Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language
Detected language: English
[00:00.000 --> 00:02.720]  Welcome back to the channel.
[00:02.720 --> 00:07.380]  As you might know, about two weeks ago, YouTube deplatformed me because I refused to cave
[00:07.380 --> 00:13.640]  into YouTube's pressure to only say concerning SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, and the vaccines, what
[00:13.640 --> 00:19.920]  the establishment said is acceptable for you to hear.
[00:19.920 --> 00:22.760]  You know, that's one of the interesting things about being deplatformed.
[00:22.760 --> 00:26.560]  It's really not about me.
[00:26.560 --> 00:29.040]  It's about you.
[00:29.040 --> 00:37.880]  What they're really saying is you aren't allowed to hear what I have to say.
[00:37.880 --> 00:41.720]  Even if you want to hear it, you might not even believe what I say.
[00:41.720 --> 00:44.720]  But they say you're not allowed to hear it.
[00:44.720 --> 00:46.280]  You're not smart enough.
[00:46.280 --> 00:47.880]  You're not intelligent enough.
[00:47.880 --> 00:49.640]  You're not discerning enough.
[00:49.640 --> 00:55.760]  You're not mature enough to be able to listen to what I say and make up your own mind.
[00:55.760 --> 00:57.640]  That's really what deplatforming is all about.
[00:57.640 --> 00:58.640]  It's not about me.
[00:58.640 --> 01:02.640]  It's about YouTube or Facebook's perception of you.
[01:02.640 --> 01:08.280]  Anyway, moving on, I was looking through the archives that I have, searching for some videos
[01:08.280 --> 01:12.800]  that were lost and unavailable to people since YouTube removed them all.
[01:12.800 --> 01:21.800]  And I came across a video that I did, which is essentially a 15-minute explanation that
[01:22.520 --> 01:28.040]  covers the key points of the government's income tax scam.
[01:28.040 --> 01:31.000]  In other words, it covers the key points.
[01:31.000 --> 01:34.480]  If somebody's wondering, like, okay, Dave's talked about this a lot.
[01:34.480 --> 01:35.480]  Is this true?
[01:35.480 --> 01:37.760]  Is Dave credible on this point?
[01:37.760 --> 01:39.720]  This hits the key points.
[01:39.720 --> 01:47.040]  So I wanted to share that with you today.
[01:47.040 --> 01:58.000]  The Dr. Reality Vodcast with Dave Champion.
[01:58.000 --> 02:07.480]  I'm Dave Champion, 26 CFR 1.1-1.
[02:07.480 --> 02:11.520]  I can almost read your mind like, what is Dave talking about?
[02:11.520 --> 02:14.920]  If you're an American citizen or a legal resident of the United States, you're going to want
[02:14.920 --> 02:18.800]  to pay very careful attention to what I'm about to say.
[02:18.800 --> 02:26.600]  So again, 26 CFR 1.1-1.
[02:26.600 --> 02:27.600]  What is that?
[02:27.600 --> 02:33.240]  Well, let's start with CFR, which means the Code of Federal Regulations.
[02:33.240 --> 02:39.640]  And the number 26 that you see appearing before CFR designates it as the title within the
[02:39.640 --> 02:42.600]  regs that addresses U.S. tax law.
[02:42.640 --> 02:46.960]  Now, do not tune out if you think tax law is going to be dry and boring because it's
[02:46.960 --> 02:47.960]  not.
[02:47.960 --> 02:48.960]  I'm going to make it easy.
[02:48.960 --> 02:49.960]  I'm going to make it fun.
[02:49.960 --> 02:53.240]  And I'm going to make it interesting and probably shocking.
[02:53.240 --> 02:55.760]  Let's start with putting this into context.
[02:55.760 --> 03:02.360]  1.1-1 is the very first tax regulation concerning income tax.
[03:02.360 --> 03:08.360]  In all the tens of thousands of regulations, 1.1-1 is the first one.
[03:08.360 --> 03:14.560]  It is also the one used a lot by people who want to try and promote the false establishment
[03:14.560 --> 03:18.080]  narrative that if you're in a living, you owe income tax.
[03:18.080 --> 03:22.960]  1.1-1 is entitled income tax on individuals.
[03:22.960 --> 03:24.480]  Let's see what it says.
[03:24.480 --> 03:28.720]  1.1-1A, general rule.
[03:28.720 --> 03:32.540]  Section one of the code imposes an income tax on the income of every individual who
[03:32.540 --> 03:38.160]  is a citizen or resident of the United States and to the extent provided by section 871B
[03:38.160 --> 03:42.880]  or 877B on the income of non-resident alien individuals.
