Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language
Detected language: English
[00:00.000 --> 00:04.920]  This headline caught my attention.
[00:04.920 --> 00:11.280]  Calls ring out for Fauci to debate virologist after Rogan podcast appearance, and obviously
[00:11.280 --> 00:14.520]  this is referring to Dr. Robert Malone.
[00:14.520 --> 00:19.880]  Debate between Fauci and Robert Malone.
[00:19.880 --> 00:26.520]  Wouldn't that be great?
[00:26.520 --> 00:37.920]  The Dr. Reality Vodcast with Dave Champion.
[00:37.920 --> 00:43.920]  If we were to put each of these people, Fauci and Malone, into a camp, it would be as follows.
[00:43.920 --> 00:50.320]  Fauci supports in every jot and tittle, every little detail, the establishment narrative.
[00:50.320 --> 00:53.880]  Dr. Malone does exactly the opposite.
[00:53.880 --> 01:00.440]  Any of the things he says cut across the grain or conflict with the establishment narrative
[01:00.440 --> 01:02.120]  put out by people like Fauci.
[01:02.120 --> 01:07.560]  I think it's important to say that Fauci is undoubtedly the most well-known spokesman
[01:07.560 --> 01:09.800]  for the establishment.
[01:09.800 --> 01:16.920]  And I think over time, Robert Malone has become the voice for those who believe there is something
[01:16.920 --> 01:19.880]  wrong with the establishment narrative.
[01:19.880 --> 01:21.520]  There is more to know.
[01:21.520 --> 01:24.800]  There are things that the establishment is not telling the public.
[01:24.800 --> 01:30.440]  Now, I listen to both Fauci and Malone with great interest.
[01:30.440 --> 01:33.280]  I don't think I need to spend a lot of time here today talking about Fauci.
[01:33.280 --> 01:38.080]  You've almost certainly seen him time and time and time again on the dominant media
[01:38.080 --> 01:40.600]  putting out the establishment narrative.
[01:40.600 --> 01:43.920]  You're probably aware of his position with the National Institutes of Health and so forth.
[01:43.920 --> 01:45.140]  So I won't spend a lot of time with that.
[01:45.140 --> 01:47.800]  But I do want to take a moment to talk about Robert Malone.
[01:48.480 --> 01:52.800]  And again, I think it's important to say that I have listened to them both.
[01:52.800 --> 02:02.560]  So I'm not choosing sides at this moment when I say that virtually all of the criticism
[02:02.560 --> 02:08.920]  that I hear of Dr. Malone is something akin to character assassination.
[02:08.920 --> 02:14.920]  One of the things that I see time and time and time again is that Robert Malone is not
[02:14.920 --> 02:17.640]  the inventor of mRNA technology.
[02:17.640 --> 02:23.560]  Now, I don't use the word inventor because I think people can bicker about what that
[02:23.560 --> 02:24.560]  means.
[02:24.560 --> 02:30.680]  I express that Dr. Robert Malone is the father of mRNA technology.
[02:30.680 --> 02:36.760]  And in support of that, he has nine patents with his name on them granted by the United
[02:36.760 --> 02:43.840]  States government, which collectively lay the foundation for all of the mRNA technology
[02:43.840 --> 02:45.600]  that we're seeing today.
[02:45.600 --> 02:51.280]  But I think the important part is that when people try and attack his credibility, character
[02:51.280 --> 02:57.420]  assassination, over the word inventor, what they're really saying is, I don't know a
[02:57.420 --> 03:01.840]  damn thing about the science involved, so I'm going to try and, I don't like the message.
[03:01.840 --> 03:04.440]  I don't know anything about the science, but I don't like the message, so I'm going to
[03:04.440 --> 03:06.200]  try to kill the messenger.
[03:06.200 --> 03:11.600]  That's my interpretation of when they have nothing to focus on but the word inventor.
[03:11.600 --> 03:14.640]  So pretty much we have these two camps.
