Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language
Detected language: English
[00:00.640 --> 00:06.480]  I'm Dave Champion. Over on the Dr. Reality YouTube channel, I had a fellow
[00:07.920 --> 00:12.640]  claim that I needed to be more responsible and I needed to do better research. And his main point
[00:12.640 --> 00:18.960]  was that SARS-CoV-2 is a 100-year contagion. He's trying to take a page out of the thing,
[00:18.960 --> 00:25.840]  like 50-year floodplain, 100-year floodplain, 200-year floodplain. Okay, so I don't know whether
[00:25.840 --> 00:33.840]  the guy is just really emotional, whether he believes whatever the media says, or whether he's
[00:34.800 --> 00:44.800]  perhaps not too bright. But let's take a look at that. Is SARS-CoV-2 in reality a 100-year contagion?
[00:44.800 --> 00:57.360]  Back on October 25th, I recorded a video that got released under the title of
[00:57.360 --> 01:03.760]  The Good Virus Data Being Hidden From You. I'll put a link down in the comments. And I crunched
[01:03.760 --> 01:10.560]  some numbers that ended up being really interesting. And that's as I'm recording this video. I did that
[01:10.560 --> 01:15.280]  video about six weeks ago, so I'm not going to re-crunch all the numbers. It was a lot of work.
[01:15.280 --> 01:20.800]  And using those numbers from just six weeks ago is 100% illustrative of the point I'm trying to
[01:20.800 --> 01:25.520]  make. The numbers I'm about to share with you are from about six weeks ago when I did the October
[01:25.520 --> 01:31.360]  25th video, which I think released on October 26th. And here's the numbers. If we took the people
[01:32.000 --> 01:41.600]  49 years old and under, again, this is October 25th numbers, and we removed that percentage with
[01:41.600 --> 01:46.800]  chronic disease, and I get into that much more detail in the previous video, that would mean
[01:46.800 --> 01:54.160]  the total sum of people 49 years of age and under in the United States by October 25th
[01:54.160 --> 02:03.280]  that would have died of COVID-19 was 1,132. Furthermore, again, as of October 25th,
[02:03.280 --> 02:07.440]  if we took the total number of people who had died of COVID-19 in the United States as of that
[02:07.440 --> 02:12.720]  date and we removed that percentage which had chronic disease, the remainder, those who would
[02:12.720 --> 02:19.760]  have died if we exclude chronic disease, was 21,000 people. I then examined what the United
[02:19.760 --> 02:29.120]  States could have experienced had SARS-CoV-2 hit the United States in 1890 before chronic disease
[02:29.120 --> 02:38.080]  was a thing, before it really existed. To give you some idea, around 1890 medical doctors were not
[02:38.080 --> 02:43.520]  trained, just as an example, on diabetes. They weren't trained. If they wanted to get training
[02:43.520 --> 02:47.760]  on diabetes, they had to travel halfway across the country when the course was offered every
[02:47.760 --> 02:53.040]  handful of years by some medical institute because not only were doctors not trained
[02:53.040 --> 03:00.240]  about diabetes in medical school, but usually throughout their career, not only did they never
[03:00.960 --> 03:07.040]  meet a single human being with diabetes, they certainly didn't have one as a patient. How
[03:07.040 --> 03:14.400]  different is that than today where one in seven Americans has diabetes, and it's estimated that
[03:14.400 --> 03:19.840]  60 percent of the U.S. population has one or more chronic diseases? The conclusion when we look back
[03:19.840 --> 03:26.720]  at 1890, but using the numbers from Italy and two U.S. sources on what percentage of people who died
[03:26.720 --> 03:32.640]  of COVID-19 had comorbidity factors code for chronic disease. After we crunched those numbers,
[03:32.640 --> 03:37.520]  what it turned out was if SARS-CoV-2 had hit the United States in 1890, the sum total of people who
[03:37.600 --> 03:42.880]  would have died, some total of people for the entire United States, sea to shining sea,
[03:44.560 --> 03:50.240]  was 4,100. Again, that's using the numbers that existed in the United States as of October 25th.
[03:50.240 --> 03:56.720]  All right, so with those numbers in mind, let's get back to the allegation, the claim
[03:57.520 --> 04:05.600]  that SARS-CoV-2 is a 100-year contagion, like a 100-year floodplain. All right, so if you have a,
[04:05.600 --> 04:12.080]  if you want to talk about floods and floodplains, there is a constant, and that constant is
[04:12.880 --> 04:20.880]  terrain elevation. So if you want to make the 100-year floodplain analogous to SARS-CoV-2
[04:20.880 --> 04:27.280]  here in the United States in 2020, then we'd also have to say that the health, the condition
[04:27.280 --> 04:34.720]  of the U.S. population would be analogous to the terrain elevation. So when we go from a flood,
[04:35.360 --> 04:41.920]  whatever year, to a flood 100 years later, unless you're in a gigantic city in the United States,
[04:41.920 --> 04:47.040]  something like that, other than that, the terrain elevation remains the same over a 100-year period.
