Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language
Detected language: English
[00:00.000 --> 00:01.480]  Welcome to the show.
[00:01.480 --> 00:06.080]  I've been telling the American people the truth about the income tax for decades.
[00:06.080 --> 00:10.560]  That truth is Congress has never imposed the income tax on ordinary hardworking Americans
[00:10.560 --> 00:11.760]  like you.
[00:11.760 --> 00:17.040]  Sadly, there are more than a few people who love the government's big income tax lie and
[00:17.040 --> 00:18.640]  attempt to defend it.
[00:18.640 --> 00:23.520]  Imagine what a reprobate one has to be to defend a government lie that has convinced
[00:23.520 --> 00:28.240]  much of the public they have to give the government a cut of the money they earn to raise their
[00:28.240 --> 00:30.560]  families and have a good life.
[00:30.560 --> 00:34.480]  Over the years, one of the most common claims I've heard is that the income tax has been
[00:34.480 --> 00:41.400]  imposed on ordinary working Americans by section one of the tax code and its associated regulation.
[00:41.400 --> 00:50.440]  Let's have some fun breaking down that nonsensical claim.
[00:50.440 --> 01:01.640]  The Dr. Reality Vodcast with Dave Champion.
[01:01.640 --> 01:02.640]  Let's start with this.
[01:02.640 --> 01:05.960]  I'm the author of Income Tax Shattering the Mist, the bestselling book in America that
[01:05.960 --> 01:11.880]  provides mountains of incontrovertible proof Congress has never imposed the income tax
[01:11.880 --> 01:14.240]  on ordinary hardworking Americans.
[01:14.240 --> 01:17.980]  Because I know what the law actually says, I haven't filed an income tax return or paid
[01:17.980 --> 01:20.620]  a penny of income tax in 30 years.
[01:20.620 --> 01:27.020]  Tens of thousands of your fellow citizens now keep 100% of what is theirs based on the
[01:27.020 --> 01:30.660]  information you'll find in Income Tax Shattering the Mist.
[01:30.660 --> 01:34.860]  Defenders of the government's income tax lie like to claim that section one of the tax
[01:34.860 --> 01:39.700]  code clearly imposes the income tax on all Americans.
[01:39.700 --> 01:46.260]  What they refer to as section one is more properly known as 26 USC section one.
[01:46.260 --> 01:50.420]  They also assert that section one's regulations support their claim.
[01:50.420 --> 01:54.620]  That regulation is found at 26 CFR 1.1-1.
[01:54.620 --> 01:59.660]  We're going to look at section one as well as 1.1-1 and you can decide if they support
[01:59.660 --> 02:01.980]  the government's big lie.
[02:01.980 --> 02:06.100]  Section one is entitled Tax Imposed.
[02:06.100 --> 02:10.780]  I suspect having read just the title, some people believe the title proves the income
[02:10.780 --> 02:14.460]  tax has been imposed on everyone.
[02:14.460 --> 02:19.700]  Some reading people would respond that the words tax imposed doesn't tell us upon who
[02:19.700 --> 02:23.060]  the tax has been imposed or under what circumstances.
[02:23.060 --> 02:30.380]  Section one is structured such that subsections A, B, C, and D tell us upon whom the tax has
[02:30.380 --> 02:31.380]  been imposed.
[02:31.380 --> 02:34.860]  So I'll quickly read those four subsections for you.
[02:34.860 --> 02:35.860]  Subsection A.
[02:35.860 --> 02:40.780]  There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of every married individual who makes a single
[02:40.780 --> 02:44.500]  return jointly with his spouse.
[02:44.500 --> 02:45.660]  Subsection B.
[02:45.660 --> 02:50.500]  There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of every head of a household a tax determined
[02:50.500 --> 02:54.220]  in accordance with the following table.
[02:54.220 --> 02:56.980]  Subsection C.
[02:56.980 --> 03:01.260]  There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of every individual or the head of a household
[03:01.260 --> 03:06.140]  who is not a married individual a tax determined in accordance with the following table.