[03:14.640 --> 03:19.000]  We have the, and by that I mean the populace, the people of the United States.
[03:19.000 --> 03:20.000]  We have two camps.
[03:20.000 --> 03:26.440]  We have those that choose, without understanding the science at all, who choose to follow Fauci
[03:26.440 --> 03:30.560]  and worship Fauci in many cases, whatever Fauci says goes.
[03:30.560 --> 03:36.040]  And then we have those who, sadly, oftentimes without understanding the science, choose
[03:36.040 --> 03:41.120]  to follow Dr. Robert Malone and believe what he's saying.
[03:41.120 --> 03:45.400]  And of course, as a physiologist, you could imagine, I'm not really keen on either of
[03:45.400 --> 03:46.400]  those.
[03:46.400 --> 03:49.080]  I think people, if they're going to take a position at all, if they're going to support
[03:49.080 --> 03:55.160]  one or the other, they should actually take the time to look into the science.
[03:55.160 --> 03:58.560]  And I mean the science, not what the media reports about the science.
[03:58.560 --> 04:03.360]  I mean the actual science, not what Pfizer says about it, not what Moderna says about
[04:03.360 --> 04:08.160]  it, not what CNN says about it, not what Fox News says about it, not what your favorite
[04:08.200 --> 04:10.320]  news outlet says about it.
[04:10.320 --> 04:16.200]  But actually look at the science, because if you're not doing that and you don't understand
[04:16.200 --> 04:22.600]  the science, why would you choose sides in a science debate that you know nothing about?
[04:22.600 --> 04:26.120]  I think a lot of people at this point in history know who Carey Mullis is.
[04:26.120 --> 04:33.600]  He was the gentleman who won a Nobel Prize for conceptualizing and creating PCR testing.
[04:34.040 --> 04:40.640]  And people have a lot of views on PCR testing, again, without understanding exactly how it
[04:40.640 --> 04:41.640]  works.
[04:41.640 --> 04:43.800]  People are either really for it or really against it.
[04:43.800 --> 04:46.880]  It's funny because the people who say it's completely bogus and it's wrong and it doesn't
[04:46.880 --> 04:49.060]  work right and it's flawed.
[04:49.060 --> 04:53.100]  And so I asked them to explain to me, because there's a rather specific lengthy process
[04:53.100 --> 04:55.220]  that PRC goes through.
[04:55.220 --> 05:00.740]  And so I asked them to describe to me at what point in that lengthy, very specific, detailed
[05:00.740 --> 05:06.180]  scientific process it goes wrong and produces whatever they believe is the negative about
[05:06.180 --> 05:07.700]  PCR testing.
[05:07.700 --> 05:08.860]  Yeah.
[05:08.860 --> 05:11.660]  I never hear back from them because they don't know.
[05:11.660 --> 05:16.340]  They just, just like choosing Fauci or just like choosing Malone, they've chosen that
[05:16.340 --> 05:20.780]  the PCR testing is somehow bad, flawed, inaccurate, whatever they want to say without understanding
[05:20.780 --> 05:21.780]  it.
[05:21.780 --> 05:24.620]  And the biggest flaw is not with PCR testing.
[05:24.620 --> 05:29.140]  It's with the protocols established for PCR testing.
[05:29.380 --> 05:30.380]  I mean, come on.
[05:30.380 --> 05:33.020]  You had 40 amplification cycles.
[05:33.020 --> 05:37.860]  I mean, Fauci himself said pandemics are not driven by people who are asymptomatic.
[05:37.860 --> 05:43.260]  And yet the way PCR testing has been done during this outbreak for the last two years,
[05:43.260 --> 05:48.420]  if you had so little virus replication in you that you were asymptomatic, you still
[05:48.420 --> 05:49.620]  tested positive.
[05:49.620 --> 05:54.240]  And a lot of expositors, including highly trained medical personnel, have seen little
[05:54.240 --> 05:55.780]  value in that approach.
