Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language
Detected language: English
[00:00.000 --> 00:09.000]  Welcome back to the channel. We all know that Big Tech has engaged in a massive amount of un-American censorship.
[00:09.000 --> 00:15.000]  But they haven't just censored the average Joe, they've even censored the press.
[00:15.000 --> 00:22.000]  The most poignant example of that is probably when Twitter locked the Washington Post Twitter account
[00:22.000 --> 00:26.000]  after they posted their story about the Hunter Biden laptop.
[00:26.000 --> 00:33.000]  It should also be noted that Facebook significantly suppressed the reach of the Washington Post story concerning the laptop.
[00:33.000 --> 00:44.000]  But here's the thing, most of the content that Big Tech has blocked, suppressed, or removed turned out to be factual.
[00:56.000 --> 01:09.000]  Let's start with this. Big Tech censorship is nothing but the private sector leg of the United States government's disinformation effort.
[01:09.000 --> 01:17.000]  The United States government and institutions that are tied to the United States government, they put out false disinformation.
[01:18.000 --> 01:28.000]  But in the internet age, it's really easy for savvy researchers to turn around and do the research, determine that the establishment's narrative is false.
[01:28.000 --> 01:31.000]  It's dangerous. It's disinformation.
[01:31.000 --> 01:38.000]  And when those savvy researchers accomplish that and then they want to go on social media and show it to others,
[01:38.000 --> 01:44.000]  it is the job of Big Tech to silence those people to ensure there is one narrative and one narrative only,
[01:44.000 --> 01:51.000]  and that is the narrative of the United States government and the institutions connected with the United States government putting out their disinformation.
[01:51.000 --> 01:57.000]  Nothing that conflicts with the government's disinformation is allowed to be placed on social media.
[01:57.000 --> 02:02.000]  Now, of course, at this point, we're talking about just certain select topics.
[02:02.000 --> 02:11.000]  But if something isn't done, you can bet your ass that that small list of subjects is going to increase incrementally over time.
[02:11.000 --> 02:15.000]  I'm no stranger to Big Tech censorship.
[02:15.000 --> 02:25.000]  Facebook removed my Dr. Reality page with 145,000 people following it, and YouTube removed my channel that had nearly 40,000 people following it.
[02:25.000 --> 02:30.000]  And in both those cases, those pages and channels were not taken down.
[02:30.000 --> 02:35.000]  They were not removed because I was wrong or because I was nonfactual.
[02:35.000 --> 02:38.000]  That's not even part of social media, these platforms.
[02:38.000 --> 02:42.000]  It's not even part of their equation, whether you're right or wrong is not part of it at all.
[02:42.000 --> 02:50.000]  The reason that I was taken down was because the information that I provided was people can go look up for themselves and I advocate that they do so.
[02:50.000 --> 02:56.000]  When I say something that's political or I say something that's scientific, I tell my audience, do not believe me.
[02:56.000 --> 02:59.000]  Go out and research this for yourself.
[02:59.000 --> 03:02.000]  And I give them the core information that allows them to go out and do that.
[03:02.000 --> 03:07.000]  But the reason that Facebook and YouTube did what they did was not because I was wrong.
[03:07.000 --> 03:17.000]  The reason I had to be removed was the content that I was posting would lead any reasonable and intelligent person to conclude either taking my word for it
[03:17.000 --> 03:24.000]  or going out and doing their own research to conclude that what the establishment putting out was false was disinformation.
[03:24.000 --> 03:35.000]  And Big Tech's job is to silence people who credibly present information showing that the establishment's narrative is false, that it is disinformation.
[03:35.000 --> 03:44.000]  But the purpose for today's presentation is I said at the outset that virtually everything that has been suppressed or the content removed
[03:44.000 --> 03:50.000]  or the creator such as myself removed from pages or channels, the content was factual.
[03:50.000 --> 03:54.000]  Then using myself as an example, I wasn't taken down because I was wrong.