[03:06.140 --> 03:07.260]  And subsection D.
[03:07.420 --> 03:11.740]  There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of every married individual who does not make
[03:11.740 --> 03:17.100]  a single return jointly with his spouse under section 6013 a tax determined in accordance
[03:17.100 --> 03:18.940]  with the following table.
[03:18.940 --> 03:25.460]  I don't know if you noticed, but there is one pivotal term that appears in every one
[03:25.460 --> 03:27.380]  of those statements.
[03:27.380 --> 03:30.480]  That term is taxable income.
[03:30.480 --> 03:34.460]  In other words, the tax hasn't been imposed on plain old income as ordinary people use
[03:34.460 --> 03:40.180]  that word such as your personal earnings, but only on a specific type of income that
[03:40.180 --> 03:41.900]  has a narrow meaning.
[03:41.900 --> 03:46.300]  We find the definition of taxable income at section 63 of the code, which reads,
[03:46.300 --> 03:51.500]  The term taxable income means gross income minus the deductions allowed by this chapter.
[03:51.500 --> 03:57.900]  Okay, so taxable income is a subset of something called gross income.
[03:57.900 --> 03:59.460]  What is gross income?
[03:59.460 --> 04:06.340]  We can find the answer to that by going to section 61 of the code entitled Gross Income Defined.
[04:06.340 --> 04:08.460]  Section 61 states,
[04:08.460 --> 04:12.460]  Except as otherwise provided in this subtitle, gross income means all income from whatever
[04:12.460 --> 04:17.620]  sources derived including but not limited to the following items compensation for services,
[04:17.620 --> 04:21.700]  including fees, commissions, fringe benefits and similar items, gross income derived from
[04:21.700 --> 04:27.060]  business gains derived from dealing in property, interest, rents, royalties, dividends, blah,
[04:27.060 --> 04:29.380]  blah, blah, blah.
[04:29.380 --> 04:31.900]  Let's take a moment to recap.
[04:31.900 --> 04:32.900]  Point 1.
[04:32.900 --> 04:35.940]  Those who try to defend the government's big income tax lie say,
[04:35.940 --> 04:40.460]  Section 1 of the code proves the tax has been imposed on everyone.
[04:40.460 --> 04:41.860]  Point 2.
[04:41.860 --> 04:47.340]  Section 1 of the code tells us the tax has been imposed on four types of individuals.
[04:47.340 --> 04:48.340]  Point 3.
[04:48.340 --> 04:52.620]  The imposition of the tax on those four types of individuals is limited to a species of
[04:52.620 --> 04:55.300]  income called taxable income.
[04:55.300 --> 04:56.540]  Point 4.
[04:56.540 --> 05:00.900]  Section 63 informed us the taxable income is a subset of gross income.
[05:00.900 --> 05:01.900]  Point 5.
[05:01.900 --> 05:06.180]  The definition of gross income provides a list of activities from which gross income
[05:06.180 --> 05:07.180]  is derived.
[05:07.180 --> 05:11.700]  That might seem like a compelling argument to some folks that the tax has been imposed
[05:11.700 --> 05:14.060]  on everyone.
[05:14.060 --> 05:18.700]  Others might think that sequence is pretty thin from which to make the case that income
[05:18.700 --> 05:20.740]  tax applies to everyone.
[05:20.740 --> 05:26.420]  Such a person may note that there is no indication of whether individual refers to a citizen
[05:26.420 --> 05:27.980]  or an alien.
[05:27.980 --> 05:33.140]  Such a person may also observe that the statute does not address where a citizen or alien
[05:33.140 --> 05:35.300]  is geographically located.
[05:35.300 --> 05:40.380]  Does alien mean an alien inside or outside the United States?
[05:40.380 --> 05:44.500]  Would a citizen be liable for the tax if he was inside or outside the country?
[05:44.500 --> 05:48.540]  Are there specific activities in which a person must be involved to be within the embrace
[05:48.540 --> 05:49.960]  of the statute?
