Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language Detected language: English [00:00.000 --> 00:05.620] Welcome to the Vodcast. The break-in at the Pelosi residence and violent attack on Paul [00:05.620 --> 00:11.900] Pelosi has spun all manner of theories about what really happened as opposed to the official [00:11.900 --> 00:17.740] government narrative. Today I want to discuss some of the inconsistencies in the official [00:17.740 --> 00:23.700] narrative. [00:23.700 --> 00:35.140] The Dr. Reality Vodcast with Dave Champion. [00:35.140 --> 00:39.300] Let's start with this. I won't be getting into things like the childish claim that Paul [00:39.300 --> 00:44.860] Pelosi is gay and was planning to have gay sex with DePapp. That's the kind of fairy [00:44.860 --> 00:50.660] tale spread by children in adult bodies. That said, some strange things have taken place [00:50.660 --> 01:01.660] The question is, what do those inconsistencies mean? Are they proof that some deep, dark [01:01.660 --> 01:06.300] conspiracy is afoot to hide the truth from the American people? The answer to that is, [01:06.300 --> 01:13.300] as you'll see, part yes and part no. The three government assertions that appear questionable [01:13.300 --> 01:14.300] are these. [01:15.300 --> 01:20.940] Mr. Pelosi was able to make a phone call and speak in code so the dispatcher was able to [01:20.940 --> 01:26.060] listen to the conversation for a period of time, able to discern there was a problem [01:26.060 --> 01:29.300] and dispatch officers. [01:29.300 --> 01:34.500] When the intruder broke into the house, his actions did not set off an alarm at the home, [01:34.500 --> 01:40.940] which seems inconceivable at the home of the Speaker of the House. [01:40.940 --> 01:45.580] The police arrived at the Pelosi house, depending on what source you believe, in either two [01:45.580 --> 01:50.620] or three minutes. We'll start with this issue, number three, and then get back to one and [01:50.620 --> 01:55.700] two. Now, remember, if one buys the story that the dispatcher who was listening to the [01:55.700 --> 02:01.700] call sensed something was amiss, we have to ask how long it took the dispatcher to make [02:01.700 --> 02:06.940] that determination. Since no violence was occurring as the dispatcher was listening, [02:06.940 --> 02:10.920] I think it obvious she had to listen to some time before coming to the conclusion she needed [02:10.920 --> 02:18.160] to dispatch officers. Yet reports state officers arrived in two or three minutes after Mr. [02:18.160 --> 02:21.000] Pelosi made the call. [02:21.000 --> 02:26.600] That claim is highly dubious. Also, the call would not have been put out as a violent battery [02:26.600 --> 02:31.200] taking place because no violence occurred during the 911 call. The call would have gone [02:31.200 --> 02:36.160] out as an open line with no identified crime or as an intruder there now. The odds are [02:36.400 --> 02:42.040] very small. Either would have produced a two or three minute response time from the police. [02:42.040 --> 02:46.940] Now, let's consider point number one, that Mr. Pelosi was able to make a phone call without [02:46.940 --> 02:50.960] specifically telling the emergency operator that a stranger had broken into the house [02:50.960 --> 02:56.320] with a hammer, was carrying wire ties, and was looking for the Speaker of the House. [02:56.320 --> 03:01.260] The narrative is that Mr. Pelosi was able to go to the bathroom without Mr. DePapp and [03:01.260 --> 03:06.740] call police from a phone in the master bathroom. Most of us don't have phones in our bathrooms, [03:06.740 --> 03:11.020] but the wealthy do. Some even have phones in their showers. My point being that that [03:11.020 --> 03:16.540] narrative is plausible, even though it's a nonsense story, and I'll explain why in [03:16.540 --> 03:21.580] a minute. Now, let's examine point number two, that DePapp breaking into the home did [03:21.580 --> 03:26.500] not set off alarms. But before I jump into point number two, let me take a moment to [03:26.500 --> 03:31.460] ask you to subscribe to the channel, hit the like button, and share this presentation [03:31.460 --> 03:36.580] with everyone. Since this story broke, the public has learned the U.S. Capitol Police [03:36.580 --> 03:42.200] have live feed cameras watching the exterior of the Pelosi home. When asked by reporters [03:42.200 --> 03:47.540] if the Pelosi residence has a security system, San Francisco District Attorney Brooke Jenkins [03:47.540 --> 03:53.100] refused to address the matter. The government pays millions of dollars, literally millions [03:54.060 --> 03:59.340] to think tanks and others to