Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language Detected language: English [00:00.000 --> 00:02.400] Welcome to the vodcast. [00:02.400 --> 00:06.580] I recently conducted a poll on my Twitter page asking people which of four topics they'd [00:06.580 --> 00:08.880] like me to tackle in my next presentation. [00:08.880 --> 00:13.600] The result was a tie between providing the facts of the US government's income tax scam [00:13.600 --> 00:18.840] and discussing who's criticizing Elon Musk at this point in history and why. [00:18.840 --> 00:21.160] I tackled the income tax issue about a week ago. [00:21.160 --> 00:24.400] I'll put a link to that mind-blowing presentation in the notes. [00:24.400 --> 00:26.120] I encourage you to watch it. [00:26.120 --> 00:31.520] Today I'll discuss who it is that's attacking Musk and why they're doing it. [00:31.520 --> 00:39.360] It may be more complex than you've considered. [00:39.360 --> 00:50.720] The Dr. Reality Vodcast with Dave Champion. [00:50.720 --> 00:52.120] Let's start with this. [00:52.120 --> 00:56.600] Musk has always been a bit of a controversial figure, but the angst some people have about [00:56.600 --> 01:00.160] him increased exponentially after he purchased Twitter. [01:00.160 --> 01:05.560] Owning Twitter has been a complete game changer in terms of how people now talk about Musk. [01:05.560 --> 01:12.920] Perhaps the largest and most vocal group condemning Musk are leftists, who absolutely adored Twitter's [01:12.920 --> 01:13.920] censorship. [01:13.920 --> 01:16.120] I get why they adored it so. [01:16.120 --> 01:20.840] It overwhelmingly targeted users who are on the political right, whether one believed [01:21.840 --> 01:26.480] Early on with the release of the Twitter files, there's no longer any doubt that's what had [01:26.480 --> 01:31.680] been happening at Twitter during at least the last three years before Musk took control. [01:31.680 --> 01:36.220] Leftists saw Twitter as a safe space where they could tweet any left-leaning content [01:36.220 --> 01:41.300] their hearts desired without Twitter censors taking any action against them, and they could [01:41.300 --> 01:47.380] gloat over their political adversaries being suspended either for a period of time or permanently. [01:47.380 --> 01:51.660] In some cases, a right-leaning person's account would be frozen until he or she knuckled [01:51.660 --> 01:58.260] under to Twitter's leftist censors and removed a tweet the leftist censors had declared unacceptable. [01:58.260 --> 02:02.960] One of the revelations that came out in the Twitter files was that once certain employees [02:02.960 --> 02:07.020] at Twitter were given the power to suppress speech, they found more and more reasons to [02:07.020 --> 02:08.020] do so. [02:08.020 --> 02:11.580] They also worked to expand their authority to silence people. [02:11.580 --> 02:15.940] They looked at policies that had originally been enacted to address narrow subjects and [02:15.940 --> 02:22.660] worked diligently to expand those policies to embrace an ever-increasing list of subjects. [02:22.660 --> 02:26.460] None of that was a surprise to me because that's simply human nature. [02:26.460 --> 02:30.860] You give someone the power to silence speech and that person will inevitably seek to silence [02:30.860 --> 02:34.860] speech on an ever-increasing basis, and so it was at Twitter. [02:34.860 --> 02:40.420] But to be clear, if there was a social media platform that gave a bunch of right-leaning [02:40.420 --> 02:45.180] staff the power to censor speech, they would end up going down the same path as did the [02:45.180 --> 02:47.500] leftists at Twitter. [02:47.500 --> 02:53.280] It is this ugly reality of human nature that makes censorship so evil and pernicious and [02:53.280 --> 02:56.180] why it should never be allowed. [02:56.180 --> 03:01.180] The next group that's notable for its criticism of Musk since he took over Twitter is the [03:01.180 --> 03:02.180] media. [03:02.180 --> 03:06.580] While obviously left-leaning media, based on their political ideology, has been attacking [03:06.580 --> 