Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language
Detected language: English
[00:00.000 --> 00:05.920]  The entire world is talking about oil, most specifically oil prices.
[00:05.920 --> 00:09.960]  I thought I would talk about something a little bit different today since we're all focused
[00:09.960 --> 00:12.160]  on oil.
[00:12.160 --> 00:20.720]  Where does it really come from?
[00:20.720 --> 00:32.000]  The Dr. Reality Podcast with Dave Champion.
[00:32.000 --> 00:38.440]  How many of you are aware that the term fossil fuels is just a theory?
[00:38.440 --> 00:44.160]  There's absolutely no evidence that petroleum products come from fossils.
[00:44.160 --> 00:51.900]  As a matter of fact, the oil industry drills significantly deeper than the deepest level
[00:51.900 --> 00:55.080]  at which a fossil has ever been found.
[00:55.080 --> 00:58.280]  Furthermore, about a year and a half ago, I ran the numbers.
[00:58.280 --> 01:06.400]  The amount of oil that human beings have consumed since it became widely used, which is after
[01:06.400 --> 01:09.640]  we moved into the beginning of the 20th century.
[01:09.640 --> 01:18.320]  The reality is the amount of matter that would be necessary if the theory even is true that
[01:18.320 --> 01:24.360]  compressed matter for over 650 million years deep in the earth turns to petroleum.
[01:24.360 --> 01:30.520]  If that's even true, the amount of matter that would be necessary to bring up the amount
[01:30.520 --> 01:36.040]  of crude that we have pulled out of the ground in the last 130 years, yeah, it's a fantasy.
[01:36.040 --> 01:37.600]  It's a fairy tale.
[01:37.600 --> 01:43.400]  There is no way there was enough flora and fauna and animals and dinosaurs and so forth
[01:43.400 --> 01:48.800]  to then transform into petroleum products in the quantities that we have pulled crude
[01:48.800 --> 01:51.440]  out of the earth and used in the last 130 years.
[01:51.440 --> 01:55.600]  It just absolutely mathematically is not possible.
[01:55.600 --> 01:59.840]  That alone should tell you that the fossil fuel model is not a valid model.
[01:59.840 --> 02:07.160]  I should also mention that the fossil fuel model first came up, first was theorized as
[02:07.160 --> 02:11.520]  a really important thing because I think like a lot of things in the world today,
[02:11.520 --> 02:15.280]  the theory has been around so long that people aren't even aware that it's just a theory.
[02:15.280 --> 02:16.920]  They actually take it as fact.
[02:16.920 --> 02:23.800]  The theory of where petroleum comes from, this fossil fuel model, was first hypothesized
[02:23.800 --> 02:26.040]  in 1857.
[02:26.040 --> 02:27.660]  As I said, it was a theory.
[02:27.660 --> 02:30.040]  There was absolutely no science to back it up until this day.
[02:30.040 --> 02:32.020]  There is absolutely no science to back it up.
[02:32.020 --> 02:36.180]  It became popularized, especially in the United States, by John D. Rockefeller, who
[02:36.180 --> 02:42.020]  heard a scientist bring it up someplace about 1890, if I recall.
[02:42.020 --> 02:45.260]  I haven't studied this in quite a few years, but he heard a scientist who had nothing to
[02:45.260 --> 02:50.700]  do with petroleum, a totally unrelated scientist, happened to mention it, and John D. Rockefeller
[02:50.700 --> 02:55.620]  saw it as a way to create the impression in the market of scarcity.
[02:55.620 --> 03:01.180]  There's only so much, and it's constantly dwindling, so you really have to pay a lot
[03:01.180 --> 03:02.180]  to get it.
[03:02.180 --> 03:07.820]  That was John D. Rockefeller's model that he used for marketing using this hypothesis
[03:07.820 --> 03:11.980]  called fossil fuel to create the impression of scarcity.
[03:11.980 --> 03:15.420]  Is there a competing hypothesis, a competing model?
[03:15.420 --> 03:16.420]  Yes, there is.
[03:16.420 --> 03:21.700]  It's called the abiotic theory, and it is significantly different than the fossil fuel
[03:21.700 --> 03:25.220]  model, if for no other reason than it is at least possible.
[03:25.220 --> 03:29.980]  The fossil fuel model is just, it's nonsense, it's a fantasy.
[03:29.980 --> 03:34.100]  As I said, for the sheer volume of crude oil that humans have brought out of the earth
[03:34.100 --> 03:37.540]  in the last 130 years, that destroys the fossil fuel model.
[03:37.540 --> 03:42.060]  At least the abiotic model does not face that dilemma.
[03:42.060 --> 03:45.100]  Here's what the abiotic model is, essentially.
[03:45.100 --> 03:48.500]  At the earth's core, the earth is doing things, of course, we don't know what really goes
[03:48.500 --> 03:53.860]  on in the earth's core, that's why it's a hypothesis, that's why it's a model.