[05:56.460 --> 06:02.300]  But back to the main point, Kerry Mullis is the brilliant scientist and researcher who
[06:02.300 --> 06:05.820]  conceptualized and then created the PCR process.
[06:05.820 --> 06:11.380]  So I want to share with you some words that Kerry Mullis had to say about Fauci because
[06:11.380 --> 06:17.820]  this goes directly to, will we ever see a debate between somebody like Fauci and somebody
[06:17.820 --> 06:18.820]  like Dr. Malone?
[06:18.820 --> 06:23.500]  So here are Kerry Mullis' remarks about Fauci, quote,
[06:23.500 --> 06:29.620]  He doesn't know anything about anything, and I would say that to his face, nothing.
[06:29.620 --> 06:33.620]  The man thinks he can take a blood sample, stick it in an electron microscope, and if
[06:33.620 --> 06:36.200]  it's got a virus in there, you'll know it.
[06:36.200 --> 06:39.220]  He doesn't understand electron microscopy.
[06:39.220 --> 06:43.420]  He should not be in a position like the one he's in.
[06:43.420 --> 06:47.340]  Most of these guys up there at the top are totally administrative people, and they don't
[06:47.340 --> 06:51.460]  know anything that's going on at the bottom, and by that he means the ground-level boots
[06:51.460 --> 06:53.820]  on the ground where the real work is being done.
[06:53.820 --> 06:59.260]  Those guys have an agenda, which is not what we would like them to have.
[06:59.260 --> 07:04.180]  Tony Fauci does not mind getting on television in front of the people who pay his salary
[07:04.180 --> 07:07.100]  and lie directly to the cameras.
[07:07.100 --> 07:08.300]  Who can we trust?
[07:08.300 --> 07:09.300]  Fauci?
[07:09.300 --> 07:10.780]  Fauci doesn't know enough.
[07:10.780 --> 07:14.740]  If Fauci wants to get on television with someone who knows a little bit about this stuff and
[07:14.740 --> 07:17.060]  debate them, he could easily do it.
[07:17.060 --> 07:18.060]  He's been asked.
[07:18.540 --> 07:25.660]  As I said, Carey Mullis was brilliant and won a Nobel Prize for his conceptualization
[07:25.660 --> 07:27.620]  and creation of PCR.
[07:27.620 --> 07:30.020]  He obviously was well familiar with Fauci.
[07:30.020 --> 07:34.660]  You just heard his assessment of Fauci, and I'm going to put a link down in the notes
[07:34.660 --> 07:38.300]  to the video in which Mullis makes these statements.
[07:38.300 --> 07:45.260]  I'd now like to share with you the assessment of Fauci by Robert Malone, who says, quote,
[07:45.660 --> 07:47.340]  I mean, it's Tony.
[07:47.340 --> 07:48.700]  What can I say?
[07:48.700 --> 07:50.300]  Tony has no integrity.
[07:50.300 --> 07:51.300]  He lies all the time.
[07:51.300 --> 07:55.100]  And me and my peers have been watching this for decades.
[07:55.100 --> 08:00.060]  We just shrug our shoulders and shake our heads and say, it's Fauci.
[08:00.060 --> 08:01.060]  Close quote.
[08:01.060 --> 08:05.820]  Over roughly the last year and a half, I've done several presentations where I've taken
[08:05.820 --> 08:14.100]  a look at public statements made by Fauci concerning SARS-CoV-2 and or COVID-19.
[08:14.100 --> 08:18.740]  And then I've compared his statements to the data.
[08:18.740 --> 08:22.580]  And it's been crystal clear by looking at his statements that we're talking about in
[08:22.580 --> 08:23.740]  context of the time.
[08:23.740 --> 08:26.900]  So let's say he makes a statement in October of whatever year.
[08:26.900 --> 08:29.300]  He makes a statement in October.
[08:29.300 --> 08:34.340]  And then we look at the data in the months or weeks leading up to his statement, and
[08:34.340 --> 08:36.380]  then shortly thereafter his statement.