create scenarios on how to accomplish things like killing high-ranking [03:59.340 --> 04:03.820] government officials in their homes or kidnapping family members. The reason the government [04:03.820 --> 04:09.220] pays so much to have experts explore every conceivable way to accomplish such things is [04:09.220 --> 04:14.620] so the government can then develop countermeasures that will keep public officials safe. The [04:14.620 --> 04:20.140] Speaker of the House is the second in presidential line of succession, which brings elevated [04:20.780 --> 04:25.900] security concerns, obviously. Additionally, in the case of Nancy Pelosi, she is a lightning [04:25.900 --> 04:31.660] rod for right-wing animosity, in some cases rising to personal hatred. Security for the [04:31.660 --> 04:36.300] Speaker is provided by the U.S. Capitol Police, who have nationwide jurisdiction when protecting [04:36.300 --> 04:42.180] any member of Congress. When it comes to protection technology and physical protection teams, [04:42.180 --> 04:47.380] the Capitol Police receive ongoing training from the Secret Service and others. The Capitol [04:47.380 --> 04:51.220] Police and Secret Service work so closely that in D.C. they are informally referred [04:51.220 --> 04:57.140] to as sister agencies. In her position as the highest-ranking member of the House, Pelosi [04:57.140 --> 05:03.060] receives many security briefings, most unrelated to her, her home, or her family. But she is [05:03.060 --> 05:08.700] also briefed on threats against herself and her family. As such, she knows how much she [05:08.700 --> 05:12.660] is hated by the far right and how many people have been identified as having expressed a [05:12.660 --> 05:18.100] desire to harm her or members of her family. Because the Speaker of the House is far more [05:18.100 --> 05:23.220] in the political spotlight than is a Vice President, protection of the Speaker is every [05:23.220 --> 05:27.940] bit as intensive and high-tech as is provided to the Vice President. It's simply under the [05:27.940 --> 05:32.660] jurisdiction of the Capitol Police rather than the Secret Service. Do you imagine the [05:32.660 --> 05:39.220] Vice President's home does not have an incredibly sophisticated multi-layered security network? [05:39.220 --> 05:43.860] Is the security system at the Vice President's house shut down when the VP isn't there? [05:43.860 --> 05:49.180] Of course not. If somebody broke into the VP's residence when the VP was not home, [05:49.180 --> 05:55.100] would the Secret Service know about it? Yes. Instantaneously. My point is that whatever [05:55.100 --> 05:59.940] is true for the Vice President's residence is also true for the Speaker's residence, [05:59.940 --> 06:06.040] even when she's not there. Would there be live-stream cameras inside the home? Of course. [06:06.040 --> 06:09.840] Would there be microphones throughout the home? Again, of course. Would there be highly [06:09.840 --> 06:15.600] sophisticated motion detectors both inside and outside the home? Of course. Would there [06:15.600 --> 06:20.840] be glass break detectors? Yes. Would the agents who monitor and control those things at the [06:20.840 --> 06:24.500] Capitol Protective Security Bureau's Central Command Center in D.C. be able to remotely [06:24.500 --> 06:30.460] lock and unlock various doors of the residence? Absolutely. Are there panic buttons concealed [06:30.460 --> 06:35.160] throughout the house that trigger an alarm in the command center when activated? Yes. [06:35.640 --> 06:39.920] Do these systems, whether at the Vice President's home or the Speaker's home, blare an alarm [06:39.920 --> 06:45.440] in the command center when triggered by an intruder or the principals? Yes. You bet. [06:45.440 --> 06:49.400] The security measures I've just mentioned are not extraordinary. In high-end personal [06:49.400 --> 06:54.220] protection, they are merely the basics. When it comes to protections of officials like [06:54.220 --> 06:57.980] the President, Vice President, and Speaker of the House, there are more measures than [06:57.980 --> 07:03.620] those I've mentioned today. Let me share a brief story from about 30 years ago. I was [07:03.900 --> 07:07.040] training members of the protection detail for one of the wealthiest men in the United [07:07.040 --> 07:12.180] States. One of the measures they had in place at his 13-acre residence in Los Angeles was [07:12.180 --> 07:17.700] pressure-sensitive netting under every inch of ground that was not covered by concrete. [07:17.700 --> 07:22.620] If a person set a single foot on the ground anywhere on that 13 acres that was not covered [07:22.620 --> 07:28.260] by concrete, such