Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language
Detected language: English
[00:00.000 --> 00:02.540]  Welcome to the podcast.
[00:02.540 --> 00:07.700]  On November 15th, 2022, Donald Trump announced he was going to seek the GOP nomination for
[00:07.700 --> 00:10.260]  president in 2024.
[00:10.260 --> 00:13.740]  But there was something unusual about the announcement event.
[00:13.740 --> 00:16.860]  Despite being invited, the media did not show up.
[00:16.860 --> 00:19.720]  Even right-leaning outlets didn't attend the event.
[00:19.720 --> 00:25.220]  Can you imagine the media not attending a significant Trump event in 2016 or 17, 18,
[00:25.220 --> 00:27.340]  19, or 2020?
[00:27.340 --> 00:32.140]  But they didn't attend Trump's 2022 candidacy announcement event.
[00:32.140 --> 00:33.140]  Why is that?
[00:33.140 --> 00:37.440]  Certainly, we can't write it off to left-leaning anti-Trump bias because even right-leaning
[00:37.440 --> 00:40.060]  outlets didn't show up.
[00:40.060 --> 00:47.060]  Something else is going on.
[00:47.060 --> 00:58.580]  The Dr. Reality Podcast with Dave Champion.
[00:58.580 --> 01:00.180]  Let's start with this.
[01:00.180 --> 01:06.020]  One thing no news outlet wants to do is get labeled as an active part of some candidate's
[01:06.020 --> 01:07.020]  political intrigue.
[01:07.020 --> 01:11.860]  They certainly want to report on the political intrigue, perhaps even in a positive light,
[01:11.860 --> 01:16.340]  but they don't want to be labeled as being a participant in a candidate's campaign or
[01:16.340 --> 01:19.620]  any related machinations related to a campaign.
[01:19.620 --> 01:24.100]  To go a step further, news outlets do not want to be accused of facilitating a candidate's
[01:24.100 --> 01:27.060]  unethical or perhaps even illegal conduct.
[01:27.060 --> 01:31.280]  Again, they certainly want to cover such stories, but never at the expense of being accused
[01:31.280 --> 01:34.500]  of facilitating unethical or illegal conduct.
[01:34.500 --> 01:39.320]  If they think by covering a candidate they may be placing themselves in that position,
[01:39.320 --> 01:43.820]  news outlets will limit themselves to superficial reporting on that candidate.
[01:43.820 --> 01:48.060]  In other words, the bare minimum and nothing more.
[01:48.060 --> 01:52.940]  My read on the outlets not sending news crews to Trump's announcement event is the news
[01:52.940 --> 01:59.220]  industry is doing exactly that concerning Trump, reporting the bare minimum and nothing
[01:59.220 --> 02:00.220]  more.
[02:00.220 --> 02:03.260]  The question is, why?
[02:03.260 --> 02:07.820]  News outlets with public name recognition are all multi-million dollar operations.
[02:07.820 --> 02:13.300]  As such, they have a lot of resources at their disposal, including experts in various fields.
[02:13.300 --> 02:18.740]  As Trump started hinting about his big announcement, you can picture-ask the executives of every
[02:18.740 --> 02:23.900]  significant news organization to hold strategy meetings to discuss how to cover Trump this
[02:23.900 --> 02:25.500]  time around.
[02:25.500 --> 02:29.660]  Corporations are typically conservative in their decision-making process, so one of the
[02:29.660 --> 02:33.340]  things they'd want to consider is whether down the road, based on their coverage of
[02:33.340 --> 02:40.180]  Trump, they could be accused of having been a party to creating another January 6 or something
[02:40.180 --> 02:41.900]  worse than that.
[02:41.900 --> 02:46.500]  The public holds many differing views on why Trump decided to run again, but in the halls
[02:46.500 --> 02:50.860]  of power, which includes media, corporations, boardrooms, there is concern that Trump is
[02:50.860 --> 02:56.620]  running because he believes doing so is the only way to avoid trial on multiple violations
[02:56.620 --> 03:01.780]  of the Espionage Act, obstruction of justice, and perhaps supporting perjury charges.