03:12.100] Musk vociferously since he bought Twitter, the media in general has jumped on the bandwagon. [03:12.100 --> 03:18.380] Headlines like Twitter and Chaos Since Musk Purchase and many similar headlines have appeared [03:18.380 --> 03:21.140] across a wide spectrum of media. [03:21.140 --> 03:25.620] So was Twitter ever in a state of chaos after Musk took charge? [03:25.620 --> 03:29.820] As a Twitter user myself, I can tell you the answer is absolutely no. [03:29.820 --> 03:34.640] Twitter continued on just as it was the day before Musk bought it, except ending censorship [03:34.640 --> 03:37.820] and making numerous improvements to the platform. [03:37.820 --> 03:43.180] If Twitter was never in a state of chaos, why did the press make such a claim? [03:43.180 --> 03:48.340] Because in 21st century America, most news outlets survive economically by mixing traditional [03:48.340 --> 03:56.100] news with entertainment masquerading as news and Musk is a big draw for pseudo-news entertainment. [03:56.100 --> 04:00.380] Headlines claiming Twitter was in chaos or Musk was failing at Twitter or users were [04:00.380 --> 04:05.260] fleeing Twitter in droves, all of which being false, got a massive amount of clicks and [04:06.260 --> 04:08.700] views drive ad revenue. [04:08.700 --> 04:13.060] In short, news outlets are more than happy to run any headline about Musk that drives [04:13.060 --> 04:14.340] revenue. [04:14.340 --> 04:18.860] As long as they can make drama involving Twitter or Musk sound plausible, they don't care if [04:18.860 --> 04:20.360] it's inaccurate. [04:20.360 --> 04:26.180] Then we have those who claim that Twitter under Musk is not really a free speech platform. [04:26.180 --> 04:30.860] These folks criticize Musk as well as anyone who supports free speech Twitter. [04:30.860 --> 04:34.020] I discussed these folks in a mid-December presentation. [04:34.020 --> 04:36.740] Here's what I had to say about them then. [04:36.740 --> 04:41.340] That group is people who assert that because Twitter still has rules about content, it's [04:41.340 --> 04:43.520] not really free speech. [04:43.520 --> 04:45.940] These folks take an absolutist view. [04:45.940 --> 04:50.900] Their perspective is if Twitter disallows any speech at all, Twitter is then not a free [04:50.900 --> 04:52.980] speech platform. [04:52.980 --> 04:54.300] Let's examine that position. [04:54.300 --> 04:57.260] We'll start by looking at what Twitter disallows. [04:57.260 --> 05:02.020] I'm not going to read the list word for word because it would make this presentation boring [05:02.020 --> 05:05.540] and far longer than it needs to be, but I will put the link to Twitter's rules page [05:05.540 --> 05:08.220] in the notes so you can read them for yourself. [05:08.220 --> 05:12.900] Before I get started, as a side note, under Musk, Twitter's explanation of prohibited [05:12.900 --> 05:18.500] conduct and the steps Twitter may take when prohibited conduct occurs is considerably [05:18.500 --> 05:25.020] more clear and transparent than either Facebook or YouTube, both of which continue to engage [05:25.020 --> 05:28.380] in communist-style suppression of speech. [05:29.220 --> 05:32.180] Twitter's rules disallow the following. [05:32.180 --> 05:35.780] Planning or coordinating criminal activities. [05:35.780 --> 05:39.380] Threatening violence against any individual or group. [05:39.380 --> 05:42.820] Engaging in child sexual exploitation. [05:42.820 --> 05:45.620] Targeting an individual with harassment. [05:45.620 --> 05:48.140] Encouraging a person to commit suicide. [05:48.140 --> 05:51.740] Sharing excessively violent material or pornography. [05:51.740 --> 05:56.420] Revealing a person's private contact information without the person's consent. [05:56.460 --> 06:00.380] Sharing intimate images of another without that person's consent. [06:00.380 --> 06:02.380] Spamming other users. [06:02.380 --> 06:06.820] Interfering in elections by misleading people about when, where, or how to vote. [06:06.820 --> 06:10.380] Impersonating individuals, groups, or organizations. [06:10.380 --> 