[03:42.880 --> 03:47.440]  I think America would be a completely different country if in 10th grade, 11th grade, 12th
[03:47.440 --> 03:54.640]  grade, students were taught something about how law operates, how laws are written.
[03:54.640 --> 03:58.000]  Because as you can imagine from the language you just heard where it says there is hereby
[03:58.000 --> 04:03.200]  imposed on the income of every U.S. citizen and resident, you can imagine that the uninformed
[04:03.200 --> 04:06.480]  person goes, well, see, see, it does apply to everybody.
[04:06.480 --> 04:07.480]  OK.
[04:07.480 --> 04:14.520]  So you have to go back and take a look at the fact that it starts with general rule.
[04:14.520 --> 04:18.360]  Now general rule is important because this is the way laws are written.
[04:18.360 --> 04:24.880]  When you have this entire compendium of laws, in this case regulations, the opening statement
[04:24.880 --> 04:37.000]  is a general statement provided without all the limiting specifics that come later.
[04:37.000 --> 04:43.840]  So what are these specifics that limit the broad general language of 1.1-1?
[04:43.840 --> 04:47.200]  There are quite a few things that are not addressed in that statement, right?
[04:47.200 --> 04:50.640]  I mean, that's a very generalized statement.
[04:50.640 --> 04:51.640]  So we'll start with this.
[04:51.640 --> 04:54.600]  It says U.S. citizen.
[04:54.600 --> 04:55.860]  Which U.S. citizen?
[04:55.860 --> 05:00.120]  Because it does not say all U.S. citizens, it just says U.S. citizens.
[05:00.120 --> 05:02.480]  Let me give you an analogy.
[05:02.480 --> 05:08.440]  Let's say the Secretary of Energy creates regulations for the nuclear power industry.
[05:08.440 --> 05:13.080]  He creates thousands of regulations for the nuclear power industry.
[05:13.080 --> 05:18.760]  And it pertains to U.S. citizens, U.S. individuals, domestic corporations, and so forth.
[05:18.760 --> 05:21.940]  That language is right in there.
[05:21.940 --> 05:26.080]  Does it apply to U.S. citizens who are not involved in the nuclear industry?
[05:26.080 --> 05:27.080]  No.
[05:27.080 --> 05:28.080]  Of course not.
[05:28.080 --> 05:29.640]  And that's how regulatory law works.
[05:29.640 --> 05:33.080]  It is not law of general applicability to everybody.
[05:33.080 --> 05:42.040]  You have to be engaged in something that causes that area of regulatory law to embrace you.
[05:42.040 --> 05:43.760]  So it's not all citizens.
[05:43.760 --> 05:46.760]  It's a very small subset.
[05:46.760 --> 05:53.080]  Some other issues that that broad generalized statement doesn't address is what specific
[05:53.080 --> 05:55.900]  activity do you have to be engaged in?
[05:55.900 --> 06:02.500]  Is there a jurisdiction, a locale, in which you have to engage in that activity for the
[06:02.500 --> 06:05.300]  regulatory net to grab you?
[06:05.300 --> 06:12.600]  Do you need to have some sort of special kind of relationship with someone over there in
[06:12.600 --> 06:15.020]  order for the tax law, again, to embrace you?
[06:15.020 --> 06:18.420]  Let's start with this somewhat arcane fact that most people probably are not aware.
[06:18.420 --> 06:22.940]  But it is one of those distinguishing characteristics that's not addressed in that broad generalized
[06:22.940 --> 06:23.940]  statement.
[06:23.940 --> 06:24.940]  And it is this.
[06:24.980 --> 06:30.940]  The court has said on numerous occasions that the income tax is not imposed on the accumulation
[06:30.940 --> 06:31.940]  of income.
[06:31.940 --> 06:36.940]  It is only imposed on the receipt of income.
[06:36.940 --> 06:44.220]  And by the way, as an aside, income does not have the same meaning in tax law that you
[06:44.220 --> 06:47.900]  probably imagine it does based on how we use it in common speech.
[06:47.900 --> 06:53.540]  So what does this distinction, accumulation versus receipt of income, look like?
