Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language
Detected language: English
[00:00.000 --> 00:01.680]  Welcome to the show.
[00:01.680 --> 00:08.120]  I bet you don't know that laws no one has ever seen, nor has anyone been able to find,
[00:08.120 --> 00:12.100]  are being enforced on Americans every single day.
[00:12.100 --> 00:17.200]  Is that acceptable in a country that supposedly operates under the rule of law?
[00:17.200 --> 00:22.560]  Is it not a violation of everything America stands for to have laws enforced upon you
[00:22.560 --> 00:25.920]  that no one can show you when you ask to see them?
[00:26.080 --> 00:30.560]  Today we're going to discuss something I call the Doctrine of Missing Parts.
[00:30.560 --> 00:33.840]  You'll understand why it's called the Doctrine of Missing Parts when I explain
[00:33.840 --> 00:41.120]  how this corrupt practice harms hundreds of millions of Americans every day, including probably you.
[00:41.120 --> 00:42.960]  Ayn Rand famously said,
[00:42.960 --> 00:47.120]  The truth is not for all men, but only for those who seek it.
[00:47.120 --> 00:51.680]  Today we're going to see an example of the stark difference between those who seek the truth
[00:51.680 --> 00:57.280]  and those who reject it and engage in despicable oppression right here in America.
[01:13.600 --> 01:14.880]  Let's start with this.
[01:14.880 --> 01:18.480]  The Doctrine of Missing Parts requires a bit of foundation to understand,
[01:18.560 --> 01:22.400]  so bear with me for a few minutes as I give you the foundational information.
[01:22.400 --> 01:25.920]  Once you have that information under your belt, you will understand
[01:25.920 --> 01:30.640]  the Doctrine of Missing Parts and it will likely piss you off.
[01:30.640 --> 01:34.560]  A prime example of the Doctrine of Missing Parts can be illustrated by examining
[01:34.560 --> 01:38.160]  payroll withholding law, so let's take a look at it together.
[01:38.160 --> 01:42.640]  I want to encourage you to stay with me to the end because I'm going to discuss
[01:42.640 --> 01:46.320]  how to successfully sue companies that unlawfully withhold from you.
[01:46.960 --> 01:52.320]  The command for wage withholding is found at 26 U.S.C. 3402 and reads as follows.
[02:00.320 --> 02:05.360]  If you work for someone else, that probably sounds like they have to withhold from you,
[02:05.360 --> 02:09.760]  but if you've been following me for some time or have read Income Tax Shattering the Miss,
[02:10.400 --> 02:17.280]  you know that Congress redefines words to mean whatever Congress wants them to mean,
[02:17.840 --> 02:21.840]  which can have no relation whatsoever to what the words mean in the English Dictionary.
[02:22.400 --> 02:28.720]  Let's see how Congress changing the meaning of words plays out in the law and in your life.
[02:28.720 --> 02:33.360]  The definitions that control payroll withholding are found at 26 U.S.C. 3401.
[02:34.080 --> 02:38.640]  Let's start with the very first definition, which is wages and reads,
[02:51.040 --> 02:57.040]  That seems pretty straightforward, but since Congress can change the meaning of words
[02:57.040 --> 03:03.040]  to whatever it wants, did it occur to you that we should check to see how Congress has defined
[03:03.120 --> 03:10.160]  the words employee and employer? If you already had that thought, you're catching on fast.
[03:10.160 --> 03:14.560]  Before we have a gander at those, a couple of quick comments. First, the U.S. Supreme Court
[03:14.560 --> 03:20.160]  has said it is completely acceptable for Congress to take a word we all know the meaning of and
[03:20.160 --> 03:26.080]  change the meaning to something entirely different. Second, Congress does this all the time. It's not
[03:26.080 --> 03:32.480]  an occasional practice. It's done extensively. In tax law, it would be accurate to say it's the rule,
[03:32.480 --> 03:39.120]  not the exception. Allow me to quickly address the meaning of includes in tax law, which I've
[03:39.120 --> 03:44.640]  covered time and again in previous videos, but I have to mention it whenever we're about to look
[03:44.640 --> 03:52.320]  at definitions that use includes. When includes is used in tax law, the items enumerated after
[03:52.320 --> 03:58.480]  the word includes establish a category. When includes is used, items that are not enumerated
[03:58.480 --> 04:03.920]  in the definition are to be considered a part of the definition if they reasonably fit within the
[04:03.920 --> 04:09.760]  category created by the enumerated items. With that in mind, when we read the definition of
[04:09.760 --> 04:17.840]  employee, I'm going to emphasize the word includes, and as you hear the enumerated items that follow,
[04:17.840 --> 04:25.360]  I want you to decide what category they establish. The term employee is found at 26 USC 3401C and
[04:25.360 --> 04:32.720]  reads, for the purpose of this chapter, the term employee includes an officer employee or elected
[04:32.720 --> 04:37.840]  official of the United States, a state or any political subdivision thereof, or the district
[04:37.840 --> 04:43.840]  of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of any one or more of the foregoing. What category
[04:43.840 --> 04:49.920]  did you determine is established by the enumerated items? If you said various government entities,
[04:50.000 --> 04:56.480]  you nailed it. To be 100% legally accurate, I'm going to go a bit further and share with
[04:56.480 --> 05:01.280]  you that the category is government entities that are under the exclusive legislative jurisdiction
[05:01.280 --> 05:06.560]  of Congress, which excludes the states of the union. The states mentioned in the definition are
[05:06.560 --> 05:11.520]  federal states such as Puerto Rico, Guam, Washington, D.C., etc., not states of the union.