[05:49.960 --> 05:53.900]  We can't know the answers from the skeletal nature of Section 1.
[05:53.900 --> 05:59.180]  To believe Section 1 imposes the income tax on everyone without regard to status, location
[05:59.180 --> 06:04.980]  or activity, one has to leap to conclusions the language of the statute doesn't support.
[06:04.980 --> 06:09.420]  Phrased another way, the person who claims Section 1 imposes the tax on everyone has
[06:09.420 --> 06:13.660]  to read into the statute things that aren't there.
[06:13.660 --> 06:17.940]  And that is impermissible according to the U.S. Supreme Court.
[06:17.940 --> 06:21.140]  In Gould v. Gould, the Supreme Court held the following.
[06:21.140 --> 06:25.500]  In the interpretation of statutes levying taxes, it is the established rule not to
[06:25.500 --> 06:31.020]  extend their provisions by implication beyond the clear import of the language used or
[06:31.020 --> 06:35.700]  to enlarge their operations so as to embrace matters not specifically pointed out.
[06:35.700 --> 06:40.180]  In case of doubt, they are to be construed most strongly against the government and in
[06:40.180 --> 06:42.180]  favor of the citizens.
[06:42.180 --> 06:46.640]  When we apply the Court's holding in Gould to the wording of Section 1, we find that
[06:46.640 --> 06:51.020]  Section 1 does not show the income tax has been imposed on everyone.
[06:51.020 --> 06:56.260]  The best we can say about Section 1 is it provides a rough outline that's missing
[06:56.260 --> 06:58.700]  necessary specifics.
[06:58.700 --> 07:03.060]  With that understanding under our belt, let's look at Section 1's associated regulation,
[07:03.060 --> 07:05.020]  which is 1.1-1.
[07:05.020 --> 07:10.700]  The primary function of tax regulations is to provide the details Congress didn't provide
[07:10.700 --> 07:12.740]  in the statutes.
[07:12.740 --> 07:17.020]  Accordingly in 1.1-1, perhaps we'll find some of the elements that are missing in Section
[07:17.020 --> 07:18.020]  1.
[07:18.380 --> 07:25.060]  Section 1 of the Code imposes an income tax on the income of every individual who is a
[07:25.060 --> 07:29.820]  citizen or resident of the United States and, to the extent provided by Section 871B and
[07:29.820 --> 07:34.340]  877B, on the income of non-resident aliens individuals.
[07:34.340 --> 07:35.700]  Aha!
[07:35.700 --> 07:42.180]  Now we find mention of citizens of the United States, U.S. residents, and non-resident aliens.
[07:42.180 --> 07:46.740]  That said, there is still no indication of where those folks must be geographically
[07:46.740 --> 07:50.380]  to have the tax imposed on them or in what activity they have to be involved for the
[07:50.380 --> 07:52.140]  tax to apply to them.
[07:52.140 --> 07:57.100]  In other words, 1.1-1 fills in a few of the blanks, but not all of them.
[07:57.100 --> 08:03.380]  Remember, according to the Supreme Court, a tax cannot be imposed by implication.
[08:03.380 --> 08:09.180]  Exacting language must appear in a statute or regulation if one is to say a tax has been
[08:09.180 --> 08:11.220]  imposed on you.
[08:11.220 --> 08:17.980]  After examining Section 1 and 1.1-1 of the regulations, we don't find the necessary
[08:17.980 --> 08:20.300]  exacting language.
[08:20.300 --> 08:22.740]  At this point, let me ask you a question.
[08:22.740 --> 08:28.380]  Do you wonder why Section 1 or 1.1-1 does not say this?
[08:28.380 --> 08:32.420]  There is hereby imposed a tax on the domestic earnings of U.S. citizens and U.S. residents
[08:32.420 --> 08:35.460]  living and working in any of the 50 union states.
[08:35.460 --> 08:40.220]  This tax includes, but is not limited to, compensation U.S. citizens and residents receive
[08:40.220 --> 08:43.700]  in exchange for their labor.