06:15.140] Posting images that have been altered to make them look like they're from real news outlets [06:15.140 --> 06:16.580] when they're not. [06:16.580 --> 06:21.940] And lastly, posting items that violate federal copyright or trademark laws. [06:21.940 --> 06:25.420] So, let me ask you. [06:25.420 --> 06:31.220] Did you hear anything in that list that would prohibit intellectual thought? [06:31.220 --> 06:35.580] Nothing in Twitter's rules could remotely be construed as prohibiting intellectual thought. [06:35.580 --> 06:42.220] If we distill Twitter's restrictions down to their core, the rules say you can't act [06:42.220 --> 06:43.220] like a douchebag. [06:43.220 --> 06:47.540] And because acting like a douche is the only way to get suspended on Twitter since Musk [06:47.540 --> 06:51.780] took over, I laugh when I see a person, it's always men. [06:51.780 --> 06:53.940] Claim they were just suspended from Twitter. [06:53.940 --> 06:57.900] In short, when guys say they were just suspended from Twitter, they aren't saying anything [06:57.900 --> 07:00.580] bad or problematic about Twitter. [07:00.580 --> 07:02.500] They're admitting they're douchebags. [07:02.500 --> 07:07.340] The fourth group who loves to knock Musk is the one that's hardest for me to understand. [07:07.340 --> 07:12.400] It's run-of-the-mill folks who have some weird emotional thing going on that causes them [07:12.400 --> 07:18.460] to attack a person they literally know nothing about other than perhaps that he's a billionaire [07:18.460 --> 07:21.000] who owns Twitter and is often in the news. [07:21.000 --> 07:24.480] This is primarily seen in social media. [07:24.480 --> 07:28.440] Examples of this are claims that no one should give Musk credit for his wealth because it [07:28.440 --> 07:30.080] came from his dad. [07:30.080 --> 07:31.080] It didn't. [07:31.080 --> 07:37.520] And the public narrative that Musk is a genius is propaganda funded by Musk. [07:37.520 --> 07:41.680] While there are a lot more petty, kooky claims out there, let's just take a quick look at [07:41.680 --> 07:43.160] those two. [07:43.160 --> 07:45.520] Did Musk get his wealth from his father? [07:45.520 --> 07:47.800] No, not even a little. [07:47.800 --> 07:54.600] In 1995, Elon's dad did give Elon and his brother $38,000 for a venture named Zip2, [07:54.600 --> 07:59.160] a company that provided and licensed online city guide software to newspapers. [07:59.160 --> 08:07.240] In 1999, Zip2 was purchased by Compaq, and that sale netted Musk $22 million. [08:07.240 --> 08:09.320] That was his first real money. [08:09.320 --> 08:13.840] In that same year, Musk started a company called x.com, which was an early version of [08:13.840 --> 08:17.040] the online payment systems we now know today. [08:17.040 --> 08:21.080] In 2001, x.com's name was changed to PayPal. [08:21.080 --> 08:27.800] A year later, eBay purchased PayPal, and Musk's share of that deal was $176 million. [08:27.800 --> 08:33.440] From there, his wealth grew from both investments in new businesses such as SpaceX and Tesla. [08:33.440 --> 08:36.640] The point of that brief recitation is Musk's wealth accumulation didn't have anything [08:36.640 --> 08:38.720] to do with his father. [08:38.720 --> 08:44.120] Musk simply saw the future, acted on what he saw, and played his cards right. [08:44.120 --> 08:49.280] So what about Musk being a genius, or not, according to his haters? [08:49.280 --> 08:53.440] It's speculative, because Musk has never taken a standardized IQ test, which is necessary [08:53.440 --> 08:57.720] in order to officially declare someone to have a particular IQ. [08:57.720 --> 09:01.880] My IQ is 136, falling into the highly gifted category. [09:01.880 --> 09:05.160] So what am I doing with all that intellectual horsepower? [09:05.160 --> 09:09.480] I'm sitting here talking with you, and I've written a few books that have dramatically [09:09.480 --> 09:12.240] changed people's lives for the better. [09:12.240 --> 09:15.080] Musk's education background looks like this. [09:15.080 --> 09:20.440] At 21, he graduated from the University of Pennsylvania