[05:12.160 --> 05:15.920]  There is one more sentence in the definition of employee which reads,
[05:16.800 --> 05:22.320]  the term employee also includes an officer of a corporation. Do you recall that in the main
[05:22.320 --> 05:27.280]  portion of the definition, it referenced instrumentalities? Instrumentalities are
[05:27.280 --> 05:32.320]  entities such as corporations created by the government that are not government agencies but
[05:32.320 --> 05:36.880]  carry out a government function. An example of that would be the Federal Deposit Insurance
[05:36.880 --> 05:42.480]  Corporation, more commonly known as FDIC. Other examples are Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
[05:42.480 --> 05:47.600]  Where the definition says employee includes an officer of a corporation, it is referring to
[05:47.600 --> 05:53.840]  officers of corporations such as the FDIC, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac. Now that we know the category
[05:53.840 --> 06:00.240]  created by the enumerated items is government entities, can you explain why the company for
[06:00.240 --> 06:06.720]  which you work considers you an employee for the purpose of payroll withholding? Now let's look at
[06:06.720 --> 06:10.560]  the definition of employer which is at subsection D and reads,
[06:21.760 --> 06:28.160]  As you can see, employer is the entity for which the employee works and as you just saw, employee
[06:28.160 --> 06:32.160]  means a person working for a government entity under the exclusive legislative jurisdiction of
[06:32.160 --> 06:38.320]  Congress. To sum up the pivotal definitions that control payroll withholding, we find that wages
[06:38.320 --> 06:44.560]  are not the money ordinary Americans earn at work but are exclusively the pay received by employees
[06:44.560 --> 06:50.480]  as defined at 3401c. Employee is defined as those who work for various government entities under the
[06:50.480 --> 06:55.040]  exclusive legislative jurisdiction of Congress which has nothing to do with people working in
[06:55.040 --> 07:01.280]  the private sector in the states of the union and employer is not the private sector firm for which
[07:01.280 --> 07:08.720]  you work but rather government entities for which the defined employees work. If we stopped
[07:08.720 --> 07:12.560]  right here and didn't go any further, it should be clear to any thinking person that Congress's
[07:12.560 --> 07:17.440]  payroll withholding law has precisely zero authority over workers in the private sector
[07:17.440 --> 07:24.080]  in the states of the union. Zero authority over the pay of those workers and grants zero authority
[07:24.080 --> 07:29.680]  to private sector companies to take money out of a worker's paycheck. But we're not going to stop
[07:29.680 --> 07:35.120]  here because I'm going to show you how deep the rabbit hole goes. To understand how deep the rabbit
[07:35.120 --> 07:41.040]  hole goes, let's return for a moment to 3402a which companies ignorantly believe grants them
[07:41.040 --> 07:46.560]  authority to withhold. I'm going to read it again but this time as I read it, I want you to tell me
[07:46.560 --> 07:53.760]  exactly which tax is being collected. Let me explain what I mean. Congress has imposed more
[07:53.760 --> 08:00.480]  than 200 taxes in the U.S. Every tax that's imposed begins with these words. There is hereby
[08:00.480 --> 08:07.680]  imposed a tax upon followed by a description of what tax is being imposed. As I read 3402 again,
[08:07.680 --> 08:16.320]  please use only the words of the statute to tell me exactly to which of the 200 plus taxes
[08:16.320 --> 08:22.000]  3402 pertains. Ready? Here we go. Except as otherwise provided in this section,
[08:22.000 --> 08:27.600]  every employer making payment of wages shall deduct and withhold upon such wages a tax.
