Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language
Detected language: English
[00:00.000 --> 00:05.080]  I'm Dave Champion. Let's talk about Dr. Anthony Fauci. It seems like people have
[00:05.080 --> 00:10.640]  one of two views. Either they utterly revere him or they think he's a pretty
[00:10.640 --> 00:16.140]  rotten guy. And he's made some controversial statements lately where he
[00:16.140 --> 00:24.220]  admitted that he was moving the bar concerning the percentage of the
[00:24.220 --> 00:30.900]  population that needs to have immunity in order to achieve herd immunity. He
[00:30.900 --> 00:35.140]  readily admitted that he's been moving those numbers all around because he
[00:35.140 --> 00:50.020]  wanted to. What Fauci is really good at is administration of his particular part
[00:50.020 --> 00:54.180]  of the agency, the National Institutes of Health, which deals in addition to
[00:54.180 --> 00:58.380]  allergies deals spot-on. This is very important. It's not like tangential.
[00:58.380 --> 01:04.060]  Infectious disease is Fauci's wheelhouse. I think it's really important to
[01:04.060 --> 01:07.460]  understand that he has been the director, not just somebody working in the
[01:07.460 --> 01:12.300]  organization, he's been the director of the National Institute of Allergy and
[01:12.300 --> 01:19.380]  Infectious Disease within the National Institutes of Health for 34 years. In a
[01:19.380 --> 01:22.140]  recent interview in the New York Times, Fauci admitted that he started talking
[01:22.380 --> 01:30.900]  about herd immunity in terms of 70 to 75 percent of the population. Then a little
[01:30.900 --> 01:37.380]  later he started talking about herd immunity in terms of 80 to 85 percent. And
[01:37.380 --> 01:43.500]  more recently he started talking about it in terms of 90 percent. He's justified
[01:43.500 --> 01:48.660]  this constant moving of the goalpost on the percentage of the population that's
[01:48.660 --> 01:53.060]  required to be immune to reach herd immunity. He said based on three things.
[01:53.060 --> 02:01.300]  Polling on the views of the American public concerning the vaccine. What? So
[02:01.300 --> 02:07.300]  based on what polling results show, he just changes the numbers around. Secondly,
[02:07.300 --> 02:11.660]  his defenders have said, Fauci himself did not say this, his defenders have said
[02:11.660 --> 02:16.300]  he's changed the number based on new science. Okay, that's a lie. There is no
[02:16.300 --> 02:20.060]  new science concerning what percentage of the population needs to be infected
[02:20.060 --> 02:24.900]  with the SARS-CoV-2 virus to achieve herd immunity. There is no new science.
[02:24.900 --> 02:32.300]  And lastly, Fauci said that he moved the numbers around based on his gut instinct
[02:32.300 --> 02:38.540]  on what the American people were willing to hear at any particular time. Okay, so
[02:38.540 --> 02:47.100]  for those who revere Fauci, I hope you will admit he has essentially come right
[02:47.100 --> 02:55.020]  out and said, I lied, okay. I knew that 70 or 75 percent was not accurate. I knew
[02:55.020 --> 02:59.860]  that 80 or 85 percent was not accurate. Now I'm saying 90 percent because I'm
[02:59.860 --> 03:04.740]  now telling you that I know that. But he's not even saying that, okay. So while
[03:04.740 --> 03:09.380]  he's issued all these numbers in an admission of the truth, he said we have to
[03:09.380 --> 03:16.300]  show some humility because we really don't know. And that is the actual truth.
[03:16.300 --> 03:19.420]  Whether somebody's throwing around numbers as some researchers did months
[03:19.420 --> 03:23.420]  and months and months ago, they threw out numbers that potentially as low as 25
[03:23.420 --> 03:27.660]  percent infection rate could produce herd immunity with this specific virus.