[06:53.540 --> 06:57.020]  I've shared with you numerous other videos, and it appears in Income Tax Shattering the
[06:57.020 --> 07:01.700]  Mist, the fact that the Secretary of the Treasury has said time and time and time and time and
[07:01.700 --> 07:09.420]  time and time again that the person who is to file a Form 1040 is a non-resident alien
[07:09.420 --> 07:15.140]  with U.S. source income or a U.S. citizen or resident – what have we heard that language
[07:15.140 --> 07:22.300]  earlier in this conversation – who is serving as the agent for the foreign person with U.S.
[07:22.300 --> 07:23.300]  source income.
[07:24.060 --> 07:27.900]  Let's say a non-resident alien has millions of dollars invested in Apple.
[07:27.900 --> 07:31.780]  And when it's time for Apple to pay out dividends, the non-resident alien has instructed
[07:31.780 --> 07:38.500]  Apple to pay those dividends to a U.S. domestic brokerage firm who then turns around and reinvests
[07:38.500 --> 07:41.820]  the money on behalf of the non-resident alien.
[07:41.820 --> 07:49.060]  Has the non-resident alien accumulated U.S. source income or taken receipt of it?
[07:49.060 --> 07:52.260]  Clearly, it's an accumulation, not a receipt.
[07:52.260 --> 07:57.780]  And the requirement to file the return kicks in only upon separation from the capital and
[07:57.780 --> 07:59.740]  receipt of the profits.
[07:59.740 --> 08:04.100]  Here's where the rubber begins to meet the road.
[08:04.100 --> 08:12.860]  What is the legal term in the tax code for Americans or domestic corporations who serve
[08:12.860 --> 08:17.860]  as the agent for non-resident aliens with U.S. source income?
[08:18.460 --> 08:22.420]  Well, until 1962, it was written out in a very lengthy way, and I'll give you an example
[08:22.420 --> 08:23.420]  of that now.
[08:23.420 --> 08:28.980]  All persons in whatever capacity acting, having the control, receipt, custody, disposal, or
[08:28.980 --> 08:34.420]  payment of any of the items of income of any non-resident alien individual or of any foreign
[08:34.420 --> 08:35.700]  partnership.
[08:35.700 --> 08:40.260]  So you can imagine that trying to integrate all of that language into every single regulation
[08:40.260 --> 08:44.020]  or statute or treasury decision or treasury order can get kind of tedious.
[08:44.180 --> 08:50.140]  So in 1962, Congress attempted to resolve that by taking a legal term that had never
[08:50.140 --> 08:54.860]  before existed in the tax code and creating it for use in the tax code.
[08:54.860 --> 09:01.740]  And that legal term was, in 1962 and remains to this very day, U.S. person.
[09:01.740 --> 09:08.100]  Now I want you to pay very careful attention to what I'm about to say next.
[09:08.100 --> 09:12.500]  Right after Congress enacted the law that created for the purpose of tax law the phrase
[09:12.980 --> 09:17.980]  or the legal term U.S. person, the secretary of the treasury came out with a slew of regulations
[09:17.980 --> 09:20.820]  relying upon that new definition.
[09:20.820 --> 09:28.860]  And every single one was in the context of a U.S. citizen or domestic corporation having
[09:28.860 --> 09:34.060]  care, control, custody, et cetera, of U.S. source income to a non-resident alien.
[09:34.060 --> 09:36.860]  Let me put an even finer point on this.
[09:36.860 --> 09:40.340]  I'm sitting here recording this in 2020, and of course that term was put in the tax code
[09:40.340 --> 09:41.340]  in 1962.
[09:42.180 --> 09:43.180]  It's been 58 years.
[09:43.180 --> 09:53.100]  I want to make clear, in 58 years, the term U.S. person in the tax code, in the tax regulations,
[09:53.100 --> 10:01.860]  and in subsequent treasury decisions and treasury orders has never once been used in any other
[10:01.860 --> 10:10.300]  application than when discussing U.S. source income belonging to a foreign person and the
[10:11.260 --> 10:17.180]  U.S. agent, the U.S. citizen or the domestic corporation acting as the agent for the foreign
[10:17.180 --> 10:18.680]  person with U.S. source income.
[10:18.680 --> 10:27.540]  That is the one, the sole, the only reference for U.S. person in the 58 years since that
[10:27.540 --> 10:29.620]  term was created.
[10:29.620 --> 10:32.740]  So why does that matter?
[10:32.740 --> 10:33.740]  Okay, hold on.
[10:33.740 --> 10:35.540]  It's going to blow your mind.
[10:35.540 --> 10:40.220]  I want all of you to pay very careful attention, but in particular, if you own your own business,
[10:41.140 --> 10:46.260]  I want you to pay extra special attention, and here's why.