[08:28.480 --> 08:37.680]  The key words are deduct and withhold upon such wages a tax. Do the words a tax tell you to
[08:37.680 --> 08:44.640]  which of the 200 plus taxes 3402 applies? Clearly not. Since this may be a case of first impressions
[08:44.640 --> 08:51.360]  for you, I'll tell you there is a perfectly good reason for that. The reason is 3402 does not impose
[08:51.360 --> 09:00.320]  a tax. 3402 is a command to collect a tax imposed somewhere else in the code. Let's read the key
[09:00.320 --> 09:06.800]  words again so you can cement in your mind that all 3402 does is command the collection of an
[09:06.800 --> 09:12.880]  unnamed tax. Quote, every employer making payment of wages shall deduct and withhold.
[09:14.320 --> 09:20.400]  That language does not impose a tax. It instructs an employer and we now know that isn't the company
[09:20.400 --> 09:26.480]  for which you work to collect some unspecified tax. Before I get into the nitty gritty of the
[09:26.480 --> 09:31.360]  wage withholding scam, please take a moment to subscribe to the channel and like the video so
[09:31.360 --> 09:36.160]  the algorithms will share with more people. Also, one of the reasons the truth of the income tax
[09:36.160 --> 09:41.120]  isn't being heard as widely as it should is too many of those who know the truth aren't sharing
[09:41.120 --> 09:48.080]  these videos. I suspect that's because people don't want their friends, in-laws, co-workers,
[09:48.080 --> 09:54.960]  etc. to think they're kooky conspiracy theorists. But here's the thing. These presentations contain
[09:54.960 --> 10:02.480]  rock solid facts and show people the actual law. In other words, these presentations are the exact
[10:02.480 --> 10:08.880]  opposite of kooky conspiracy theories. I'm sure you're aware that the earth being round was once
[10:08.880 --> 10:14.800]  considered something only kooks said. How did the masses learn that the earth is round? Initially,
[10:14.800 --> 10:19.280]  they heard about it from a relatively small number of people who kept sharing the truth.
[10:20.080 --> 10:23.360]  How do you think the American people are going to learn the truth about the income tax
[10:24.080 --> 10:29.120]  if you don't share it with them? If you want to live in a country where your fellow citizens
[10:29.120 --> 10:34.320]  know the truth and thus the scam collapses, you've got to put it out there. You need to
[10:34.320 --> 10:41.520]  share these videos. With that said, back to the presentation. Treasury decision 8734 is entitled
[10:41.920 --> 10:48.560]  Section 1441, Withholding of Tax on Non-Resident Aliens. Every single word of 8734 applies
[10:48.560 --> 10:53.440]  exclusively to the subject of its title, Withholding of Tax on Non-Resident Aliens.
[10:53.440 --> 10:59.520]  That is the supposition. Having read every word of the excruciatingly long 8734, I can assure you
[11:00.080 --> 11:03.760]  everything in it deals exclusively with withholding on non-resident aliens.
[11:04.320 --> 11:10.560]  In Treasury decision 8734, we find this. A payor making payments to foreign persons must also be
[11:10.560 --> 11:15.280]  aware of the information reporting provisions under Chapter 61 of the Code and of other
[11:15.280 --> 11:22.800]  withholding regimes such as Section 3406, Backup Withholding, Section 3402, Wage Withholding.
[11:23.360 --> 11:31.840]  3402, Wage Withholding, which is exactly what we're discussing. Treasury decision 8734
[11:31.840 --> 11:36.960]  instructs those making payments of U.S. source income to non-resident aliens to use Section
[11:37.040 --> 11:42.960]  3402 as the mechanism by which to collect the tax. Several months ago I did a presentation
[11:42.960 --> 11:49.520]  specifically on Treasury decision 8734. It's incredibly revealing. I'll put the link down
[11:49.520 --> 11:56.400]  in the notes. Now, let's look at Treasury decision 8881, which is entitled Revisions to Regulations
[11:56.400 --> 12:02.480]  Relating to Withholding of Tax on Certain U.S. Source Income Paid to Foreign Persons. Just like
[12:02.480 --> 12:09.200]  8734, Treasury decision 8881 pertains exclusively to what the title says, withholding of tax on
[12:09.200 --> 12:15.360]  certain U.S. source income paid to foreign persons. On page 143, speaking of U.S. source income paid
[12:15.360 --> 12:22.480]  to a foreign person in the form of wages, 8881 says, such compensation would be subject to
[12:22.480 --> 12:31.280]  withholding under Section 3402. On page 204, speaking of what forms to use and when, it says,
[12:31.360 --> 12:38.160]  any item required to be reported on a Form W-2, including an item required to be shown on a Form
[12:38.160 --> 12:46.240]  W-2 solely by reason of 1.6041-2 relating to return of information for payments to employees.
