> 02:59.640] Well, that one guy, seriously, one. [02:59.640 --> 03:00.640] And here's the kick in the pants. [03:00.640 --> 03:05.800] There is some indication that vaccination may actually make people more susceptible [03:05.880 --> 03:08.080] to being infected by Omicron. [03:08.080 --> 03:09.920] We'll get to that information in a minute. [03:09.920 --> 03:16.520] Shifting gears to the United States, the governor of New York has initiated a new mask mandate [03:16.520 --> 03:18.800] for all of the state of New York. [03:18.800 --> 03:21.680] So this leads me to ask you a couple of questions. [03:21.680 --> 03:28.520] Number one, as we look back over the last 24 months of SARS-CoV-2, has wearing masks [03:28.520 --> 03:30.000] done anything? [03:30.560 --> 03:36.840] Well, the answer to that is clearly no, because in the last several months, we have seen new [03:36.840 --> 03:42.800] daily infections skyrocket in jurisdictions where they have very high vaccination rates [03:42.800 --> 03:45.000] and everybody's wearing masks. [03:45.000 --> 03:49.320] Several months ago, I did a presentation on that exact phenomenon, places where they had [03:49.320 --> 03:54.240] virtually 100% mask wearing compliance and new daily infections skyrocketed. [03:54.240 --> 03:57.760] Then I'll put a link to that video down in the notes. [03:57.760 --> 04:02.520] Question number two, how well did social distancing work? [04:02.520 --> 04:07.400] Yeah, here we are 24 months later, SARS-CoV-2 still ruling the roost, running around the [04:07.400 --> 04:12.520] globe, unaffected by much of anything, including social distancing. [04:12.520 --> 04:17.440] Question number three, since there's the word lockdown is being thrown around again, have [04:17.440 --> 04:21.880] lockdowns done anything to stop the spread of SARS-CoV-2? [04:21.880 --> 04:24.840] And again, the answer is no. [04:24.840 --> 04:30.200] If lockdowns work, people still wouldn't be talking about lockdowns two years after [04:30.200 --> 04:31.200] the first lockdowns. [04:31.200 --> 04:35.000] So in other words, mask mandates don't work again. [04:35.000 --> 04:39.840] I encourage you to watch the presentation that I'm going to link down in the notes. [04:39.840 --> 04:43.720] Social distancing didn't work then and it won't work now. [04:43.720 --> 04:46.360] Lockdowns never worked and they won't work now. [04:46.360 --> 04:56.280] So as I've been saying for two years, government cannot stop a virus, but government can screw [04:56.280 --> 05:01.440] up a whole lot of other things and make people absolutely miserable, destroy their livelihoods [05:01.440 --> 05:05.840] and make them their mental health and just a slew of things, while it does worthless [05:05.840 --> 05:10.680] things that it falsely promotes as stopping the virus. [05:10.680 --> 05:13.160] Let's switch our Omicron discussion to South Africa. [05:13.520 --> 05:18.520] Remember, South Africa is the first place where Omicron was discovered by sequencing [05:18.520 --> 05:23.680] the SARS-CoV-2 virus after some unusual developments in a hospital. [05:23.680 --> 05:27.040] Although that is not considered to be the origin of Omicron, it was the first place [05:27.040 --> 05:30.800] that Omicron was detected via genomic sequencing. [05:30.800 --> 05:37.360] The worldwide narrative since the discovery of Omicron has been that it is incredibly, [05:37.360 --> 05:40.760] incredibly transmissible, makes Delta look like a walk in the park. [05:40.760 --> 05:46.320] In fact, some expositors are saying sometime probably by mid-2022, every human being on [05:46.320 --> 05:48.920] the planet will have been exposed to Omicron. [05:48.920 --> 05:50.680] That's been the narrative. [05:50.680 --> 05:56.800] So then it may surprise you to learn that new daily infections of Omicron variant in [05:56.800 --> 06:01.800] South Africa appear to have leveled out, they've plateaued. [06:01.800 --> 06:06.800] If that is indeed the case, how then can we explain that? [06:06.840 --> 06:12.880] What would cause there to be this huge upsurge in new daily infections of Omicron in South [06:12.880 --> 06:17.800] Africa for a brief period of time, measured in about five weeks, six weeks? [06:17.800 --> 06:21.680] That would put us earlier than it was identified, but it's reasonable to assume it was present [06:21.680 --> 06:22.920] earlier than it was identified. [06:22.920 --> 06:25.680] So we'll call it six weeks for the sake of this discussion. [06:25.680 --> 06:32.960] So Omicron skyrocketed in South Africa for somewhere in the range of six weeks and