Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language
Detected language: English
[00:00.800 --> 00:06.880]  Welcome to the show. On December 21st, 2023, The Washington Post ran a story with the headline,
[00:07.680 --> 00:16.240]  colon cancer is rising in young Americans. It's not clear why. Let me be clear. That claim is just
[00:16.240 --> 00:22.080]  more of the establishment's flim-flam that has made the U.S. population the sickest people in
[00:22.080 --> 00:27.280]  all of human history. I'm going to straighten that out for you right now.
[00:43.760 --> 00:48.560]  Let's start with this. I'm the author of Body Science, a groundbreaking book on human
[00:48.560 --> 00:54.160]  physiology that gives people the knowledge to avoid a long list of diseases, including
[00:54.160 --> 01:00.800]  colorectal cancer. And if you are unaware, colorectal cancer is the second most deadly
[01:00.800 --> 01:06.400]  form of cancer. When we consider the deadly nature of colon cancer, the fact that cases are
[01:06.400 --> 01:10.640]  increasing and colon cancer is striking people at younger ages than ever before,
[01:11.680 --> 01:17.040]  why is the establishment lying to you? The reason is that the lies the establishment
[01:17.040 --> 01:22.880]  has been telling you for 40 years are the reason the number of colon cancer cases have been steadily
[01:22.880 --> 01:28.880]  growing. Let me share some statistics with you. The very first medical paper on colorectal cancer
[01:28.880 --> 01:35.680]  was published in 1913. However, the family being followed for that research had a genetic condition
[01:35.680 --> 01:40.800]  later given the name Lynch syndrome. In other words, for most of U.S. history and well into
[01:40.800 --> 01:46.640]  the 20th century, colorectal cancer unrelated to genetic predisposition was virtually unknown.
[01:47.280 --> 01:54.000]  A study published in September 2022 provided the following numbers. For rectal and rectal
[01:54.000 --> 02:01.440]  sigmoid cancer in the age group of 20 to 34 years, there was a 34.7 percent increase in cases from
[02:01.440 --> 02:12.160]  2001 to 2011 with a projected increase of 52.1 from 2022 to 2030. In the age group of 35 to 49
[02:12.160 --> 02:19.440]  years, a similar trend was observed reaching a 37.2 percent increase from 2001 to 2011 with an
[02:19.440 --> 02:28.560]  estimated increase of more than 56 percent for the period of 2022 to 2030. A 36 percent increase
[02:28.560 --> 02:36.800]  over a decade with another 56 percent increase expected in the following eight years. The
[02:36.800 --> 02:42.320]  following statement is from a 2020 meta-analysis published on NIH's website, quote,
[02:42.320 --> 02:46.800]  the growing proportion of obese children and adolescents and the increasing proportion of
[02:46.800 --> 02:51.840]  young and obese patients with colorectal cancer suggests an association between metabolic
[02:51.840 --> 02:59.680]  dysfunction and carcinogenesis. That brings to mind the old expression no shit, Sherlock.
[02:59.680 --> 03:04.480]  Yet colorectal cancer is not exclusively the result of metabolic dysfunction. There are
[03:04.560 --> 03:10.560]  other factors in play. Before I get into that, let me clear up some establishment propaganda.
[03:10.560 --> 03:17.680]  Colorectal cancer has nothing to do with eating red meat or processed meats. That nonsense is
[03:17.680 --> 03:23.360]  just part of the establishment's anti-meat agenda, which is 100 percent political having
[03:24.160 --> 03:30.640]  nothing to do with science. If we focus on science, what is the cause of the distressing
[03:30.640 --> 03:35.680]  increase in colorectal cancer? As mentioned a moment ago, one causes metabolic dysfunction,
[03:35.680 --> 03:41.680]  which we'll circle back to shortly. Let me read a bit to you from body science, quote,
[03:42.560 --> 03:48.480]  researchers have known since the mid-1970s that high consumption of polyunsaturated fats
[03:48.480 --> 03:55.440]  in the form of vegetable oil increased the odds of getting colon cancer 300 percent and all other
[03:55.440 --> 04:02.400]  forms of cancer by 200 percent. I put vegetable oil in quotation marks because it isn't
[04:02.960 --> 04:08.800]  vegetable oil. What is dishonestly pitched to you as vegetable oil is actually industrially
[04:08.800 --> 04:14.400]  processed oil from nuts, seeds, and grains. The extraction of oil from nuts, seeds, and grains
[04:14.400 --> 04:20.640]  only became possible via the industrial technology at the turn of the 20th century. If the trajectory
[04:20.640 --> 04:28.400]  of increase in colon and rectal cancer observed from 1975 to 2010 remains constant moving forward,
[04:28.400 --> 04:34.480]  researchers at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center tell us to expect a 90 percent
[04:34.480 --> 04:42.480]  increase in colon cancer in people ages 20 to 34 and 124 percent increase in rectal cancer by 2030.
