Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language
Detected language: English
[00:00.000 --> 00:02.480]  Welcome back to the channel.
[00:02.480 --> 00:06.000]  I'm sure you're all aware there remains a lot of controversy concerning ivermectin in
[00:06.000 --> 00:09.000]  terms of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19.
[00:09.000 --> 00:20.480]  A new study just came out dealing with ivermectin and the fuckery continues.
[00:20.480 --> 00:31.800]  The Dr. Reality Vodcast with Dave Champion.
[00:31.800 --> 00:34.480]  The new study appears in the New England Journal of Medicine.
[00:34.480 --> 00:37.320]  Its date is March 30, 2022.
[00:37.320 --> 00:43.960]  The study title is Effect of Early Treatment with ivermectin Among Patients with COVID-19.
[00:43.960 --> 00:46.800]  However, that title is inaccurate.
[00:47.400 --> 00:51.000]  Might go so far as to say it's an out and out lie and we're going to get to the reason
[00:51.000 --> 00:52.400]  for that in a moment.
[00:52.400 --> 00:58.080]  But this study did not in any way shape or form involve early treatment as that term
[00:58.080 --> 01:03.520]  is recognized when applying ivermectin to SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19.
[01:03.520 --> 01:08.760]  The benefit of ivermectin concerning SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 is when it is used either prophylactically
[01:08.760 --> 01:11.920]  or upon first symptoms.
[01:11.920 --> 01:16.780]  That is when it comes to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, the definition of early treatment as that
[01:16.780 --> 01:21.980]  phrase is applied to the use of ivermectin, which is not at all what was done in the study.
[01:21.980 --> 01:26.940]  Let me give you the profile of the participants that were selected for the study.
[01:26.940 --> 01:34.580]  They had acute COVID-19 and they had been ill for at least seven days.
[01:34.580 --> 01:38.580]  In the medical context, acute means severe.
[01:38.580 --> 01:45.220]  So the participants selected for the study had severe COVID-19 and they had been ill
[01:45.380 --> 01:47.300]  at least seven days.
[01:47.300 --> 01:51.500]  I think the important thing to understand when we look at this study is no one, even
[01:51.500 --> 01:56.860]  the most staunch advocates of ivermectin treatment for SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, has ever said
[01:56.860 --> 02:02.420]  that it is efficacious concerning COVID-19 that is acute, severe, or when a person's
[02:02.420 --> 02:05.260]  been sick already for seven days.
[02:05.260 --> 02:11.100]  Additionally, the dosage given in the study was trivial and, of course, we have to remember
[02:11.100 --> 02:15.180]  that we're dealing with SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, we are not dealing with a parasitical situation.
[02:15.220 --> 02:16.940]  So the dosages are different.
[02:16.940 --> 02:21.820]  Nevertheless, when you compare the proper five-day protocol for ivermectin in the correct
[02:21.820 --> 02:27.460]  dosage to the three-day protocol with the, like I said, trivial numbers that they gave
[02:27.460 --> 02:36.100]  the patients who were acutely ill with COVID-19, they gave those patients just 13% of the amount
[02:36.100 --> 02:41.980]  of ivermectin that's typically recommended to use prophylactically or upon first signs
[02:41.980 --> 02:43.780]  of COVID-19.
[02:43.780 --> 02:45.380]  13%.
[02:45.380 --> 02:47.580]  You think the fix is in?
[02:47.580 --> 02:54.220]  Then we have the fact that this study was funded by U.S. organizations, but was not
[02:54.220 --> 03:00.460]  conducted in the U.S., in fact, was not conducted in Canada, was not conducted in Western Europe.
[03:00.460 --> 03:02.540]  It was conducted in Brazil.
[03:02.540 --> 03:05.820]  Now, what's the significance of that?
[03:05.820 --> 03:13.180]  With all of the 260-something sovereign nations on the globe, why do they pick the one named
[03:13.580 --> 03:14.580]  Brazil?
[03:14.580 --> 03:16.420]  Well, that's part of the scam.
[03:16.420 --> 03:17.420]  Let me explain.
[03:17.420 --> 03:22.540]  Some of the most compelling, positive, factual research concerning the use of ivermectin
[03:22.540 --> 03:29.380]  prophylactically or upon first symptom came out of Brazil probably in late 2020, and there
[03:29.380 --> 03:30.900]  was a number of them back-to-back.
[03:30.900 --> 03:38.060]  And they all had glowing results for ivermectin when used prophylactically or upon first symptom.
[03:38.060 --> 03:41.660]  And those studies out of Brazil were frequently cited.
[03:41.660 --> 03:45.980]  So the reason they chose Brazil is so that when you do an internet search, especially
[03:45.980 --> 03:51.300]  on a bias platform such as Google, when you do an internet search and you type in Brazil
[03:51.300 --> 03:57.260]  study ivermectin, what's going to happen now is instead of getting those studies that were
[03:57.260 --> 04:02.700]  observational, that involved hundreds and hundreds of people and the outcome was fantastic,
[04:02.700 --> 04:06.780]  instead of seeing those, you're going to see this contrived study.