[08:36.380 --> 08:40.660]  And we see that his statement had zero validity in light of the data.
[08:40.780 --> 08:49.100]  Obviously, that would tend to support the view of Fauci espoused by Terry Mullis and
[08:49.100 --> 08:50.100]  Robert Malone.
[08:50.100 --> 08:54.140]  I'm not going to put links to every single video I've done about Fauci's credibility.
[08:54.140 --> 09:00.780]  I will link to the last one I did down in the notes, because that particular falsehood
[09:00.780 --> 09:08.140]  was incredibly egregious, the worst, by far the worst falsehood Fauci has told during
[09:08.140 --> 09:13.020]  his time with the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak and him speaking publicly.
[09:13.020 --> 09:17.740]  In light of remarks by people like Kerry Mullis and Dr. Robert Malone and others concerning
[09:17.740 --> 09:24.420]  Fauci and his, according to them, his lack of integrity, why do people, again, without
[09:24.420 --> 09:30.020]  understanding the science, why do people get on board with what Fauci has to say?
[09:30.020 --> 09:33.020]  Well, I think there's various motivations.
[09:33.780 --> 09:43.860]  I believe is that it is too emotionally challenging for the genre of people that choose to follow
[09:43.860 --> 09:46.260]  Fauci and believe him and in some cases worship him.
[09:46.260 --> 09:54.740]  I think it's too emotionally painful for them to acknowledge that somebody like Fauci,
[09:54.740 --> 09:59.260]  who has the trust of the American people, he's the most highly paid federal employee
[09:59.260 --> 10:01.420]  in the entire federal government.
[10:01.420 --> 10:06.060]  He has this significant responsibility.
[10:06.060 --> 10:13.100]  I think it's just too painful for a lot of people to say to themselves, this guy that
[10:13.100 --> 10:17.100]  we're supposed to be able to trust, we can't.
[10:17.100 --> 10:19.300]  There's a wider implication to that.
[10:19.300 --> 10:26.180]  If they admit, you know, we just can't trust Fauci, he's not trustworthy, I believe that
[10:26.180 --> 10:28.940]  opens a whole can of worms because then they have to do something else.
[10:28.940 --> 10:34.100]  They have to start looking at the entire government structure and the people who speak
[10:34.100 --> 10:38.700]  on behalf of government and they have to say to themselves, all right, so if Fauci with
[10:38.700 --> 10:43.620]  all of his credentials and his, I think he's what, 37 or 38 years now in his position with
[10:43.620 --> 10:49.100]  the National Institutes of Health, I think if they say we can't trust this guy, then
[10:49.100 --> 10:51.220]  who in government can we trust?
[10:51.220 --> 10:56.300]  Of course, that presents some problems when you start asking that question, who in the
[10:56.620 --> 10:59.180]  government can we trust if not Fauci?
[10:59.180 --> 11:05.580]  I think that opens a huge can of worms and I think a lot of people are just not emotionally
[11:05.580 --> 11:09.020]  where they're willing to tackle that.
[11:09.020 --> 11:12.180]  They would rather, even if it's completely false, even if it's completely bogus, they
[11:12.180 --> 11:17.580]  would rather invest themselves in the fact that somebody like Fauci is scrupulously honest
[11:17.580 --> 11:21.860]  in telling the American people the truth and has our best interests at heart.
[11:21.860 --> 11:24.860]  I think emotionally that's where they're at.
[11:24.900 --> 11:29.260]  They find it difficult to do anything other than that and it's all emotion.
[11:29.260 --> 11:34.740]  In my case, it's a lot easier for me to do that than I think for the average American
[11:34.740 --> 11:38.460]  and the reason is if you've been following me for any length of time, you know that I'm
[11:38.460 --> 11:44.220]  the author of Income Tax Shattering the Mist, which is the fruits of 17 years of research
[11:44.220 --> 11:50.020]  into the truth about the income tax, about who Congress has in fact imposed the income
[11:50.020 --> 11:54.780]  tax upon and who Congress has in fact not imposed the income tax on.