[10:46.260 --> 10:52.220]  If you own your own business, you've probably been asked to fill out this form time and
[10:52.220 --> 10:54.980]  time and time again, right?
[10:54.980 --> 11:00.780]  And you've probably thought the Form W-9 is just something that is, it's required,
[11:00.780 --> 11:06.580]  and it is used just between regular old businesses doing business together in the states of the
[11:06.580 --> 11:07.580]  union.
[11:07.580 --> 11:08.860]  There's nothing special about it.
[11:09.500 --> 11:11.020]  It's just common bill affair.
[11:11.020 --> 11:15.580]  That's probably what you thought because your accountant told you so.
[11:15.580 --> 11:17.080]  But is that true?
[11:17.080 --> 11:24.780]  The question then becomes, who is it that is to fill out and sign under penalty of perjury
[11:24.780 --> 11:25.780]  a Form W-9?
[11:25.780 --> 11:27.900]  Well, I'm not going to answer that for you.
[11:27.900 --> 11:34.060]  Instead, I'm going to take you directly to irs.gov and the instruction page for the Form
[11:34.060 --> 11:36.940]  W-9 on irs.gov.
[11:37.020 --> 11:41.900]  You can see very clearly here that the question being asked is, how do I know when to use
[11:41.900 --> 11:43.900]  a Form W-9?
[11:43.900 --> 11:47.460]  And you can see with equal clarity the answer right here.
[11:47.460 --> 11:55.020]  Use Form W-9 to request the taxpayer identification number of a, yeah, U.S. person.
[11:55.020 --> 11:57.900]  And as we just discussed, the U.S. person isn't legal term.
[11:57.900 --> 12:04.180]  It's the euphemism since 1962 for a U.S. citizen or domestic corporation having care,
[12:04.420 --> 12:09.260]  custody, control, et cetera, of U.S. sources and come belonging to a foreign person.
[12:09.260 --> 12:14.140]  So you did not realize for all the years that you've been filling out and executing those
[12:14.140 --> 12:18.900]  W-9s and giving them to the people that were paying you that you were actually declaring
[12:18.900 --> 12:25.500]  under penalty of perjury to the IRS that the transaction that was taking place is in the
[12:25.500 --> 12:28.500]  interest of the money being received by you.
[12:28.820 --> 12:36.380]  The money being received by you actually belongs to a foreign person, and you are the U.S.
[12:36.380 --> 12:38.020]  agent for the foreign person.
[12:38.020 --> 12:41.100]  You are the U.S. person.
[12:41.100 --> 12:48.300]  So I guess what you don't know can hurt you because you're declaring that you are a U.S.
[12:48.300 --> 12:50.340]  agent of a non-resident alien.
[12:50.340 --> 12:54.380]  Every time you fill that out, sign it and give it to the guy who's paying you.
[12:54.380 --> 12:57.860]  And guess who's required to file a 1040 at the end of the year?
[12:58.220 --> 13:02.780]  The non-resident alien upon whom the tax has been imposed, or this takes us all the way
[13:02.780 --> 13:10.860]  back around to the language of 1.1-1, or a U.S. citizen or resident acting as the agent
[13:10.860 --> 13:17.500]  for the non-resident alien if the non-resident alien does not file his own 1040, then according
[13:17.500 --> 13:24.900]  to the regs, the U.S. citizen or resident who is acting as the U.S. agent for that non-resident
[13:24.940 --> 13:31.140]  alien has to file an income tax return 1.1-1.
[13:31.140 --> 13:34.100]  And although I've said this, till I'm blue in the face, I'm going to say it one more
[13:34.100 --> 13:35.100]  time.
[13:35.100 --> 13:39.020]  Well, probably not just one more time, but of all these Treasury decisions where the
[13:39.020 --> 13:43.660]  Secretary of the Treasury has mandated time and time and time and time and time again
[13:43.660 --> 13:49.260]  that the people who are to fill out a Form 1040 or non-resident aliens and U.S. agents
[13:49.620 --> 13:54.940]  for the non-resident alien, how many times has the Secretary of the Treasury said that
[13:54.940 --> 13:58.780]  an American citizen living in one of the 50 states earning his or her own domestic source
[13:58.780 --> 14:05.380]  income is to fill out any U.S. tax form?
[14:05.380 --> 14:09.300]  Again, as I've said time and again, the answer to that question, I know you know the answer
[14:09.300 --> 14:19.180]  before I say it out loud, is zero, because no such requirement exists unless you don't
[14:19.180 --> 14:23.220]  know what you're doing and you're filling out W-9s and handing them out and declaring
[14:23.220 --> 14:24.220]  under penalty of perjury.
