Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language Detected language: English [00:00.000 --> 00:02.880] Welcome to the Vodcast. [00:02.880 --> 00:08.280] The use of non-traditional personal pronouns coming out of the LGBTQ community has gotten [00:08.280 --> 00:10.480] a lot of attention the last few years. [00:10.480 --> 00:14.640] But what happens when this trend works its way into the schools your children attend? [00:14.640 --> 00:21.400] Let's take a look at that. [00:21.400 --> 00:32.720] The Dr. Reality Vodcast with Dave Champion. [00:32.720 --> 00:34.200] Let's begin with this. [00:34.200 --> 00:38.460] I haven't objected to the pronoun issue in the same way many people have. [00:38.460 --> 00:42.120] Being libertarian minded, I don't really care what people do as long as it isn't diminishing [00:42.120 --> 00:43.120] my liberty. [00:43.120 --> 00:48.320] And as long as my liberty isn't being infringed, I don't have much of an objection to accommodating [00:48.320 --> 00:49.320] the wishes of others. [00:49.840 --> 00:55.200] If a person born a female wants to dress up as a guy and prefers to be called he or him, [00:55.200 --> 00:58.080] okay, that's not a big deal to me. [00:58.080 --> 01:03.040] Likewise, if a person born a male dresses up like a woman and prefers the pronouns she [01:03.040 --> 01:04.960] or her, same thing. [01:04.960 --> 01:08.200] It doesn't bother me to accommodate that person. [01:08.200 --> 01:14.180] We've all got our bullshit and I'm not going to judge them because their bullshit is different [01:14.180 --> 01:15.720] than my bullshit. [01:15.720 --> 01:21.880] That said, a critical aspect is I'm choosing to accommodate their preference. [01:21.880 --> 01:25.560] The first time I started to get a bad feeling about the use of non-traditional personal [01:25.560 --> 01:31.220] pronouns was when some universities began punishing students for declining to accommodate [01:31.220 --> 01:34.120] a person's pronoun preference. [01:34.120 --> 01:39.760] That's a complete 180 from freely choosing to accommodate a person's preference or choosing [01:39.760 --> 01:40.760] not to. [01:40.920 --> 01:47.280] I've been saying for some time that American society appears to be losing its earlier reverence [01:47.280 --> 01:49.160] for free speech. [01:49.160 --> 01:53.360] Universities punishing students for not accommodating someone's pronoun preference is a perfect [01:53.360 --> 01:56.400] example of violating free speech. [01:56.400 --> 01:59.940] How does that violate free speech, you might ask? [01:59.940 --> 02:04.560] It violates free speech because implicit in the right of free speech are two aspects less [02:04.560 --> 02:08.160] well recognized than merely saying what's on your mind. [02:08.160 --> 02:10.520] What is the right to not be compelled to speak? [02:10.520 --> 02:15.280] In other words, choosing not to speak is a part of the right of free speech. [02:15.280 --> 02:20.760] The other less well known aspect is not being compelled to say what someone else wants you [02:20.760 --> 02:21.760] to say. [02:21.760 --> 02:25.880] In other words, if you choose to speak, your right of free speech protects you from others [02:25.880 --> 02:29.720] putting words in your mouth by threatening to punish you for non-compliance with their [02:29.720 --> 02:33.600] demands of what words must come out of your mouth. [02:33.600 --> 02:39.600] In short, universities don't have the authority to silence a student's speech nor dictate [02:39.600 --> 02:44.240] what words come out of the student's mouth that the student chooses to speak. [02:44.240 --> 02:48.320] But what of those who say the First Amendment only prohibits government interference with [02:48.320 --> 02:49.640] free speech? [02:49.640 --> 02:52.040] Technically, they're correct. [02:52.040 --> 02:56.320] But there's a difference between the Constitution prohibiting government from censoring speech [02:56.320 --> 03:01.480] and the broader subject of free speech generally, which Americans are supposed to value, if [03:01.480 --> 03:03.040] not revere. [03:03.040 --> 03:09.060] That brings me to what I believe