now [06:32.960 --> 06:35.160] appears to be plateauing. [06:35.240 --> 06:40.000] I think one explanation we might want to look at for that is that there is some distinction [06:40.000 --> 06:45.380] that differentiates who's getting infected with the Omicron variant and who is not. [06:45.380 --> 06:52.520] Could that differentiation perhaps be people who are vaccinated versus people who are not? [06:52.520 --> 06:58.040] That would appear to be a reasonable hypothesis to pursue because new daily infections of [06:58.040 --> 07:04.920] Omicron in the United Kingdom are surging well past that of South Africa, which then [07:04.920 --> 07:09.520] might cause us to ask, what differentiates the populations of South Africa from the population [07:09.520 --> 07:10.520] of the UK? [07:10.520 --> 07:12.180] Well, here's one. [07:12.180 --> 07:16.160] South Africa has a fully vaccinated population of 26%. [07:16.160 --> 07:22.000] The UK has a fully vaccinated percentage of the population at 70%. [07:22.000 --> 07:28.040] In other words, if the differentiating characteristic between the populations of South Africa where [07:28.040 --> 07:34.480] the increase in new daily infections has seemingly plateaued and the UK where it's surging is [07:34.480 --> 07:40.280] to be explained by a differentiation in the population, unless we want to claim that there's [07:40.280 --> 07:44.080] some sort of other physiological distinction between human beings in South Africa and human [07:44.080 --> 07:49.400] beings in the UK, the most evident differentiation is the percentage of the population is fully [07:49.400 --> 07:50.740] vaccinated. [07:50.740 --> 07:56.260] In addition to the distinction between South Africa and the UK, the very first person infected [07:56.260 --> 08:02.920] with Omicron that was detected in the United States when contact tracing was done considering [08:02.920 --> 08:08.840] the people that he had been in close proximity to, none of them tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 [08:08.840 --> 08:14.520] and in particular the Omicron variant, none, and the US citizen who was infected with Omicron [08:14.520 --> 08:16.280] was fully vaccinated. [08:16.280 --> 08:22.280] Also, the current information we have from CDC indicates that far more people who are [08:22.280 --> 08:26.760] vaccinated are getting infected with Omicron than people who are unvaccinated. [08:26.760 --> 08:29.120] Is that because they're vaccinated? [08:29.120 --> 08:32.880] Well, we don't know, but I think that'd be a great thing to find out, don't you? [08:32.880 --> 08:38.040] Sadly, it won't be done, and it's not going to be done because here in the United States, [08:38.040 --> 08:41.800] research is not going to be conducted if it is thought that the results of which would [08:41.800 --> 08:46.880] be detrimental to the establishment narrative that every single person on the planet should [08:46.880 --> 08:48.000] be vaccinated. [08:48.000 --> 08:52.280] If the results of research would cause people to question that they should get vaccinated, [08:52.280 --> 08:56.020] either the research will not be done or the results will not be made public. [08:56.020 --> 09:00.080] And that's because in the United States, we believe in freedom and transparency. [09:00.080 --> 09:05.200] As I mentioned a moment ago, many expositors are claiming that Omicron is going to sweep [09:05.200 --> 09:10.040] the globe, the word tidal wave is thrown around a lot, and that here within the next handful [09:10.040 --> 09:14.120] of months, every single person on the planet is going to be exposed to Omicron. [09:14.120 --> 09:17.480] Whether that is true or not, we have yet to see. [09:17.480 --> 09:22.240] But the people who believe that is exactly what's going to happen aren't necessarily [09:22.240 --> 09:23.400] disappointed by that. [09:23.400 --> 09:29.480] What they're saying is, look, if we can get the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the Omicron variant [09:29.480 --> 09:36.280] in particular, to infect every single person in the world, understanding that it does not [09:36.280 --> 09:42.080] cause serious illness, then we will finally be able to achieve herd immunity. [09:42.080 --> 09:45.480] Yeah, so that's not factual. [09:45.480 --> 09:52.560] Sadly, because billions of people have been vaccinated, it is very unlikely the world [09:52.560 --> 09:54.600] will ever hit herd immunity now. [09:54.600 --> 09:57.480] Let me explain what I mean by that. [09:57.480 --> 10:02.480] Herd immunity is a product of something that happens in our