with two bachelor's degrees, [09:20.440 --> 09:22.280] one in physics, the other economics. [09:22.280 --> 09:27.880] He later acquired a doctorate degree in energy physics, though Musk never sat for an IQ test. [09:27.880 --> 09:32.360] Experts estimate his IQ to be 155, which is genius level. [09:32.360 --> 09:36.560] Musk has acknowledged having Asperger's, which experts believe also affected Isaac [09:36.560 --> 09:41.080] Newton, Henry Cavendish, and Albert Einstein, so Musk was in good company. [09:41.080 --> 09:48.320] In my opinion, what distinguishes Musk is his exceptional vision and execution of ideas. [09:48.320 --> 09:52.720] Examples of that are SpaceX, Tesla, Neuralink, Tesla Energy, and others. [09:52.720 --> 09:56.520] His vision, his ability to look at the world as events unfold and discern what is critical [09:56.520 --> 09:59.800] for tomorrow, is what impresses me most. [09:59.800 --> 10:02.800] And that brings us back to Twitter. [10:02.800 --> 10:06.280] The masses don't grasp what Musk is doing. [10:06.280 --> 10:09.000] Most people think in a narrow, linear fashion. [10:09.000 --> 10:11.840] Musk thinks dynamically and in futuristic terms. [10:11.840 --> 10:14.480] His outlook on the world is libertarian in nature. [10:14.480 --> 10:19.240] In other words, he values personal liberty, which makes sense because all of his accomplishments [10:19.240 --> 10:24.840] were possible because he saw the future and was freely able to pursue his vision. [10:24.840 --> 10:28.880] When Musk began talking about social media and free speech, he expressed concern for [10:28.880 --> 10:34.720] the future of our liberties if censorship in the digital town square became a normalized [10:34.960 --> 10:37.040] part of the American experience. [10:37.040 --> 10:41.680] At the time his concerns were aroused, the three largest social media players in the [10:41.680 --> 10:47.880] U.S., Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube, were all engaged in censoring any speech that conflicted [10:47.880 --> 10:50.720] with a number of establishment narratives. [10:50.720 --> 10:55.600] My own case is a perfect example of what was happening at that time. [10:55.600 --> 11:00.000] YouTube removed my channel and Facebook shut down my professional page that had 145,000 [11:00.000 --> 11:01.000] followers. [11:01.000 --> 11:02.640] I was removed for two reasons. [11:02.640 --> 11:08.600] First, because what I had to say was in conflict with establishment lies. [11:08.600 --> 11:13.120] Second, because I was early, not because I was wrong. [11:13.120 --> 11:14.240] What does that mean? [11:14.240 --> 11:19.320] Back in early 2021 and moving forward, I was discussing anticipated problems with the mRNA [11:19.320 --> 11:23.120] vaccines that have subsequently been substantiated by independent research. [11:23.120 --> 11:27.720] In other words, I understood the likelihood of those problems was very high and I shared [11:27.720 --> 11:29.960] my thoughts openly with my audience. [11:29.960 --> 11:35.520] It didn't matter that I said there was no solid evidence at that time, but I was confident [11:35.520 --> 11:40.840] researchers would see the evidence develop in vaccinated recipients as time went on. [11:40.840 --> 11:46.600] In fact, that only made my statements worse to the communist censors at YouTube and Facebook. [11:46.600 --> 11:51.720] Another disclosure that enraged the communist gatekeepers was when I said there is no evidence [11:51.720 --> 11:56.080] the so-called vaccines activate production of memory T cells. [11:56.960 --> 11:59.960] That they don't. [11:59.960 --> 12:04.880] If the vaccines activate a production of memory T cells, people wouldn't need ongoing injections. [12:04.880 --> 12:09.600] After the first few shots, you'd have protection lasting at minimum years, likely decades, [12:09.600 --> 12:11.720] and possibly the rest of your life. [12:11.720 --> 12:14.560] That's the level of protection that comes with memory T cells. [12:14.560 --> 12:19.840] Yet, in a person who receives the mRNA vaccine, just the opposite occurs. [12:19.840 --> 12:24.280] As