[03:54.000 --> 03:56.000]  I was taken down because I was first.
[03:56.000 --> 04:04.000]  I came to various conclusions before the establishment had decided that information was acceptable to get out.
[04:04.000 --> 04:10.000]  Now, let's talk about a few things that I've said and others that I'm going to name here in a few minutes that we've said that we were punished for,
[04:10.000 --> 04:14.000]  that our message was silenced, and yet we were right.
[04:14.000 --> 04:16.000]  Let's take a look at a few examples of that.
[04:16.000 --> 04:27.000]  Last week, CDC admitted that 44% of the people who are hospitalized with COVID-19 have been boosted.
[04:27.000 --> 04:28.000]  44%.
[04:28.000 --> 04:33.000]  Now, that's not just 44% of people who are infected have been boosted.
[04:33.000 --> 04:40.000]  That's 44% of the people who are so seriously ill with COVID-19, they require hospitalization.
[04:40.000 --> 04:41.000]  44%.
[04:41.000 --> 04:46.000]  Myself and many others, most notably Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Peter McCullough,
[04:46.000 --> 04:55.000]  have spoken about the problems with mRNA technology vaccines generally and ongoing booster shots in particular.
[04:55.000 --> 05:05.000]  CDC's recent admission confirms that all of us, Dr. Malone, Dr. McCullough, myself, we were correct all along,
[05:05.000 --> 05:09.000]  and yet we were silenced and we were punished.
[05:09.000 --> 05:15.000]  I'll put the link to CDC, the page on CDC's website where they admit the 44% figure down in the notes.
[05:15.000 --> 05:22.000]  Next, a recent study published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory Practice and Research
[05:22.000 --> 05:30.000]  found that 94% of blood samples taken from people who had been vaccinated showed aggregation of erythrocytes,
[05:30.000 --> 05:38.000]  and I want to get this wording right, the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin
[05:38.000 --> 05:42.000]  one month after the mRNA vaccines were injected.
[05:42.000 --> 05:48.000]  Erythrocytes is the medical term for red blood cells, and aggregation means to cluster.
[05:48.000 --> 05:54.000]  Red blood cells are not supposed to cluster, ever.
[05:54.000 --> 06:01.000]  If red blood cells are clustering, that means there is a pathology going on within the red blood cells.
[06:01.000 --> 06:11.000]  Since you can't remain healthy without properly functioning erythrocytes, this report is very concerning.
[06:11.000 --> 06:19.000]  Finding particles that have not been previously seen in human blood, obviously very concerning.
[06:19.000 --> 06:26.000]  In that portion of the cohort where the researchers had access to pre-vaccination blood samples,
[06:26.000 --> 06:31.000]  they compared those to the post-vaccination blood samples,
[06:31.000 --> 06:36.000]  and what they found in the pre-vaccination blood samples was there was no erythrocyte aggregation
[06:36.000 --> 06:40.000]  and there was not the presence of unidentified material in the blood,
[06:40.000 --> 06:45.000]  both of which were observed in the post-vaccination blood samples.
[06:45.000 --> 06:51.000]  And this is not a small, trivial amount that the government and big pharma can sweep away.
[06:51.000 --> 06:57.000]  This is 94% of the blood samples taken.
[06:57.000 --> 07:06.000]  Since late 2020, I have been warning the American people that despite government safe and effective assurances,
[07:06.000 --> 07:17.000]  mRNA technology vaccines were new and experimental and had not been tested using rigorous scientific methods,
[07:17.000 --> 07:24.000]  but rather had only been superficially tested to the extent that they could provide data to the FDA
[07:24.000 --> 07:27.000]  in order to get emergency use authorization.
[07:27.000 --> 07:35.000]  Yet even the superficial testing was rigged in order to give FDA just enough information,
[07:35.000 --> 07:40.000]  much of it false, to give FDA enough information to grant emergency use authorization.