[11:55.420 --> 11:59.500]  If you're reading Income Tax Shattering the Mist, I don't know how many tens of thousands
[11:59.500 --> 12:02.980]  of people have read it, but I'm going to go out on a limb here because I haven't spoken
[12:02.980 --> 12:06.940]  to all of them, but the feedback that I get that I've gotten for the last, was it 11 years
[12:06.940 --> 12:10.660]  now, 12 years that the book's been out, when people get to the final page and they close
[12:10.660 --> 12:18.700]  it, they can never, ever, ever, ever, ever trust the federal government again about anything.
[12:18.780 --> 12:23.660]  I think in most people's minds, the quintessential truth, one of the quintessential truths in
[12:23.660 --> 12:28.620]  life is that if you earn some money, you owe some to the government in the form of income
[12:28.620 --> 12:33.420]  tax and when you get done with Income Tax Shattering the Mist, you know that that has
[12:33.420 --> 12:39.740]  got to be one of the most pervasive false narratives that exists in this country and
[12:39.740 --> 12:43.340]  it is promoted, actively promoted.
[12:43.340 --> 12:49.020]  This falsehood is actively promoted day in and day out by the United States government.
[12:49.020 --> 12:52.620]  I refer to it in Income Tax Shattering the Mist as the largest financial crime in the
[12:52.620 --> 12:58.060]  history of the world and you, if you're just an ordinary American getting up in the morning,
[12:58.060 --> 13:02.540]  getting the kids off to school, having a cup of coffee, going to work, make some money,
[13:02.540 --> 13:08.220]  you are the government's victim of this scam.
[13:08.220 --> 13:11.660]  I mean the income tax is not a scam, but the false representations to you about to whom
[13:11.660 --> 13:16.700]  it applies and to whom it does not apply is indeed a scam and you are the victim.
[13:17.420 --> 13:26.620]  Because I know what I know, I know that the federal government is 1000% non-trustworthy.
[13:26.620 --> 13:29.260]  When I look at somebody like Fauci, and I started at the very beginning of this talking
[13:29.260 --> 13:33.100]  about that I listen carefully to Fauci and I listen carefully to people like Dr. Robert
[13:33.100 --> 13:39.100]  Malone, when I listen, I don't have this emotional thing that requires me to trust anybody or
[13:39.100 --> 13:45.660]  in this case we were talking about trusting government. I know that the correct, accurate,
[13:45.660 --> 13:53.180]  and proper way to view the government is always that they are non-trustworthy unless or until
[13:53.180 --> 13:56.540]  you happen to, in a small amount of cases, find out that they're telling the truth.
[13:56.540 --> 14:01.420]  That is the proper context. So when I listen to Fauci as an example, it's much easier for
[14:01.420 --> 14:06.460]  me to listen to him and say, let me assess, as I said earlier, let me assess his statements
[14:06.460 --> 14:12.940]  in comparison to the data because it shows, as I pointed out, that he's lied time and time again.