[03:53.860 --> 03:59.180]  What goes on in the earth's core creates something, it may not be the crude that we pull out of
[03:59.180 --> 04:01.380]  the ground, but something like that.
[04:01.380 --> 04:04.620]  It's a byproduct of whatever goes on at the core of the earth.
[04:04.620 --> 04:10.780]  And then as the earth rotates, right, we know it rotates, right, I'm not sure, a flat earther,
[04:10.780 --> 04:16.500]  so the rotation creates this centrifugal effect, and whatever this byproduct is of what's going
[04:16.500 --> 04:21.500]  on at the earth's core, it begins to migrate out away from the core up towards the surface
[04:21.500 --> 04:24.980]  of the earth, and it finds little tributaries and cracks, and it works its way up until
[04:25.140 --> 04:29.220]  it finds a cavity where it can pool.
[04:29.220 --> 04:34.980]  And if it finds such a cavity and it pools at a distance from the surface where man can
[04:34.980 --> 04:38.860]  drill down and get at it, then we bring it up out of the earth.
[04:38.860 --> 04:40.780]  So a couple of things about the abiotic model.
[04:40.780 --> 04:47.540]  Number one, it's not a scarcity model, per se, because the theory is the earth's core
[04:47.540 --> 04:53.940]  is constantly making more of whatever it is, that as it filters outward through this centrifugal
[04:53.980 --> 04:58.740]  effect, as it filters outward through the various layers, that what we end up getting
[04:58.740 --> 05:01.780]  our hands on is what we call crude oil.
[05:01.780 --> 05:08.300]  So it replenishes, that it's just a constant thing that the core of the earth does under
[05:08.300 --> 05:09.380]  this model.
[05:09.380 --> 05:15.740]  So it's not a scarcity model, per se, like the fossil fuel model is, which was Rockefeller's
[05:15.740 --> 05:16.980]  big.
[05:16.980 --> 05:20.780]  The reason Rockefeller really liked the fossil fuel model and promoted it throughout the
[05:20.780 --> 05:25.780]  United States, and I think creating the impression in a lot of Americans by having it taught
[05:25.780 --> 05:30.740]  in school and so forth, which he funded, that it wasn't a theory, it was a fact, which benefited
[05:30.740 --> 05:31.740]  his marketing.
[05:31.740 --> 05:35.140]  So I said it's not a scarcity model, per se.
[05:35.140 --> 05:37.980]  Why do I keep adding, per se?
[05:37.980 --> 05:43.420]  Because people might think, okay, it replenishes great, then we're never going to run out of
[05:43.420 --> 05:44.420]  petroleum.
[05:44.420 --> 05:46.900]  We're never going to run out of crude oil, which we then distill into various products
[05:46.900 --> 05:48.340]  that we use.
[05:48.820 --> 05:50.060]  Maybe.
[05:50.060 --> 05:56.500]  Because if the abiotic model is factual, if that's really how we end up getting our hands
[05:56.500 --> 06:03.180]  on crude oil, it is automatically replenishing itself constantly.
[06:03.180 --> 06:07.980]  However, this is where we get into a scarcity discussion.
[06:07.980 --> 06:15.020]  We don't know at what rate the core is producing, if the abiotic model is correct, whatever
[06:15.020 --> 06:18.740]  it is that it produces that then filters out and we know it is crude oil.
[06:18.740 --> 06:23.780]  We don't know in what volume the core might be producing that.
[06:23.780 --> 06:31.420]  So while in this model, these pools into which that byproduct is, it filters up, ends up,
[06:31.420 --> 06:37.060]  if it's close enough to the earth, gathering, and then we pump it up, if that model is accurate,
[06:37.060 --> 06:42.940]  we could still be pulling more out of the ground and consuming more every single year,
[06:42.940 --> 06:47.780]  year after year, than the rate of replenishment by the earth's core.
[06:47.780 --> 06:52.740]  So while again, clearly then you see that the fossil fuel model is absolutely a scarcity
[06:52.740 --> 06:57.940]  model and in fact, if the fossil fuel model were accurate, we'd long since have run out
[06:57.940 --> 06:58.940]  of petroleum.
[06:58.940 --> 07:04.260]  However, with the abiotic model, we don't know, will that day ever come?
[07:04.260 --> 07:08.140]  Well, if it's replenished and that day is going to come, it's certainly going to come
[07:08.140 --> 07:10.020]  later.
[07:10.020 --> 07:14.020]  So really the question becomes if one buys into the abiotic model, which by the way,
[07:14.020 --> 07:17.380]  there's only two really competing models and there's not even really two because fossil
[07:17.380 --> 07:18.380]  fuels is nonsense.
[07:18.380 --> 07:23.100]  It's like, you know, the US after the fall of the Soviet Union, the US was the one remaining
[07:23.100 --> 07:24.100]  superpower.
[07:24.100 --> 07:28.620]  Well, when you take a close look at fossil fuel, then the abiotic model is the one remaining
[07:28.620 --> 07:34.380]  model of how petroleum is produced and how we get our hands on it.