[03:01.780 --> 03:06.220]  By the way, as a side note, violating the Espionage Act provisions concerning classified
[03:06.220 --> 03:09.860]  documents does not mean a person engaged in espionage.
[03:10.340 --> 03:14.460]  In other words, a grand jury could indict Trump for violating the Espionage Act without
[03:14.460 --> 03:16.660]  accusing him of espionage.
[03:16.660 --> 03:20.980]  If it's true that Trump is running to avoid being prosecuted for numerous counts of various
[03:20.980 --> 03:25.140]  crimes, how would announcing his candidacy accomplish that?
[03:25.140 --> 03:28.900]  First, it's important to note that Trump's announcement will not stop a grand jury from
[03:28.900 --> 03:32.460]  indicting him if the grand jury is inclined to do so.
[03:32.460 --> 03:36.180]  Since Trump's announcement can't stop an indictment, then the next thing in the sequence
[03:36.180 --> 03:40.300]  of events would be for the government to bring Trump to trial.
[03:40.300 --> 03:43.980]  It is that step in the process that many in the halls of power believe Trump is attempting
[03:43.980 --> 03:49.540]  to prevent by his significantly premature announcement of running in 2024.
[03:49.540 --> 03:54.060]  The concern in the halls of power is that Trump intends to portray any attempt to put
[03:54.060 --> 04:00.020]  him on trial as a corrupt, politically driven government action taken to stop him from making
[04:00.020 --> 04:01.300]  America great again.
[04:01.300 --> 04:05.980]  In other words, he's going to tell his base that just as the 2020 election was stolen
[04:05.980 --> 04:10.700]  from them, any attempt to put him on trial is an even more egregious plot by the deep
[04:10.700 --> 04:16.380]  state to steal the 2024 election and they must rise up and stop the government from
[04:16.380 --> 04:21.140]  destroying America, which will translate into stopping the government from putting him on
[04:21.140 --> 04:22.480]  trial.
[04:22.480 --> 04:27.500]  The fear in the halls of power is that hundreds of thousands of his supporters will buy what
[04:27.500 --> 04:32.740]  Trump is selling and violently attack government buildings and government employees.
[04:32.740 --> 04:37.580]  The only realistic way to stop that violence will be for the government to apply opposing
[04:37.580 --> 04:38.900]  violence.
[04:38.900 --> 04:42.740]  Trump will then characterize the government's use of violence as the government committing
[04:42.740 --> 04:45.420]  open warfare against the American people.
[04:45.420 --> 04:51.660]  He'll then tell his supporters it is imperative they defend America by doing whatever is necessary
[04:51.660 --> 04:56.020]  to show the government there's a price to pay for using violence against God-fearing
[04:56.020 --> 04:57.500]  Americans.
[04:57.500 --> 05:02.180]  He'll tell them America can only be saved from leftist tyranny if they act right now
[05:02.180 --> 05:03.260]  to stop it.
[05:03.260 --> 05:07.820]  The concern in the halls of power is this scenario may explode into something exponentially
[05:07.820 --> 05:13.380]  worse than January 6, such as Trump's diehard supporters believing it's time to kick off
[05:13.380 --> 05:16.140]  a second American civil war.
[05:16.140 --> 05:20.900]  If there is even a tiny chance of this scenario occurring, media outlets don't want to find
[05:20.900 --> 05:27.980]  themselves blamed for facilitating it by broadcasting, amplifying Trump's message.
[05:27.980 --> 05:32.280]  Will they report on things concerning Trump that aren't newsworthy and benign?
[05:32.280 --> 05:33.280]  They will.
[05:33.280 --> 05:38.140]  But they're not going to hang on every word spoken by Trump as they did from 2016 through
[05:38.140 --> 05:39.260]  2020.