[03:27.660 --> 03:33.220]  And clearly they were mistaken. And so now Fauci comes along and he says 70 to 75
[03:33.220 --> 03:38.740]  percent, 80 to 85 percent, 90 percent on whatever day he changes his numbers
[03:38.740 --> 03:43.780]  around. And he doesn't know either. And here's why. And please do look this up
[03:43.780 --> 03:51.500]  for yourself. Don't believe me. There is absolutely zero way to know or even
[03:51.500 --> 03:56.900]  credibly guesstimate what the percentage is that will achieve herd immunity with
[03:56.900 --> 04:02.620]  any particular virus because the peculiarities or the particularities of
[04:02.740 --> 04:09.340]  a given virus dictate when or what the threshold is when comprehensive herd
[04:09.340 --> 04:15.380]  immunity has been reached. And that is absolutely one hundred percent.
[04:15.380 --> 04:24.220]  I want to repeat that again. Absolutely one hundred percent unknowable until it
[04:24.220 --> 04:31.180]  has occurred. That is the scientific reality. So these researchers that many,
[04:31.220 --> 04:34.860]  many months ago said it could be as low as 25 percent. When I spoke to you about
[04:34.860 --> 04:39.740]  that back then, I said that's speculative. They really don't know. When Fauci said
[04:39.740 --> 04:42.940]  it's going to be 70 or 75 percent, he didn't come out and say, but I don't
[04:42.940 --> 04:46.860]  really know. When he said 80 to 85 percent, he didn't come out and say, I
[04:46.860 --> 04:51.300]  don't really know. When he said 90 percent, he didn't add, but I don't really
[04:51.300 --> 04:55.980]  know. Only when he was pressed by the reporters about the science did he say,
[04:55.980 --> 05:03.460]  well, we don't actually really know. So for those who revere Fauci, I hope they
[05:03.460 --> 05:11.820]  will acknowledge that he just straight up lied to the entire country repeatedly.
[05:12.140 --> 05:16.140]  Now, I said that I have a different view of Fauci than maybe some others do.
[05:16.740 --> 05:24.540]  And here's why. Fauci is a really talented administrator, which is why he
[05:24.540 --> 05:28.820]  spent 35 years in charge of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
[05:28.820 --> 05:32.460]  Disease in the National Institutes of Health. And he's 80, right? You don't
[05:32.460 --> 05:37.500]  hold on to a position for 34 years and hang out there unless you're really,
[05:37.660 --> 05:41.620]  really good at administration. I don't believe he's a particularly good
[05:41.620 --> 05:46.180]  scientist, by the way, and there's some evidence to indicate that in his past.
[05:46.500 --> 05:50.420]  But he is a bang up administrator. So I think it's really important when we talk
[05:50.420 --> 05:52.860]  about the fact that he's a bang up administrator. I think it's really
[05:52.860 --> 05:56.820]  important to look at what that means in terms of the National Institutes of
[05:56.820 --> 06:03.100]  Health and its connection to big pharma. And I think the average American
[06:03.100 --> 06:07.380]  presumes you've got for profit pharmaceutical companies over here.
[06:08.620 --> 06:13.100]  And then you've got taxpayer funded National Institutes of Health over here.
[06:13.700 --> 06:18.100]  And they conduct research and they conduct research and never the two shall
[06:18.100 --> 06:22.740]  meet because one is for profit and the other is taxpayer funded. If that's
[06:22.740 --> 06:28.020]  what you believe, you could not be more wrong. The National Institutes of
[06:28.020 --> 06:33.100]  Health uses your money, the taxpayer money paid by the American people in
[06:33.100 --> 06:37.940]  all sorts of different federal taxes. They use that money to conduct all
[06:37.940 --> 06:43.620]  sorts of research, including into things like vaccines. Then they take the
[06:43.620 --> 06:48.020]  results. I'm not kidding. I think this is going to shock a lot of people, which
[06:48.020 --> 06:50.500]  is why I say I'm not kidding you, because I think people are gonna be like,
[06:50.500 --> 06:57.020]  that can't be true. And it is. National Institutes of Health take the results of
[06:57.020 --> 07:03.100]  millions and millions and millions of dollars of taxpayer funded research.