body, in our immune systems, [10:02.480 --> 10:05.080] called the production of memory T cells. [10:05.080 --> 10:06.080] I'm not going to get into that. [10:06.080 --> 10:08.040] I'm going to put some links down in the notes. [10:08.040 --> 10:11.600] If you want to know more about this, you can go down there, and I can encourage you to [10:11.600 --> 10:14.480] understand the science and learn what's really going on. [10:14.480 --> 10:19.400] So the human body, when presented with an infection pathogen, I won't go through the [10:19.400 --> 10:20.400] whole immune process. [10:20.400 --> 10:22.560] I've gone through it many, many times here with you. [10:22.640 --> 10:28.680] However, the last stage, the final stage, is that it creates memory T cells that store [10:28.680 --> 10:33.600] the data concerning that pathogen, and then that data is accessed in a rapid response [10:33.600 --> 10:39.360] takes place if the body ever encounters that particular pathogen again later after the [10:39.360 --> 10:40.840] initial infection. [10:40.840 --> 10:44.960] The ability of the body to do that, which is tied directly to the existence of memory [10:44.960 --> 10:51.360] T cells, is what produces the society-wide effect we know as herd immunity. [10:51.360 --> 10:56.760] Unfortunately, the vaccines that are being used for SARS-CoV-2 do not activate in the [10:56.760 --> 10:59.640] human body production of memory T cells. [10:59.640 --> 11:01.480] So the equation goes like this. [11:01.480 --> 11:06.640] No memory T cells, no herd immunity, end of story, full stop. [11:06.640 --> 11:11.720] I'll put a link down in the notes to another presentation in which I discuss why numerous [11:11.720 --> 11:17.720] public health officials in different countries have come out and said the future is jab after [11:17.760 --> 11:26.760] jab, after jab, after jab in order to maintain this temporary protection from SARS-CoV-2 [11:26.760 --> 11:28.160] and COVID-19. [11:28.160 --> 11:32.920] As Dr. Zarca, who is Israel's coronavirus czar, he phrased it quite well. [11:32.920 --> 11:36.800] He said that the people of Israel, by that implication he also means the people, anybody [11:36.800 --> 11:42.960] who is relying on the protection, such as it is, from the vaccines will need another [11:43.200 --> 11:48.040] shot, quote, every few months, close quote. [11:48.040 --> 11:53.720] And if you think that's just hyperbole, the UK just a day or two ago authorized yet another [11:53.720 --> 11:59.520] shot for anyone who hasn't had a shot within 90 days. [11:59.520 --> 12:03.440] Added to the concerns I just expressed are two additional questions concerning the vaccines [12:03.440 --> 12:04.640] and memory T cells. [12:04.640 --> 12:12.440] One is if you were initially infected pre-vaccination, so you have memory T cells, and then you become [12:12.440 --> 12:19.720] vaccinated, does this new vaccine technology somehow disable the memory T cells that originally [12:19.720 --> 12:22.320] existed from your first contact with SARS-CoV-2? [12:22.320 --> 12:29.400] The second question is if you've been vaccinated and then you were infected from the wild virus, [12:29.400 --> 12:34.120] does the fact that you were vaccinated inhibit your body's future ability to produce memory [12:34.120 --> 12:35.120] T cells? [12:35.120 --> 12:37.560] Then again, I'm not going to get into all the detail of that today. [12:37.560 --> 12:39.360] I've already done it in a previous presentation. [12:39.360 --> 12:40.360] I'll put the link down in the notes. [12:40.360 --> 12:43.760] I encourage you to go there and take a look at the data for yourself. [12:43.760 --> 12:47.520] As I mentioned earlier, many of the expositors are claiming that Omicron is going to sweep [12:47.520 --> 12:50.640] the globe in the next handful of months, and every single person on the planet will be [12:50.640 --> 12:53.000] exposed to Omicron. [12:53.000 --> 12:58.800] Whether that happens or not is significant to me because I am the first person on the [12:58.800 --> 13:03.600] planet to understand that the vaccines do not activate production of memory T cells [13:03.600 --> 13:06.120] and the consequences thereof. [13:06.320 --> 13:11.240] I've included a link to that presentation also down in the notes so that you can understand [13:11.240 --> 13:14.120] the science behind what we're talking about. [13:14.120 --> 13:20.960] Because my reach as an influencer on social media is limited, it's modest. [13:20.960 --> 13:27.520] I have reached out to a number of influencers who have many, many, many, many, many