[12:46.960 --> 12:51.920]  In 8881, we see the Secretary of the Treasury telling those who are making payments of U.S.
[12:51.920 --> 12:58.560]  source income in the form of wages to withhold under 3402 and file a W-2 under authority of the
[12:58.560 --> 13:05.920]  regulation at 26 CFR 1.6401-2, which is the regulation accountants use to wrongly convince
[13:05.920 --> 13:11.040]  ordinary American companies that they have to file a Form W-2 against their workers.
[13:11.760 --> 13:20.240]  Now let's take a look at IRS Cumulative Bulletin 197.44, which also exclusively addresses U.S.
[13:20.240 --> 13:24.480]  source income paid to foreign persons. While Treasury decisions are issued by the Treasury
[13:24.480 --> 13:29.280]  Department and are the official determinations of the Secretary of the Treasury, the Cumulative
[13:29.280 --> 13:33.520]  Bulletin is an official publication of the Internal Revenue Service intended to provide
[13:33.520 --> 13:39.280]  guidance to IRS employees and non-governmental people in the income tax industry. In Cumulative
[13:39.280 --> 13:47.040]  Bulletin 197-44, we see the IRS Commissioner repeating this from Treasury Decision 8734.
[13:47.680 --> 13:52.320]  A payor making payments to foreign persons must also be aware of the information reporting
[13:52.320 --> 13:56.960]  provisions under Chapter 61 of the Code and other withholding regimes, such as Section
[13:56.960 --> 14:05.360]  3406 Backup Withholding and Section 3402 Wage Withholding. At this point, we have the following.
[14:05.360 --> 14:12.320]  We have the Wage Withholding Statute 3402, which when we read the definitions tells us it has
[14:12.320 --> 14:17.760]  zero applicability to private sector companies. We have two Treasury decisions instructing payors
[14:17.760 --> 14:23.600]  to engage in wage withholding upon U.S. source income being paid to foreign persons and an IRS
[14:23.600 --> 14:28.880]  Cumulative Bulletin instructing payors to engage in wage withholding upon U.S. source income being
[14:28.880 --> 14:37.520]  paid to foreign persons. So then, what do I mean when I speak of this thing called the Doctrine
[14:37.520 --> 14:45.120]  of Missing Parts? To help explain that, let's look at this graphic. The field on the left is titled
[14:45.120 --> 14:52.080]  Known Parts. The field on the right, Missing Parts. In the Known Parts column, we have four items.
[14:52.080 --> 14:59.840]  The first is Section 3402 does not apply to private sector companies. The second, Treasury
[14:59.840 --> 15:09.040]  Decision 8734 Wage Withholding applies to foreign persons. The third, Treasury Decision 8881 Wage
[15:09.040 --> 15:17.360]  Withholding applies to foreign persons. And the fourth, Cumulative Bulletin 197-44 Wage Withholding
[15:17.360 --> 15:23.600]  applies to foreign persons. I think we all agree that every company tells its workers that the
[15:23.600 --> 15:29.600]  company is legally required to obtain a W-4 and withhold income tax from the workers' pay.
[15:30.560 --> 15:35.120]  The company likely believes that because no one in the company has ever read the law.
[15:36.080 --> 15:41.040]  How do I know no one at the company has ever read the law? I know that because I've been in
[15:41.040 --> 15:47.280]  this space for three decades and I've spoken to hundreds of company payroll people, HR folks,
[15:47.280 --> 15:54.320]  company executives, and company attorneys. Over three decades, I've never spoken with anyone
[15:54.960 --> 16:02.240]  in any of those positions who has read the law. They will say to your face that they are legally
[16:02.240 --> 16:08.320]  required to withhold. But not one person spouting that dogma has actually read the law,
[16:09.200 --> 16:14.720]  including the company's attorneys. That brings us squarely to the Doctrine of Missing Parts.
[16:15.680 --> 16:22.720]  When what the law really says is shown to them, they shift to rely on the missing parts.