[07:40.000 --> 07:42.000]  That was the whole game.
[07:42.000 --> 07:46.000]  Studies such as the one we've just been discussing with the 94% of blood samples
[07:46.000 --> 07:52.000]  showing erythrocyte aggregation and unknown particles appearing in the blood
[07:52.000 --> 07:55.000]  shows that myself and others were correct all along.
[07:55.000 --> 08:00.000]  Yet we were silenced. We were punished by big tech.
[08:00.000 --> 08:06.000]  Moving on, a new study conducted by scientists at Harvard and Johns Hopkins currently in preprint
[08:06.000 --> 08:18.000]  concluded that the mRNA technology vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 are 98 times worse for young adults than is the virus.
[08:18.000 --> 08:26.000]  In other words, the report completely decimates CDC's recommendation that everyone should become vaccinated.
[08:26.000 --> 08:36.000]  Doctors Malone and McCullough and myself have told our audiences since, again, probably late 2020, early 2021
[08:36.000 --> 08:43.000]  that CDC's guidance and recommendation was horribly flawed, and this new research proves it.
[08:44.000 --> 08:48.000]  Again, we were right, we were punished, and we were silenced.
[08:48.000 --> 08:51.000]  And speaking of being silenced, I just want to point something out.
[08:51.000 --> 08:54.000]  I'm sure you're already aware of this, but I want to make it clear.
[08:54.000 --> 09:01.000]  Silencing people like Dr. Malone, Dr. McCullough, and myself doesn't change what we know.
[09:01.000 --> 09:07.000]  What it is is a bunch of corporate executives at billion-dollar firms saying,
[09:07.000 --> 09:15.000]  You, the public, can't be allowed to hear us, can't be allowed to hear the facts, the evidence, the data,
[09:15.000 --> 09:20.000]  viewing the facts, data, and evidence, which you might conclude to be the truth.
[09:20.000 --> 09:30.000]  These executives have established censorship departments in their corporations to make sure you can't hear the information.
[09:30.000 --> 09:34.000]  So ultimately, it's really not about people like me and Dr. Malone and Dr. McCullough.
[09:34.000 --> 09:36.000]  It's what they're doing to you.
[09:36.000 --> 09:38.000]  How about wearing masks?
[09:38.000 --> 09:46.000]  I have long preached since, I'm going to guess probably April of 2020, that masks are worthless.
[09:46.000 --> 09:50.000]  And I have said it loud, and I have said it proud, and I have said it repeatedly,
[09:50.000 --> 09:54.000]  and I have presented the science every single step of the way.
[09:54.000 --> 10:00.000]  I have shared with my audience that in 100 years, from 1920 to 2020,
[10:00.000 --> 10:10.000]  there was not one single scientific study that concluded that masks of any kind halt or slow the spread of a virus.
[10:10.000 --> 10:12.000]  Not one.
[10:12.000 --> 10:18.000]  And as we move into 2020 itself and into 2021, there was in fact one.
[10:18.000 --> 10:23.000]  And it was put out by CDC, and it involved like 13 people, and it was horribly flawed.
[10:23.000 --> 10:27.000]  Actually, it ended up being the laughing stock of the scientific community.
[10:27.000 --> 10:32.000]  But even being completely rigged and making a mockery of science,
[10:32.000 --> 10:38.000]  they only asserted that masks cut down on illness by 2.3%,
[10:38.000 --> 10:42.000]  which in terms of what we're talking about is statistically insignificant.
[10:42.000 --> 10:45.000]  Of course, if they hadn't rigged it, the number would have been zero.
[10:45.000 --> 10:53.000]  But even rigging it, all the best they could do was the statistically insignificant number of 2.3% in favor of wearing masks.
[10:53.000 --> 10:57.000]  I'll go ahead and put one of my older mask videos down in the notes for you
[10:57.000 --> 11:00.000]  so you can see the kind of information we're talking about.
