Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language Detected language: English [00:00.000 --> 00:07.400] Robert Reich recently wrote an op-ed railing against Elon Musk's attempt to end, or at [00:07.400 --> 00:10.400] least roll back, Twitter's censorship. [00:10.400 --> 00:15.920] Reich is a former U.S. Secretary of Labor, and he's a professor at UC Berkeley. [00:15.920 --> 00:20.320] Given the content of his op-ed, I think it warrants examination. [00:20.320 --> 00:23.800] Reich's op-ed was written before Musk's offer to purchase Twitter outright and take [00:23.800 --> 00:24.800] it private. [00:24.800 --> 00:32.240] However, that offer only makes Reich's comments more appropriate for examination. [00:32.240 --> 00:37.840] Today I'm only going to share with you the portions of the op-ed that deal directly with [00:37.840 --> 00:41.320] censorship on social media platforms such as Twitter. [00:41.320 --> 00:44.080] Everything else is just window dressing, and I don't want to waste your time with that. [00:44.080 --> 00:52.960] So what did Reich have to say? [00:52.960 --> 01:04.640] The Dr. Reality Vodcast with Dave Champion. [01:04.640 --> 01:10.800] Reich begins with these words, the Russian people know little about Putin's war on Ukraine [01:10.800 --> 01:17.880] because Putin has blocked their access to the truth, substituting propaganda and lies. [01:17.880 --> 01:25.760] Years ago, pundits assumed the internet would open a new era of democracy, giving everyone [01:25.760 --> 01:27.920] access to the truth. [01:27.920 --> 01:34.480] But dictators like Putin and demagogues like Trump have demonstrated how naive that assumption [01:34.480 --> 01:35.480] was. [01:35.480 --> 01:45.760] Let's take a moment here and look at Reich's phrase, a new era of democracy. [01:45.760 --> 01:49.160] What does that even mean in a practical sense? [01:49.160 --> 01:52.120] I might speculate what I think it means. [01:52.120 --> 01:57.280] You might speculate on what you think it means, but since Reich didn't explain what it means, [01:57.280 --> 01:59.400] we have no way to know what that phrase means. [01:59.400 --> 02:02.780] It's much like make America great again. [02:02.780 --> 02:06.620] You could take 100 people, we'll call them Trump supporters for the sake of this discussion, [02:06.620 --> 02:10.800] you could take 100 Trump supporters individually so they can't hear each other talk, and you [02:10.800 --> 02:15.280] could say to one of them, what does make America great again, and then move that person away [02:15.400 --> 02:19.240] and then in isolation ask the second one, what does make America great again mean, and [02:19.240 --> 02:20.680] in the third and so on. [02:20.680 --> 02:24.200] When you go through the whole hundred, you'd probably have a hundred different answers [02:24.200 --> 02:30.280] because it means whatever the person hearing it thinks it means, which is exactly the case [02:30.280 --> 02:34.800] with Reich's phrase, new era of democracy. [02:34.800 --> 02:41.080] I should point out that Reich begins his op-ed by pointing out that in his view, the people [02:41.080 --> 02:45.040] of Russia are not getting the facts that he believes they should get concerning Russia's [02:45.040 --> 02:51.480] invasion of the Ukraine because of censorship, which of course involves social media censorship. [02:51.480 --> 02:59.040] So at least in the first 23 words of his op-ed, he seems to acknowledge that censorship is [02:59.040 --> 03:00.440] a problem. [03:00.440 --> 03:07.800] Now continuing with Reich's op-ed, quote, at least the U.S. responded to Trump's lies. [03:07.800 --> 03:13.920] Trump had 88 million Twitter followers before Twitter took him off its platform just two [03:13.920 --> 03:20.440] days after the attack on the Capitol, which he provoked in part with his tweets. [03:20.440 --> 03:23.880] So again, let's analyze what Reich is saying. [03:23.880 --> 03:29.040] He says, the U.S. responded to Trump's lies. [03:29.040 --> 03:33.880] In that context, who is the U.S. responding to Trump? [03:34.040 --> 03:38.080] Well, the totality of that paragraph, I can only imagine that what Reich means, because [03:38.080 --> 03:42.760] he doesn't tell us, so we have to imagine, I can only imagine what he means is the wealthy [03:42.760 --> 03:46.040] elites who have control of social media platforms. [03:46.040 --> 03:52.240] The wealthy elites decided that Trump could no longer have a voice on social media. [03:52.240 --> 04:00.720] Reich then continues, these moves were necessary to protect American democracy. [04:00.720 --> 04:07.720] And that sentence puts him in conflict with the Founding Fathers, whose views were, whether [04:07.720 --> 04:13.120] you were a dirt poor farmer or whether you were one of the Virginia elite before the [04:13.120 --> 04:19.400] Revolutionary War or one of the 13 states after the Revolutionary War, their view was [04:19.400 --> 04:25.560] everyone gets to say, in whatever venues available, given the era and the technology, everyone [04:25.560 --> 04:28.320] gets to say whatever they want to say. [04:28.320 --> 04:33.160] And it's up to the person reading it or hearing it or seeing it to determine what [04:33.160 --> 04:34.160] is credible. [04:34.160 --> 04:42.200] In other words, it's up to us, the American people, to decide what's credible after hearing [04:42.200 --> 04:46.800] everything that everyone has to say. [04:46.800 --> 04:52.960] Continuing now with the op-ed, but Elon Musk, the richest man in the world with 80 million [04:52.960 --> 04:56.400] Twitter followers, wasn't pleased. [04:56.480 --> 05:02.400] Musk tweeted that the US tech companies shouldn't be acting, quote, as the de facto arbiter [05:02.400 --> 05:04.720] of free speech, close quote. [05:04.720 --> 05:10.560] Musk advocates free speech, but in reality, it's just about power. [05:10.560 --> 05:14.440] And Reich is absolutely correct about that. [05:14.440 --> 05:16.600] It is about power. [05:16.600 --> 05:25.480] Free speech empowers the entire populace of the United States to assess what they hear, [05:25.960 --> 05:27.960] that's the concept of free speech. [05:27.960 --> 05:36.040] It allows the American people to assess everything they hear and decide what they view as credible, [05:36.040 --> 05:43.880] rather than having what they see, what they hear, and accordingly what they think, controlled [05:43.880 --> 05:47.160] by the elites engaged in censorship. [05:47.160 --> 05:49.520] So yes, it is about power. [05:49.520 --> 05:53.160] Power to the people, not power to the elites. [05:53.160 --> 05:59.760] Continuing with Reich's words, power compelled Musk to buy 2.64 billion of Twitter stock, [05:59.760 --> 06:02.320] making him the largest individual shareholder. [06:02.320 --> 06:05.920] He'll buy as much as he needs to gain total control. [06:05.920 --> 06:10.680] What, end quotes, improvements does Musk have in mind for Twitter? [06:10.680 --> 06:15.960] Will he use his clout over Twitter to prevent users with tens of millions of followers from [06:15.960 --> 06:18.920] blocking people who criticize them? [06:18.920 --> 06:21.600] Wait, what? [06:21.680 --> 06:24.680] That's not platform censorship. [06:24.680 --> 06:28.640] That's individual choice of association. [06:28.640 --> 06:36.080] One user on Twitter choosing not to interact any further with another user of Twitter, [06:36.080 --> 06:39.320] that's not platform censorship. [06:39.320 --> 06:45.240] Continuing with more of Reich's words, quote, Musk has long advocated a libertarian vision [06:45.240 --> 06:49.280] of an, quote, uncontrolled internet. [06:49.280 --> 06:52.480] This vision is dangerous rubbish. [06:52.480 --> 06:55.360] There's no such animal, and there never will be. [06:55.360 --> 07:02.160] Again, with the vagueness, what does uncontrolled mean as he's using it in this context? [07:02.160 --> 07:08.200] There is a huge difference between a social media platform exercising a level of control [07:08.200 --> 07:12.160] where they say, you can't come on our platform and use it to organize a murder with other [07:12.160 --> 07:13.160] people. [07:13.160 --> 07:14.160] We don't allow that. [07:14.160 --> 07:15.160] That would be control, right? [07:15.760 --> 07:21.560] the people cannot organize felonious criminal activities using your platform. [07:21.560 --> 07:26.440] That's significantly different from making sure that people with a certain political [07:26.440 --> 07:33.760] message are not allowed to be given a voice or disallowing people from speaking against [07:33.760 --> 07:35.880] false establishment narratives. [07:35.880 --> 07:41.240] Yet Reich throws out uncontrolled once again without telling us what the hell he means [07:41.240 --> 07:42.720] by it. [07:42.720 --> 07:46.800] Continuing with Reich's words, Musk talks about freedom of speech, but his real power [07:46.800 --> 07:52.960] is freedom of reach, reaching 80 million Twitter followers without accountability to anyone, [07:52.960 --> 07:55.120] including critics like me. [07:55.120 --> 07:58.080] Wait, what? [07:58.080 --> 08:04.720] So Reich is saying he's upset because Musk has 88 million followers. [08:04.720 --> 08:08.120] Reich has 1.4 million followers. [08:08.760 --> 08:13.840] He's upset that more people want to hear what Musk has to say than want to hear what [08:13.840 --> 08:18.120] Reich has to say, which I think is a problem for Reich because Musk is pretty open about [08:18.120 --> 08:20.880] the fact that he doesn't share Reich's politics. [08:20.880 --> 08:26.520] Further, I've never heard Reich criticize the person who has the number one that the [08:26.520 --> 08:33.520] very most followers on Twitter, Barack Obama with 131 million. [08:33.520 --> 08:35.560] So we've got Reich at 1.4 million. [08:35.560 --> 08:37.480] We've got Elon Musk at 88 million. [08:37.480 --> 08:41.240] We've got Obama at 131 million. [08:41.240 --> 08:48.280] And Reich is equating reach with power, but I've never heard him criticize Obama for his [08:48.280 --> 08:51.120] power on Twitter. [08:51.120 --> 08:58.760] Continuing with the words of Reich, Musk has never believed that power comes with responsibility. [08:58.760 --> 09:04.040] I have to admit, I was floored by that statement. [09:04.600 --> 09:08.680] That's absolutely idiotic. [09:08.680 --> 09:14.040] Musk is in charge of several extremely large successful companies operating in billion [09:14.040 --> 09:15.040] dollar industries. [09:15.040 --> 09:22.440] It's pretty much the epitome of needing to have a very strong sense of responsibility. [09:22.440 --> 09:30.800] On the other hand, Reich has spent his entire adult life either in government or academia, [09:30.800 --> 09:36.760] which is essentially the antithesis of having any need for personal responsibility. [09:36.760 --> 09:42.520] Reich continues, billionaires like Musk have shown time and again they consider themselves [09:42.520 --> 09:46.160] above the law, and to a large extent, they are. [09:46.160 --> 09:52.440] Odd that I've never heard Reich make a similar statement about a billionaire like Michael [09:52.440 --> 09:55.400] Bloomberg, who is a hard leftist. [09:55.400 --> 10:01.940] It seems that Reich's angst concerning billionaires is limited to billionaires who are either [10:01.940 --> 10:04.800] libertarian or right-leaning. [10:04.800 --> 10:10.880] Then Reich says, Musk has enough wealth and enough power to control one of the most important [10:10.880 --> 10:15.480] ways the public now receives news. [10:15.480 --> 10:17.920] So it's totally fine with Reich. [10:17.920 --> 10:20.360] He never wrote this kind of op-ed. [10:20.360 --> 10:25.360] As long as control over one of the most important ways that people receive news in this moment [10:25.360 --> 10:34.320] in the modern era is controlled by the likes of Jack Dorsey, Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Page. [10:34.320 --> 10:39.880] The only difference I can see between Musk and people like Dorsey, Zuckerberg, and Page [10:39.880 --> 10:45.200] is that they aren't openly disdainful of Reich's political views. [10:45.200 --> 10:51.560] Continuing with Reich's words, someone has to decide on the algorithms in every platform, [10:51.560 --> 10:57.480] how they're designed, how they evolve, what they reveal, and what they hide. [10:57.480 --> 11:03.160] Musk has enough power and money to quietly give himself this sort of control over Twitter. [11:03.160 --> 11:04.480] Translation. [11:04.480 --> 11:10.860] Reich is concerned that Musk won't support policies such as shadow banning, where the [11:10.860 --> 11:17.020] platform decides to limit how many people can see something that the platform operators [11:17.020 --> 11:22.320] don't like, which is what he refers to as the algorithms deciding what's going to be [11:22.320 --> 11:27.880] hidden from the users on the platform, allowing the American people to see whatever is posted [11:27.880 --> 11:31.340] by the people they choose to follow on platforms such as Twitter apparently doesn't sit well [11:31.340 --> 11:33.180] with