Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language Detected language: English [00:00.000 --> 00:02.340] I'm Dave Champion. [00:02.340 --> 00:06.840] Just yesterday, as I'm sitting here making this video, I released a video in which I [00:06.840 --> 00:13.440] broke down the elements of the latest CDC report concerning wearing of masks. [00:13.440 --> 00:16.440] And I went into the whole thing about what the framework was and the demographics and [00:16.440 --> 00:23.320] what the statistics showed and rejected, by the way, the erroneous conclusions spread [00:23.320 --> 00:24.880] all over social media. [00:24.880 --> 00:31.000] And I pointed out that those conclusions were erroneous, and I pointed out what the factual [00:31.000 --> 00:33.040] conclusions were. [00:33.040 --> 00:39.840] Then somebody who follows the Dr. Reality page attempted to share that video. [00:39.840 --> 00:43.560] This is when we get to Facebook fact checkers. [00:43.560 --> 00:55.200] Let's take a quick look at the thumbnail for that video yesterday. [00:55.200 --> 00:56.840] Here you can see it. [00:56.840 --> 01:03.560] And you can see this either on the Dr. Reality Dave Champion Facebook page or on my YouTube [01:03.560 --> 01:04.560] channel. [01:04.560 --> 01:13.200] I want to remind you, I rejected the whole social media nonsense, erroneous conclusions [01:13.320 --> 01:14.440] that are spreading far and wide. [01:14.440 --> 01:18.800] I rejected those. [01:18.800 --> 01:20.080] Facebook didn't care. [01:20.080 --> 01:25.520] The fact that I rejected what was non-factual and I said, here's the only part of this that's [01:25.520 --> 01:29.920] actually factual based on the data, not based on social media nonsense. [01:29.920 --> 01:32.600] Looking at the study, here's the only part that's relevant. [01:32.600 --> 01:40.120] Nevertheless, Facebook put this in front of the video when a person attempted to share [01:40.120 --> 01:41.120] the video. [01:41.240 --> 01:46.600] I want to draw your attention right here where it says, mask use does not lead to a higher [01:46.600 --> 01:48.640] risk of COVID-19. [01:48.640 --> 01:49.640] Right? [01:49.640 --> 01:50.640] And? [01:50.640 --> 01:56.040] I never said that in the video, ever. [01:56.040 --> 02:05.600] Then I wonder, is it possible that Facebook fact checkers, even to this day, remain so [02:05.600 --> 02:16.240] incredibly off the charts ignorant that they think SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 are the same [02:16.240 --> 02:17.240] thing? [02:17.240 --> 02:23.080] Of course, if you've been following my videos or reading any science, you know that SARS-CoV-2 [02:23.080 --> 02:27.200] is the technical designation for a virus. [02:27.200 --> 02:34.760] And of course, COVID-19 is the disease that virus causes in some people. [02:34.760 --> 02:41.560] It's really simple stuff, unless perhaps you're a Facebook fact checker. [02:41.560 --> 02:46.720] Furthermore, in that video that the person was trying to share when that graphic popped [02:46.720 --> 02:55.360] up, I never mentioned COVID-19, ever, even once. [02:55.360 --> 03:00.440] And even though I say that the false stuff is false, Facebook fact checkers still, when [03:00.440 --> 03:03.640] I say, okay, this is false and this is true, no. [03:03.640 --> 03:06.240] Even though you said this is false, you're still lying, Dave. [03:06.240 --> 03:13.400] Okay, so one of the authors of that CDC study, a Vanderbilt School of Medicine associate [03:13.400 --> 03:19.760] professor, Wesley Self, said, we are not aware of any of our data showing that wearing a [03:19.760 --> 03:23.360] mask increases the risk for COVID-19. [03:23.360 --> 03:25.560] Yeah. [03:25.560 --> 03:30.040] And I agree with Professor Self, 100%. [03:30.040 --> 03:37.240] There was nothing in that CDC report that would say anything about the disease called [03:37.240 --> 03:39.080] COVID-19. [03:39.080 --> 03:43.960] What the CDC report did show, I mean, it's