times [13:27.520 --> 13:29.280] the number of followers that I do. [13:29.280 --> 13:31.960] In other words, they have a dramatically greater reach. [13:31.960 --> 13:35.600] I've reached out to them and encouraged them to look at the evidence concerning the memory [13:35.600 --> 13:39.040] T cells and talk about it, or have me on to talk about it. [13:39.040 --> 13:41.560] To date, none of them have been willing to do so. [13:41.560 --> 13:46.200] If I read between the lines, these people, when you have millions of people following [13:46.200 --> 13:52.240] you, your revenue from the platform or platforms you're on is usually huge. [13:52.240 --> 13:56.760] The last thing you want is to be suspended, not to be able to post presentations, not [13:56.760 --> 14:03.200] to put up your podcast, or perhaps have your channel page, what have you, deplatformed. [14:03.200 --> 14:08.200] Because you talked about something publicly that the establishment doesn't want the people [14:08.200 --> 14:09.680] to hear about. [14:09.680 --> 14:14.560] That's something I know about personally, because I had a Facebook page, Dr Reality, [14:14.560 --> 14:22.400] with 145,000 followers that Facebook shut down simply because Facebook didn't want users [14:22.400 --> 14:26.160] receiving the facts, data, and evidence I was presenting. [14:26.160 --> 14:29.960] So I get where these influencers are coming from. [14:29.960 --> 14:33.720] None of them, in particular, I mean, he was pretty forthright. [14:33.720 --> 14:43.080] He said until the health minister of his country sanctioned, approved of, gave his blessing [14:43.080 --> 14:48.000] to the issue that the vaccines do not activate production of memory T cells, he could not [14:48.000 --> 14:50.900] and would not discuss it on his show. [14:50.900 --> 14:56.800] Even if I say it's not about the money, right, okay, so these influencers, if you've got [14:56.800 --> 14:59.080] a million people following me, you're making a lot of money. [14:59.080 --> 15:01.920] So let's say for the sake of argument, however, it's not about the money. [15:01.920 --> 15:07.560] Let's say somebody says, look, if I get suspended or deplatformed for discussing one issue, [15:07.560 --> 15:11.680] then I cannot share with my audience all these other issues. [15:11.680 --> 15:14.160] So let's say that is really what's going on. [15:14.160 --> 15:19.200] Clearly, then I could understand the reasoning of the influencer, and I don't blame the influencer. [15:19.200 --> 15:24.260] Who I blame is the politicians in the social media platforms that have made it clear they [15:24.260 --> 15:30.420] will punish influencers who talk about things that the establishment doesn't want talked [15:30.420 --> 15:31.420] about. [15:31.420 --> 15:35.540] I've said for quite a long time that influencers are often not punished for saying something [15:35.540 --> 15:38.260] that is wrong or incorrect or inaccurate. [15:38.260 --> 15:43.900] They are punished for saying something first, for saying it before the establishment has [15:43.900 --> 15:48.020] given its permission for that to be talked about publicly. [15:48.020 --> 15:52.540] And quite clearly, at this point, the establishment absolutely does not want the public to know [15:52.540 --> 15:56.460] that the vaccines do not activate production memory T cells, because that would lead to [15:56.460 --> 15:59.660] a discussion of the consequences of that. [15:59.660 --> 16:03.820] But back to the possibility that Omicron is going to sweep the entire globe here by some [16:03.820 --> 16:05.400] time in 2022. [16:05.400 --> 16:12.380] The reason I say it's significant to me is because of their claims that that will finally [16:12.380 --> 16:18.620] achieve SARS-CoV-2 worldwide comprehensive herd immunity. [16:18.620 --> 16:25.060] And when that doesn't happen, there's going to have to be a discussion about why it didn't [16:25.060 --> 16:26.060] happen. [16:26.060 --> 16:28.860] And there are really only two choices. [16:28.860 --> 16:33.700] Number one, even though the human body has produced memory T cells in response to contagious [16:33.700 --> 16:39.200] pathogens for the entire history of mankind, one explanation would be that miraculously [16:39.200 --> 16:44.540] for some unexplained reason, starting in 2020, a large percentage of the human population, [16:44.540 --> 16:51.340] their immune systems just miraculously stopped activating production of memory T cells. [16:51.340 --> 16:57.300] The second possibility is that there was some sort of external factor and some external [16:57.300 --> 