[04:44.400 --> 04:49.600]  If you've been following me, you know the claim made since the early 1960s that saturated fat
[04:49.600 --> 04:57.760]  causes heart disease was and remains a blatant lie. Using myself as an example of the physiological
[04:57.760 --> 05:05.680]  truth, I'm 64 years old. I eat roughly 230 grams of dietary fat every day and half for years. And
[05:05.680 --> 05:13.360]  since I eat carnivore style, much of my dietary fat is saturated fat. To put my 230 grams a day
[05:13.360 --> 05:19.600]  into context of current recommended levels of saturated fat, the UK National Health Service
[05:19.600 --> 05:25.920]  recommends no more than 20 grams a day. Given my daily calorie intake, the American Heart Association
[05:25.920 --> 05:31.680]  would have me eat no more than 18 grams. Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health,
[05:31.680 --> 05:36.160]  more commonly known simply as Harvard Health, recommends I eat no more than 30 grams.
[05:36.800 --> 05:41.680]  I should mention that if you want to get heart disease and die decades earlier than otherwise
[05:41.680 --> 05:46.720]  would be the case, all you need to do is follow the advice of the American Heart Association or
[05:46.720 --> 05:52.160]  Harvard Health. Both are nothing but mouthpieces for big med and big pharma, which of course only
[05:52.160 --> 05:58.960]  reap billions of dollars in annual revenue if you're sick. So what happens if you ignore the
[05:58.960 --> 06:05.840]  advice of those establishment shills and consume 230 grams of fat a day? As do I. One good indicator
[06:05.920 --> 06:14.080]  is to have a coronary artery calcium scan, CAC for short. What was my recent CAC score? It was
[06:14.800 --> 06:21.520]  a big fat zero. In short, I don't have coronary artery disease. If the establishment narrative
[06:21.520 --> 06:27.840]  was true, it would be impossible for me to eat 230 grams a day of dietary fat from animal sources
[06:27.840 --> 06:35.280]  for years and not have heart disease. But I don't have heart disease and neither do other carnivores.
[06:35.840 --> 06:42.480]  Why? Because the establishment narrative is a lie. Millions of people eating carnivore style
[06:42.480 --> 06:49.440]  for years without ever getting heart disease is incontrovertible evidence. The saturated fat
[06:49.440 --> 06:56.880]  narrative is and always has been false. Before I continue, please take a moment to subscribe
[06:56.880 --> 07:01.680]  and hit the like button. When you do that, the platform will show this video to more people.
[07:01.760 --> 07:07.520]  Thank you for helping spread the truth. Since roughly the 1970s, the establishment, which in
[07:07.520 --> 07:12.480]  this matter includes the U.S. government, the medical industry, the processed food industry,
[07:12.480 --> 07:18.960]  and the media, has been inundating the American people with a saturated fat lie. Part of that
[07:18.960 --> 07:22.880]  propaganda was telling you that to avoid heart disease, you needed to switch from consuming
[07:22.880 --> 07:28.880]  saturated fat to consuming vegetable oil, which as you just heard is oil extracted from nuts,
[07:28.880 --> 07:35.040]  seeds, and grains. Nuts, seed, and grain oils are not saturated fat. They are overwhelmingly
[07:35.040 --> 07:41.520]  unsaturated fat. And what did you learn just a moment ago when I read from body science? Right,
[07:41.520 --> 07:46.800]  that researchers have known since the mid-70s that high consumption of polyunsaturated fats
[07:46.800 --> 07:51.680]  increased the odds of getting colon cancer 300% and all other forms of cancer by 200%.
