Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language Detected language: English [00:00.000 --> 00:06.520] Elon Musk, the wealthiest man in the world, just acquired 9.2% of Twitter's stock, making [00:06.520 --> 00:09.080] him the majority shareholder. [00:09.080 --> 00:13.440] As you are probably aware, Twitter is one of the most egregious platforms concerning [00:13.440 --> 00:15.180] censorship. [00:15.180 --> 00:22.160] If you contradict or conflict with any establishment narrative supported by the government or multi-billion [00:22.160 --> 00:28.240] or trillion-dollar industries, Twitter will find justification at some point to take you [00:28.240 --> 00:29.600] off Twitter. [00:29.600 --> 00:35.720] Musk has long been an advocate of free speech and has expressed strong aversion to Twitter's [00:35.720 --> 00:36.720] censorship. [00:36.720 --> 00:44.200] So, what changes might we see in Twitter now that Musk has significant influence? [01:00.600 --> 01:06.320] Let's define the problem and then we'll move on to what Musk may do about it over Twitter. [01:06.320 --> 01:11.040] Whether we're talking Twitter or any other social media platform that engages in censorship, [01:11.040 --> 01:16.520] the way they do this is they create rules that are exceedingly vague and anytime a controversial [01:16.520 --> 01:23.040] subject becomes important to millions of people, most specifically we're going to be talking [01:23.040 --> 01:26.920] about millions of Americans, which almost certainly means that it becomes important [01:26.920 --> 01:30.500] to the government and it becomes important to these multi-billion or multi-trillion-dollar [01:30.500 --> 01:31.960] industries. [01:31.960 --> 01:38.360] Once that happens, if the push, if the direction of the dialogue is adverse to the narrative [01:38.360 --> 01:43.640] the government wants to see and these billion-dollar industries want to see, then Twitter simply [01:43.640 --> 01:48.960] adds that subject to the list of things concerning which it is impermissible to contradict or [01:48.960 --> 01:53.600] say something that's in conflict with the government or what these billion-dollar industries [01:53.600 --> 01:55.640] want the public to hear. [01:56.120 --> 02:01.160] Once Twitter has added it to its list, then when a person speaks in opposition to the [02:01.160 --> 02:06.880] establishment narrative, Twitter says, ah, you're spreading misleading information and [02:06.880 --> 02:10.580] punishes the person up to and including taking them off of Twitter permanently. [02:10.580 --> 02:16.600] So who decides what is misinformation? [02:16.600 --> 02:21.200] Well the government and large institutions funded by these same multi-billion or trillion-dollar [02:21.280 --> 02:27.640] industries we just talked about, who decided that it's impermissible to say anything that's [02:27.640 --> 02:32.400] in conflict with or in opposition to the narrative they want the public to hear. [02:32.400 --> 02:40.120] The situation is so bad over Twitter that Twitter refuses to disclose what entities [02:40.120 --> 02:46.080] it relies upon in determining what is or is not misinformation. [02:46.080 --> 02:52.280] Twitter knows if it was to reveal the entities that it allows to determine, quote, misinformation [02:52.280 --> 02:55.320] for Twitter, then people would see it for what it is. [02:55.320 --> 02:57.760] So Twitter won't reveal that information. [02:57.760 --> 03:02.560] The bottom line is that Twitter and these other platforms that engage in censorship [03:02.560 --> 03:10.920] are simply acting as gatekeepers for the establishment and in particular narratives the establishment [03:10.920 --> 03:17.400] does not want people to understand our faults. [03:17.400 --> 03:24.500] Since Musk doesn't dig these rules at Twitter that lead to censorship, now with Musk having [03:24.500 --> 03:30.340] significant influence at Twitter, what changes might we expect? [03:30.340 --> 03:35.400] My prediction is that over the next several months, we're going to see Twitter begin [03:35.400 --> 03:43.600] to remove or significantly modify these rules that it uses to engage in censorship in defense [03:43.600 --> 03:45.720] of establishment narratives. [03:45.720 --> 03:51.880] If Twitter's CEO declines to roll back or highly modify those rules, Musk essentially [03:51.880 --> 03:53.160] has two options. [03:53.160 --> 03:58.400] He can significantly increase the number of shares that he owns in Twitter, which would [03:58.400 --> 04:03.320] give him even more influence up to and including at some