[04:47.040 --> 04:54.480]  So has the health of the American people remained the same over the last 100 years? And by the way,
[04:54.480 --> 05:01.920]  what he means by the 100 years is comparing the last large-scale serious pandemic, which was the
[05:01.920 --> 05:08.960]  Spanish Flu, he's comparing that, which was 1918, 1919, a little bit into 1920, he's comparing that
[05:08.960 --> 05:15.280]  to 2020 SARS-CoV-2. In the case of a 100-year flood, as I mentioned, the terrain elevation
[05:15.840 --> 05:21.520]  remains the same every 100 years unless that land gets built into a giant city or something like
[05:21.520 --> 05:31.040]  that. Okay, is the analogous health of the U.S. population, has that remained the same, the same
[05:31.040 --> 05:35.920]  terrain elevation, so to speak? You know the answer to that as well as I do. We've already
[05:35.920 --> 05:41.360]  talked about that. We went from, say, 1890 where there was virtually no chronic disease, and if we
[05:41.360 --> 05:48.880]  move forward to the Spanish Flu, 1918, still just a tiny, tiny percentage of the U.S. population had
[05:48.880 --> 05:55.200]  chronic disease. It still wasn't even a thing yet. Now we fast forward 100 years and 60 percent of
[05:55.200 --> 06:00.720]  the U.S. population has one or more chronic diseases. Before we move on, let's take a moment and
[06:00.720 --> 06:09.520]  compare the deadliness of various pandemics. Okay, so in Egypt, in right around the year 1600,
[06:09.520 --> 06:15.440]  they had a pandemic breakout, and roughly because of course we don't have exact numbers from the
[06:15.440 --> 06:21.520]  1600s and we don't have exact numbers of population or exactly how many people died, but it appears
[06:21.520 --> 06:30.000]  medical historians say one in four Egyptians, 25 percent of the population, died of that pandemic.
[06:30.560 --> 06:38.400]  Now let's leap forward to the Spanish Flu, 1918, 1919. Four percent of the world's population is
[06:38.400 --> 06:43.680]  said to have died. Again, those are not exact numbers because even as recently as 1918, 1919,
[06:44.480 --> 06:50.880]  the world was not keeping very precise numbers, so it is estimated that four percent of the world's
[06:50.880 --> 06:56.160]  population died. So with all the panic about SARS-CoV-2, it must be at least as bad as the
[06:56.160 --> 07:02.480]  Spanish Flu, right? I mean, maybe even heading towards the Egyptian pandemic of 1600, right?
[07:03.680 --> 07:12.640]  Not exactly. As of today, as I'm sitting here making this video, the death toll from COVID-19
[07:12.640 --> 07:24.080]  worldwide is two one hundredths of one percent. And right here in the U.S., as of today, I just
[07:24.080 --> 07:30.400]  checked the numbers before I came and sat down here, in the U.S., using the CDC's Provisional
[07:30.400 --> 07:38.640]  Death Count, the current death toll population-wide in the United States from COVID-19 is seven
[07:39.840 --> 07:50.320]  one hundredths of one percent. And people, or is it just the media, are freaking out.
[07:51.040 --> 08:02.560]  If we go back to October 25th, the U.S. death toll from COVID-19 was six one hundredths of one
[08:02.560 --> 08:09.280]  percent. Now, I want you to pay attention carefully to the next thing I say. If on October 25th,
[08:09.280 --> 08:15.200]  we'd been able to take that percentage of people who died from COVID-19 because they had
[08:15.280 --> 08:20.640]  chronic disease, take those number of cases and say we're going to take those off the map because
[08:20.640 --> 08:28.080]  they were really all about chronic disease. If we take that out of the equation, the death toll
[08:28.080 --> 08:36.640]  from COVID-19 in the United States would have been six one thousandths of one percent.
[08:37.520 --> 08:43.760]  So I want to ask you a question that I think is highly relevant to SARS-CoV-2 hitting the United
[08:43.760 --> 08:52.480]  States back in 1890 versus now. If you or someone standing next to you was holding a lit match,
[08:52.480 --> 09:00.480]  just as you see here, would that concern you in the least? Would you consider that a threat
[09:00.480 --> 09:12.080]  to your safety? By contrast, would you feel safe doing this while you were drenched in gasoline?