the neutralizing antibodies fade away, the person has no protection from infection [12:24.400 --> 12:26.600] or from getting ill with COVID-19. [12:26.600 --> 12:31.920] Furthermore, no matter how many mRNA injections a person gets, the same continues to be true. [12:31.920 --> 12:36.800] No ongoing injections equals no more protection from infection or disease. [12:36.800 --> 12:42.600] It is impossible for that to be true if the vaccines were activating production of memory T cells. [12:42.600 --> 12:47.760] I should add that natural infection and old fashioned killed virus or attenuated virus [12:47.760 --> 12:53.840] vaccines do activate production of memory T cells, just not mRNA vaccines, which is [12:53.840 --> 13:00.320] the reason they are not vaccines in any authentic use of that word, but merely therapeutic products. [13:00.320 --> 13:03.920] When I first presented this information, I said I foresaw injections being necessary [13:03.920 --> 13:06.800] every four months in order to provide ongoing protection. [13:06.800 --> 13:11.440] And in fact, we now know if you want continuous jab provided protection, [13:11.440 --> 13:14.400] you need another shot at least every four months. [13:14.400 --> 13:20.320] However, doing that repeatedly will, over time, make the person more prone to infection and illness. [13:20.320 --> 13:23.520] So even that approach won't give people the protection they're seeking. [13:23.600 --> 13:28.480] The reason they will never get the protection they want is the product they keep putting in their bodies [13:28.480 --> 13:34.480] does not activate production of memory T cells, without which there will never be any long term [13:34.480 --> 13:37.040] protection from the virus or its disease. [13:37.040 --> 13:42.240] That's also the reason the world has not achieved herd immunity despite the fact that most experts agree [13:42.240 --> 13:46.000] everyone on the planet has now been exposed to SARS-CoV-2. [13:46.000 --> 13:51.360] As you can imagine, few people would want to be injected with an experimental temporary therapeutic, [13:51.440 --> 13:53.040] masquerading as a vaccine. [13:53.040 --> 13:58.800] If they knew in doing so, it would ensure they never developed long term protection. [13:58.800 --> 14:04.800] That reality made my pronouncement a financial threat to Big Pharma, so I had to be silenced. [14:04.800 --> 14:08.400] How many tens of billions of dollars went into Big Pharma's pocket for a product [14:08.400 --> 14:13.520] almost no one would have wanted had they been told the injection will never create memory T cells [14:13.520 --> 14:17.280] and thus never provide anything other than fleeting protection? [14:18.080 --> 14:22.560] Dr. Marty McCurry, one of the shining lights pushing for medical freedom of speech over the [14:22.560 --> 14:27.040] last three years, recently said in reference to the virus, COVID-19, and the vaccines, [14:28.240 --> 14:32.640] there's a long list of misinformation from the government. [14:34.880 --> 14:41.600] As I'm recording this, the UK just signed a 10-year agreement with Moderna for 250 million [14:41.600 --> 14:43.200] mRNA doses a year. [14:43.200 --> 14:46.480] Australia is doing the same to the tune of 100 million doses a year. [14:47.280 --> 14:52.480] 100 million doses for a nation with a population of 26 million. [14:52.480 --> 14:57.840] That's just shy of four anti-SARS-CoV-2 injections a year for every man, woman, [14:58.480 --> 15:00.240] and child in Australia. [15:00.800 --> 15:05.360] Clearly, the injections offer nothing in terms of durable protection if governments are taking [15:05.360 --> 15:08.080] steps to ensure injections go on for years. [15:08.800 --> 15:14.480] Planning for years of anti-SARS-CoV-2 injections also makes crystal clear that governments know [15:14.480 --> 15:17.280] the shots don't activate production of memory T cells. [15:17.280 --> 15:22.480] I'll put a link in the notes to my presentation on the science of the memory T cell issue. [15:22.480 --> 15:26.240] The point of that brief detour is I had to be silent. [15:26.240 --> 15:27.200] Not