point removing the CEO. [04:03.320 --> 04:09.960] Or he can simply sell his stake in Twitter and go open a competitive platform. [04:09.960 --> 04:13.960] I think it's important to understand where Musk is coming from. [04:13.960 --> 04:22.280] He has characterized platforms such as Twitter as the de facto town square, which is interesting [04:22.280 --> 04:29.040] because I've been asserting that social media is the new town square for several years now. [04:29.040 --> 04:36.240] It's part of my view on the reason that social media platforms can and should be regulated [04:36.240 --> 04:38.040] out of censorship. [04:38.040 --> 04:42.640] Back in the days of the founding fathers when freedom of speech, as far as the United States [04:42.640 --> 04:49.680] was concerned, was sort of viewed as a right and preserved for all Americans, the town [04:49.680 --> 04:52.320] square was huge. [04:52.320 --> 04:56.400] You'd have a small community, there would be a central area of the town, the town square. [04:56.400 --> 04:59.920] Sometimes there'd be literally a tree stump. [04:59.920 --> 05:04.480] People who wanted to talk almost exclusively about politics, people would stand up on that [05:04.480 --> 05:09.800] stump in the town square and they would say, my fellow citizens, I want you to understand [05:09.800 --> 05:11.600] that or my view is... [05:11.600 --> 05:16.520] This was stumping in the town square. [05:16.520 --> 05:25.560] That was the basis, that was the core of where public free speech took place in America. [05:25.560 --> 05:29.480] That was the birth, that was the beginning, that's how it was done. [05:29.480 --> 05:36.480] That's the genus of the mechanism of free speech in the United States. [05:36.480 --> 05:41.620] So, how many towns still have a small town square? [05:41.620 --> 05:45.800] They have something like a stump, even if it's something that's been constructed for [05:45.800 --> 05:49.360] the purpose of standing upon it and speaking to your fellow citizens. [05:49.360 --> 05:51.920] How many communities in America have that ability? [05:52.320 --> 05:57.140] If somebody were to go there and get up and begin to speak in today's hectic society, [05:57.140 --> 06:01.560] people can't come from all around to be in that town square to hear that person talk. [06:01.560 --> 06:06.760] So, that is a no longer viable model. [06:06.760 --> 06:12.120] Just like the press, as in freedom of the press, morphed from a single guy running a [06:12.120 --> 06:20.480] hand crank wooden press to get out a one page newspaper 200 plus years ago, has morphed [06:20.480 --> 06:29.920] into multi-billion dollar media conglomerates, the town square has morphed into social media [06:29.920 --> 06:33.040] sites such as Twitter. [06:33.040 --> 06:36.760] There are a lot of people who will not believe that Twitter is stepping away from censorship [06:36.760 --> 06:41.240] unless or until a number of the people who have been removed, permanently removed from [06:41.240 --> 06:43.240] Twitter are brought back. [06:43.240 --> 06:48.040] I'm sure you can probably think of some people who were deplatformed from Twitter and you'd [06:48.040 --> 06:50.720] like to see their accounts come back online. [06:50.720 --> 06:53.800] Of particular interest to me are certain science commentators. [06:53.800 --> 07:01.200] I'd like to share a quote with you from Einstein who said, freedom of communication is indispensable [07:01.200 --> 07:07.400] for the development and extension of scientific knowledge. [07:07.400 --> 07:15.320] It must be guaranteed by law, but laws alone cannot secure freedom of expression in order [07:15.320 --> 07:20.600] that every man may present his views without penalty. [07:20.600 --> 07:28.360] There must be a spirit of tolerance in the entire population. [07:28.360 --> 07:33.800] With Einstein's quote as the backdrop, I'll be very curious to see whether Twitter brings [07:33.800 --> 07:42.040] back Dr. Robert Malone and Alex Berenson along with restoring all of the people who were [07:42.040 --> 07:43.480] following them. [07:43.880 --> 07:45.960] So what about Trump? [07:45.960 --> 07:48.040] Trump is going to be a little bit of a different story. [07:48.040 --> 07:52.960] Let me share what I believe is going to happen concerning Trump. [07:52.960 --> 07:58.520] No matter what happens, even if suddenly Elon Musk became the CEO of Twitter, which is never [07:58.520 --> 08:02.760] going to happen, even if something like that were to happen, we're not going to see, in [08:02.760 --> 08:07.160] my opinion, Trump brought