[08:43.700 --> 08:46.780]  That language would settle the matter, would it not?
[08:46.780 --> 08:52.380]  Those 45 words address who, where, and the activity subject to the tax.
[08:52.380 --> 08:54.100]  Now, think about this.
[08:54.100 --> 08:59.820]  As I'm sitting here speaking with you today, the income tax has been in force 111 years.
[08:59.820 --> 09:04.980]  Congress has had 111 years to enact a statute removing all ambiguity concerning who, when,
[09:04.980 --> 09:08.780]  and upon what activity the tax has been imposed.
[09:08.780 --> 09:10.300]  But it hasn't done so.
[09:10.300 --> 09:14.940]  The Secretary of the Treasury, who writes the tax regulations, has had 111 years to
[09:14.940 --> 09:20.740]  write a regulation clarifying who, when, and upon what activity the tax has been imposed,
[09:20.740 --> 09:23.580]  but has chosen not to do so.
[09:23.580 --> 09:28.300]  Why do you think it is that Congress and the Secretary have left a statute and a regulation
[09:28.300 --> 09:33.960]  in place for 111 years that have significant legal holes in them?
[09:33.960 --> 09:38.180]  The answer to why neither Congress nor the Secretary has written a statute or a regulation
[09:38.180 --> 09:43.100]  using the 45-word version I just shared with you is twofold.
[09:43.100 --> 09:47.660]  Before I share those two reasons with you, please take a moment to subscribe to the channel
[09:47.660 --> 09:52.420]  so you'll be notified when I post new content and like this presentation so the algorithms
[09:52.420 --> 09:54.300]  will share it with more people.
[09:54.300 --> 09:56.580]  Thank you for taking a moment to do that.
[09:56.580 --> 10:00.340]  The first reason Congress hasn't written such a statute is because Congress doesn't have
[10:00.340 --> 10:06.060]  the constitutional authority to tax your labor and hasn't done so.
[10:06.060 --> 10:09.780]  You just believe they have because you've never read what the law says.
[10:09.780 --> 10:14.020]  You've just believed whatever the government told you.
[10:14.020 --> 10:18.540]  Reason number one then leads directly to reason number two, which is that because Congress
[10:18.540 --> 10:22.700]  doesn't have the authority to tax your labor but wants you to believe they do, they've
[10:22.700 --> 10:27.980]  employed deceptive language that doesn't reveal the scam they're pulling while allowing
[10:27.980 --> 10:33.220]  the American people to fill in the blanks with things the law doesn't say.
[10:33.220 --> 10:36.340]  Americans do that because after 60 years of government propaganda, the American people
[10:36.340 --> 10:40.940]  are brainwashed into believing the government's income tax lie.
[10:40.940 --> 10:46.540]  Another way to phrase it is that Congress and the Secretary wrote the statute and regulation
[10:46.540 --> 10:52.780]  in such a way that they know you'll assume things that aren't there, thus impliedly considering
[10:52.780 --> 10:57.460]  yourself a person upon whom the tax has been imposed despite the Supreme Court in Gould
[10:57.460 --> 11:01.580]  v. Gould saying taxation doesn't work by implication.
[11:01.580 --> 11:05.500]  In short, the government is playing you.
[11:05.500 --> 11:16.020]  You are the master and the government is the servant and your servant is playing you.
[11:16.020 --> 11:18.040]  How long are you going to put up with that?
[11:18.040 --> 11:19.920]  Let's return to the statute for a moment.
[11:19.920 --> 11:25.520]  Do you recall I said the tax is imposed on gross income minus deductions and exemptions?
[11:25.520 --> 11:30.420]  What I did not tell you at that point is when you read chapter three of the code, you discover
[11:30.420 --> 11:35.800]  that gross income is limited to U.S. source income belonging to a nonresident alien or
[11:35.800 --> 11:41.300]  foreign corporation and foreign income earned by U.S. citizens residing outside the U.S.