[09:12.640 --> 09:18.800]  That is a pretty vivid, practical demonstration, the difference between how one would have viewed
[09:18.800 --> 09:24.800]  SARS-CoV-2 hitting the United States in 1890, like nobody would have even known it was there,
[09:24.800 --> 09:35.360]  and then SARS-CoV-2 hitting the United States in 2020. And the lack of gasoline and the existence
[09:35.360 --> 09:41.600]  of a person soaked in gasoline with a match, that difference is no chronic disease,
[09:43.040 --> 09:48.880]  sixty percent of the population with chronic disease. And in the overwhelming majority of
[09:48.880 --> 09:56.560]  cases, the vast, vast, vast majority of cases, having chronic disease is because of lifestyles,
[09:56.560 --> 10:04.080]  because that person chose it. In other words, in terms of a virus like SARS-CoV-2 that is
[10:04.080 --> 10:11.520]  essentially banal and meaningless, absent chronic disease, these people by their lifestyles have
[10:11.520 --> 10:17.760]  chosen to douse themselves in gasoline and then complain when somebody walks by with a match.
[10:17.760 --> 10:22.160]  I'll tell you what, why don't you not douse yourself in gasoline? Why don't you not have
[10:22.160 --> 10:28.160]  chronic disease? Then when a person walks by with a match, you just go like, whatever dude,
[10:28.160 --> 10:34.080]  what are you doing? So no, SARS-CoV-2 is not a hundred year contagion. What we have is,
[10:35.040 --> 10:40.880]  if you want to phrase it this way, a hundred year illness. A hundred years ago, Americans
[10:40.880 --> 10:46.480]  didn't have sixty percent chronic disease. I'm going to guess back in 1918, it was less
[10:46.480 --> 10:52.160]  than one percent of the American population had chronic disease. Now it's sixty percent of the
[10:52.160 --> 10:59.680]  population. That's the hundred year contagion. That's what's killing people. And I want to be
[10:59.840 --> 11:05.840]  really crazy. Do what you want. I'm at the point now, as I'm recording this early December,
[11:05.840 --> 11:11.920]  I'm at the point it's like, you want to be sick and you want to get the virus and you want to
[11:11.920 --> 11:19.120]  develop COVID-19 and become ill and perhaps even die. I can't stop you from continuing the same
[11:19.120 --> 11:24.560]  screwed up lifestyle choices you've always had. I can't even convince the vast majority of the
[11:24.560 --> 11:29.920]  population that they have a choice. So here's the deal. I'm not going to get it. I have an
[11:29.920 --> 11:35.200]  immune system, but for some odd chance it actually got inside me. I'm not going to get sick. I'm
[11:35.200 --> 11:40.320]  going to be asymptomatic because I have an immune system that's functioning correctly,
[11:41.680 --> 11:46.800]  not as degraded by all the lifestyle choices we've talked about, which is by the way, what
[11:46.800 --> 11:52.480]  allows people to readily get SARS-CoV-2 and then for it to develop into COVID-19 and in the extreme
[11:52.480 --> 11:58.320]  cases for them to die. So if you don't want to do that, if you want to be smarter, if you want
[11:58.320 --> 12:04.320]  to take a better path, I'm just going to tell you, yeah. The answer is right here. I'm not
[12:04.320 --> 12:08.720]  bullshitting you. The answer is right here. Now, if you don't want to read it, don't read it.
[12:11.440 --> 12:14.720]  I admittedly get tired of telling people there's a solution and having them go
[12:15.280 --> 12:23.280]  la, la, la, la, la. So if you want it, it's a doctorreality.news. Go there, get yourself a copy.
[12:24.320 --> 12:30.000]  Look at the physiology for yourself. I say in every single one of my works, do not believe me.
[12:30.560 --> 12:35.200]  Look at it and then research it. So of the thousands and thousands of people who've read
[12:35.200 --> 12:40.880]  body science all over the world, I might add, yeah, every single person is researching for
[12:40.880 --> 12:47.840]  themselves. Wow. Totally credible. 100%. Okay. But if you want to position yourself not like
[12:47.840 --> 12:54.240]  these knuckleheads who have, in terms of a virus, doused themselves in fuel and then lit a match,
[12:54.240 --> 12:58.880]  if you don't want to be that person, just go to doctorreality.news. Get yourself a copy of
[12:58.880 --> 13:04.560]  body science. Read it. Research it for yourself. Don't believe me. And then when you find out it's
[13:04.560 --> 13:12.240]  all true, perhaps adapt it for yourself. Integrate it into your own life. Allow your
[13:12.240 --> 13:18.480]  immune process to, over time, restore itself to the way that your genetics intended the immune
[13:18.480 --> 13:34.400]  system to operate. I don't know. Call me crazy.