[11:00.000 --> 11:08.000]  A recent study, 600 million people in 35 countries concluded the following.
[11:08.000 --> 11:14.000]  Positive correlation between mask usage and cases that they mean infections.
[11:14.000 --> 11:17.000]  Let me insert the word infections instead to make it more clear.
[11:18.000 --> 11:26.000]  Positive correlation between mask usage and infections was not statistically significant,
[11:26.000 --> 11:34.000]  while the correlation between mask usage and deaths was positive and significant.
[11:34.000 --> 11:39.000]  In other words, wearing a mask isn't going to stop you from getting infected,
[11:39.000 --> 11:44.000]  but the data shows wearing a mask will increase your odds of dying from COVID-19.
[11:44.000 --> 11:49.000]  And again, I was saying from day one, masks don't work.
[11:49.000 --> 11:58.000]  They don't prevent nor slow the spread of an infectious virus, period, full stop.
[11:58.000 --> 12:01.000]  Then I was punished, and that message was silenced.
[12:01.000 --> 12:06.000]  And this latest study shows that I and many others were absolutely right,
[12:06.000 --> 12:12.000]  but Big Tech decided you weren't going to be allowed to know that.
[12:12.000 --> 12:17.000]  A recent study out of Canada has now concluded that there is virtually no difference whatsoever
[12:17.000 --> 12:24.000]  between vaccinated and unvaccinated in terms of hospitalizations and deaths.
[12:24.000 --> 12:33.000]  And it found for every one unvaccinated person in ICU, there are six vaccinated people in ICU.
[12:33.000 --> 12:38.000]  Since early 2021, I've been telling the nation that the data provided by Pfizer to the FDA
[12:38.000 --> 12:43.000]  was fraudulent, was a rigged game all along for no other purpose than to get emergency use authorization.
[12:43.000 --> 12:48.000]  I was punished, and the message silenced for saying that, as was Dr. Malone.
[12:48.000 --> 12:53.000]  This latest study out of Canada confirms we were right all along.
[12:53.000 --> 13:00.000]  Let me give you a final example of how insane the effort is to prop up the false establishment narrative.
[13:00.000 --> 13:05.000]  One expositor who is followed by millions of people said just the other day
[13:05.000 --> 13:12.000]  that masks were effective when we were looking at the wild virus, alpha, and delta.
[13:12.000 --> 13:17.000]  But masks suddenly became ineffective once Omicron was on the scene.
[13:17.000 --> 13:24.000]  That has got to be one of the most idiotic claims that I have heard since SARS-CoV-2 appeared.
[13:24.000 --> 13:32.000]  Viruses are roughly 150 nanometers. A nanometer is one billionth of a meter.
[13:32.000 --> 13:38.000]  So viruses are 150 billionths of a meter.
[13:38.000 --> 13:44.000]  Now, if that doesn't paint a discernible clear picture for you of how incredibly tiny viruses are,
[13:44.000 --> 13:54.000]  let me share this with you. No one, no one has ever seen a virus.
[13:54.000 --> 13:58.000]  Even with our most powerful microscopes, the electron microscope,
[13:58.000 --> 14:03.000]  Humans have never been able to see a virus. That's how small they are.
[14:03.000 --> 14:08.000]  Electron microscopes don't allow us to see the virus.
[14:08.000 --> 14:14.000]  What happens is the electron microscope fires electrons at a virus sample,
[14:14.000 --> 14:19.000]  and then a computer analyzes the interaction between the electrons and the virus sample,
[14:19.000 --> 14:24.000]  and the computer then renders an image for us to look at.
[14:24.000 --> 14:27.000]  Again, they are so small, no human has ever seen one.
[14:27.000 --> 14:32.000]  This is why I've been telling you since 2020 that there is no mask. Let me repeat that.
[14:32.000 --> 14:41.000]  No mask that the public would wear. There's no mask of any substance that is going to stop a virus from infecting you.
