Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language
Detected language: English
[00:00.000 --> 00:06.300]  I'm Dave Champion. You may be aware that six states have now ended their
[00:06.300 --> 00:11.440]  statewide mask mandates. I've already covered North Dakota in a previous video
[00:11.440 --> 00:17.120]  and I told you at that time that when Iowa reached 21 days or more, I would
[00:17.120 --> 00:20.840]  review what's going on in the state of Iowa in light of the fact that they have
[00:20.840 --> 00:22.640]  removed their mask mandate.
[00:22.640 --> 00:34.640]  As I'm sitting here talking to you today, Iowa has not had a state mask mandate in
[00:34.640 --> 00:38.520]  more than a month. So let's take a look at the data and as you know, if you had
[00:38.520 --> 00:42.600]  followed me for any length of time, I like the graphs that help you visualize
[00:42.600 --> 00:46.760]  what the data actually shows. And that's exactly what you're looking at here, a
[00:46.760 --> 00:51.760]  graph from the data of the state of Iowa. Now you'll notice the vertical
[00:51.880 --> 00:58.720]  black line. That's January 18th when Iowa's mask mandate stopped. To the
[00:58.720 --> 01:04.160]  right, the green line is February 20th. I stopped there for a reason. I'll
[01:04.160 --> 01:10.200]  explain that in a moment. But this represents obviously more than a month.
[01:10.800 --> 01:16.960]  And what do you see in the trajectory? Iowa has not had a mask mandate in more
[01:17.000 --> 01:23.120]  than a month as per the green line. You see any change in the downward trajectory
[01:23.120 --> 01:28.480]  of new daily infections in the state of Iowa? That would be no. We're gonna see
[01:28.480 --> 01:33.120]  this in all the states and I'll show you as they hit 21 days or more. And at the
[01:33.120 --> 01:37.600]  end of this video, I'm gonna explain why that's a very, very problematic
[01:37.920 --> 01:43.240]  construct for the establishment. But I said that I stopped on the 20th of
[01:43.240 --> 01:48.720]  February on that graph, that green line. Why did I do that? To answer that, let's
[01:48.720 --> 01:53.840]  go back to the graph for a moment. You see this little uptick right here. So
[01:53.920 --> 01:58.360]  what is that? To be clear, that has nothing to do with the masks. That is
[01:58.360 --> 02:04.600]  common in damn near every single state that was impacted with extremely cold
[02:04.600 --> 02:10.400]  temps on February 13th through the 16th. This graphic shows the storm across the
[02:10.400 --> 02:15.560]  United States, at least at one moment in time. And this white circle right here,
[02:15.760 --> 02:20.160]  yeah, that's Iowa. So you can see Iowa is getting some of the worst of it. In
[02:20.160 --> 02:24.440]  virtually every single state that got hammered by that storm front by those
[02:24.440 --> 02:28.040]  extremely cold temperatures, what you see is our cases are going down, down,
[02:28.040 --> 02:31.200]  down, down, down. Then the 13th through the 16th hits, it goes down for about
[02:31.200 --> 02:35.360]  another 10 days and then bloop, it goes up. I'm not gonna get into why that is,
[02:35.360 --> 02:38.760]  but I didn't want you to think it was pertaining to the masks. It's all about
[02:38.760 --> 02:43.680]  that February 13th through 16th storm. So we've got Florida that doesn't have a
[02:43.680 --> 02:47.320]  mask mandate. We've got North Dakota that doesn't have a mask mandate. We've got
[02:47.360 --> 02:51.800]  Iowa that doesn't have a mask mandate. All of these have reached 21 days or more
[02:51.800 --> 02:57.960]  as I'm sitting here talking to you now. No cases are all plunging. Why is this a
[02:57.960 --> 03:02.760]  problem for the establishment? Why is this a problem for the media? Why is this
[03:02.760 --> 03:07.480]  a problem for social media platforms like Facebook that want to silence any
[03:07.480 --> 03:10.240]  narrative that doesn't follow the establishment's narrative?
[03:14.800 --> 03:19.760]  Everything I'm about to say in this block pertains to the false narrative that
[03:19.760 --> 03:23.360]  the United States has not yet achieved herd immunity, most especially it didn't
[03:23.360 --> 03:28.440]  achieve herd immunity back in early January, which it did. Okay, so let's just
[03:28.440 --> 03:32.680]  use the six states that have either lifted their mask orders or some of them
[03:32.680 --> 03:35.840]  have announced they're about to lift their mask orders. So let's fast forward
[03:35.840 --> 03:40.960]  to the point where all six of them have had, say, 30 days of experience and the
[03:40.960 --> 03:47.520]  new daily infections just keep going down. The fact that they keep going down
[03:49.040 --> 03:52.160]  without a large percentage of the populations of those states wearing
[03:52.160 --> 03:57.560]  masks is yet another confirming factor that we did in early January hit herd
[03:57.560 --> 04:01.480]  immunity. So this reality, what I predict is going to happen to these six
[04:01.480 --> 04:05.280]  states and all the others that are going to follow suit shortly thereafter, this
[04:05.280 --> 04:12.480]  is incredibly disruptive to the false establishment narrative that we did, the
[04:12.480 --> 04:18.280]  United States did not hit herd immunity, natural, not vaccine, natural herd
[04:18.280 --> 04:21.040]  immunity back in early January. It's completely antithetical to the
[04:21.040 --> 04:23.640]  establishment's narrative. And in a minute, I'm going to tell you what that
[04:23.640 --> 04:24.200]  narrative is.