[07:52.640 --> 07:59.920]  Stated more pointedly, while researchers already knew polyunsaturated fats dramatically increased
[07:59.920 --> 08:06.160]  the incidence of colon cancer and other forms of cancer, the establishment has spent billions of
[08:06.160 --> 08:12.240]  dollars telling you that consuming a substance known to promote cancer was the way for you to
[08:12.240 --> 08:18.720]  remain healthy. Some nutritional researchers are now making the argument that most chronic diseases
[08:18.720 --> 08:23.920]  we've attributed to things like sugar and high glycemic carbs are actually caused by high
[08:23.920 --> 08:28.880]  consumption levels of nuts, seed, and grain oil, which significantly increases a person's level of
[08:28.880 --> 08:35.120]  omega-6 fatty acids. In short, these researchers believe consumption of nuts, seeds, and grain oil
[08:35.120 --> 08:41.280]  is the true underlying cause of the metabolic dysfunction that then leads to a long list of
[08:41.280 --> 08:48.000]  chronic diseases, including obesity, heart disease, and type 2 diabetes. But the issue isn't just the
[08:48.080 --> 08:54.480]  nuts, seed, and grain oils people buy from the grocery store. The processed food industry uses
[08:54.480 --> 09:02.000]  the commercial version of the same polyunsaturated oils in virtually everything they make. So,
[09:02.960 --> 09:09.600]  how can the establishment now tell you the truth? If they did, it would sound something like this.
[09:10.320 --> 09:15.520]  We've spent billions of dollars on propaganda to brainwash you into believing those fake vegetable
[09:15.520 --> 09:20.400]  oils are healthy, and for several decades now the commercial version of those fake oils have
[09:20.400 --> 09:26.400]  permeated nearly every factory-produced food item you consume. The lies we told you and the substance
[09:26.400 --> 09:31.360]  we put in nearly all of the food you've consumed over the years is why so many of you are getting
[09:31.360 --> 09:37.200]  colorectal cancer. Despite that being the truth of the matter, you'll never hear them admit it.
[09:38.160 --> 09:43.760]  In Body Science, I have a section dedicated to what science tells us about cancer in general,
[09:43.760 --> 09:48.240]  not just colorectal cancer. Although the establishment propaganda about cancers
[09:48.240 --> 09:53.360]  other than colorectal isn't focused on polyunsaturated fats, the brainwashing is
[09:53.360 --> 09:59.200]  equally as egregious. Today, the public believes that various foods are essential for good health,
[09:59.840 --> 10:05.280]  when in fact your body's physiological response to those foods produces the substances that
[10:05.280 --> 10:14.960]  promote the activation of cancer in your body. It is so simple to not ever get diseases such
[10:14.960 --> 10:20.800]  as hypertension, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, metabolic disease, cancer, Alzheimer's,
[10:20.800 --> 10:28.720]  obesity, and heart disease. But that requires you to be willing to entertain the possibility
[10:29.440 --> 10:36.080]  that 40 or 50 years of establishment propaganda has you believing things that will make you sick
[10:36.080 --> 10:41.360]  are actually healthy for you. If you're open to entertaining that possibility, the next step is to
[10:41.360 --> 10:48.800]  read Body Science. Once you read Body Science, it's game over for the false establishment narratives
[10:48.800 --> 10:53.440]  you thought were factual. There's a reason Body Science has never gotten anything less than a
[10:53.440 --> 10:59.440]  five-star rating. It's because readers see the facts, data, and evidence, which completely
[10:59.440 --> 11:04.560]  changes what they perceive as healthy. If they put what they've learned into action,
[11:05.360 --> 11:12.800]  then they won't get the diseases just mentioned, including colorectal cancer. You can get Body
[11:12.800 --> 11:21.040]  Science at drreality.news. While you're there, consider picking up a copy of Income Tax Shattering
[11:21.520 --> 11:28.400]  the Best Selling Book in America that lays out the incontrovertible proof that Congress has never
[11:28.400 --> 11:34.080]  imposed the income tax on ordinary working Americans like you. I'm going to do something
[11:34.080 --> 11:40.640]  I rarely do, which is tell you right now exactly upon whom the income tax has been imposed.
[11:41.760 --> 11:48.320]  Congress has imposed the income tax on three what the law calls classes of persons. The three
[11:48.320 --> 11:55.120]  classes upon whom the tax has been imposed are these. Number one, non-resident aliens with US
[11:55.120 --> 12:03.120]  source income. Two, foreign corporations with US source income. And three, US citizens residing
[12:03.120 --> 12:10.560]  abroad with foreign earned income. That's it. No one else, despite the fact that I haven't filed
[12:10.560 --> 12:14.960]  or paid income tax in 30 years, wrote the best-selling book on this subject and speak
[12:14.960 --> 12:22.160]  about it nationally. Lots of people think I'm a kook because the government says everyone owes it.