[14:41.000 --> 14:48.000]  It is quite literally like enclosing your patio in chain link to keep out the flies.
[14:48.000 --> 14:54.000]  But now if we are to believe this expositor, then we would have to believe that as small as the virus is,
[14:54.000 --> 15:01.000]  we just talked about that, that changes to parts of the virus that are many times smaller than the virus itself
[15:01.000 --> 15:06.000]  somehow makes the difference whether the virus passes through a mask or not.
[15:06.000 --> 15:12.000]  If we go back to the chain link and fly analogy, it would be no different than if this expositor said
[15:12.000 --> 15:17.000]  when you put up chain link around your patio, you enclose it in chain link,
[15:17.000 --> 15:21.000]  flies with red eyes cannot get through, but flies with white eyes can.
[15:21.000 --> 15:31.000]  It is exactly every bit that nonsensical. Yet these kind of inane claims is where we find ourselves.
[15:31.000 --> 15:38.000]  Let me share perhaps a piece of good news. In terms of ending platform censorship,
[15:38.000 --> 15:46.000]  the federal U.S. Fifth Circuit just ruled that platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, YouTube
[15:46.000 --> 15:52.000]  do not have wide ranging powers to silence your speech.
[15:52.000 --> 16:03.000]  Judge Andrew Oldham writing for the court said the platforms argued for a rather odd inversion of the First Amendment
[16:03.000 --> 16:14.000]  and buried somewhere in the person's enumerated rights to free speech lies the corporation's unenumerated right to muzzle speech.
[16:14.000 --> 16:18.000]  Judge Oldham summarized with this,
[16:18.000 --> 16:27.000]  Today we reject the idea that corporations have a freewheeling First Amendment right to censor what people say.
[16:27.000 --> 16:34.000]  You may have heard people scream that private companies can do whatever they want and that's legal nonsense from ignorant people.
[16:34.000 --> 16:40.000]  Corporations are created in law within a particular jurisdiction.
[16:40.000 --> 16:45.000]  In the United States, when we're talking about private enterprise, those jurisdictions are the states of the union.
[16:45.000 --> 16:50.000]  Because corporations are what the law calls legal fictions,
[16:50.000 --> 16:56.000]  absent law, they're not real, they're not like you and me, they're just made up things in law.
[16:56.000 --> 17:05.000]  And because of that, whatever rights people, rights in quotes, people perceive corporations have are granted to the corporation
[17:05.000 --> 17:10.000]  by the jurisdiction that created them or by the jurisdiction in which they operate.
[17:10.000 --> 17:15.000]  They have no inherent rights. They're not like you and I that have unalienable rights.
[17:15.000 --> 17:19.000]  Corporations have bubkiss in terms of what we would equate to unalienable rights.
[17:19.000 --> 17:22.000]  Nothing, zero, zip, zip, zilch, nada.
[17:22.000 --> 17:26.000]  Anything that people look at a corporation and say, well, they have the right to do this and that.
[17:26.000 --> 17:33.000]  Those pseudo rights are created by the jurisdiction whose law permits the creation of a corporation.
[17:33.000 --> 17:39.000]  And setting boundaries for those pseudo rights is the sole prerogative of the legislature.
[17:39.000 --> 17:48.000]  So if a legislature for a particular jurisdiction says a corporation's right of free speech does not extend to muzzling users,
[17:48.000 --> 17:52.000]  then it doesn't, period. End of statement, full stop.
[17:52.000 --> 17:55.000]  Because corporations don't have inherent rights.
[17:55.000 --> 18:00.000]  They are creatures of statute and they are controlled by statute.
[18:00.000 --> 18:08.000]  And guess what? No jurisdiction has ever granted any corporation the right to muzzle free speech,
[18:08.000 --> 18:11.000]  as Judge Oldham said in the Fifth Circuit's decision.