[14:24.220 --> 14:28.060]  You're a domestic agent of a foreign person with U.S. source income.
[14:28.060 --> 14:32.420]  I don't know whether that was all crystal clear to you or whether it was clear as mud,
[14:32.420 --> 14:39.580]  but the good news is you can get all of this information really super easy to understand.
[14:39.580 --> 14:42.900]  Number one, you can purchase income tax shattering the mess, which right now there's a special
[14:42.900 --> 14:47.340]  that you buy it, I pay the shipping, so shipping is for you.
[14:48.020 --> 14:52.500]  A lot of people have referred to income tax shattering the mess as concerning the truth
[14:52.500 --> 14:54.860]  about the income tax, the Bible.
[14:54.860 --> 15:00.980]  That should give you an idea of how comprehensive and thorough, and in this particular case,
[15:00.980 --> 15:03.540]  easy to understand the material is.
[15:03.540 --> 15:08.740]  Now if for any reason you question, you're like, yeah, you know, I hear what Dave's saying,
[15:08.740 --> 15:11.980]  but I don't know if I want to go ahead and buy the whole book.
[15:11.980 --> 15:13.500]  There is also an alternative.
[15:13.500 --> 15:20.220]  There is the W-9 1099 handbook, the booklet.
[15:20.220 --> 15:26.260]  That costs a bit less, and it's only, I don't know, 13, 14 pages, but it buttresses, it
[15:26.260 --> 15:31.780]  represents very, very clearly in undisputable terms everything I just laid out to you now.
[15:31.780 --> 15:40.040]  So if you were inclined to say, let me get that 1099 W-9 booklet, let me take a look
[15:40.040 --> 15:41.040]  at that.
[15:41.040 --> 15:44.320]  If I find that information compelling, then I'll take the next step to income tax shattering
[15:44.320 --> 15:45.320]  the mess.
[15:45.320 --> 15:52.360]  You can certainly do that as well, and they are both available right now at DrReality.News.
[15:52.360 --> 15:56.600]  Also for those of you who work for somebody else, because this was primarily oriented
[15:56.600 --> 16:00.600]  around the concept of owning your own business, but for those of you who work for somebody
[16:00.600 --> 16:06.520]  else, I want you to know that it's the same scam, a very similar scam, with a whole W-4
[16:06.520 --> 16:07.520]  and all that.
[16:08.000 --> 16:12.600]  So for you, again, if you don't want to make the full investment in income tax shattering
[16:12.600 --> 16:16.480]  the mess, you may want to get the withholding booklet.
[16:16.480 --> 16:19.400]  Again, I think it's 12 or 13 pages.
[16:19.400 --> 16:21.520]  It costs less.
[16:21.520 --> 16:25.800]  When you're done, you'll say, I totally get it, and then you'll probably want to go ahead
[16:25.800 --> 16:30.440]  and buy income tax shattering the mess, because you'll want to know more of the nitty gritty,
[16:30.440 --> 16:32.080]  more of the detail.
[16:32.080 --> 16:37.000]  Now I would encourage you just to go ahead and get income tax shattering the mess, because
[16:37.480 --> 16:38.480]  it's all in there.
[16:38.480 --> 16:46.320]  But if you're wary, then either get the W-9 1099 handbook and the W-4 employee handbook
[16:46.320 --> 16:51.680]  that can service your entry into the subject matter.
[16:51.680 --> 16:57.160]  On the other hand, you can get them all, which is a super comprehensive package.
[16:57.160 --> 17:02.840]  And again, if income tax shattering the mess is in whatever bundle you buy, so it can be
[17:02.840 --> 17:06.520]  multiple items, but if income tax shattering the mess is there, I pay the shipping for
[17:07.040 --> 17:08.040]  you.
[17:08.040 --> 17:12.280]  Go to DrReality.News, and I hope all this information I gave you at the outset and throughout
[17:12.280 --> 17:20.920]  this video leads you to understand there is absolutely, 100% without a doubt, a scam afoot.
[17:20.920 --> 17:24.640]  And you are the person being victimized by the scam.
[17:24.640 --> 17:32.760]  And it's so easy to say, I'm done, but it does require a little bit of education.
[17:32.760 --> 17:34.840]  And that's what you'll find in income tax shattering the mess.
[17:34.840 --> 17:35.560]  Thanks for being here.