[14:12.940 --> 14:20.540]  So it's not hard for me to say that because I've already unearthed what is perhaps the federal
[14:20.540 --> 14:27.420]  government's single largest most injurious lie that has victimized hundreds of millions of
[14:27.420 --> 14:31.420]  Americans and they know it and they're doing it anyway. So yeah, it's not hard for me to look at
[14:31.420 --> 14:37.100]  Fauci objectively and look at the data and come to a conclusion, which again, I think there's
[14:37.100 --> 14:42.540]  certain kinds of Americans that just emotionally cannot cope with that. I'm also the author of
[14:42.540 --> 14:45.900]  body science, which essentially does the same thing we just talked about with income tax,
[14:46.540 --> 14:52.300]  but with physiology and with an emphasis on nutritional physiology and the nutritional
[14:52.300 --> 14:56.460]  research done over the last 60 years, and I'm not going to go into a long winded spiel, but I will
[14:56.460 --> 15:01.180]  tell you it's the same thing you've been lied to for the last 50 or 60 years, abundantly lied to
[15:01.180 --> 15:07.100]  to the point where it has made America the most ill society in all of human history. With all of
[15:07.100 --> 15:13.740]  our science and all our technology, we are the most ill society in all of human history and it's
[15:13.740 --> 15:19.820]  because of people just like Fauci. Fauci's predecessors, if you will, the people that came
[15:19.820 --> 15:28.060]  before him, the prime example of that being Ansel Keys. I mean, he sold his soul to the big sugar
[15:28.140 --> 15:38.060]  industry and he harmed hundreds of millions of Americans over the last 50 years because he was
[15:38.060 --> 15:43.580]  willing to take money to lie, and I detail that in body science. And then it's not enough that you
[15:43.580 --> 15:49.740]  just take money and lie, but the way his personality was in his professional demeanor, I don't know if
[15:49.740 --> 15:54.380]  you were aware of this, he was a household name during like the 60s and the 70s on television
[15:54.940 --> 16:00.780]  and with his false information that he put out, he knew it was false to the American people. I
[16:00.780 --> 16:05.580]  don't know how many hundreds of millions of Americans he made sick and they died prematurely
[16:06.140 --> 16:09.980]  so that he could have money, so that he could have fame, so that he could have notoriety.
[16:09.980 --> 16:15.260]  So that's the kind of early predecessors, if you will, to how easily it is for people when
[16:15.260 --> 16:18.540]  money's in the picture. And of course, we know money's in the picture concerning things like
[16:18.540 --> 16:26.380]  the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. When money's involved, how horribly skewed, just blatant falsehoods,
[16:26.380 --> 16:32.700]  are put out by the establishment as truth for the purpose of various industries
[16:33.580 --> 16:40.540]  getting trillions of your dollars. And if you become incredibly ill and die decades prematurely,
[16:41.980 --> 16:45.660]  they don't care. So again, my point being that with that as a background,
[16:45.660 --> 16:52.220]  backdrop, with my personal experience, I don't have a problem assessing Fauci's information
[16:52.220 --> 17:02.540]  objectively. When I say look at Fauci objectively, I saw a video not long ago of Fauci speaking to
[17:02.540 --> 17:13.100]  the media and he was telling people that AIDS, the HIV retrovirus, could be transmitted through
[17:13.740 --> 17:20.860]  normal familial contact, such as being in the same household, parents and children,
[17:21.980 --> 17:27.980]  and that there was a risk of transmission of the HIV virus by normal familial contact in the
[17:27.980 --> 17:34.780]  household. I think there were some, well, I know there were political reasons that he made that
[17:34.780 --> 17:44.060]  statement. Nevertheless, he told the entire nation a blatant, whopping falsehood. I mean,
[17:44.060 --> 17:48.860]  you can go find it, I'm sure, on YouTube for yourself. But the point is that, again,
[17:49.580 --> 17:55.900]  verifies Mullis's assessment of him and Malone's assessment of him. And you can see it with your
[17:55.900 --> 17:59.100]  own eyes. You don't need to believe Mullis. You don't need to believe Malone. You don't need to
[17:59.100 --> 18:05.100]  believe me. Go look it up. So then with all that said, what are the odds that we're going to see
[18:05.100 --> 18:11.180]  a debate between Dr. Robert Malone and Fauci? Before I address that, let me just quickly say
[18:11.180 --> 18:17.260]  that Dr. Robert Malone has a standing offer to debate any doctor, any medical researcher,
[18:17.260 --> 18:24.780]  any vaccinologist, any professional who is in a field relevant to the topic of discussion,
[18:24.780 --> 18:32.700]  because primarily Dr. Robert Malone talks about the mRNA vaccines. And it's so weird that, again,
[18:32.700 --> 18:39.100]  his critics try to paint him, character assassination, as an anti-vaxxer. The man
[18:39.100 --> 18:47.020]  literally spent 30 years of his life developing healthy, safe vaccines. He literally is like,
[18:47.020 --> 18:52.940]  he spent the lion's share of his adult life in the vaccine industry, creating vaccines for you
[18:52.940 --> 18:57.420]  and your family to take that will save you from disease and so forth. But he's somehow
[18:58.380 --> 19:10.060]  an anti-vaxxer because he believes there are serious concerns with the mRNA technology vaccine.