because I was wrong. [15:27.200 --> 15:28.640] In fact, I was correct. [15:28.640 --> 15:33.200] But because I had the unmitigated gall to speak various truths, the establishment wanted [15:33.200 --> 15:34.880] to keep quiet. [15:34.880 --> 15:40.640] The meaningful aspect of all that in terms of today's presentation is that only Twitter [15:40.640 --> 15:43.680] has stopped engaging in that communist style censorship. [15:43.680 --> 15:48.800] And that is solely because Elon Musk had the foresight to give Americans one major platform [15:48.800 --> 15:53.680] that doesn't punish its users for speaking the truth or simply sharing an opinion that [15:53.680 --> 15:55.680] may or may not be factual. [15:56.560 --> 16:01.120] If you are not allowed to say something that may be mistaken, then others will have the [16:01.120 --> 16:03.920] job of determining whether you may speak at all. [16:04.960 --> 16:09.120] If that doesn't turn your blood cold, you have no intellectual or emotional connection [16:09.120 --> 16:10.000] to free speech. [16:10.880 --> 16:12.720] Fortunately, Musk does. [16:13.360 --> 16:15.440] Let's talk neural link for a moment. [16:15.440 --> 16:19.760] I see people frequently condemning Musk for the idea of placing a chip in the human brain [16:19.760 --> 16:22.800] that will link the brain to all the world's knowledge. [16:23.520 --> 16:28.560] His critics claim it's just another attempt by a billionaire to make money off the masses. [16:29.600 --> 16:32.960] Unsurprisingly, these folks have no clue what they're talking about. [16:33.600 --> 16:38.560] I'm going to sit here quietly for a moment to give you an opportunity to say out loud [16:39.280 --> 16:42.320] the reason Musk is getting involved in brain implants. [16:42.320 --> 16:45.760] If you think you know, go ahead and say it out loud now. [16:48.640 --> 16:55.280] I don't know what you said, but the true reason is Musk believes without the sort of instantaneous [16:55.280 --> 17:01.440] access to information and computing power that comes with a brain chip, in time humans [17:01.440 --> 17:04.560] will not stand a chance against AI. [17:05.360 --> 17:10.480] Musk's view is that humanity will become slaves to AI because AI can bring up facts [17:10.480 --> 17:15.840] and determine the correct course of action in seconds or minutes, while the same analysis [17:15.840 --> 17:20.000] and decision-making cycle for humans is usually measured in days. [17:21.200 --> 17:23.200] I follow AI closely. [17:23.200 --> 17:24.880] There's a lot of chatter that humans will be fine. [17:25.440 --> 17:26.400] They'll be safe. [17:26.960 --> 17:29.440] As long as AI is used ethically. [17:30.960 --> 17:33.200] I find that thinking incredibly childish. [17:33.200 --> 17:37.360] People always want the other guy to be ethical, but most aren't concerned about their own [17:37.360 --> 17:39.920] conduct being ethical, if there's money in it for them. [17:40.560 --> 17:47.520] What did 2020, 2021, and 2022 highlight for us about the ethics of giant corporations? [17:48.240 --> 17:51.840] Right, there is no such thing as an ethical corporation. [17:51.840 --> 17:56.720] Even in cases of corporations we may see as ethical, it's really just a matter of comparison. [17:56.720 --> 18:00.880] They appear ethical in contrast to the actions of other corporations. [18:01.440 --> 18:07.840] Job one for all corporations is, and always will be, making money for the shareholders. [18:10.080 --> 18:14.960] So who will be developing the kind of AI that might view humans as adversaries in the future? [18:15.760 --> 18:19.280] Right, giant corporations that don't give a damn about ethics. [18:20.000 --> 18:24.480] Which defense contractor is it you believe would decline a trillion dollar contract for [18:24.480 --> 18:29.600] autonomous killing machines simply because there is a chance the AI could go rogue and wipe out [18:29.600 --> 18:33.680] every man, woman, and child in a small town in Iowa? [18:33.680 --> 18:38.560] And if you're thinking that would never happen because they'd be sued back to the stone age, [18:38.560 --> 