17:04.380] influence that caused their bodies not to produce memory T cells or perhaps have their [17:04.380 --> 17:06.660] memory T cells disabled. [17:06.660 --> 17:12.380] I don't think anyone doubts which of those two would be found to be true. [17:12.380 --> 17:16.580] And eventually we are going to find out as an example, just, I don't know, less than [17:16.580 --> 17:25.120] a week ago, a study was released that showed that a full 50% of science research done over [17:25.120 --> 17:31.340] the last, I forget what it was, 10 or 15 years, a full 50% of that could not be replicated [17:31.340 --> 17:36.860] by science researchers who set out exactly to do that, to replicate the research. [17:36.860 --> 17:42.140] So the way science works is if you cannot replicate what was claimed in the original [17:42.140 --> 17:47.820] study, that it's almost a certainty that the original study and its conclusions were [17:47.820 --> 17:55.060] fraudulent, 50% of science research over the last 10 or 15 years, fraudulent. [17:55.060 --> 18:00.540] Now in this case concerning the memory T cell issue in reference to the vaccines, I don't [18:00.540 --> 18:03.780] see that there's any fraudulent research going on. [18:03.780 --> 18:08.740] In fact, the establishment had just a complete and total blackout on that research. [18:08.740 --> 18:13.740] No, that research will not be done, but that can only last so long sooner or later. [18:13.740 --> 18:14.740] It will be done. [18:14.740 --> 18:19.140] As we're getting close to Christmas, if you value this sort of fact-based and evidence-based [18:19.140 --> 18:24.820] straight-shooting, no BS presentation, I want to encourage you to go to DrReality.News [18:24.820 --> 18:29.760] and pick up either a copy of Body Science or Income Tax Shattering that would miss. [18:29.760 --> 18:34.860] Body Science deals with the kind of things we've been talking about, with the establishment [18:34.860 --> 18:40.820] either lying or suppressing studies or false studies concerning human physiology, which [18:40.820 --> 18:47.020] has resulted in the United States in 2021, almost 2022 now, being the most chronically [18:47.020 --> 18:52.440] ill society in all of human history, full stop. [18:52.440 --> 18:57.300] It addresses that and then it gives you the science, the truth that has been hidden from [18:57.300 --> 19:05.460] you to bring that 180 and make yourself incredibly healthy by knowing the truth, not the establishment [19:05.460 --> 19:06.460] dogma. [19:06.460 --> 19:10.580] And Income Tax Shattering the miss, what to say about that? [19:10.580 --> 19:16.500] The government and the media, which this is part of this whole thing called the establishment, [19:16.500 --> 19:19.300] has convinced virtually every single American that if you get up in the morning, have a [19:19.300 --> 19:22.640] cup of coffee, get the kids off to school, go to work and earn a living and get a paycheck [19:22.640 --> 19:24.400] that you owe the government income tax. [19:24.400 --> 19:29.160] That narrative, that establishment narrative is so utterly and completely false. [19:29.160 --> 19:32.120] It is astounding that anybody still believes it. [19:32.120 --> 19:36.720] But if you want to find out for yourself by an amazing yet easy to understand breakdown [19:36.720 --> 19:45.840] of almost what, 126 years of history and an analysis and breakdown that everyone can understand [19:45.840 --> 19:49.320] of the law over that period of time, most importantly, Supreme Court cases, which are [19:49.320 --> 19:54.960] pivotal to this, you will understand balls to bones that Congress has never imposed [19:54.960 --> 19:57.000] the income tax on the average American. [19:57.000 --> 20:00.000] And because we're almost at Christmas, I'm running a special right now. [20:00.000 --> 20:03.640] And that is if you purchase a copy of Body Science and Income Tax Shattering the Miss [20:03.640 --> 20:07.680] together, I'll put the link down in the notes to that particular bundled product, that I [20:07.680 --> 20:11.400] will inscribe and autograph both copies for you. [20:11.400 --> 20:14.600] So if you want to keep them and read them both, great, however, if you want to grab [20:14.600 --> 20:19.020] one for somebody else and the other for yourself, vice versa, they'll both be inscribed and [20:19.020 --> 20:21.820] autograph, which is my Christmas gift to you. [20:21.820 --> 20:27.260] Also in doing that, you help me to continue to be here with this sort of presentation [20:27.260 --> 20:28.260] for you. [20:28.260 --> 20:28.760] Thank you.