[07:34.420 --> 07:40.520]  So while nobody on the planet, myself included, can prove that the abiotic model is factual,
[07:40.520 --> 07:43.900]  if it's the only one left standing, I'm going to give it a nod unless there's reason to
[07:43.900 --> 07:45.420]  believe that it's not valid.
[07:45.420 --> 07:56.660]  Now I should add, whenever billions or trillions of dollars is on the line with a model that
[07:56.660 --> 08:02.420]  serves a particular industry or industries, you can bet your ass that the establishment
[08:02.420 --> 08:08.340]  is going to close ranks against the truth if what benefits those industries is non-truthful,
[08:08.340 --> 08:09.340]  is non-factual.
[08:09.340 --> 08:11.140]  And that's exactly what goes on here.
[08:11.140 --> 08:16.740]  The establishment, despite the idiocy of the fossil fuel model, the establishment continues
[08:16.740 --> 08:22.460]  to say that that is the most viable model and the abiotic model is not truly viable,
[08:22.460 --> 08:24.900]  which it's actually the other way around.
[08:24.900 --> 08:28.660]  But of course, you can understand from the perspective of the oil industry, which has
[08:28.660 --> 08:33.700]  great sway with the politicians, which has great sway with institutions of higher learning
[08:33.700 --> 08:34.700]  and so forth.
[08:34.700 --> 08:38.080]  There's this whole community that collectively we call the establishment.
[08:38.080 --> 08:40.860]  You can understand why it would be in the interest of the establishment to say that
[08:40.860 --> 08:42.620]  fossil fuels is corrected.
[08:42.620 --> 08:49.100]  It's not a fantasy, which it is, and to say that abiotic model is not factual because
[08:49.100 --> 08:56.820]  it severely reduces the argument of scarcity, which has the potential to diminish profitability.
[08:56.820 --> 08:59.580]  As you can see today, I just gave you an outline of this.
[08:59.580 --> 09:03.420]  You may never have even heard of the abiotic model, which is, with oil being talked about
[09:03.420 --> 09:05.300]  so much right now, why I wanted to bring it to your attention.
[09:05.300 --> 09:08.540]  I encourage you to do your own research into both models.
[09:08.540 --> 09:09.540]  Don't take my word for anything.
[09:09.540 --> 09:13.180]  I always say, don't believe me, please go do your own research.
[09:13.180 --> 09:17.860]  However, if you enjoy this kind of presentation where information is put on the table that
[09:17.860 --> 09:22.820]  you have never heard before and which cuts across the grain of false establishment narratives,
[09:22.820 --> 09:25.340]  I want to encourage you to go to DrReality.News.
[09:25.340 --> 09:31.580]  Take yourself up a copy of Body Science and or Income Tax Shattering the Mist.
[09:31.580 --> 09:33.220]  They do the same exact thing.
[09:33.220 --> 09:38.020]  They take the narrative that's put out by government and industry, various industries,
[09:38.020 --> 09:42.780]  depending on which book you're talking about, and in any particular respective subject matter,
[09:42.780 --> 09:45.900]  it creates the establishment narrative on that.
[09:45.900 --> 09:51.700]  So if we're talking about income tax, income tax shattering the mist, utterly guts, seriously.
[09:51.700 --> 09:55.060]  Anyone who's read it, thousands and thousands and thousands and thousands of people who've
[09:55.060 --> 09:59.420]  read Income Tax Shattering the Mist wouldn't verify to you that it absolutely guts the
[09:59.420 --> 10:03.220]  establishment narrative that most or all Americans owe income tax.
[10:03.220 --> 10:05.620]  In fact, it's just the other way around.
[10:05.620 --> 10:07.980]  Almost all Americans do not owe income tax.
[10:07.980 --> 10:11.420]  And then Body Science does the same thing concerning human physiology with an emphasis
[10:11.420 --> 10:16.740]  on nutritional physiology and explains why despite our technology and all of our medical
[10:16.740 --> 10:22.020]  prowess, the United States is the most chronically ill society in all the history of mankind.
[10:22.020 --> 10:23.480]  That's a shocking statement.
[10:23.480 --> 10:28.080]  We are a more ill society than any society in the history of mankind, despite all of
[10:28.080 --> 10:34.920]  our science and technology, because of these false establishment narratives that are intended
[10:34.920 --> 10:38.480]  to prop up billion or trillion dollar industries and make them more and more profitable.
[10:38.480 --> 10:40.080]  And if you die, they don't give a fuck.
[10:40.080 --> 10:43.080]  Okay, so get yourself a copy of Income Tax Shattering the Mist.
[10:43.080 --> 10:45.240]  Get yourself a copy of Body Science.
[10:45.240 --> 10:49.280]  You have my word, they will be two of the most fascinating books you have ever read.
[10:49.280 --> 10:55.000]  And in doing so, you help me to continue to be here for you with these kind of presentations.
[10:55.000 --> 10:55.520]  Thanks.