Reich. [11:33.180 --> 11:38.940] Continuing with Reich's words, Musk says he wants to quote, free the internet. [11:38.940 --> 11:44.860] But what he really aims to do is make it even less accountable than it is now. [11:44.860 --> 11:46.860] Less accountable. [11:46.860 --> 11:49.720] And with the vagueness, less accountable. [11:49.720 --> 11:51.320] Accountable to who? [11:51.320 --> 11:56.320] Never for a second have I thought that somebody who posts something on any social media platform, [11:56.320 --> 12:01.600] including Twitter, is accountable to me. [12:01.600 --> 12:05.680] I'm sure you've never looked at something on a social media platform and thought, that [12:05.680 --> 12:10.060] guy needs to be accountable to me for what he said. [12:10.060 --> 12:17.440] What Reich really means by accountable means that their speech must be controlled. [12:17.440 --> 12:22.900] Then of course in Reich's view, in his world, speech should be controlled by him and others [12:22.900 --> 12:25.040] who think like him. [12:25.040 --> 12:32.120] Can you imagine how horrified Reich would be if the people who made the decisions about [12:32.120 --> 12:37.800] what speech should be allowed or not allowed on social media was somebody like Sean Hannity [12:37.800 --> 12:39.800] or Dick Cheney. [12:39.800 --> 12:45.140] In other words, Reich's pitch about accountability has nothing to do with accountability. [12:45.140 --> 12:52.200] It has to do with suppressing political views that Reich and other elites that think like [12:52.200 --> 12:55.140] him don't approve of. [12:55.140 --> 12:59.740] Reich continues, make no mistake, this is not about freedom. [12:59.740 --> 13:01.540] It's about power. [13:01.540 --> 13:03.160] Absolutely. [13:03.160 --> 13:09.020] Reich is 100% correct, especially the way he sees the world, it is all about power and [13:09.100 --> 13:17.300] in particular, for him, it is about retaining the power to suppress speech of which he and [13:17.300 --> 13:19.700] his ill do not approve. [13:19.700 --> 13:23.260] Continuing with Reich's words, it's often impossible to discover who is filling social [13:23.260 --> 13:28.920] media with lies, who is poisoning our minds with pseudoscience and propaganda, and who [13:28.920 --> 13:34.740] is deciding which versions of events go viral and which stay under wraps. [13:34.740 --> 13:40.940] I think it's pretty clear that Reich wants the power for himself and his ilk to determine, [13:40.940 --> 13:49.460] as he puts it, what is poison, the lies, what is pseudoscience or valid science, and what [13:49.460 --> 13:53.020] is factual versus what is propaganda. [13:53.020 --> 14:00.140] He also, he and his ilk, want the power to suppress a post if it's highly popular and [14:00.140 --> 14:01.980] begins to go viral. [14:02.020 --> 14:06.100] But of course, they will only suppress those posts that look like they're going viral when [14:06.100 --> 14:09.320] they disagree with the message. [14:09.320 --> 14:13.540] As an example, Reich would certainly never suppress a post by Barack Obama that was going [14:13.540 --> 14:14.620] viral. [14:14.620 --> 14:19.780] I don't know about you, but I don't want anybody making those decisions for me. [14:19.780 --> 14:26.180] I don't want anybody deciding what is poison, what are lies, what's true science, what's [14:26.180 --> 14:30.900] fake science, what's propaganda, what can go viral. [14:30.900 --> 14:32.100] I want to see it all. [14:32.100 --> 14:35.260] I want the American people to see it all. [14:35.260 --> 14:38.820] You know, for myself, I'll decide what's valid science. [14:38.820 --> 14:41.300] I'll decide what's invalid science. [14:41.300 --> 14:43.380] I'll decide what's propaganda. [14:43.380 --> 14:51.100] I don't need any elitist, arrogant assholes making sure that only the messages they like [14:51.100 --> 14:53.460] can be seen by the American public. [14:53.460 --> 15:00.180] Continuing with Reich's words, in Musk's vision of Twitter and the internet, he'd be the wizard [15:00.180 --> 15:06.980] behind the curtain, projecting on the world screen a fake image of a brave new world empowering [15:06.980 --> 15:07.980] everyone. [15:07.980 --> 15:12.580] In reality, that world would be dominated by the richest and most powerful people in [15:12.580 --> 15:18.180] the world who wouldn't be accountable to anyone for facts, truth, science, or