as one of the several lawns or a flower bed, an alarm blared in the security [07:28.260 --> 07:32.140] command center, and an electronic map of the grounds covering most of one wall of the command [07:32.180 --> 07:39.180] center pinpointed and tracked the person's location in real time. That was 30 years ago. [07:39.620 --> 07:46.620] How much more sophisticated do you think things are today? Here is the key question. Would [07:46.620 --> 07:51.660] all these systems and others I've not discussed today be something Paul Pelosi would have [07:51.660 --> 07:58.120] to remember to turn on or turn off when entering or leaving the home? Or would those systems [07:58.200 --> 08:03.360] be under the control of the protective security bureau's central command center? I assure [08:03.360 --> 08:09.760] you it's under the control of the DC command center. Did the Capitol Police know the instant [08:09.760 --> 08:14.840] DePapp approached the rear of the Pelosi's home? Yeah, absolutely. Did they know he was [08:14.840 --> 08:20.120] breaking into the house through the back door? Of course. Did they track him as he moved [08:20.120 --> 08:27.120] throughout the home? Absolutely. So who do you think actually notified the San Francisco [08:27.280 --> 08:31.960] police? Paul Pelosi from his bathroom phone after the crime was well underway? Or the [08:31.960 --> 08:37.300] protective security bureau's command center? Was there really a two or three minute response [08:37.300 --> 08:42.320] time by the cops? Or had the command center notified the police much earlier than the [08:42.320 --> 08:47.800] public is being told, such as when the exterior motion detectors alerted and they saw DePapp [08:47.800 --> 08:53.040] heading for Pelosi's back door with a hammer in his hand? Remember the initial reports [08:53.120 --> 08:57.420] that an unknown third person had unlocked the front door for responding officers? If [08:57.420 --> 09:01.680] the door audibly unlocked as the officers approached, would it not make sense they thought [09:01.680 --> 09:06.920] someone had unlocked it? And someone had. The responding officers just never stopped [09:06.920 --> 09:11.360] to consider that the someone who unlocked the door was 3,000 miles away in the command [09:11.360 --> 09:16.560] center. So why all the ridiculous stories spun for the public about what happened? Why [09:16.560 --> 09:21.440] don't you just tell the public how it really went down? Because the specifics of the protective [09:21.440 --> 09:27.560] systems and protocols for high ranking government officials are classified. It is a violation [09:27.560 --> 09:32.080] of federal law to discuss them with anyone not having the proper clearance as it is to [09:32.080 --> 09:37.400] make statements that might reveal those systems and protocols. And the government has a vested [09:37.400 --> 09:43.000] interest in the public believing its security of high ranking government officials is inept [09:43.000 --> 09:48.960] and unprofessional. Instead of saying no comment to virtually every question asked by the press, [09:48.960 --> 09:53.400] one politically high up decided it was preferable to spin yarns to the public. Of course, when [09:53.400 --> 09:58.480] stories are fabricated to conceal the security systems and protocols, it is inevitable there [09:58.480 --> 10:03.440] will be the kind of contradictions and inconsistencies we've seen in the official narrative of the [10:03.440 --> 10:07.960] Pelosi attack. I thought it important to share how high ranking government officials such [10:07.960 --> 10:15.320] as Nancy Pelosi are actually protected to dispel the kooky theories being propounded [10:15.320 --> 10:21.880] on social media. That said, it isn't unusual for the Feds to hide the truth or spin yarns to mislead [10:21.880 --> 10:26.960] or misdirect the public. In fact, the federal government has been doing exactly that for 60 [10:26.960 --> 10:31.680] years concerning upon whom Congress has imposed the income tax. The truth is that Congress has [10:31.680 --> 10:37.760] never imposed the income tax on ordinary working Americans. You believe the income tax applies [10:37.760 --> 10:44.040] to you only because of a massive and successful federal government disinformation campaign to [10:44.040 --> 10:49.900] convince you that narrative is true. Here are a few questions I ask Americans who believe the [10:49.900 --> 10:55.120] government's disinformation campaign. In what title of the United States code our income tax [10:55.120 --> 11:00.840] law is found? Can you cite the law that imposes the income tax on ordinary working Americans? [11:00.840 --> 11:08.840] What is the statutory definition of