statistical. [03:43.960 --> 03:50.920] You can't argue against it, is that whether you wear a mask or whether you don't, your [03:50.920 --> 03:59.000] odds of being infected with the virus designated by science to SARS-CoV-2 is virtually identical. [03:59.000 --> 04:04.440] Whether you get COVID-19 is an entirely separate question, not addressed in my video. [04:04.440 --> 04:05.440] Why? [04:05.440 --> 04:08.160] Because it wasn't addressed in the CDC report. [04:08.160 --> 04:12.120] But none of that matters to Facebook fact checkers, because for them it's all about [04:12.120 --> 04:13.400] the emotion. [04:13.400 --> 04:19.600] They see a video and they say, you know, I don't like that data the champion presented [04:19.760 --> 04:22.640] and the conclusions that that data inexorably leads to. [04:22.640 --> 04:24.120] I don't feel good about that. [04:24.120 --> 04:29.280] I don't like where that message is taking the rational mind. [04:29.280 --> 04:37.120] So even though champion didn't say a single thing that was false, false! [04:37.120 --> 04:43.320] I think there are all sorts of issues, problems, concerns about fact checking in general on [04:43.320 --> 04:45.440] social media platforms. [04:45.440 --> 04:52.800] But I think the biggest problem is there is zero accountability, as many people have [04:52.800 --> 04:55.880] phrased it, who's fact checking the fact checkers. [04:55.880 --> 05:01.640] I mean, honestly, this is a soft version of what's happening in communist China. [05:01.640 --> 05:07.440] Somebody is saying, I find that speech unacceptable. [05:07.440 --> 05:12.280] And then they're trying to suppress it, leaving aside whether platforms like Twitter [05:12.520 --> 05:17.000] and Facebook and so forth should be engaged in this sort of conduct. [05:17.000 --> 05:22.760] I think the more immediate question, the more immediate concern is how it's being done. [05:22.760 --> 05:25.220] As I mentioned, there's no accountability. [05:25.220 --> 05:30.800] In my case, as an example, what I actually really said in the video is irrelevant to [05:30.800 --> 05:37.240] the Facebook fact checkers, because it's all about how the data lines up and the conclusions [05:37.440 --> 05:44.040] it leads to rationally and how the Facebook fact checker feels about that. [05:44.040 --> 05:45.040] I don't like that. [05:45.040 --> 05:46.360] I don't like that message. [05:46.360 --> 05:48.960] I don't like the conclusions that data leads to. [05:48.960 --> 05:53.160] So ha, false, false, ha! [05:53.160 --> 06:00.760] I'm waiting for one of the people who've been intimately involved in fact checking on social [06:00.760 --> 06:06.560] media websites to become a whistleblower, to step out and write a book or series of [06:06.560 --> 06:15.840] articles in which they detail how absolutely corrupt the fact checking process is. [06:15.840 --> 06:23.240] In the documentary Social Dilemma, a lot of former engineers and code writers and executives [06:23.240 --> 06:28.080] from social media companies, Twitter and Facebook, they talk about the truth, what's going on [06:28.080 --> 06:29.080] behind the scenes. [06:29.080 --> 06:33.200] But unfortunately, they've been out of that industry for years. [06:33.280 --> 06:38.520] I'm hoping somebody who's involved intimately in the fact checking process comes out a lot [06:38.520 --> 06:45.320] sooner than that so that America gets to see the corruption, the obscene way the fact checking [06:45.320 --> 06:53.160] is being done, and as if it's virtuous, when it's a bunch of crap, it's a bunch of lies. [06:53.160 --> 06:59.640] Facebook fact checkers are thought to be so non-credible that people frequently comment [06:59.640 --> 07:05.120] and they say, the minute I see Facebook fact checkers saying something is false or misleading, [07:05.120 --> 07:08.320] I immediately assume that it's factual. [07:08.320 --> 07:14.080] So yeah, I think that's the only way to rationally approach the obscene corrupt process of