[16:22.720 --> 16:26.480]  They are so desperate to conduct Wage Withholding that they will tell you there's
[16:27.200 --> 16:33.680]  something else somewhere else in the law. My response has always been great. I'm glad to
[16:33.680 --> 16:39.520]  hear that because I'm all about compliance with the law. In fact, this conversation has the
[16:39.520 --> 16:44.480]  objective of ensuring we all comply with the law. I've never seen the other parts of the law you
[16:44.480 --> 16:49.040]  just told me you're relying on, so I'm excited to see them. Can you give me this citation so we can
[16:49.040 --> 16:55.680]  look at it together? But a strange thing happens when I express enthusiasm for seeing the parts
[16:55.680 --> 17:03.040]  of the law they claim exist but haven't been a part of the discussion. They can't provide anything.
[17:03.680 --> 17:08.080]  What the company offers in support of its position appears in the right-hand column
[17:08.080 --> 17:15.840]  of the graphic, which is zero, nothing, bupkis. Let's recap the timeline of how this discussion
[17:15.840 --> 17:22.240]  goes. First, the worker shows the company what the law really says. Second, once the company
[17:22.240 --> 17:27.840]  has shown the law, it says it's relying on other parts of the law, thus unknowingly invoking the
[17:27.840 --> 17:33.840]  doctrine of missing parts. Third, because the company can't provide any law to support its actions
[17:33.840 --> 17:40.080]  quite naturally, logically, and rationally, the worker instructs the company to not withhold from
[17:40.080 --> 17:48.560]  his or her earnings. What happens then? This is when, after the company initially justified
[17:48.560 --> 17:55.040]  withholding as being obedient to the law, the company now does a complete 180 and essentially
[17:55.040 --> 18:02.720]  says, screw the law! Do what we say or you don't work here! Phrased another way. In a hot second,
[18:02.720 --> 18:09.360]  the company goes from characterizing itself as a patriotic participant in American democracy,
[18:09.360 --> 18:14.240]  complying with the will of the American people as expressed in the law through their elected
[18:14.240 --> 18:18.640]  representatives, to being a violent scumbag who doesn't give a shit about America, democracy,
[18:18.640 --> 18:24.880]  personal liberty, or the law. Of course, the truth is, for the company, it was never about the law.
[18:24.880 --> 18:31.760]  It was always about do what we say or we're going to screw you. And to be clear, when they say
[18:31.760 --> 18:40.240]  do what we say, that includes you working there only if you're willing to commit perjury. If the
[18:40.240 --> 18:44.240]  company was committed to obeying the law, once the law was shown to them, they'd say,
[18:44.880 --> 18:50.720]  holy cow, we didn't know that! Thanks for bringing this to our attention. Not only will we not
[18:50.720 --> 18:55.760]  withhold from you, but this is great news because we can forever end the administrative burden of
[18:55.760 --> 19:01.760]  having to do wage withholding on the rest of our workers. No more W-4s, no more 941s, and no more
[19:01.760 --> 19:09.440]  W-2s. This is great! Thank you! Now that we know these companies are low-life, lawless whores,
[19:09.440 --> 19:15.120]  let's you and I get back to discussing the law. Remember when we read 3402 and saw that it didn't
[19:15.120 --> 19:20.960]  disclose which tax was being withheld? It merely said the government entities are to deduct and
[19:20.960 --> 19:27.200]  withhold a tax? Let's get into which tax is being withheld. I want to remind you the Treasury
[19:27.200 --> 19:35.520]  decisions 8734, 8881, and cumulative bulletin 1997-44 all said wage withholding is to be affected
[19:35.520 --> 19:41.760]  upon non-resident aliens receiving U.S. source income. At this point, I want to ask you a question.
[19:42.800 --> 19:48.960]  How many Treasury decisions or additions of the cumulative bulletin do you think instruct
[19:48.960 --> 19:53.520]  businesses to affect wage withholding on Americans earning their own domestic income?
[19:54.560 --> 20:02.080]  If you said zero, you got that number exactly right. In the 111-year history of the income tax
[20:02.080 --> 20:07.520]  and in the 111-year history of Treasury decisions making public the determinations of the
[20:07.520 --> 20:12.640]  Secretary of the Treasury about income tax, not a single Treasury decision has instructed wage
[20:12.640 --> 20:16.400]  withholding to be conducted upon the pay of Americans earning their own domestic income.