is a free speech issue far more relevant in 2023 than [03:09.060 --> 03:12.500] discussing a Constitutional provision. [03:12.500 --> 03:18.840] The founding father's era town square no longer exists. [03:18.840 --> 03:20.480] It's gone. [03:20.480 --> 03:22.520] And it's never coming back. [03:22.520 --> 03:27.760] If we accede to the idea that private entities can ban speech, there is no free speech left [03:27.760 --> 03:32.800] in America except perhaps on some random public sidewalk if you don't get arrested. [03:32.800 --> 03:37.360] In other words, if there is no modern town square and private entities are free to suppress [03:37.360 --> 03:43.600] whatever speech they desire, where are Americans left to exercise free speech? [03:43.600 --> 03:45.360] Only in your own living room? [03:45.360 --> 03:48.680] What good is the right of free speech if we allow a construct to take hold in America [03:48.680 --> 03:53.760] in which there is no place we are permitted to exercise the right? [03:53.760 --> 03:58.560] Imagine having the right to own a firearm, but only on the condition that it is stored [03:58.640 --> 04:03.120] with a private entity that has the power to decide whether or not you can touch it or [04:03.120 --> 04:04.480] shoot it. [04:04.480 --> 04:07.600] No one would consider that a true right to own firearms. [04:07.600 --> 04:11.360] We would consider that a mockery of the right to keep and bear arms. [04:11.360 --> 04:15.680] Yet we have allowed ourselves to get in that position concerning the right of free speech. [04:15.680 --> 04:21.040] If there is no place to exercise the right of free speech without someone else's permission, [04:21.040 --> 04:22.520] then the right of free speech is a joke. [04:22.520 --> 04:24.280] It doesn't mean anything. [04:24.280 --> 04:26.160] But back to personal pronouns. [04:26.160 --> 04:31.000] The assault on free speech by certain universities notwithstanding, everyone who attends a university [04:31.000 --> 04:35.480] is an adult functioning from their own free will, or at least they should be, so I don't [04:35.480 --> 04:41.440] see the pronoun issue being any different in universities than I do in society generally. [04:41.440 --> 04:46.440] But recently, school districts have started writing policies for the use of non-traditional [04:46.440 --> 04:48.480] personal pronouns. [04:48.480 --> 04:53.760] Worse yet, some school districts are not involving the students' parents when the issue of non-traditional [04:53.760 --> 04:55.160] personal pronouns arises. [04:55.840 --> 05:00.920] In other words, if that subject becomes an issue with a student, school staff may never [05:00.920 --> 05:07.120] involve that student's parents in a discussion concerning how best to address this subject. [05:07.120 --> 05:11.800] Imagine the level of arrogance it takes for an administrator to think it's acceptable [05:11.800 --> 05:18.920] to exclude a student's parents from a discussion that has nothing to do with education and [05:18.920 --> 05:24.680] everything to do with a cultural matter concerning which some parents have very strong opinions. [05:24.680 --> 05:28.880] Having witnessed the arrogance that's often present in public school administrators, you [05:28.880 --> 05:32.840] can bet your ass the circumstances in which school staff will exclude parents from the [05:32.840 --> 05:38.120] discussion is when they suspect the parents won't approve of what the school is doing. [05:38.120 --> 05:42.000] In other words, the school's way of addressing a situation in which they believe the parents [05:42.000 --> 05:47.680] would object to the school's action is to hide that action from the parents by intentionally [05:47.680 --> 05:49.480] excluding them. [05:49.480 --> 05:53.760] Some school districts are attempting to justify keeping parents in the dark by claiming it's [05:53.760 --> 05:56.680] for everyone's safety. [05:56.680 --> 06:01.760] Let's move from the cultural aspect to the education impact of these policies. [06:01.760 --> 06:06.280] Schools that are enacting these policies are permitting the use of the following pronouns. [06:06.280 --> 