[11:41.300 --> 11:46.580]  If I were to go into chapter three today, this presentation would be hours long to learn
[11:46.580 --> 11:51.100]  about and understand that chapter three limits the meaning of gross income to U.S. source
[11:51.100 --> 11:55.040]  income belonging to a nonresident alien or foreign corporations and foreign income earned
[11:55.040 --> 11:59.760]  by U.S. citizens residing outside the U.S. read income tax shattering the mess.
[11:59.760 --> 12:03.720]  If you'll be kind enough to give me the benefit of the doubt until you read income tax shattering
[12:03.720 --> 12:09.360]  the mess, the takeaway from how section one is worded is that the government is intentionally
[12:09.360 --> 12:14.880]  staying away from specifics that would reveal the tax has only been imposed upon nonresident
[12:14.880 --> 12:19.240]  aliens and foreign corporations with U.S. source income and U.S. citizens residing abroad
[12:19.240 --> 12:21.040]  with foreign earned income.
[12:21.040 --> 12:24.720]  Now, let's take another look at 1.1-1.
[12:24.720 --> 12:27.560]  You'll recall that 1.1-1 says,
[12:36.280 --> 12:39.080]  If you've been following me for some time, you've almost certainly heard me say Congress
[12:39.080 --> 12:44.200]  has imposed the income tax on just three classes of persons, nonresident aliens with U.S. source
[12:44.200 --> 12:49.560]  income, foreign corporations with U.S. source income, and three, U.S. citizens residing
[12:49.560 --> 12:52.120]  abroad with foreign earned income.
[12:52.120 --> 13:00.400]  But when you heard 1.1-1 say the code imposes an income tax on the income of every citizen
[13:00.400 --> 13:04.560]  or resident of the United States, I bet you assumed it meant Americans living and working
[13:04.560 --> 13:08.240]  in the 50 states earning their own domestic income.
[13:08.240 --> 13:09.660]  Why did you assume that?
[13:09.660 --> 13:15.120]  Because you've been socialized by 60 years of government disinformation to believe the
[13:15.120 --> 13:19.080]  government's false narrative about who owes the income tax.
[13:19.080 --> 13:24.040]  When you consider that you automatically thought those words meant you rather than
[13:24.040 --> 13:28.680]  U.S. citizens residing abroad with foreign earned income, it should be clear how incredibly
[13:28.680 --> 13:33.760]  effective the government's propaganda, its disinformation has been.
[13:33.760 --> 13:38.280]  Are any other U.S. citizens or U.S. residents required to file a pay?
[13:38.280 --> 13:40.040]  Why yes, yes they are.
[13:40.040 --> 13:44.680]  But again, it's not who or what you think based on the false societal income tax narrative.
[13:44.680 --> 13:46.680]  Let me do explain.
[13:46.680 --> 13:49.880]  We just covered the three classes of persons upon whom Congress has imposed the income
[13:49.880 --> 13:50.880]  tax.
[13:50.880 --> 13:55.640]  But there's a fourth class of person who is required to collect the U.S. income tax from
[13:55.640 --> 13:59.720]  its non-resident alien and foreign corporation owners.
[13:59.720 --> 14:05.120]  While the tax has not been imposed upon these Americans, if they engage in certain actions,
[14:05.120 --> 14:10.040]  they make themselves liable to collect and pay over to the government the U.S. income
[14:10.040 --> 14:14.200]  tax owed by the non-resident alien or foreign corporation.
[14:14.200 --> 14:18.800]  These Americans have entered into an agreement to serve as the non-resident alien or foreign
[14:18.800 --> 14:21.080]  corporation's U.S. agent.
[14:21.080 --> 14:26.040]  Depending on the complexity of the financial arrangements, this subject can get complicated.
[14:26.040 --> 14:29.960]  For simplicity today, I'm going to give you a streamlined example.
[14:29.960 --> 14:34.900]  Let's say a Peruvian billionaire sent a U.S. investment firm several million dollars with
[14:34.900 --> 14:38.420]  instructions to invest his money in various U.S. businesses.