common good. [15:18.180 --> 15:21.780] Let's see now. [15:21.780 --> 15:30.060] Projecting on the world screen a fake image of a brave new world empowering everybody. [15:30.060 --> 15:33.580] Empowering everybody is a fake image. [15:33.580 --> 15:43.940] So according to Reich, allowing everyone to speak freely is not, what do you say, empowering [15:43.940 --> 15:46.140] everyone. [15:46.140 --> 15:53.500] But controlling what people are allowed to see and hear is empowering everyone. [15:53.500 --> 15:56.860] And finally, Musk's final paragraph. [15:56.860 --> 15:59.620] That's Musk's dream. [15:59.620 --> 16:01.020] And Trump's. [16:01.020 --> 16:02.340] And Putin's. [16:02.340 --> 16:05.980] And the dream of every dictator, strongman, demagogue, and modern-day robber baron on [16:05.980 --> 16:06.980] earth. [16:06.980 --> 16:11.860] For the rest of us, it would be a brave new nightmare. [16:11.860 --> 16:13.700] End op-ed. [16:13.700 --> 16:21.140] I'm sure you noticed how Reich lumped Musk in with Putin and Trump. [16:21.140 --> 16:25.940] I'm going to ignore the Putin and Trump part, but I do want to focus on the adjectives he [16:26.020 --> 16:29.260] used, the descriptors, and Musk. [16:29.260 --> 16:32.700] Is Musk a dictator? [16:32.700 --> 16:35.100] No. [16:35.100 --> 16:37.140] Is Musk a strongman? [16:37.140 --> 16:38.140] No. [16:38.140 --> 16:42.060] Well, that's virtually synonymous with dictator. [16:42.060 --> 16:47.700] Is he a demagogue, which applies to a politician? [16:47.700 --> 16:49.940] No. [16:49.940 --> 16:52.060] Is he a modern-day robber baron? [16:52.060 --> 16:53.060] No. [16:54.060 --> 17:02.180] In other words, Reich attempts to hang four anti-liberty appellations upon Musk, none [17:02.180 --> 17:06.220] of which can rationally or factually be applied to him. [17:06.220 --> 17:11.980] At this point, allow me to share my personal thoughts with you. [17:11.980 --> 17:20.860] My confidence in the American people has nosedived over what is called the last decade or so. [17:20.900 --> 17:28.900] In my opinion, the masses here in the US are now easily manipulated into accepting whatever [17:28.900 --> 17:32.700] the establishment wants them to accept. [17:32.700 --> 17:38.260] I don't see a lot of critical thinking skills in the US public. [17:38.260 --> 17:45.100] I think if the choice is between making a decision based on emotion or making a decision [17:45.100 --> 17:52.340] based on intellect, at this point in American history, yeah, Americans making emotionally [17:52.340 --> 17:55.340] driven decisions, yeah, it's a slam dunk. [17:55.340 --> 17:59.940] I think America is predominantly at this point a nation of sheep. [17:59.940 --> 18:03.580] Given that perspective, I'm obviously not attempting to make an argument for you here [18:03.580 --> 18:08.460] today that free speech will cause the American people to make wise decisions. [18:08.460 --> 18:14.260] With that as my frame of reference, I see two options. [18:15.260 --> 18:21.020] The elites can decide what can be said, or at least what can be said in a way that others [18:21.020 --> 18:27.300] can be exposed to it, and at this moment in history, it appears to be people on the left [18:27.300 --> 18:29.700] that are making those decisions. [18:29.700 --> 18:36.220] Option number two, no one is controlling anything that anyone has said, therefore the American [18:36.220 --> 18:42.140] people are free to hear anything and everything that is being said, and then they are free [18:42.300 --> 18:45.660] to make as many shitty decisions as they want. [18:45.660 --> 18:55.140] But here's the thing, if freedom is to mean anything, it must include the freedom to make [18:55.140 --> 19:01.780] mistakes, to be wrong, to make crappy decisions. [19:01.780 --> 19:09.780] So for me, I would not love it, but I would much rather live in a country where the American [19:09.780 --> 19:16.180] people are free to hear and see all of the information, make their own decisions, and [19:16.180 --> 19:24.100] the result of that is the country goes down in flames, rather than a country where what [19:24.100 --> 19:30.700] you see and hear is controlled by the wealthy elites and the masses. [19:30.700 --> 19:36.580] They falsely believe they're free while they're being brainwashed into following and believing [19:36.580 --> 19:44.340] in false