06:23.280] E, M, air, spelled E, E-M, and E-I-R, Z, her, hers, spelled Z-E, H-I-R, and H-I-R-S. [06:23.960 --> 06:35.960] And, fae, fair, fairs, spelled F-A-E, F-A-E-R, and F-A-E-R-S. [06:35.960 --> 06:39.400] I don't want to spend a lot of time on these, but let me help you understand what they are. [06:39.400 --> 06:45.520] I'll use E, M, and air, pronounced E-M, air, as an example. [06:45.520 --> 06:56.240] E, M, and air are simply the original words, the, them, and their, with T-H removed from the front end. [06:56.240 --> 06:59.440] The problem I have with this is adults are knowingly, willfully, and intentionally allowing [06:59.440 --> 07:04.640] children to use these terms and pretend they're real words in the English language. [07:04.640 --> 07:10.120] I looked them up, and these terms are not found in online English dictionaries. [07:10.120 --> 07:11.520] Why? [07:11.520 --> 07:13.560] Because they aren't real words. [07:13.560 --> 07:14.560] Now, don't get me wrong. [07:14.560 --> 07:18.320] I'm all for children being creative, and some young kids have always made up words [07:18.320 --> 07:21.120] and used them when speaking with friends. [07:21.120 --> 07:26.000] What distinguishes these pseudo pronouns from kids making up words in the past is school [07:26.000 --> 07:31.120] officials are sanctioning it, validating it in district policy, and encouraging the use [07:31.120 --> 07:33.360] of these terms in an educational setting. [07:33.360 --> 07:38.860] Also, some of the kids using these made up pronouns are prepubescent. [07:38.860 --> 07:42.520] In my opinion, the vast majority of kids who want people to refer to them by these pseudo [07:42.520 --> 07:46.840] pronouns are not invested in gender issues as much as they are being part of something [07:46.840 --> 07:47.840] trendy. [07:47.840 --> 07:54.220] Yet, even if a child is actually focused on a gender issue, in my opinion, no school should [07:54.220 --> 07:58.320] advance that agenda without the parent's consent. [07:58.320 --> 08:02.160] Then we get into the potential problem of government compelling speech in places like [08:02.160 --> 08:05.160] elementary school, middle school, and high school. [08:05.160 --> 08:09.800] Once using these terms is official district policy, what happens when a member of the [08:09.800 --> 08:13.480] school staff or students decline to use those terms? [08:13.480 --> 08:18.400] Once the school has initiated what they're referring to as a gender support plan for [08:18.400 --> 08:22.120] a student, then staff and students who decline to use those terms will be seen as refusing [08:22.120 --> 08:25.320] to follow district policy. [08:25.320 --> 08:29.360] Following district policy is not optional for staff or students, therefore refusing [08:29.360 --> 08:32.880] to do as the policy dictates is subject to punishment. [08:32.880 --> 08:38.180] Can you imagine your kid getting detention or being suspended because he or she declines [08:38.180 --> 08:42.580] to call others by made up words that are not in the dictionary? [08:42.580 --> 08:46.820] In what educational setting is it remotely acceptable to force a student to use pseudo [08:46.820 --> 08:51.740] pronouns that are not words in the English dictionary and punish students who decline [08:51.740 --> 08:53.060] to do so? [08:53.060 --> 08:55.860] Again, I want to reiterate. [08:55.860 --> 09:00.620] I generally have no truck with these matters, but my perspective is based on the following [09:00.620 --> 09:01.620] points. [09:01.620 --> 09:06.540] One, it is my choice whether to accommodate a person's wishes or not, thus showing respect [09:06.540 --> 09:09.220] for my personal liberty. [09:09.220 --> 09:15.180] Two, never having the authorities attempt to force me to speak words, I don't choose [09:15.180 --> 09:16.460] to speak. [09:16.460 --> 09:20.820] Three, the government is not involved in any way. [09:20.820 --> 09:24.760] Four, everyone involved is an adult. [09:24.760 --> 09:29.060] With the use of these pseudo pronouns being written into school district policy, every [09:29.060 --> 09:33.300] one of those factors disappears, freedom of choice