[19:10.060 --> 19:15.740]  So this gigantic marketplace of vaccines, he has concerns about one particular type
[19:17.660 --> 19:21.100]  that somehow, in the minds of those who want to practice character assassination,
[19:21.900 --> 19:27.820]  makes him anti-vaxxer. But the point is, he has a standing offer to debate anyone. So will Fauci
[19:27.820 --> 19:34.460]  take him up on that offer? No, absolutely not. Fauci knows his limitations. Fauci is a medical
[19:34.460 --> 19:40.300]  doctor, by the way, and quite brilliant. And I've said this time and time again,
[19:40.300 --> 19:45.580]  the fact that somebody is incredibly brilliant if they are corrupt, it doesn't matter how brilliant
[19:45.580 --> 19:50.540]  they are. And of course, Fauci really found his forte when he got into the administrative
[19:50.540 --> 19:56.620]  and political wranglings of heading up a federal agency. And that's why he's been in that position
[19:56.620 --> 20:03.020]  for, like I said, I think it's 37 or 38 years now. But as Mullis said, the guys at the top really
[20:03.020 --> 20:08.140]  don't know what's going on with the people at the bottom who are actually doing the work.
[20:08.140 --> 20:11.980]  The number one demographic of people who have some sort of problem with Malone are people
[20:11.980 --> 20:18.700]  who've never heard him speak, to be clear. When you hear him speak, he offers nothing
[20:19.500 --> 20:23.740]  in medical terms. He gets into a little bit of the politics of where we're at today. And of course,
[20:23.740 --> 20:28.220]  that is subjective. That's personal opinion. However, when it comes to the medical side of
[20:28.220 --> 20:36.380]  things, he offers evidence. He offers clinical trials. He offers other kinds of research.
[20:36.380 --> 20:43.740]  He never says, well, because I hold nine patents that collectively are the foundation of all mRNA
[20:43.740 --> 20:49.260]  vaccine technology in the world. He doesn't rely on that. I mean, he gives that as part of his
[20:49.260 --> 20:57.260]  credentials. But then he shows based on research, he says, here's what this shows. I have concerns
[20:57.260 --> 21:04.780]  about that. Here's what this shows. I have concerns about that. That's what this shows. I have
[21:04.780 --> 21:08.700]  concerns about that. And I think we all should have concerns about that is what he puts out.
[21:09.660 --> 21:15.740]  And he just goes and goes and goes with research, with science. And it's so funny because, you know,
[21:15.740 --> 21:20.700]  there's the follow the science crowd who normally wouldn't understand science, wouldn't recognize
[21:20.700 --> 21:27.100]  science if it bit them in the butt. But suddenly when Robert Malone lines up study after study,
[21:27.100 --> 21:32.780]  after study, after study, and he talks about these concerning results from these studies, all of a
[21:32.860 --> 21:39.820]  sudden the follow the science people don't want to follow that science. Instead, not understanding
[21:39.820 --> 21:47.100]  science. They just want to emotionally invest themselves, believe in Fauci. My point being
[21:47.100 --> 21:55.900]  that there will never be a debate between Fauci and Malone. The reason is, and as Mullis said
[21:55.900 --> 22:02.460]  decades ago, Fauci could hold a debate with any of these professionals anytime he wants
[22:02.540 --> 22:08.060]  because they've asked him, as Malone has, standing offer. You want to debate me? You want to say I'm
[22:08.060 --> 22:17.260]  wrong? Let's get it on. Let's do this. Fauci has had offers to debate people publicly, to buttress
[22:17.260 --> 22:23.980]  his claims, to show his credibility for decades now. And he's never accepted a single one. And
[22:23.980 --> 22:31.260]  he's not going to accept this one with Malone. Now, people can attribute their own reasons why