[12:23.600 --> 12:29.040]  Think about that premise for a minute. Those who have been following me for years know I am
[12:29.040 --> 12:36.000]  fastidious about being factual with you, but somehow the US government that lies constantly
[12:36.720 --> 12:43.440]  is suddenly telling the truth on this one issue. I'd say the person who thinks like that
[12:44.080 --> 12:50.160]  is the real kook. And keep in mind, I would consider it unethical to tell you the income tax
[12:50.160 --> 12:55.200]  doesn't apply to ordinary working Americans if I can't back it up with indisputable evidence,
[12:55.200 --> 13:00.960]  which is exactly what I do when income tax shattering the mist. But let's take me out of
[13:00.960 --> 13:08.800]  the loop. A buddy recently asked an AI chat bot for statutes, regulations, and treasury decisions
[13:09.360 --> 13:15.760]  pertaining to non-resident aliens owing income tax. The AI cited a number of statutes, regulations,
[13:15.760 --> 13:22.080]  and treasury decisions. My buddy then asked the AI for the statutes, regs, and treasury decisions
[13:22.080 --> 13:29.120]  pertaining to US citizens earning domestic income within a state of the union. To that request,
[13:29.120 --> 13:36.080]  the AI was unable to provide a single statute, regulation, or treasury decision.
[13:36.960 --> 13:44.160]  Zero. Zip. Nada. If an AI can't find a single statute, reg, or treasury decision saying you
[13:44.160 --> 13:50.080]  owe income tax on the fruits of your labor, maybe you should be reading Income Tax Shattering the
[13:50.080 --> 13:56.320]  Mist. About six months ago, a longtime friend asked an AI chat bot questions about the income
[13:56.320 --> 14:01.360]  tax in plain English. In other words, he didn't ask for statutes, regs, or treasury decisions.
[14:01.360 --> 14:07.040]  He simply asked questions such as, do US citizens owe income tax on their domestic earnings?
[14:07.920 --> 14:14.560]  The AI responded with traditional establishment answers such as that US citizens owe income tax
[14:14.560 --> 14:22.080]  on their taxable income. My friend then gave the AI a number of points of law from income tax
[14:22.080 --> 14:29.440]  shattering the myths. In response, the AI said it was sorry its original response had been inaccurate
[14:29.440 --> 14:33.920]  and then stated there appears to be no law requiring an American earning his or her domestic
[14:33.920 --> 14:42.080]  income in a state of the union to file a return or pay income tax. So what changed the AI's position?
[14:43.040 --> 14:48.320]  At first, the AI was simply regurgitating the establishment narrative that's so prevalent on
[14:48.320 --> 14:53.200]  the internet. That's analogous to the average American believing the government's income tax
[14:53.200 --> 15:00.640]  propaganda. Then, after the AI was shown what the law says, it did a 180 on the subject.
[15:01.520 --> 15:05.840]  That's exactly what readers of income tax shattering the myths experience.
[15:05.840 --> 15:09.280]  When they open the cover to read it, they have the false narrative in their head.
[15:09.280 --> 15:17.200]  By the time they complete the book, they know with absolute certainty that Congress has never
[15:17.200 --> 15:25.280]  imposed the income tax on them. Whether it's an AI or the human brain, the false establishment
[15:25.280 --> 15:32.560]  narrative cannot survive income tax shattering the myths. I'm proud of that because you deserve
[15:32.560 --> 15:39.120]  the truth. You also deserve to keep 100% of your earnings for the rest of your life. Once you know
[15:39.120 --> 15:44.160]  the truth of the income tax, you can decide what you want to do about it. Again, I'm proud that
[15:44.160 --> 15:50.480]  income tax shattering the myths allows you to safely walk away from the scam. Right now,
[15:50.480 --> 15:57.360]  and for a limited time, if you buy body science and income tax shattering the myths together
[15:57.360 --> 16:05.280]  in the two-book bundle, you get 15% off income tax shattering the myths and I'll pay the shipping
[16:05.280 --> 16:10.480]  on your order, which almost cuts the cost of body science in half. This offer will only be good for
[16:10.480 --> 16:16.560]  a few weeks, sort of a post-Christmas offering, so don't delay. Place your order using the coupon
[16:16.560 --> 16:22.800]  code freebie. I'll put the link and the code down in the notes. Also, by purchasing body science and
[16:22.800 --> 16:29.360]  income tax shattering the myths, you help me to continue to be here to get the truth out. Please
[16:29.360 --> 16:34.240]  share this presentation with as many people as you can. Thanks for being here. Take care.