is gone. [09:33.300 --> 09:37.860] People and authority will be forcing staff and students to use pseudo pronouns. [09:37.860 --> 09:42.900] Government is involved because school districts are their own government units and the matter [09:42.900 --> 09:46.260] is no longer limited to adults. [09:46.260 --> 09:51.540] There's a now infamous quote by William Casey, former director of the CIA. [09:51.540 --> 09:57.860] Casey said this, quote, will know our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the American [09:57.860 --> 10:03.200] public believes is false, close quote. [10:03.200 --> 10:08.080] If one's paying attention, I think it's difficult not to see Casey's objective has been thoroughly [10:08.080 --> 10:09.320] achieved. [10:09.320 --> 10:13.800] The American public not only buys into all sorts of propaganda, hook, line and sinker, [10:13.800 --> 10:18.800] but those who drink the Kool-Aid will fight to the death to defend that propaganda. [10:18.800 --> 10:24.080] A perfect example is that most Americans believe the government's 60 year disinformation campaign [10:24.080 --> 10:30.040] to convince hardworking Americans they owe income tax when in fact the law says no such [10:30.040 --> 10:31.040] thing. [10:31.040 --> 10:36.160] As I mentioned a moment ago, they bought it, hook, line and sinker. [10:36.160 --> 10:38.600] Let's return to William Casey for a moment. [10:38.600 --> 10:45.060] Casey is widely credited as being the inventor of tax shelters and he made millions putting [10:45.060 --> 10:47.240] wealthy clients into tax shelters. [10:47.240 --> 10:50.980] It makes perfect sense that he would want America to believe the lie that income tax [10:50.980 --> 10:55.900] applies to everyone and he would create a massive disinformation campaign to promote [10:55.900 --> 10:57.000] the lie. [10:57.000 --> 11:02.880] Not only does it perfectly fit his CIA statement about disinformation, but it also allowed [11:02.880 --> 11:08.280] him to become a very rich man, convincing America's wealthy class they needed his tax [11:08.280 --> 11:09.280] shelters. [11:09.280 --> 11:14.160] Normally, at this point, I tell you about income tax shattering the miss and body science, [11:14.160 --> 11:16.040] but today I'm going to do something different. [11:16.040 --> 11:20.580] I'm going to limit my description to just one sentence for each book and then share [11:20.580 --> 11:23.320] what readers say about them. [11:23.320 --> 11:28.360] Okay, my one sentence about income tax shattering the miss is this. [11:28.360 --> 11:32.840] Income tax shattering the miss lays out the history and law concerning income tax and [11:32.840 --> 11:38.800] in doing so provides you with incontrovertible proof that the income tax does not apply to [11:38.800 --> 11:42.160] the ordinary working American like you. [11:42.160 --> 11:45.200] Before I share what readers have said about income tax shattering the miss, you need to [11:45.200 --> 11:49.980] know the quotes you're about to hear and see if you're watching on video are unsolicited [11:49.980 --> 11:51.560] comments from social media. [11:51.560 --> 11:54.600] I don't know the people whose comments you're about to hear. [11:54.600 --> 11:58.600] So what do they say about income tax shattering the miss? [11:58.600 --> 12:05.480] Chase said, some light reading on my flight, 100 pages in and I can't put it down. [12:05.480 --> 12:08.240] Thank you, Dave Champion, for your dedication to this movement. [12:08.240 --> 12:12.120] A quick word about Chase not being able to put it down. [12:12.120 --> 12:17.440] Given the subject, people might think income tax shattering the miss would be dry and boring. [12:17.440 --> 12:19.240] Just the opposite is true. [12:19.240 --> 12:24.120] Most readers have Chase's experience that it's a page turner they cannot put down. [12:24.120 --> 12:26.600] Chad said, well, I did it. [12:26.600 --> 12:31.200] Just finished income tax shattering the miss and I have to say, I'm speechless. [12:31.200 --> 12:36.880] It was a little hard for me to read and comprehend, parentheses, that's just me, close parentheses. [12:36.880 --> 