back immediately. [08:07.160 --> 08:13.400] I suspect that Twitter, no matter who is running Twitter, is going to wait to see the report [08:13.400 --> 08:16.560] from the January 6th House committee. [08:16.560 --> 08:21.960] They're going to want to see what evidence the committee makes public. [08:21.960 --> 08:24.200] Let me explain that comment. [08:24.200 --> 08:25.200] No platform. [08:25.200 --> 08:31.360] It doesn't matter whether it's a platform that is known for non-censorship. [08:31.360 --> 08:38.440] No platform is going to allow someone on who advocates or has advocated violence. [08:38.440 --> 08:40.120] I'm not saying Trump did that. [08:40.120 --> 08:44.120] What I'm saying is, before Twitter brings Trump back, they're going to want to see the [08:44.120 --> 08:45.120] evidence. [08:45.120 --> 08:47.520] Let me explain to you how I believe this is going to go down. [08:47.520 --> 08:53.200] If Twitter's attorneys and Twitter's executive staff and the board of directors, they look [08:53.200 --> 08:59.800] at what's laid out in the January 6th committee's report, and there is language in there that [08:59.800 --> 09:09.680] is indicative that Trump knowingly intended his rally to go down the street and commit [09:09.680 --> 09:14.560] a violent assault of the Capitol building, then they're not going to bring him back. [09:14.560 --> 09:20.520] However, if the language of the report, even if it sounds condemnatory concerning Trump, [09:20.520 --> 09:29.320] but if the language is things like, he should have known what reaction his words would engender, [09:29.320 --> 09:35.360] or something like, having seen the violence occur, he didn't react quickly enough to [09:35.360 --> 09:39.600] encourage his followers to stop committing the acts of us. [09:39.600 --> 09:44.440] Does this indicate he didn't intend for it to happen and he didn't make it happen? [09:44.440 --> 09:49.360] The committee may still be critical of Trump, but if the language doesn't indicate that [09:49.360 --> 09:57.680] Trump intended to, or knew that, or planned that violence would or should occur, if there's [09:57.680 --> 10:04.480] no language that indicates that concerning Trump, especially if Musk has his way, I'm [10:04.480 --> 10:07.120] pretty confident they'll bring Trump back. [10:07.120 --> 10:14.800] Again, if the language that the January 6th committee brings forward indicates that at [10:14.800 --> 10:21.040] least in the committee's opinion, Donald Trump knew what he was doing from the minute he [10:21.040 --> 10:24.280] opened his mouth and his agenda was to have them march down the street and get violent [10:24.280 --> 10:29.160] down at the Capitol building, if that message is there, then it's unlikely Twitter will [10:29.160 --> 10:30.280] bring him back. [10:30.280 --> 10:33.320] We'll have to see what the January 6th report says. [10:33.320 --> 10:37.480] Then you can acid test the language of the report against my view that I'm sharing with [10:37.480 --> 10:38.880] you here today. [10:38.880 --> 10:44.920] Let us say that Musk is successful at Twitter and they strike a number of their rules and [10:44.920 --> 10:49.960] they significantly roll back censorship and they bring back people like Dr. Robert Malone [10:49.960 --> 10:53.200] and Alex Berenson and perhaps Donald Trump. [10:53.200 --> 11:00.280] Can we then expect to see somebody like Musk do the same thing at platforms such as Facebook [11:00.280 --> 11:01.920] and Google? [11:01.920 --> 11:04.760] Absolutely not. [11:04.760 --> 11:09.000] And the reason is the stock structure at Google and Facebook are different. [11:09.000 --> 11:12.440] The founders there have something called super voting rights. [11:12.440 --> 11:13.720] I'll give you an example. [11:13.720 --> 11:20.880] Sergey Brin and Larry Page, who are the founders of Google, at this moment in time, they only [11:20.880 --> 11:25.540] own 14% of Google and of course Google owns YouTube, which is why we're talking about [11:25.540 --> 11:27.800] platforms that engage in censorship. [11:27.800 --> 11:31.080] So they only own 14% of Google. [11:31.080 --> 11:38.960] However, because of super voting rights, they have 56% of the votes when shareholder voting [11:38.960 --> 11:39.960] takes place. [11:39.960 --> 11:43.680] The same is true concerning Zuckerberg and Facebook. [11:43.680 --> 11:49.320] So it would be absolutely impossible for somebody like Musk to buy shares of Facebook or buy [11:49.320 --> 11:54.620] shares of Google and affect the same change that he may very possibly be able to affect [11:54.620 --> 11:59.520] at Twitter where there is no super voting rights vested with the founders. [11:59.520 --> 12:04.480] This kind of discussion about platform censorship isn't merely academic for me. [12:04.480 --> 12:10.640] I have had my YouTube channel deplatformed, Facebook about a year and a half ago removed [12:10.640 --> 12:16.760] my Dr. Reality business page that had 150,000 followers, boom. [12:16.760 --> 12:20.760] That fast, 150,000 people and 12 years of work gone. [12:20.760 --> 12:26.680] So I understand censorship in a way that perhaps people who haven't had that experience don't [12:26.680 --> 12:28.960] quite feel about censorship. [12:28.960 --> 12:35.960] My most notable works in writing, Income Tax Shattering the Mists and Body Science, both [12:35.960 --> 12:40.840] cut hard against the establishment narrative. [12:40.840 --> 12:47.200] They go through the evidence and they completely eviscerate the establishment narratives on [12:47.200 --> 12:48.200] their respective fields. [12:48.200 --> 12:53.560] One is the income tax and the other is physiology with an emphasis on nutritional physiology. [12:53.560 --> 12:57.320] So in the case of Income Tax Shattering the Mists, we take a look at from all the way [12:57.680 --> 13:02.720] from 1895 forward, what the laws say and the Constitution says and the Supreme Court has [13:02.720 --> 13:06.040] said and Treasury orders say and Treasury decisions and internal IRS documents. [13:06.040 --> 13:09.300] They never thought anybody outside the agency would ever see and so forth. [13:09.300 --> 13:14.560] We take a look at all the way from 1895 forward concerning the income tax and show, not speculate, [13:14.560 --> 13:19.520] absolutely prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Congress has never imposed the income [13:19.520 --> 13:20.720] tax on the average American. [13:20.720 --> 13:26.040] So again, it utterly destroys the establishment narrative that probably 98% of the U.S. public [13:26.040 --> 13:29.240] believes that if you go out and you earn some money, you owe some to the government. [13:29.240 --> 13:34.360] It's absolute poppycock and all of the evidence is Income Tax Shattering the Mists. [13:34.360 --> 13:40.600] Body Science, I take the same thing, I take 60 years worth of science fraud committed [13:40.600 --> 13:47.380] by various billion dollar and trillion dollar industries that all they want to do is they [13:47.380 --> 13:53.640] want to continue to promote them making billions and trillions of dollars and they really don't [13:54.040 --> 13:59.280] care how many Americans get ill, how many Americans die prematurely, how many Americans [13:59.280 --> 14:02.440] suffer for decades with chronic diseases. [14:02.440 --> 14:07.860] They just don't care and they have blatantly lied to the American people. [14:07.860 --> 14:11.260] So I take you through all of that in Body Science and then we get into a discussion [14:11.260 --> 14:15.800] of how the human body really works, the true physiology of the human body because especially [14:15.800 --> 14:20.400] when it comes to nutritional physiology, these industries have spent billions of dollars [14:20.520 --> 14:26.440] so that all of the information you see is a narrative that's false and much of that [14:26.440 --> 14:30.000] false narrative you've probably accepted over the last couple decades. [14:30.000 --> 14:35.200] So I explain how all of that occurred in the first place, why many people believe what [14:35.200 --> 14:40.980] they believe which is utterly false, I destroy the establishment false narratives, I explain [14:40.980 --> 14:47.240] how human physiology works and then I say if you want to stop, if you want to get healthy, [14:47.240 --> 14:52.200] if you want to stop getting sick because they're telling you lies, you actually want [14:52.200 --> 14:59.200] to follow true human physiology and be exceedingly, exceptionally healthy, I lay that out and [14:59.360 --> 15:00.920] do that in Body Science. [15:00.920 --> 15:06.040] So if you value, number one, the sort of analysis I've done today and number two, if you value [15:06.040 --> 15:11.760] the truth over false establishment narratives, go to DrReality.News, grab yourself a copy [15:11.760 --> 15:16.160] of Income Text, Shattering the Mist and or Body Science, you have my word they will be [15:16.160 --> 15:21.920] two of the most fascinating books you have ever read in your life and in fact, if you [15:21.920 --> 15:25.760] let them, they will change your life. [15:25.760 --> 15:33.600] Thanks for being here.