establishment narratives because voices in opposition are no longer allowed [19:44.340 --> 19:46.700] to speak or be heard. [19:46.700 --> 19:52.340] Even if Americans make all the wrong choices, all the wrong decisions, better that than [19:52.340 --> 20:03.120] the Orwellian leftist censorship-based nightmare that Reich envisions and wants for America. [20:03.120 --> 20:11.280] If you value this sort of analysis and you value facts, data, and evidence that undermine [20:11.280 --> 20:19.280] false establishment narratives, which essentially, I guess if I've had a profession for the last [20:19.280 --> 20:25.280] 20 years, it's been doing exactly that, presenting facts, data, and evidence that disproves false [20:25.280 --> 20:26.520] establishment narratives. [20:26.520 --> 20:31.920] But if that's what you value, if you're like me, if you can't stand the establishment pushing [20:31.920 --> 20:35.300] false narratives down the throats of the American people, brainwashing the American [20:35.300 --> 20:38.720] people, I want to encourage you to go to DrReality.News. [20:38.720 --> 20:44.120] Pick yourself up a copy of Income Tax Shattering the Miss and or Body Science. [20:44.120 --> 20:49.000] Income Tax Shattering the Miss completely obliterates through facts, law, Supreme Court [20:49.000 --> 20:52.560] decisions, internal documents of the Irish they thought the public would never get their [20:52.560 --> 20:57.360] hands on, and I did, Treasury orders, Treasury decisions, and so forth. [20:57.360 --> 21:01.520] Completely eviscerates the false establishment narrative that here in America if you work [21:01.520 --> 21:04.600] for a living, you owe some to the government, nonsense. [21:04.600 --> 21:12.560] And then body science, same thing, tears down the false establishment narratives that have [21:12.560 --> 21:18.760] caused the American public to be the most chronically ill society in the history of [21:18.760 --> 21:23.840] the world, despite all of our prowess with technology and medicine and science, the most [21:23.840 --> 21:27.520] chronically ill society in the world. [21:27.520 --> 21:33.720] And that's because the American people have been lied to en masse by the establishment. [21:33.720 --> 21:38.840] They've literally, I know this sounds conspiratorial and I don't mean it that way, it simply is [21:38.840 --> 21:40.200] what it is. [21:40.200 --> 21:45.680] The American people have been brainwashed by 60 years of lies about human physiology, [21:45.680 --> 21:48.520] especially nutritional physiology. [21:48.520 --> 21:54.560] Body science discusses all of those establishment narratives, shows you what's behind them, [21:54.600 --> 22:00.800] shows you the fake science, the false science, the purchased science, and then compares that [22:00.800 --> 22:05.600] to the correct invalid science so you understand exactly what has taken place, what the political [22:05.600 --> 22:08.200] motivations were, what the wealth motivations were. [22:08.200 --> 22:10.280] Again, it's all for the wealthy elites. [22:10.280 --> 22:14.520] And frankly, as long as they're making their trillions of dollars, they don't care that [22:14.520 --> 22:19.120] you, the American people, are getting sick, you're miserable, you're dying years or even [22:19.120 --> 22:23.400] decades sooner than you otherwise would, depriving the parents of time with their children and [22:23.800 --> 22:26.280] time with their parents, they don't care. [22:26.280 --> 22:30.520] So if you want to know the truth about how human physiology really works, you want to [22:30.520 --> 22:34.880] get incredibly healthy, no chronic disease, lifestyle chronic disease, there are certain [22:34.880 --> 22:37.520] genetic chronic disease, but if you don't want to get any lifestyle chronic disease, [22:37.520 --> 22:43.160] you want to live to be 90, 100, 110, 120, without any lifestyle chronic diseases. [22:43.160 --> 22:45.120] Because the thing isn't about living long, right? [22:45.120 --> 22:48.480] It's about living long and happily and healthy. [22:48.560 --> 22:53.680] And body science is a critical tool to help you achieve that. [22:53.680 --> 22:57.920] And if you go to DrReality.News and grab yourself a copy of Incompetent Shattering Mist or Body [22:57.920 --> 23:02.920] Science, you help me to continue to be here for you. [23:02.920 --> 23:03.920] Thank you.