[04:06.780 --> 04:08.460]  So what can we make of this study?
[04:08.460 --> 04:14.700]  I think it's obvious, but if we make the study analogous to automobiles, basically
[04:14.700 --> 04:20.860]  this study is announcing that a 1975 Ford Pinto is never going to win the Indianapolis
[04:20.860 --> 04:21.860]  500.
[04:21.860 --> 04:29.380]  There really is and was only one reason that this study got funded and this study got done,
[04:29.380 --> 04:36.020]  and that was to create this kind of headline for the public to see, which is, quote, ivermectin
[04:36.020 --> 04:43.340]  does not reduce risk of COVID-19 hospitalization clinical study shows, close quote, which is
[04:43.340 --> 04:48.460]  exactly the headline of the article from which I learned about this study.
[04:48.460 --> 04:54.540]  But I'm sure this was very, very effective for the purpose that it was funded, because
[04:54.540 --> 04:59.340]  in America in 2022, who actually goes and reads the study?
[04:59.340 --> 05:03.300]  They just look at the headline and even if somebody did go and read the study, as did
[05:03.300 --> 05:04.300]  I.
[05:04.300 --> 05:07.380]  Were they even aware of the studies from Brazil back in late 2020?
[05:07.380 --> 05:09.180]  It's highly unlikely.
[05:09.180 --> 05:14.140]  So I'm sure the money was well spent from the perspective of the propagandists that
[05:14.140 --> 05:16.180]  wanted to create this headline.
[05:16.180 --> 05:22.500]  If you're like me and you prefer facts, data, and evidence to propaganda, even something
[05:22.500 --> 05:27.100]  that's funded under the title of science, but isn't reality propaganda such as this
[05:27.100 --> 05:30.140]  study, I want to encourage you to run over to DrReality.News.
[05:30.140 --> 05:32.620]  Grab yourself a copy of Income Tax Shattering the Mist.
[05:33.180 --> 05:36.060]  There's a special going on right now.
[05:36.060 --> 05:37.880]  So hear me out.
[05:37.880 --> 05:41.620]  If you go to DrReality.News right now and purchase Income Tax Shattering the Mist, which
[05:41.620 --> 05:49.100]  will be my word to you, if not the most fascinating book you will ever read in your entire life,
[05:49.100 --> 05:51.160]  it'll come damn close.
[05:51.160 --> 05:56.700]  So right now, if you put Income Tax Shattering the Mist in your cart and at checkout, enter
[05:56.900 --> 06:04.580]  in the coupon code, tax honesty, all one word, tax honesty, I will inscribe and autograph
[06:04.580 --> 06:08.300]  your copy of Income Tax Shattering the Mist.
[06:08.300 --> 06:13.420]  Maybe that's not your bag, but maybe you know somebody who's really into facts, data, evidence,
[06:13.420 --> 06:18.220]  law, history, and so forth, and perhaps is not a fan of government and understands that
[06:18.220 --> 06:22.180]  government lies, lies all the time, and lies even when the truth will serve it well, and
[06:22.180 --> 06:28.180]  that it has lied for at least 60 years and created this incredible false narrative in
[06:28.180 --> 06:32.340]  the United States that if you earn some money here in this country, that you owe the federal
[06:32.340 --> 06:36.100]  government something, which is utter nonsense, and the only reason people believe it is they've
[06:36.100 --> 06:37.100]  never read the law.
[06:37.100 --> 06:40.480]  And that's what Income Tax Shattering the Mist cures.
[06:40.480 --> 06:45.380]  So if you're that guy or you know that guy or gal, again, put Income Tax Shattering the
[06:45.380 --> 06:49.100]  Mist in the shopping cart on the way out in the coupon code slot.
[06:49.100 --> 06:54.420]  You want to put tax honesty, all one word, and I will inscribe and autograph the book
[06:54.420 --> 06:55.420]  for you.
[06:55.420 --> 07:00.860]  Also, last thing before I go, if you purchase body science with Income Tax Shattering the
[07:00.860 --> 07:07.100]  Mist or even by itself, because I do the same thing with body science, I just shred the
[07:07.100 --> 07:11.660]  establishment lies and I tell you how human physiology really works and how to avoid all
[07:11.660 --> 07:16.100]  but genetic-caused chronic diseases, even if you purchase that by yourself.
[07:16.100 --> 07:19.740]  So if you purchase it with Income Tax Shattering the Mist or even by itself and you put tax
[07:19.740 --> 07:24.180]  honesty in the coupon code box on your way out, I will inscribe and autograph that for
[07:24.180 --> 07:25.180]  you as well.
[07:25.180 --> 07:27.860]  If you get both, I'll inscribe and autograph them both.
[07:27.860 --> 07:29.420]  It's been a pleasure being with you here today.
[07:29.420 --> 07:30.420]  Thanks for being with me.
[07:30.420 --> 07:30.660]  Take care.