[18:11.000 --> 18:18.000]  The platform's argument that the right to free speech empowers them to censor what the users say is, quote,
[18:18.000 --> 18:21.000]  an odd inversion.
[18:21.000 --> 18:26.000]  And what Judge Oldham means by that is that the corporations are attempting to get from the First Amendment on its head.
[18:26.000 --> 18:30.000]  Another quick side note so the comments don't get filled with silliness.
[18:30.000 --> 18:39.000]  It has been determined that corporations may restrict the free speech of employees in certain circumstances,
[18:39.000 --> 18:43.000]  but that has nothing to do with the case we're talking about now out of the Fifth Circuit.
[18:43.000 --> 18:50.000]  The statute being challenged pertains solely to social media platforms, does not deal with employees in any way,
[18:50.000 --> 18:54.000]  and the court is not ruling on anything having to do with employee speech.
[18:54.000 --> 19:02.000]  I should add that the recent Fifth Circuit decision is in conflict with the decision of the Eleventh Circuit
[19:02.000 --> 19:07.000]  dealing with a very similar question, a very similar statute in Florida.
[19:07.000 --> 19:13.000]  The Eleventh Circuit held that corporations do have the authority to censor social media platform corporations,
[19:13.000 --> 19:18.000]  do have the authority to censor their users, and the Fifth Circuit says you absolutely do not.
[19:18.000 --> 19:22.000]  So this is what's called in judicial circuits, a circuit split,
[19:22.000 --> 19:28.000]  and it increases the odds significantly that this matter will be taken up by the U.S. Supreme Court in the near future.
[19:28.000 --> 19:30.000]  So what might the Supreme Court do?
[19:30.000 --> 19:38.000]  The traditional stance of the Supreme Court has been any speech is allowable, even speech that advocates violence,
[19:38.000 --> 19:47.000]  as long as there is time for the people who are hearing that speech to hear opposing speech.
[19:47.000 --> 19:52.000]  If the Supreme Court holds to that doctrine, then the content provided by myself
[19:52.000 --> 19:58.000]  and people like Drs. Malone and McCullough could not possibly be lawfully censored
[19:58.000 --> 20:02.000]  because the opposing speech was already out, it was already on the table.
[20:02.000 --> 20:07.000]  In fact, information put out by people like me and Dr. McCullough and Dr. Malone
[20:07.000 --> 20:14.000]  have been the opposing speech that the Supreme Court has said is critical in the free speech equation.
[20:14.000 --> 20:20.000]  Yet big tech social media platforms are attempting to argue the paradigm
[20:20.000 --> 20:25.000]  that the speech of government and large institution is constitutionally protected.
[20:25.000 --> 20:31.000]  But if people like you or me, Drs. Malone or McCullough attempt to present fact data and evidence
[20:31.000 --> 20:39.000]  showing that the government's position is not factual, it is false, it is disinformation,
[20:39.000 --> 20:44.000]  then our opposing speech is not protected by the right of free speech.
[20:44.000 --> 20:50.000]  It doesn't get any more backwards than that in terms of free speech in America.
[20:50.000 --> 20:56.000]  There are a couple of other things that I am 100% correct about that the establishment doesn't want you to hear.
[20:56.000 --> 21:02.000]  In particular, I'm referring to the truth of the income tax and the information that destroys 60 years
[21:02.000 --> 21:06.000]  of disinformation concerning human physiology put out primarily by the government.
[21:06.000 --> 21:11.000]  In terms of the income tax, the disinformation campaign, a very, very successful disinformation campaign,
[21:11.000 --> 21:15.000]  I might add, that's been put out by the United States government for the last 60 years,
[21:15.000 --> 21:20.000]  is that if you earn a living in America, you owe some money to the federal government.
[21:20.000 --> 21:24.000]  That is absolute bunk. It is poppycock.
[21:24.000 --> 21:30.000]  But do you believe it because you've been socialized to believe it by the 60-year disinformation campaign?