[20:17.040 --> 20:24.240]  The first Internal Revenue Bulletin was published in 1919. In the 105-year history of Internal Revenue
[20:24.240 --> 20:29.440]  bulletins, not a single instruction has ever been given to affect wage withholding on the pay of
[20:29.440 --> 20:36.880]  Americans earning their own domestic income. Not one. With that in mind, we return to the question
[20:36.880 --> 20:44.720]  of which tax 3402 means when it says to deduct and withhold a tax. I'm confident you would say
[20:44.720 --> 20:50.400]  a tax is the income tax, and you're right. I'm not going to make this presentation even longer by
[20:50.400 --> 20:54.320]  laying out the evidence of that today. If you'd like to see the statutory connection between
[20:54.320 --> 20:58.720]  wage withholding and income tax, you can find it laid out clearly in Income Tax Shattering the Myths.
[20:59.440 --> 21:05.200]  Let me ask you another question. With 3402 being the command to collect income tax via wage
[21:05.200 --> 21:10.640]  withholding, why do you think it is that in the 111-year history of Treasury decisions and the
[21:10.640 --> 21:16.800]  105-year history of Internal Revenue bulletins, Treasury and IRS have never once instructed anyone
[21:16.800 --> 21:23.440]  to wage withhold from Americans earning their own domestic income? Of course, wage withholding
[21:23.440 --> 21:28.960]  is not the only form of withholding. If you've read Income Tax Shattering the Myths, you know
[21:28.960 --> 21:33.120]  that U.S. citizens and domestic corporations making payments of U.S. source income to foreign
[21:33.120 --> 21:37.760]  persons are required to deduct and withhold income tax before sending the balance to its foreign
[21:37.760 --> 21:46.080]  owners. So what we have is withholding unrelated to wages is to be performed on U.S. source income
[21:46.080 --> 21:52.400]  belonging to a foreign person. You can find that in Chapter 3 of the Code. And withholding is also
[21:52.400 --> 21:57.840]  required on U.S. source income paid to non-resident aliens when the payment is made in the form of
[21:57.840 --> 22:04.400]  wages. I've asked you several questions. Now I want to make a statement. The statement is this.
[22:05.520 --> 22:11.360]  Every single U.S. law that imposes a tax includes a mechanism by which to collect that tax from
[22:11.360 --> 22:20.080]  the persons upon whom it has been imposed. There are zero exceptions to that statement. In 111 years
[22:20.080 --> 22:26.240]  we find the only collection mechanism that exists in income tax law operate exclusively upon U.S.
[22:26.240 --> 22:31.760]  source income belonging to foreign persons. Of course, if you speak to any one of the millions
[22:31.760 --> 22:35.840]  of Americans who have bought the government's income tax propaganda hook, line, and sinker,
[22:36.640 --> 22:42.080]  when you point this out to them, they'll invoke the doctrine of missing parts. They'll say there's
[22:42.080 --> 22:47.920]  something else, somewhere else. But when you ask to see it, they can't provide it. Let's go a step
[22:47.920 --> 22:53.040]  further. When I wrote Income Tax Shattering the Myths almost 15 years ago, I wrote that there are
[22:53.040 --> 22:59.280]  eight treasury decisions saying form 1040 is to be used by non-resident aliens with U.S. source
[22:59.280 --> 23:07.120]  income or the non-resident aliens domestic agent. As a side note, starting in 1962, the tax code
[23:07.120 --> 23:14.320]  refers to a foreign person's domestic agent as a U.S. person. In the year since Income Tax Shattering
[23:14.320 --> 23:20.720]  the Myths was released, two more treasury decisions were located that say 1040 is to be used by
[23:20.720 --> 23:26.000]  non-resident aliens with U.S. source income or their domestic agent. With the addition of those two,
[23:26.000 --> 23:32.480]  we were at 10. Then, just this past week, I was reading through a treasury decision I'd not read
[23:32.480 --> 23:38.480]  before, and there it was again. It reads, the responsible heads, agents, or representatives of
[23:38.480 --> 23:43.600]  non-resident aliens who are in charge of the property owned or businesses carried on within
[23:43.600 --> 23:48.800]  the United States by non-resident aliens shall make full and complete returns of the income therefrom
[23:48.800 --> 23:55.840]  on form 1040 revised and shall pay any and all tax normal and additional assessed upon
[23:55.840 --> 24:05.360]  the set income of such non-resident aliens. So, as of a week ago, we know of 11 treasury decisions
[24:05.360 --> 24:10.480]  saying form 1040 is to be used by non-resident aliens with U.S. source income or the non-resident
[24:10.480 --> 24:16.320]  aliens domestic agent. I'm sure you'd know the answer if I asked you how many treasury decisions
[24:16.320 --> 24:22.640]  in the last 111 years say form 1040 is to be used by Americans earning their own domestic income.