12:40.440] So I will read it again and this time take notes. [12:40.440 --> 12:46.600] Corey, being humorous, said, I was just getting ready to list my signed copy of Shattering [12:46.600 --> 12:48.900] the Miss for $300. [12:48.900 --> 12:49.900] Just kidding. [12:49.900 --> 12:56.300] You'll have to pry this book from my cold, dead hands. [12:56.300 --> 13:00.280] To combine these sentiments would be to say income tax shattering the miss is a page turner [13:00.280 --> 13:04.940] that can't be put down, leaves you speechless from what you learn and is so valuable it [13:04.940 --> 13:08.460] would have to be pried from your cold, dead hands. [13:08.460 --> 13:11.900] Sounds like a book maybe you should read, does it not? [13:11.900 --> 13:14.820] I'm going to tell you how to do just that in a moment. [13:14.820 --> 13:18.260] Now for my single sentence about body science. [13:18.260 --> 13:23.160] Body science destroys 60 years of propaganda by big med, big pharma and big food shows [13:23.160 --> 13:25.140] you the truth about human physiology. [13:25.140 --> 13:29.520] The establishment does not want you to know because they want you sick and then gives [13:29.520 --> 13:34.380] you a clear roadmap to being incredibly healthy and never getting chronic disease. [13:34.380 --> 13:37.100] So what do readers say about body science? [13:37.100 --> 13:41.900] Mike said, regarding your body science book, I lent another one to a friend. [13:41.900 --> 13:47.580] He sent me this text on Thursday, quote, I've read well over 200 books on diet slash nutrition [13:47.580 --> 13:54.660] slash exercise, et cetera, and nothing compares to what I just read. [13:54.660 --> 13:57.420] Thanks for letting me borrow it, close quote. [13:57.420 --> 14:02.180] John said, Hi, Dave, I just wanted to say bravo for your work on body science. [14:02.180 --> 14:07.380] I'm not someone you described as a book reader, but I was riveted when I started reading it [14:07.380 --> 14:11.340] and not opening a book in years due mostly to my own attention span. [14:11.340 --> 14:13.940] I read over 40 pages in a sitting. [14:13.940 --> 14:15.660] I can't wait to read the rest. [14:15.660 --> 14:18.380] Thank you for making this information available. [14:18.380 --> 14:21.580] And Ivan said, I just got through the book. [14:21.580 --> 14:25.860] You hit it out of the park, couldn't put it down till I finished it. [14:25.860 --> 14:30.420] It was like confirmation on so many questions I've had regarding many health issues, plaguing [14:30.420 --> 14:34.580] not just my family members, but this country as a whole. [14:34.580 --> 14:39.440] One's got to be a complete idiot not to be able to understand and grasp what you've presented. [14:39.440 --> 14:44.820] If we put those together, you get a book that outclasses 200 other books in the same category, [14:44.820 --> 14:48.500] resulted in a person who isn't much of a reader burning through 40 pages in a single [14:48.500 --> 14:51.620] sitting and being enthusiastic to keep going. [14:51.620 --> 14:55.500] And it answers so many questions about why America is the most chronically ill society [14:55.500 --> 14:57.620] in all of human history. [14:57.620 --> 15:01.860] Again, does it not sound like a book you should be reading? [15:01.860 --> 15:05.500] It's so easy to get your personal copy of Income Tax Shattering the Mist and or body [15:05.500 --> 15:06.580] science. [15:06.580 --> 15:09.220] Just go to DrReality.News. [15:09.220 --> 15:11.980] That's DrReality.News. [15:11.980 --> 15:12.980] Put them in the cart. [15:12.980 --> 15:13.980] Check out. [15:13.980 --> 15:16.580] They'll be on their way to you within 24 hours. [15:16.580 --> 15:20.700] Also, I've been doing these fact-based presentations, which I think you'll agree are unique in their [15:20.700 --> 15:23.460] candor for almost 20 years. [15:23.460 --> 15:28.260] When you purchase Income Tax Shattering the Mist and or body science, you help me to continue [15:28.260 --> 15:31.580] to be here for you with these thought-provoking presentations. [15:31.580 --> 15:32.580] Thanks for being here. [15:32.580 --> 15:39.580] Take care.