withholding agent in tax law? Tax law states that withholding [11:08.840 --> 11:14.520] agent is generally synonymous with another statutorily defined party with whom is withholding [11:14.520 --> 11:20.680] agent generally synonymous. They are never able to answer a single question. Why? Because they've [11:20.680 --> 11:27.440] never read a word of tax law. They don't know anything. Instead of actually knowing something, [11:27.440 --> 11:32.280] they've simply chosen to believe the government's disinformation. That's how we do it in a land of [11:32.280 --> 11:37.520] liberty, right? We just blindly believe the government. You give them a chunk of your personal [11:37.520 --> 11:43.280] property every year because they tell you that's what the law says and you never bother to see if [11:43.280 --> 11:49.040] they're lying to you as they do about so many things. The good news is you don't need to spend [11:49.040 --> 11:54.200] years poring over income tax statutes, regulations, treasury orders, treasury decisions, revenue [11:54.200 --> 12:00.160] rulings, Supreme Court cases and more. That's already been done for you. All you have to do [12:00.160 --> 12:07.240] is read one book to stop acting from a belief based on ignorance and start making decisions [12:07.240 --> 12:13.720] from actually knowing what the law says. One book that allows you to compare what the law [12:13.720 --> 12:19.920] actually says to the government's disinformation. One book that explains everything in a simple, [12:19.920 --> 12:24.880] straightforward manner all Americans can understand. If you prefer having facts and [12:24.880 --> 12:34.080] knowledge over blindly believing government, go to drreality.news and grab yourself a copy of [12:34.080 --> 12:38.600] Income Tax Shattering the Mist. You have my word. It will be one of the most fascinating books [12:38.600 --> 12:44.720] you've ever read. I refer to the government's false income tax narrative as the largest financial [12:44.720 --> 12:51.160] crime in history perpetrated against you, the rest of the American people. Income Tax Shattering [12:51.160 --> 12:55.960] the Mist reads like a mystery. You know who's done it, but as you move through the book, [12:55.960 --> 13:02.720] you discover how they've done it. It truly is fascinating to see. I wish I could tell you the [13:02.720 --> 13:07.160] income tax scam is the only government disinformation campaign. Sadly, that's not true. [13:07.160 --> 13:13.560] Americans are the most chronically ill society in all of human history because of yet another [13:13.560 --> 13:18.400] massive government disinformation campaign, this one to make you sick and miserable by lying to [13:18.400 --> 13:24.000] you about human physiology response to macronutrients containing what you eat. Think about this. The [13:24.000 --> 13:30.320] government has knowingly, willfully, and intentionally lied to every American for the better part of 60 [13:30.320 --> 13:35.800] years in order to put trillions of dollars into the pockets of big food, big med, and big pharma. [13:35.800 --> 13:40.800] And like other issues you may be able to think of, they refuse to perform honest research that [13:40.800 --> 13:46.760] would confirm the harm being done to hundreds of millions of American citizens. Billions of [13:46.760 --> 13:54.000] dollars a year in profits for various companies is the goal. Your sickness and misery isn't even a [13:54.000 --> 13:58.520] consideration for them. If you want to learn about the lies that have made America the most [13:58.520 --> 14:05.080] chronically ill society in history and how your physiology really works, go to DrReality.News, [14:05.080 --> 14:12.320] DrReality.News, and pick up a copy of Body Science. It is a roadmap for being incredibly healthy in a [14:12.320 --> 14:18.560] society filled with illness, misery, and premature death from having believed an utterly false [14:18.560 --> 14:22.920] narrative. I should also let you know that Body Science has never received anything less than five [14:22.920 --> 14:28.440] stars out of five in our reader reviews. So do yourself a favor. Go to DrReality.News and grab a [14:28.440 --> 14:34.240] copy of Income Tax Shattering the Mist, or Body Science, or both, and have your mind blown by [14:34.240 --> 14:40.720] comparing the government's disinformation with the facts, the science, and the law, all laid out in [14:40.720 --> 14:46.680] crystal clarity for you. In doing so, you'll also help me to continue to be here for you with these [14:46.680 --> 14:51.400] fact-based presentations. And before I leave you, do please subscribe to the channel. Thanks for [14:51.400 --> 14:52.760] being here. Take care.