[24:22.640 --> 24:29.200]  The answer, of course, is zero. Yet, if you asked the ordinary American to explain why they file
[24:29.200 --> 24:35.920]  a 1040 every year in light of the fact that the secretary of the treasury says it is only to be
[24:35.920 --> 24:41.840]  used by a non-resident alien or his domestic agent, they would invoke the doctrine of missing parts.
[24:41.840 --> 24:47.680]  They'd say there's something else somewhere else. And again, when you ask to see the missing parts,
[24:48.560 --> 24:54.560]  they can't provide anything. We've covered a lot of grounds, so let's recap. Point one,
[24:54.560 --> 24:59.360]  there are several authoritative documents from the treasury department and IRS saying wage
[24:59.360 --> 25:04.400]  withholding is to be conducted on non-resident aliens receiving U.S. source income in the form
[25:04.400 --> 25:10.960]  of wages. Point two, there are zero authoritative documents from the treasury department and the IRS
[25:10.960 --> 25:16.080]  saying wage withholding is to be performed upon anyone other than non-resident aliens receiving
[25:16.080 --> 25:22.480]  U.S. source income in the form of wages. Point three, a form W-4 is only to be submitted to a
[25:22.480 --> 25:27.920]  government entity under the exclusive legislative jurisdiction of Congress by a non-resident alien
[25:27.920 --> 25:34.400]  in the employ of the government entity. Point four, a form W-2 is only to be issued by a government
[25:34.400 --> 25:39.440]  entity under the exclusive legislative jurisdiction of Congress showing the wages paid to and the
[25:39.440 --> 25:45.360]  amount withheld from a non-resident alien employee of the government entity. Point five,
[25:45.360 --> 25:50.080]  when these legal realities are brought up to a company by a worker, the company invokes the
[25:50.080 --> 25:57.360]  doctrine of missing parts. Point six, when the worker asks to see the missing parts, the company
[25:57.360 --> 26:02.880]  becomes the embodiment of evil, threatening to not hire you or fire you if you already work there
[26:03.440 --> 26:09.920]  if you insist the company comply with the law. Point seven, because the company has the power
[26:09.920 --> 26:13.840]  to prevent workers from earning the money they need to feed themselves or their children,
[26:14.400 --> 26:20.640]  it exercises upon the worker what the law calls undue influence. The definition of undue influence
[26:20.640 --> 26:27.200]  is influence by which a person is induced to act otherwise than by their own free will or without
[26:27.200 --> 26:34.080]  adequate attention to the consequences. Point eight, exercising its undue influence, the company
[26:34.080 --> 26:39.520]  commits a felony known as subordination of perjury by pressuring the worker to execute a form W-4
[26:39.520 --> 26:45.280]  even though the worker has already told the company it would be perjurious for the worker to sign it.
[26:45.920 --> 26:51.840]  Point nine, there are 11 treasury decisions saying a form 1040 is to be used by a non-resident alien
[26:51.840 --> 26:59.360]  with U.S. source income or the non-resident alien's domestic agent. Point 10, in the 111-year history
[26:59.360 --> 27:05.200]  of the income tax and treasury decisions concerning the income tax, no treasury decision exists saying
[27:05.200 --> 27:12.560]  any American earning his own domestic income should file any federal tax form, which includes
[27:12.560 --> 27:20.560]  the 1040, of course. So what does that recap tell us? Well, it should tell a thinking person
[27:20.560 --> 27:26.400]  that income tax is not what the American people have been brainwashed to believe it is. If it
[27:26.400 --> 27:33.440]  is not what the public believes it to be, then what is it? You'll find all the evidence anyone
[27:33.440 --> 27:37.760]  could ever want to prove the truth of the income tax in Income Tax Shattering the Mist, but for
[27:37.760 --> 27:45.680]  today I'll simply say the reason the only collection mechanisms are to obtain the tax from foreign
[27:45.680 --> 27:53.520]  persons is because, in terms of receiving U.S. source income, the only people who owe the tax are
[27:54.240 --> 28:03.040]  foreigners. Now, let's discuss suing the company for its actions. This needs to happen on a national
[28:03.040 --> 28:07.360]  scale. Eventually, it should be a class action filed against many of the largest corporations
[28:07.360 --> 28:13.600]  in America, but we're not there yet. Several weeks ago, I spoke with an attorney in Los Angeles.
[28:13.600 --> 28:18.400]  Once he understood the dynamics of what's been going on, he became really enthusiastic about
[28:18.400 --> 28:23.120]  going after one of these companies. In fact, during our call, he laid out the best way to
[28:23.120 --> 28:29.680]  go after them to receive the largest judgment possible from a jury. We also discussed that if
[28:29.680 --> 28:34.560]  the worker has the entire interaction with the company properly documented, the company will
[28:34.560 --> 28:40.160]  have no choice but to settle because the law is so crystal clear they have no meaningful defense.