[04:28.760 --> 04:33.280]  In this block, I discuss why the actions of these six states and the additional
[04:33.280 --> 04:36.880]  states that will be following suit shortly thereafter is a problem for the
[04:36.880 --> 04:42.160]  establishment if we were to all accept, yes, the United States hit herd immunity
[04:42.160 --> 04:45.880]  back in early January. The reason that the actions of these six states is so
[04:45.880 --> 04:51.760]  problematic is because to everybody to rip their masks off and cases keep
[04:51.760 --> 04:56.080]  plummeting pretty much is confirmation. I mean, it's not absolute confirmation,
[04:56.080 --> 04:59.720]  but on a practical level, it's about as good as you're ever going to get that the
[04:59.720 --> 05:03.920]  United States hit natural herd immunity back in January. So I said it's six
[05:03.920 --> 05:06.320]  states now, it's going to be more states. So imagine we get to the point where it's
[05:06.320 --> 05:10.920]  14, 15, 16, 20 states have gotten rid of their mask orders, most of the citizens
[05:10.920 --> 05:15.640]  are no longer wearing masks, and boom, the cases just keep going down. What is
[05:15.640 --> 05:19.720]  the answer going to be to the fact that the United States hit herd immunity back
[05:19.720 --> 05:23.480]  in January? What's the what's the counter argument going to be when cases are
[05:23.480 --> 05:29.200]  collapsing without mitigation measures? And the acceptance that the United States
[05:29.200 --> 05:32.480]  hit herd immunity back in early January, which the scenario I just described
[05:32.480 --> 05:37.160]  would confirm with incredible strength, at least to the rational mind, that's a
[05:37.160 --> 05:42.400]  problem for the establishment. So what is the establishment's narrative that's
[05:42.400 --> 05:46.320]  threatened by either accepting that the United States hit herd immunity back in
[05:46.320 --> 05:51.440]  January, or trying to reject it at herd immunity back in January? Either way,
[05:51.440 --> 05:56.560]  this is problematic for the establishment, because it cuts hard against
[05:56.600 --> 06:00.840]  their narrative, and their narrative is based on their agenda. So what is the
[06:00.840 --> 06:07.000]  narrative? What is the agenda? Vaccination. Plain and simple. The
[06:07.000 --> 06:11.080]  establishment, which in this particular instance, the constituent elements of
[06:11.080 --> 06:17.400]  that are the United States government, big pharma, and the media, all want big
[06:17.400 --> 06:26.440]  pharma to make billions upon billions upon billions upon billions of dollars
[06:27.360 --> 06:31.040]  from having everybody in the country vaccinated. Now, Facebook moderators, I'm
[06:31.040 --> 06:33.760]  not saying vaccination is good or good or bad. I'm just pointing out what the
[06:33.760 --> 06:38.680]  media's narrative is, and why the two constructs that I've discussed in
[06:38.680 --> 06:42.360]  reference to mitigation measures and mass monitoring, why that is disruptive,
[06:42.360 --> 06:45.320]  why that is disadvantageous to the narrative being put out by the
[06:45.320 --> 06:48.280]  establishment and what the establishment's goal is, which is vaccinate,
[06:48.280 --> 06:52.520]  vaccinate, vaccinate, vaccinate. Montana has also lifted its mask order. And as I
[06:52.520 --> 06:55.880]  sit here talking to you now, I don't know, I'm a day or two shy of the
[06:55.880 --> 06:59.440]  requisite 21 days that I require before I take up your time to share the data
[06:59.440 --> 07:01.840]  with you, because less than 21 days, I don't think the data is actually
[07:01.840 --> 07:06.160]  reliable. It doesn't confirm anything to us. 21 days or more, it absolutely does.
[07:06.400 --> 07:10.000]  Then following Montana, we have Texas and Mississippi, and I'll be updating
[07:10.000 --> 07:13.600]  you on those as well. Please do share this data. As I've talked about, the
[07:13.600 --> 07:18.560]  establishment does not want this data to get out. So social media is going to
[07:18.560 --> 07:22.200]  censor it. The dominant media is not even going to talk about it at all.
[07:22.480 --> 07:25.960]  Government health experts are going to say, oh, no, that's not true.
[07:27.400 --> 07:33.480]  Doesn't it behoove us as Americans to share the actual data we're looking at
[07:33.480 --> 07:37.720]  with our own two eyes? Share it with our fellow Americans so we have a more
[07:37.720 --> 07:41.840]  well-informed country. So please, if you find this content meritorious, do share.