18:40.080] no, they won't. [18:40.080 --> 18:44.960] Because they will be granted immunity from suit for such oopsies just as big pharma has [18:44.960 --> 18:48.160] been granted immunity concerning mRNA injuries. [18:48.160 --> 18:53.920] Should the day come where odds with AI, Musk wants humanity to have a chance to prevail. [18:55.200 --> 18:58.320] Am I glorifying Musk, as some people have accused me? [18:59.280 --> 19:03.040] Frankly, I don't even know what that means. [19:03.040 --> 19:05.520] I'm telling you what he's doing and why. [19:05.520 --> 19:07.120] Nothing more, nothing less. [19:07.840 --> 19:10.720] Am I glad Musk exists? [19:10.720 --> 19:11.280] You bet. [19:11.280 --> 19:14.240] In the same way I'm glad Jonas Salk exists. [19:14.240 --> 19:15.200] Look him up. [19:15.200 --> 19:18.320] Yet no one has ever accused me of glorifying Salk. [19:19.120 --> 19:22.000] When I consider Musk, this is my thought process. [19:22.880 --> 19:28.480] Name anyone else in the world with Musk's wealth, intelligence, and resources [19:29.040 --> 19:32.880] who is putting his money where his mouth is concerning matters such as free speech [19:32.880 --> 19:35.760] and the continued existence of humanity in a state of freedom? [19:36.720 --> 19:37.200] I'll wait. [19:39.840 --> 19:44.080] Some people seem to have distaste for Musk simply because he's a billionaire. [19:44.080 --> 19:49.520] Okay, then tell me which auto mechanic, real estate agent, medical doctor, author, [19:50.480 --> 19:56.480] bowling lane owner, crane operator it is who's going to preserve free speech in America's [19:56.480 --> 20:00.080] town square and protect humanity from enslavement by AI? [20:00.880 --> 20:02.240] Again, I'll wait. [20:04.000 --> 20:09.520] Like Musk, I have seen threats to the American people by the establishment and sounded the alarm. [20:10.080 --> 20:14.480] Several years ago, I recognized certain core truths about human physiology and health. [20:14.480 --> 20:18.320] Those truths had been and continue to be suppressed by government [20:18.400 --> 20:20.400] and various industries for profit. [20:21.200 --> 20:25.440] I set out to save lives by writing body science. [20:25.440 --> 20:29.600] I know I've done that because some readers tell me they'd almost certainly be dead [20:29.600 --> 20:31.440] had they not read body science. [20:31.440 --> 20:37.280] That's exciting and gratifying, but I'm just an ordinary guy and I'm reaching only a tiny [20:37.280 --> 20:41.840] fraction of the people who desperately need to hear what the establishment has been hiding [20:41.840 --> 20:47.280] from them as Americans become chronically ill in greater and greater numbers every year. [20:48.560 --> 20:52.080] When I discovered the United States government was committing the largest financial crime [20:52.080 --> 20:56.480] in the history of the world against the American people through a 60-year [20:56.480 --> 21:01.760] disinformation campaign to convince Americans the law requires them to give a percentage [21:01.760 --> 21:07.920] of their earnings to the government, I wrote income tax shattering the miss to set a nation free. [21:08.720 --> 21:12.960] I hear back from readers all the time, so I'm vividly aware of the impact income tax [21:12.960 --> 21:15.440] shattering the miss has on an individual level. [21:16.240 --> 21:21.440] That said, I'll likely die without seeing the truth develop into a nationwide movement [21:21.440 --> 21:26.800] which Americans walk away from the government's fraud and restore financial freedom to hundreds [21:26.800 --> 21:28.960] of millions of hardworking American families. [21:29.520 --> 21:34.880] Why? Because I'm just an ordinary guy reaching a tiny fraction of the population. [21:35.680 --> 21:39.920] I've often thought about the steps I would take to affect change if I was a billionaire. [21:41.040 --> 21:44.800] It would be epic, but alas, I'm not a billionaire, even a millionaire. [21:45.520 --> 21:49.760] Experiencing the frustration of not being able to affect change on a large scale, [21:49.760 --> 21:54.800] I don't begrudge Musk his wealth