[05:39.260 --> 05:43.780]  They want to showcase a new paradigm in which politically meaningful events involving Trump
[05:43.780 --> 05:45.460]  will be reported upon.
[05:45.460 --> 05:51.980]  But as an example, they will no longer be showing their viewers video of Trump's speeches.
[05:51.980 --> 05:56.060]  They want to step away from that level of coverage so they establish a track record
[05:56.140 --> 06:01.700]  of reporting on him as nothing more than one candidate among many for the Republican nomination.
[06:01.700 --> 06:06.580]  They consider that reduced level of attention to best position themselves to decline to
[06:06.580 --> 06:12.020]  cover any innuendo-fueled calls he may make for open rebellion as a means of attempting
[06:12.020 --> 06:15.800]  to stop the federal government from taking him to trial.
[06:15.800 --> 06:19.660]  Are there developments that could change the media's current position?
[06:19.660 --> 06:20.740]  You bet.
[06:20.740 --> 06:26.140]  Number one is if the special prosecutor announced the grand jury declined to indict Trump.
[06:26.140 --> 06:29.700]  Another would be if Trump goes to trial and is acquitted by a jury.
[06:29.700 --> 06:33.820]  There is another development that would likely change the media's position.
[06:33.820 --> 06:39.140]  Now that Elon Musk has reinstated Trump on Twitter, if Trump returns to Twitter, which
[06:39.140 --> 06:45.300]  I imagine he will, and is communicating with 80 or 90 million people on a daily basis,
[06:45.300 --> 06:49.340]  there would be little reason for news outlets to refuse to cover Trump's messages that
[06:49.340 --> 06:53.180]  a significant percentage of the American people would already be getting directly from
[06:53.180 --> 06:54.860]  the horse's mouth.
[06:54.860 --> 06:59.540]  Interestingly, Trump isn't the only subject from which the U.S. media has stepped away.
[06:59.540 --> 07:03.340]  Try to get anyone in the media to discuss the truth of the income tax that Congress
[07:03.340 --> 07:07.180]  has never imposed the income tax on the ordinary working American.
[07:07.180 --> 07:12.620]  Let me share a couple of quick stories with you illustrating there is a media blackout
[07:12.620 --> 07:13.620]  on this subject.
[07:13.620 --> 07:19.180]  You know, a media blackout in a land of freedom of the press.
[07:19.180 --> 07:23.060]  Over the almost 13 years income tax shattering the mess has been out.
[07:23.060 --> 07:28.100]  It has been read by tens of thousands of Americans and has never received a review less than
[07:28.100 --> 07:29.920]  four out of five stars.
[07:29.920 --> 07:35.500]  During that same time, several hundred copies have been sent to media personalities asking
[07:35.500 --> 07:41.140]  them to read it and discuss it on the air, preferably having me on as a guest.
[07:41.140 --> 07:44.340]  How many media personalities have discussed it on the air?
[07:44.340 --> 07:48.020]  How many media personalities have called me to be a guest on their show and lay it out
[07:48.020 --> 07:50.180]  for the American people?
[07:50.180 --> 07:52.540]  That would be zero.
[07:52.540 --> 07:58.340]  Hundreds of books sent by hardworking Americans at their own expense to have the media look
[07:58.340 --> 08:01.780]  at the evidence and bring it forth to the American people.
[08:01.780 --> 08:07.460]  After all, one major purpose for the free press is to serve as a government watchdog.
[08:07.460 --> 08:11.600]  The press is supposed to report to the American people when it discovers the government is
[08:11.600 --> 08:14.740]  lying to the American people and stealing from the American people.
[08:15.220 --> 08:20.060]  Yet when it comes to the truth of the income tax, the media has a complete blackout on
[08:20.060 --> 08:21.060]  the subject.