[22:31.260 --> 22:40.620]  Tony Fauci never accepts a public debate offer. I'll share my opinion with you of why Fauci will
[22:40.620 --> 22:48.860]  not ever debate Malone. My opinion is having listened to Fauci and having listened to Malone,
[22:48.860 --> 22:55.820]  both of them in depth, Fauci will not agree to a debate with Malone because Fauci would be
[22:56.780 --> 23:05.580]  decimated. He would be publicly humiliated. I think many of his supporters would even call
[23:05.580 --> 23:13.740]  for his resignation if there was a debate and they got to see Robert Malone present solid,
[23:13.740 --> 23:23.020]  hardcore study data. And Fauci not being able to compete. I think he's also a little concerned,
[23:23.020 --> 23:29.580]  at this point, Fauci is about his legacy. I think the last two years has really damaged Fauci's
[23:29.580 --> 23:36.140]  reputation with a lot of Americans. I think it's damaged his reputation quietly within the halls
[23:36.140 --> 23:42.620]  of the federal government. He's a pugilist in the political arena and in the media arena,
[23:42.620 --> 23:51.180]  not in the boxing ring. But he's a pugilist. And I think as long as SARS-CoV-2 is still a thing,
[23:51.820 --> 23:58.860]  he will absolutely not resign because he would see that as affecting his legacy.
[23:59.820 --> 24:05.740]  However, I'm equally confident that when SARS-CoV-2 goes away, it's no longer a thing,
[24:05.740 --> 24:11.500]  he's no longer the White House spokesperson for the pandemic. I think he's going to step down,
[24:11.500 --> 24:18.140]  probably not because he wants to, but probably because the tide quietly amongst congresspersons
[24:18.140 --> 24:23.980]  and senators and others in the federal government have quietly, as I said, turned against him.
[24:23.980 --> 24:27.420]  No one's going to come out and speak against him at this point. But when this is all over,
[24:27.420 --> 24:33.020]  there's going to be so much pressure on him to resign and to turn his agency over to somebody
[24:33.020 --> 24:39.980]  whose credibility hasn't been seriously damaged. Pretty confident shortly after SARS-CoV-2 is no
[24:39.980 --> 24:44.220]  longer a thing, you're going to see an announcement in the press that Fauci is resigning.
[24:44.220 --> 24:49.420]  So we've talked here today a lot about credibility, falsehoods, and government,
[24:49.420 --> 24:54.620]  and so forth. If you would like to help me to continue to be here for you with these
[24:54.620 --> 24:59.180]  sort of presentations, may I encourage you to go to DrReality.News, grab yourself a copy of
[24:59.180 --> 25:07.820]  Income Tax, Shattering the Mist, or Body Science. Cautionary note right now, either one or both,
[25:07.900 --> 25:21.340]  when you read it or them, you will never, ever, ever again be able to trust the establishment.
[25:22.140 --> 25:29.340]  If you read Income Tax, Shattering the Myths, you will never, ever again on any subject be able to
[25:30.060 --> 25:34.380]  trust the United States government. I don't have to convince you of that. The facts will
[25:34.380 --> 25:39.340]  convince you of that. If you read it, and let's say you're somebody who actually has faith in the
[25:39.340 --> 25:44.140]  federal government, if you read Income Tax, Shattering the Myths, cautionary note up front,
[25:44.140 --> 25:50.220]  it will destroy that construct for you. You will never, ever again look at the federal
[25:50.220 --> 25:53.660]  government in the same light. But again, if you appreciate these sort of presentations,
[25:53.660 --> 25:57.740]  what funds my being able to take the time to do this is the sale of these books. So if you
[25:57.740 --> 26:02.380]  would be so kind as to go to DrReality.News and grab yourself a copy or both, that would be
[26:02.380 --> 26:11.580]  fantastic. Thank you for being here.