fact [07:14.080 --> 07:19.760] checking as it exists today, is to assume the minute you see them flag something as [07:19.760 --> 07:28.200] false or misleading, that they're just trying to defend or support a false establishment [07:28.200 --> 07:34.680] narrative and to presume, I mean, always research, but to presume if Facebook fact [07:34.680 --> 07:39.640] checkers say it's false, to begin with the presumption, okay, odds are it's true. [07:39.640 --> 07:44.880] Now you might think that this is as bad as it gets and it's not. [07:44.880 --> 07:51.200] If you've been following me for some time, you probably know there is a website, DrReality.News, [07:51.200 --> 07:53.720] that sells my books. [07:53.720 --> 07:55.320] That's all the site does. [07:55.320 --> 07:58.600] It just sells books. [07:58.600 --> 08:01.800] There is no blog. [08:01.800 --> 08:04.480] There are no videos. [08:04.480 --> 08:06.720] There's nothing like this. [08:06.720 --> 08:09.400] You simply go to the website. [08:09.400 --> 08:11.160] You see products. [08:11.160 --> 08:16.920] If you want, you can click on the button that says to put them in the cart. [08:16.920 --> 08:18.340] That's it. [08:18.340 --> 08:23.000] So I was on the busy Keto Life page, which is one of my professional pages for people [08:23.000 --> 08:31.120] who want to follow keto, and I posted something about the book Body Science. [08:31.120 --> 08:35.360] Nothing about mask wearing, nothing like, I mean, not even remotely, right? [08:35.360 --> 08:40.200] People who want to be in ketosis and wearing masks in the middle of an outbreak, that's [08:40.200 --> 08:41.200] right. [08:41.200 --> 08:42.660] They're not connected at all. [08:42.660 --> 08:47.080] So the post was totally unrelated to any of that garbage. [08:47.080 --> 08:51.240] It was something about physiology and diet and nutrition and if you want to learn more, [08:51.240 --> 08:52.560] go to Body Science. [08:52.560 --> 08:58.880] And I put the link in, DrReality.News, whatever it is, forward slash Body Science, I put the [08:58.880 --> 09:06.480] link in and I think there was a Facebook screw-up because that's my page, right, so as the creator, [09:06.480 --> 09:09.680] they don't tell me it's false information. [09:09.680 --> 09:16.860] But there was a screw-up and suddenly this screen comes up and tells me this page promotes [09:16.860 --> 09:18.360] false information. [09:18.360 --> 09:22.280] And do you know what the specific false information was that it listed? [09:22.800 --> 09:27.000] Yeah, some nonsense about wearing masks. [09:27.000 --> 09:31.480] There is not a single thing on DrReality.News about wearing masks, nothing. [09:31.480 --> 09:35.520] I mean, like I said, there's no blog, there's no videos, you just go there, you look at [09:35.520 --> 09:40.120] images of products and if you want one, you click to put it in the cart and off you go. [09:40.120 --> 09:45.960] And yet Facebook was putting up a cautionary, this is false and misleading information flag [09:45.960 --> 09:55.720] about mask wearing concerning a website for which there is absolutely zero content pertaining [09:55.720 --> 10:01.520] to SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, mask wearing, mitigation, zero. [10:01.520 --> 10:07.520] So speaking of DrReality.News, in contrast to things like Facebook and Twitter, if you [10:07.520 --> 10:14.200] want to go someplace where there is no censorship and you can get real, honest, hard, core facts, [10:14.200 --> 10:18.200] whether it's about physiology, whether it's about the law, explained in a way that everybody [10:18.200 --> 10:23.480] can understand and companies like Facebook, they can't do a thing to stop you from getting [10:23.480 --> 10:24.480] it. [10:24.480 --> 10:30.480] Yeah, go to DrReality.News, purchase one or more of the books and have a great time learning [10:30.480 --> 10:37.040] reality without having people like fact-checkers try to stop you from learning the truth.