[08:21.060 --> 08:25.460]  I was recently contacted by a person who wanted to share with me his inside information about
[08:25.460 --> 08:30.220]  an up-and-coming talk show personality who was recently picked up by a major streaming
[08:30.220 --> 08:31.540]  service.
[08:31.540 --> 08:36.680]  In the contract he was required to sign, there was a provision in which he had to specifically
[08:36.680 --> 08:40.700]  agree not to discuss the income tax.
[08:40.700 --> 08:42.020]  Media blackout?
[08:42.020 --> 08:43.660]  What media blackout?
[08:43.660 --> 08:48.660]  Even media hosts who strongly disagree with me on the income tax won't have me on as
[08:48.660 --> 08:49.660]  a guest.
[08:49.660 --> 08:54.300]  I find this odd because if they had the facts on their side, why not have me on, make mincemeat
[08:54.300 --> 08:57.020]  out of me, make me look like a fool?
[08:57.020 --> 09:01.660]  Even media hosts who are attorneys run like hell from the truth because they know they
[09:01.660 --> 09:05.000]  will be the ones who look like fools.
[09:05.000 --> 09:09.900]  About 20 years ago, I was approached in early March by a representative of the Bill Handel
[09:09.900 --> 09:10.900]  show.
[09:10.900 --> 09:15.180]  I was an attorney who has been doing the morning drive time show on KFI radio in Los Angeles
[09:15.180 --> 09:16.180]  for decades.
[09:16.180 --> 09:22.340]  I believe through syndication and other avenues, Handel is heard by about a million listeners
[09:22.340 --> 09:23.620]  a day.
[09:23.620 --> 09:26.960]  Handel routinely mocks those who know the truth of the income tax.
[09:26.960 --> 09:30.660]  He does everything he can to make them sound like buffoons.
[09:30.660 --> 09:35.540]  The reason Handel's people contacted me in March was to have me as a guest on Bill's
[09:35.540 --> 09:37.900]  April 15th show.
[09:37.900 --> 09:41.980]  As soon as I was invited, I knew the agenda was for Handel, who is an attorney, to make
[09:41.980 --> 09:48.340]  mincemeat out of me on the air, thus proving the truth of the income tax is actually nonsense.
[09:48.340 --> 09:49.580]  Good luck with that.
[09:49.580 --> 09:53.340]  I immediately agreed to be a guest on Bill's show.
[09:53.340 --> 09:57.980]  Then, suddenly, on about the 12th of April, I got a call from a person saying she was
[09:57.980 --> 10:02.340]  a producer for Handel and we needed to do a run through of the interview so they could
[10:02.340 --> 10:04.860]  better prepare to have me as a guest.
[10:04.860 --> 10:07.980]  She and I sat on the phone for about 10 minutes with her playing the role of Handel and me
[10:07.980 --> 10:09.680]  responding to questions.
[10:09.680 --> 10:13.620]  At the conclusion, she said she had all she needed and they'd be in touch.
[10:13.620 --> 10:14.620]  In touch they were.
[10:14.620 --> 10:19.820]  A few hours later, I received a call informing me Bill had decided to go in a, quote, different
[10:19.820 --> 10:24.060]  direction on his April 15th show and I would not be his guest.
[10:24.060 --> 10:28.020]  I got up at the crack of dawn on the 15th to hear Bill show.
[10:28.020 --> 10:31.900]  Instead of having someone knowledgeable about the income tax on the show, Handel opened
[10:31.900 --> 10:36.340]  the phone lines to take calls from listeners who felt the income tax didn't apply to
[10:36.340 --> 10:37.340]  most Americans.
[10:37.340 --> 10:41.540]  Needless to say, the call screeners only passed on to Bill callers with the most ridiculous
[10:41.540 --> 10:47.580]  claims and Bill slaughtered them all one after another, thus rigging the game to create the
[10:47.580 --> 10:52.540]  false impression that people who say they know the truth about the income tax are actually
[10:52.540 --> 10:53.540]  kooks.