[14:38.420 --> 14:42.240]  The investment firm uses some of the money to buy Apple stock.
[14:42.240 --> 14:45.040]  The stocks are held in the name of the investment firm.
[14:45.040 --> 14:49.040]  When Apple pays dividends, it pays them to the investment firm.
[14:49.040 --> 14:52.160]  Apple has no idea the true owner is Peruvian.
[14:52.160 --> 14:56.480]  The investment firm has instructions from the Peruvian government to deposit all U.S.
[14:56.480 --> 15:00.540]  source dividends into his bank account in Peru.
[15:00.540 --> 15:06.040]  That means the investment firm has to send the U.S. source income out of the United States
[15:06.040 --> 15:07.920]  to its foreign owner.
[15:07.920 --> 15:13.000]  At that point, U.S. tax law requires the investment firm to withhold the tax the non-resident
[15:13.000 --> 15:18.040]  alien, the Peruvian gentleman, owes on his U.S. source income.
[15:18.040 --> 15:23.000]  When the investment firm withholds the non-resident alien's U.S. income tax, the investment firm
[15:23.000 --> 15:28.440]  then becomes liable to the United States government for the withheld amount.
[15:28.440 --> 15:32.880]  Because the investment firm is liable for the tax it withheld, it must file a return
[15:32.880 --> 15:36.480]  and pay the non-resident alien's income tax to the IRS.
[15:36.480 --> 15:40.860]  Interestingly, the example I just shared with you is exactly the situation that gave
[15:40.860 --> 15:45.600]  rise to a New York federal court case that went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court
[15:45.600 --> 15:51.600]  in 1916 called Bruce Shaver v. Union Pacific Railroad, which is the seminal case on the
[15:51.600 --> 15:54.400]  proper application of the 16th Amendment.
[15:54.400 --> 15:59.880]  In that case, Frank Bruce Shaver was the U.S. agent for a non-resident alien with U.S. source
[15:59.880 --> 16:03.480]  income from shares he owned in the Union Pacific Railroad.
[16:03.480 --> 16:07.080]  If inclined, you can read the Bruce Shaver decision by doing an internet search.
[16:07.080 --> 16:11.200]  You can also read the U.S. Treasury Department's interpretation of the Supreme Court's Bruce
[16:11.200 --> 16:14.980]  Shaver decision in Treasury Decision 2313.
[16:14.980 --> 16:20.360]  Both the Bruce Shaver case and Treasury Decision 2313 are examined and clearly explained in
[16:20.360 --> 16:22.480]  income tax shattering the mess.
[16:22.480 --> 16:24.100]  Let's summarize.
[16:24.100 --> 16:28.880]  Some people assert that Section 1 of the tax code and Section 1.1-1 of the regulations
[16:28.880 --> 16:33.680]  prove the income tax has been imposed on ordinary Americans in the states of the Union.
[16:33.680 --> 16:37.920]  Upon investigation, we found that Section 1 is surprisingly vague because it's missing
[16:37.920 --> 16:43.420]  a number of particulars one would need to determine upon whom the tax has been imposed.
[16:43.420 --> 16:47.860]  You learn that the Supreme Court held that taxes can't be imposed by implication, meaning
[16:47.860 --> 16:52.480]  folks just can't fill in Section 1's omissions as they see fit in order to claim the taxes
[16:52.480 --> 16:56.520]  imposed on ordinary Americans living and working in the 50 states.
[16:56.720 --> 17:02.660]  1.1-1 of the regulations fills in a few of the Section 1 blanks, but still omits particulars
[17:02.660 --> 17:07.840]  that would need to be included to determine upon whom the tax has been imposed.
[17:07.840 --> 17:12.720]  You learn that Congress and the Secretary of the Treasury have not corrected those omissions
[17:12.720 --> 17:16.680]  over the 111-year history of the income tax.
[17:16.680 --> 17:21.520]  You were shown a 45-word sample enactment that would resolve those omissions.