[07:06.940 --> 07:13.060]  And they hand it to for profit, big pharma companies, who then go a bit
[07:13.060 --> 07:18.140]  further with the research. They patent drugs, then they build the hell out of
[07:18.140 --> 07:22.860]  you for it. When a goodly part of the research that was done was done
[07:22.860 --> 07:27.860]  originally on your dime. And for the purpose of this presentation, I am not
[07:27.860 --> 07:31.940]  condemning that process. You may. And I made another video, but I'm not
[07:31.940 --> 07:35.940]  condemning it today. The reason I share that with you today is to point out that
[07:35.940 --> 07:42.260]  Fauci and big pharma, they're like this. When Fauci was saying at one point, it
[07:42.260 --> 07:47.700]  was 70 75%, then another point 80 85, then another point 90. What he's doing
[07:47.700 --> 07:52.860]  is he's feathering big pharma's bed to make billions and billions and billions
[07:52.860 --> 07:59.620]  of dollars off the vaccine. Fauci even said back in November, that even if
[07:59.620 --> 08:04.100]  you've had the virus, you know, you had the test, right? Or maybe you didn't have
[08:04.100 --> 08:08.460]  the PCR test, but you had the serology test later. So you know, you've got the
[08:08.460 --> 08:12.860]  antibodies. Fauci said, It doesn't matter. If you know you've had SARS
[08:13.580 --> 08:19.820]  and recovered, you should just take the vaccine anyway. Now, it's important to
[08:19.820 --> 08:25.300]  keep in mind that the vaccine doesn't do anything special. The vaccine tickles
[08:25.300 --> 08:32.100]  your body to create the same exact antibodies as if you had the virus and
[08:32.100 --> 08:34.900]  recovered. It doesn't do anything special or different doesn't create a
[08:34.900 --> 08:39.140]  whole different set of antibodies. It tickles your body to create those very
[08:39.180 --> 08:43.060]  same antibodies. So Fauci is saying if you want to talk about if you want to
[08:43.060 --> 08:46.660]  understand Fauci's connection to the profits of big pharma, take a look at the
[08:46.660 --> 08:51.380]  fact that if you have the virus and you recover, thus you have the same exact
[08:51.380 --> 08:56.420]  antibodies, as if you get the vaccine, you should take the vaccine anyway. Well,
[08:56.420 --> 09:02.860]  of course, because Fauci is totally invested in the profits of big pharma. I
[09:02.860 --> 09:06.460]  don't mean he's invested like a shareholder. I'm sure the arrangements
[09:06.460 --> 09:12.740]  are much more circumspect than that. Nevertheless, his job isn't to look out
[09:12.740 --> 09:17.220]  for you. His job is to look out for the profits of big pharma and all the stuff
[09:17.220 --> 09:20.900]  where he's changed the numbers. That's all about that. Along the same line of
[09:20.900 --> 09:25.780]  Fauci and his behavior, his conduct, I want to share with you a tweet by
[09:25.800 --> 09:32.460]  Senator Marco Rubio, who said, Dr. Fauci lied about masks in March. Dr. Fauci
[09:32.460 --> 09:36.820]  has been distorting the level of vaccination needed for herd immunity. It
[09:36.820 --> 09:41.300]  isn't just him. Many in elite bubbles believe the American public doesn't
[09:41.300 --> 09:46.620]  know what's good for them. So they need to be tricked into doing the right
[09:46.620 --> 09:52.140]  thing. Rubio's tweet is part accurate and part inaccurate. The accurate part
[09:52.140 --> 09:56.080]  is yes, these people like Fauci and others in the elite group, they do
[09:56.080 --> 10:02.320]  believe you're absolutely morons. And therefore they have to trick you into
[10:02.400 --> 10:08.040]  doing what they believe is the right thing for you to be doing. That's
[10:08.040 --> 10:11.680]  evidenced by Fauci. Just since we're talking about Fauci, that's evident by
[10:11.680 --> 10:16.560]  Fauci with his 70 75 one day 80 85 this couple weeks later, 90% a couple weeks