[10:53.540 --> 10:58.660]  Needless to say, Handel never disclosed to his audience that he'd canceled the guest
[10:58.660 --> 11:00.780]  who would have made mincemeat out of him.
[11:00.860 --> 11:05.480]  Since Bill was an avid promoter of the government's big income tax lie, he took the callers way
[11:05.480 --> 11:10.820]  out by canceling the man who would have made him look like exactly what he is.
[11:10.820 --> 11:12.140]  A stooge.
[11:12.140 --> 11:16.780]  The good news is you don't have to be kept in the dark by corrupt media.
[11:16.780 --> 11:21.100]  You can simply purchase a copy of Income Tax Shattering the Mist and prove the truth to
[11:21.100 --> 11:26.840]  yourself by seeing what the law has said consistently for more than a hundred years.
[11:26.900 --> 11:31.680]  When I say the law, don't be concerned that it may be too complex to understand.
[11:31.680 --> 11:36.440]  The entire scheme is laid out in Income Tax Shattering the Mist with crystal clarity so
[11:36.440 --> 11:41.600]  every single American can understand what the government has done and how it's been
[11:41.600 --> 11:42.600]  done.
[11:42.600 --> 11:46.440]  Further, you're given the knowledge with which to walk away from the scam if you're
[11:46.440 --> 11:50.220]  inclined to do so after seeing the facts in law with your own two eyes.
[11:50.220 --> 11:56.320]  You can get Income Tax Shattering the Mist by going to drreality.news.
[11:56.480 --> 12:00.860]  There is never a better time than right now because I'm running a special for the holidays.
[12:00.860 --> 12:06.960]  If you use the coupon code Santa, as in Santa Claus, I'll inscribe your copy, autograph
[12:06.960 --> 12:09.160]  it, and I'll pay the shipping for you.
[12:09.160 --> 12:10.500]  But that's not all.
[12:10.500 --> 12:15.600]  The special also applies to body science, which explains in an easy-to-understand manner
[12:15.600 --> 12:20.860]  the true physiological reason that America is the most chronically ill society in all
[12:20.860 --> 12:22.700]  of human history.
[12:22.700 --> 12:28.020]  The reason for that also involves a corrupt government and a complicit media.
[12:28.020 --> 12:31.980]  Body science details the disinformation campaign that's been run by the government and key
[12:31.980 --> 12:39.580]  institutions for 60 years, knowingly leading to an unbelievable amount of pain, illness,
[12:39.580 --> 12:41.900]  and death for the American people.
[12:41.900 --> 12:47.860]  Then body science explains how your physiology really works and how to get and stay incredibly
[12:47.860 --> 12:52.900]  healthy in the midst of the most chronically ill society in all of history.
[12:52.900 --> 12:55.620]  That's getting worse every day.
[12:55.620 --> 13:00.220]  If you enter the coupon code Santa at checkout, I'll inscribe and autograph your copy of
[13:00.220 --> 13:03.000]  body science and pay the shipping for you.
[13:03.000 --> 13:06.380]  If you purchase Income Tax Shattering the Mist and body science, I'll inscribe and
[13:06.380 --> 13:08.980]  autograph both and pay the shipping.
[13:08.980 --> 13:14.220]  Further, if you purchase anything from the Dr. Reality site, I'll pay the shipping for
[13:14.220 --> 13:15.220]  you.
[13:15.220 --> 13:20.020]  The sale is good through midnight on December 25th and free shipping is only on domestic
[13:20.020 --> 13:21.020]  orders.
[13:21.020 --> 13:25.860]  Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, or whatever you celebrate will be here before you know
[13:25.860 --> 13:26.860]  it.
[13:26.860 --> 13:31.380]  So go to DrReality.News now and get a copy of Income Tax Shattering the Mist and or body
[13:31.380 --> 13:32.380]  science.
[13:32.380 --> 13:33.380]  Thanks for being with me today.
[13:33.380 --> 13:33.820]  Take care.