[28:41.040 --> 28:45.600]  Once the word spreads throughout the community of civil litigators that these suits are fast,
[28:45.600 --> 28:52.000]  easy, and lucrative, the number of these cases will explode. How long do you imagine companies
[28:52.000 --> 28:56.480]  will keep insisting on W-4s and wage withholding once they begin getting hit with judgments
[28:56.480 --> 29:04.960]  in the hundreds of thousands of dollars that their insurance policy won't cover? As exciting as that
[29:04.960 --> 29:10.800]  is, there are necessary steps to lay the legal foundation for a successful suit. If you live in
[29:10.800 --> 29:16.400]  the L.A. area and have an interest in suing a company that is taking such actions, email me at
[29:16.400 --> 29:23.200]  dave at drreality.news. And remember, the attorney's compensation comes out of the judgment,
[29:23.840 --> 29:30.640]  not out of your pocket. If you want to know all the facts and law that indisputably prove Congress
[29:30.640 --> 29:34.880]  never imposed the income tax on Americans earning their own domestic income, grab a copy of
[29:34.880 --> 29:42.080]  Income Tax Shattering the Miss at drreality.news. While you're there, also pick up a copy of Body
[29:42.080 --> 29:49.120]  Science. In Body Science, I take apart 60 years of disinformation concerning human physiology,
[29:49.120 --> 29:53.040]  just like I take apart the government's income tax lies in Income Tax Shattering the Miss.
[29:54.160 --> 30:01.040]  Are you aware that America is the most ill society in the world? Not only that, but Americans are the
[30:01.040 --> 30:07.360]  sickest people in all of human history. Why do you think that is? That situation exists because
[30:07.360 --> 30:11.920]  Americans have been lied to about how human physiology works, just as they've been lied to
[30:11.920 --> 30:16.480]  about who owes the income tax. And when it comes to health and physiology, the American people do
[30:16.480 --> 30:24.400]  the same things they do concerning the income tax. They overwhelmingly believe whatever the authorities
[30:24.400 --> 30:32.240]  tell them. Americans tend to think quite well of themselves. In fact, I'd say they believe they are
[30:32.240 --> 30:38.320]  a cut above those who are not Americans. Now, don't get me wrong, I'm all about thinking well
[30:38.320 --> 30:44.640]  of oneself, but I believe that should be merit based. Because I believe it should be merit based,
[30:44.640 --> 30:49.760]  I have to scratch my head when people who have been lied to incessantly by their government
[30:49.760 --> 30:56.720]  and trillion dollar industries for decades still believe whatever the authorities tell them.
[30:58.240 --> 31:04.320]  Should folks who still buy the establishment's bullshit think well of themselves? But of course,
[31:04.320 --> 31:08.800]  when I speak of people continuing to buy the establishment's bullshit, I'm not talking about
[31:08.800 --> 31:15.920]  you because you've learned about the government's big income tax lie and exited the scam. Right?
[31:16.880 --> 31:20.720]  You've read Income Tax Shattering the Mist, so you know how the government has
[31:20.720 --> 31:27.520]  pulled its scam and how you can safely walk away. Right? I'm not talking about you
[31:27.520 --> 31:31.040]  because you've read body science, put into action what you've learned,
[31:31.040 --> 31:37.280]  and have become lean, fit, and incredibly healthy. Right? Do you know that the U.S.
[31:37.280 --> 31:43.520]  government and trillion dollar industries in the U.S. absolutely love people who don't read Income
[31:43.520 --> 31:49.120]  Tax Shattering the Mist and body science because they love people who willingly allow themselves
[31:49.120 --> 31:54.640]  to be uninformed marks for the establishment's scams. If you're tired of being a willing mark
[31:54.640 --> 31:59.440]  for the scumbags running these cons, may I suggest reading Income Tax Shattering the Mist
[31:59.440 --> 32:06.800]  and body science? You can get them at drreality.news. Not only will they change your life,
[32:06.800 --> 32:11.520]  but by purchasing Income Tax Shattering the Mist and body science, you will be helping me to continue
[32:11.520 --> 32:16.400]  to be here for you with these revealing and thought-provoking presentations. As I close,
[32:16.400 --> 32:22.240]  a reminder, please share this video far and wide so our fellow Americans can learn the truth.
[32:22.240 --> 32:30.240]  Thank you for being here.