[10:16.560 --> 10:20.620]  later, and obviously they can all be true. So he straight up lie. A part of
[10:20.620 --> 10:25.880]  Rubio's tweet that is inaccurate is that Fauci lied back in March about
[10:25.880 --> 10:32.800]  masks. What Rubio is talking about is back on March 8 2020. Fauci said, and I'm
[10:32.920 --> 10:35.880]  this is damn near a quote, I'm paraphrasing, but it's probably just if
[10:35.920 --> 10:40.260]  it's either a quote or a word or two off. There's no reason for anybody to be
[10:40.260 --> 10:45.320]  walking around with a mask. Okay, that that was his statement on March 8 2020,
[10:45.880 --> 10:53.080]  which Rubio is saying he lied. No, he told the truth then. And then later he
[10:53.080 --> 10:56.640]  reversed himself and lied and said, Oh, yeah, masks work. Everybody should wear
[10:56.640 --> 10:59.680]  a mask. Now, let me support for a moment the statement that he was telling the
[10:59.680 --> 11:08.920]  truth in the first place. Okay. As of March 2020, Fauci had again, not just
[11:08.920 --> 11:13.920]  been some guy in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease in the
[11:13.920 --> 11:21.880]  National Institutes of Health, he had been the director for 34 years, dealing
[11:21.880 --> 11:26.920]  with all manner of contagions, including viruses and including specifically
[11:26.920 --> 11:34.840]  Coronavirus, right? As such, when Fauci says after 34 years overseeing research
[11:34.840 --> 11:39.800]  and laboratory work and so forth on viruses and which to include the
[11:39.800 --> 11:44.040]  Coronavirus, and he comes out and says there's no reason for anybody to be
[11:44.040 --> 11:50.120]  wearing a mask. That's 34 years of his experience. But then the politics kick
[11:51.080 --> 11:56.920]  in, then the official establishment narrative becomes, you must be obedient,
[11:57.200 --> 12:04.840]  you must wear a mask to show that you show allegiance to the establishment, to
[12:04.840 --> 12:08.720]  the government, to the narrative, even if it's absurd, you're going to show
[12:08.720 --> 12:11.520]  allegiance to it, you're going to be obedient, you're going to be submissive.
[12:11.720 --> 12:16.800]  Once the establishment put out that narrative, then Fauci turned around and
[12:16.800 --> 12:22.080]  reversed 34 years of his personal experience that said there's no reason
[12:22.080 --> 12:26.680]  for anybody to be wearing a mask because he knows it doesn't work. He changed 34,
[12:27.040 --> 12:32.560]  he changed his position based on 34 years of experience based on a political
[12:32.560 --> 12:37.200]  narrative. So while Rubio got the one part right, he got the other part wrong.
[12:37.560 --> 12:40.960]  Fauci is a complex character. I think whether you're on YouTube watching
[12:40.960 --> 12:43.960]  something he said months ago, or you're seeing him on the news today, he's
[12:43.960 --> 12:45.960]  going to be part of the Biden administration. I think he's going to be
[12:45.960 --> 12:50.120]  like the chief medical advisor for SARS-CoV-2, something like that.
[12:50.200 --> 12:54.040]  Okay, so you're going to continue to see Fauci and to hear from Fauci.
[12:54.040 --> 12:58.120]  So I think the very best way to look at this objectively and realistically,
[12:58.120 --> 13:04.320]  when you see Fauci or you read something he said, to recognize that he's Big
[13:04.320 --> 13:08.320]  Pharma's man in terms of SARS-CoV-2, it's all about the billions and billions
[13:08.320 --> 13:13.280]  and billions of dollars in profit from the vaccine. I'm not condemning Fauci.
[13:13.320 --> 13:16.280]  I'm simply saying that that's who he is. That's what he's about.
[13:16.880 --> 13:22.360]  Wouldn't it be better if instead of revering him or reviling him, wouldn't it
[13:22.360 --> 13:25.840]  be better if we just understood who he is and what he's doing?