[21:30.000 --> 21:40.000]  Wouldn't it be nice to know, I know this is scary, what the law really says?
[21:40.000 --> 21:47.000]  As opposed to buying into disinformation, wouldn't you want to just look at a compendium
[21:47.000 --> 21:50.000]  and go through it in a way that's easy for every single American to understand
[21:50.000 --> 21:56.000]  and know what the truth is instead of being manipulated by the government's disinformation campaign?
[21:56.000 --> 22:00.000]  Wouldn't that be great? And then you could decide what you want to do about that?
[22:00.000 --> 22:04.000]  And that's exactly why I wrote Income Tax Shattering the Mist,
[22:04.000 --> 22:09.000]  so you could read all of the information you'd ever want to show you the truth,
[22:09.000 --> 22:13.000]  made super easy to understand, you could read through it,
[22:13.000 --> 22:18.000]  and the government would never be able to fool you again with its disinformation campaign.
[22:18.000 --> 22:23.000]  And the same thing when I wrote body science, the same exact agenda, different subject.
[22:23.000 --> 22:30.000]  You've probably heard me say, America is the most chronically ill society in all of human history,
[22:30.000 --> 22:34.000]  and that's not hyperbole, that is a statistical fact.
[22:34.000 --> 22:41.000]  The people of the United States are the most chronically ill people in all of mankind's history,
[22:41.000 --> 22:46.000]  despite our wealth, despite our medical prowess, despite our scientific achievement.
[22:46.000 --> 22:52.000]  The most chronically ill society in all of human history, how could that possibly be?
[22:52.000 --> 22:56.000]  Well, the same reason that you falsely believe that you owe income tax,
[22:56.000 --> 23:02.000]  because the American public has bought hook, line, and sinker into 60 years of disinformation
[23:02.000 --> 23:05.000]  by the United States government and trillion-dollar industries.
[23:05.000 --> 23:11.000]  And I wrote body science to, first of all, let them see all of the disinformation,
[23:11.000 --> 23:16.000]  and then to compare that disinformation against how human physiology,
[23:16.000 --> 23:20.000]  with an emphasis on nutritional physiology, how it really works.
[23:20.000 --> 23:25.000]  I break the science broken down, just like I break down the law into something that's very easy for you to understand.
[23:25.000 --> 23:29.000]  I break the science down into something that's very easy for you to understand,
[23:29.000 --> 23:36.000]  so you can compare the actual real science to the crap you've been brainwashed with for the last 60 years.
[23:36.000 --> 23:40.000]  And then you have the choice, whether we're talking about income tax shattering the myth or body science,
[23:40.000 --> 23:42.000]  you have the choice what you want to do about it.
[23:42.000 --> 23:45.000]  You now know what the lies are, and you now know what the truth is.
[23:45.000 --> 23:47.000]  What do you want to do?
[23:47.000 --> 23:52.000]  But I want to encourage you to go to DrReality.News, DrReality.News,
[23:52.000 --> 23:56.000]  pick up a copy of Income Tax Shattering the Myth and or Body Science,
[23:56.000 --> 24:02.000]  and you have my personal word, they will be two of the most fascinating books you have ever read.
[24:02.000 --> 24:05.000]  And if you let them, they will change your life.
[24:05.000 --> 24:10.000]  And as a closing note, I've done these videos for probably going on 20 years now.
[24:10.000 --> 24:14.000]  All the material that I put out, such as in today's video, has always been free to the public.
[24:14.000 --> 24:18.000]  So going to DrReality.News and grabbing yourself a copy of Income Tax Shattering the Myth,
[24:18.000 --> 24:21.000]  Body Science, or any of the other writings that appear there,
[24:21.000 --> 24:25.000]  is your way of supporting these sort of fact-based presentations by me.
[24:25.000 --> 24:28.000]  And I appreciate that. Thank you.