[17:21.640 --> 17:28.920]  Yet Congress and the Secretary of the Treasury have chosen not to do so in 111 years.
[17:28.920 --> 17:33.280]  You discovered that when 1.1-1 says it imposes an income tax on the income of every individual
[17:33.280 --> 17:37.800]  who is a citizen or resident of the United States, many Americans leap to the errant
[17:37.800 --> 17:41.500]  conclusion that those words mean the tax has been imposed on Americans living and working
[17:41.500 --> 17:43.360]  in the 50 states.
[17:43.360 --> 17:47.920]  You learned that in reality Congress has imposed the income tax on U.S. citizens residing abroad
[17:47.920 --> 17:54.060]  with foreign earned income, and that is what 1.1-1 means when it says the tax is imposed
[17:54.060 --> 17:56.520]  on citizens of the United States.
[17:56.520 --> 18:00.440]  You learned that U.S. citizens and domestic corporations can make themselves liable to
[18:00.440 --> 18:05.240]  file and pay over to the government the income tax imposed on non-resident aliens and foreign
[18:05.240 --> 18:10.240]  corporations with U.S. source income if they put themselves in a position where they are
[18:10.240 --> 18:15.800]  required to withhold U.S. income tax owed by the foreign person before sending the balance
[18:15.800 --> 18:18.320]  to its foreign owner outside the United States.
[18:18.320 --> 18:20.240]  How was that for a run on sentence?
[18:20.240 --> 18:25.560]  Today's presentation was to rebut the false assertion that sections 1 and 1.1-1 of the
[18:25.560 --> 18:31.960]  regulations impose the income tax on ordinary hardworking Americans like you.
[18:31.960 --> 18:35.240]  As you learned today, neither does that.
[18:35.240 --> 18:39.800]  What we covered today is the tip of the iceberg.
[18:39.800 --> 18:45.680]  Income tax shattering this lays out the rest of that massive iceberg with crystal clarity
[18:45.880 --> 18:49.520]  every American can understand.
[18:49.520 --> 18:54.080]  Don't you owe it to yourself to discover the truth?
[18:54.080 --> 18:56.940]  While you're on the website, take a look at the other publications.
[18:56.940 --> 19:02.400]  There is the Business Withholding Guide designed to help you properly communicate the law to
[19:02.400 --> 19:09.120]  your employer and the W-9 1099 Handbook designed to help you do the very best job of communicating
[19:09.120 --> 19:13.940]  to a company with which you do business why you are not a person required to furnish them
[19:13.940 --> 19:16.020]  with a form W-9.
[19:16.020 --> 19:17.980]  Then there's body science.
[19:17.980 --> 19:21.700]  I'm not going to go into it today, but if you want to live in the manner before which
[19:21.700 --> 19:27.220]  your body is genetically coded rather than the illness creating way we live today, you
[19:27.220 --> 19:29.620]  will be thrilled with body science.
[19:29.620 --> 19:34.120]  Body science has never gotten anything less than a five-star rating and readers rave about
[19:34.120 --> 19:39.920]  the fact they look and feel decades younger after putting into action what they learn
[19:39.920 --> 19:41.280]  in body science.
[19:41.280 --> 19:46.360]  The package containing all four is deeply discounted.
[19:46.360 --> 19:53.560]  So go to drreality.news and pick up a copy of Income Tax Shattering the Mist, Body Science
[19:53.560 --> 19:55.040]  or the four-pack.
[19:55.040 --> 19:58.800]  Any or all of them will be the most fascinating books you will ever read.
[19:58.800 --> 20:00.240]  You have my word on that.
[20:00.240 --> 20:05.080]  Also, by purchasing Income Tax Shattering the Mist, Body Science or the four-pack, you
[20:05.080 --> 20:10.120]  help me to continue to be here for you with these revealing and thought-provoking presentations.
[20:10.120 --> 20:12.760]  Please share this presentation with others.
[20:12.760 --> 20:14.000]  Thank you for being here.
[20:14.000 --> 20:14.500]  Take care.