and influence at all. Quite the opposite. [21:55.360 --> 22:00.240] Given that he's applying it even to his own detriment at times for the preservation of [22:00.240 --> 22:06.240] free speech and the future freedom of humanity, I'm glad he has the resources to affect change [22:06.240 --> 22:12.800] on a grand scale. People have often asked me, why do I do the things I do? My answer is, [22:13.760 --> 22:19.120] if not me, then who? When it comes to issues such as free speech and the future freedom [22:19.120 --> 22:25.440] of humanity, my reply would be, if not me, then Musk, and that's okay. [22:26.160 --> 22:30.000] Before I let you go, I want to revisit the government's income tax fraud for a moment. [22:30.560 --> 22:34.800] The lies put out in the government's disinformation campaign are nearly impossible [22:34.800 --> 22:41.040] to dislodge from the psyche of the American people, because for most people it's rooted in fear. [22:41.120 --> 22:45.760] What that means is some people will refuse to read Income Tax Shattering the Mist because they fear [22:45.760 --> 22:51.440] discovering something that may jeopardize them feeling fearful, as odd as that may sound. [22:52.000 --> 22:58.640] It's rare for intellect to successfully overcome fear, even fear based on fabricated BS. [22:58.640 --> 23:05.920] Yet there are Americans who refuse to live in fear of government lies. If that's you, it's you I want [23:05.920 --> 23:11.040] to have read Income Tax Shattering the Mist today. Your fellow citizens will follow along [23:11.920 --> 23:18.640] after they know it's safe. Whether it's Musk and free speech, or humanity surviving AI in the future, [23:18.640 --> 23:25.760] or the government's income tax scam, whether it's Musk, me, or you, the answer is to take a stand. [23:26.320 --> 23:30.320] But of course you can't take a stand unless you know with every fiber of your being [23:30.320 --> 23:35.040] that you have the facts and you're doing the right thing. In order for you to know that [23:35.040 --> 23:39.360] concerning the government's fraudulent income tax scheme, all you need to do is read Income [23:39.360 --> 23:46.240] Tax Shattering the Mist. It's literally that easy. You and I can't accomplish what someone like [23:46.240 --> 23:51.840] Musk can, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't be doing everything we can to keep liberty alive. [23:51.840 --> 23:56.880] I hope you'll do what you can, which means getting informed about the scam and taking a stand [23:56.880 --> 24:02.880] against the government's grotesque misinformation campaign, just as Musk has taken a stand against [24:02.880 --> 24:13.200] communist-style censorship. To that end, I want you to go to drreality.news and pick up a copy [24:13.200 --> 24:19.200] of Income Tax Shattering the Mist. See the irrefutable evidence with your own eyes and then [24:19.200 --> 24:25.120] decide what you think should be done about it. While you're there, grab a copy of Body Science. [24:25.120 --> 24:30.160] I know in 2023 it's hard to believe you've been hoodwinked your entire life about how your [24:30.160 --> 24:35.840] physiology really works, what truly creates health or causes sickness, but you have my word [24:35.840 --> 24:41.120] that it's not only the case, but Body Science will eviscerate those false narratives and make you the [24:41.120 --> 24:46.720] healthiest you have ever been. Once you've proven it to yourself, then you can share the great news [24:46.720 --> 24:51.920] with others. Lastly, I've been doing these fact-based presentations for almost 20 years without any [24:51.920 --> 24:57.120] cost to anyone by picking up a copy of Income Tax Shattering the Mist for Body Science. Not only [24:57.200 --> 25:02.080] will it change your worldview, but you will help me to continue to be here for you. [25:02.800 --> 25:07.440] And finally, don't forget the link I put in the notes to the presentation that lays out some of [25:07.440 --> 25:12.160] the astounding, irrefutable proof of the Income Tax Scam. Thanks for spending your time with me [25:12.160 --> 25:20.560] today. Take care.