Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language
Detected language: English
[00:00.800 --> 00:07.120]  I'm Dave Champion. Infections are increasing pretty much everywhere in the United States and
[00:07.120 --> 00:16.160]  Europe concerning the SARS-CoV-2 virus, despite the fact that government has now for 10 months
[00:16.160 --> 00:20.400]  been telling us, we have to do this, we have to do that, we have to do the other,
[00:20.400 --> 00:24.640]  and if we just do these things then we'll all be okay and the virus won't spread.
[00:25.280 --> 00:34.720]  Yeah, okay. So the virus is spreading and the government on the whole is not being honest,
[00:34.720 --> 00:43.440]  is not admitting that its measures were completely, utterly meaningless and superfluous
[00:43.440 --> 00:52.240]  except to destroy the lives and economies of millions of people. So finally I came across
[00:52.240 --> 01:00.080]  I came across a single article of all places in the New York Times where government officials
[01:00.080 --> 01:07.600]  are starting to say, man, we just don't know. This is the New York Times headline. How are
[01:07.600 --> 01:14.160]  Americans catching the virus? Increasingly they have no idea. This is by Sarah Mirvosh
[01:14.160 --> 01:19.920]  and Lucy Tompkins and they did a really nice job with this article. They're still stuck sort of
[01:19.920 --> 01:24.560]  in the old paradigm, you know, the traditional establishment narrative, but on the whole they
[01:24.560 --> 01:29.280]  did a great job with the article and as we move forward I'm going to be quoting quite a bit from
[01:29.280 --> 01:40.400]  their article. Because I'm going to be quoting a lot from the New York Times article, I'm going
[01:40.400 --> 01:46.480]  to be looking down and reading from paper. So let's start with an individual who is a patient,
[01:46.480 --> 01:50.960]  somebody who tested positive and developed COVID-19 rather than one of the health experts. So
[01:51.920 --> 01:59.760]  Denny Taylor, 45 years of age, said he had taken exacting precautions, wearing a mask,
[02:00.320 --> 02:06.480]  getting groceries delivered before he became the first in his family and among his co-workers to
[02:06.480 --> 02:15.440]  test positive for the virus and develop COVID-19. His statement is, I was so careful. And that
[02:15.440 --> 02:21.600]  parallels some of the people in my universe, people who I know socially and friends, those
[02:21.600 --> 02:28.080]  who never wear a mask only social distance one in public because you never know who actually says,
[02:28.080 --> 02:33.520]  yeah man, you need to social distance. So most of my friends, including myself, we social distance
[02:33.520 --> 02:37.360]  in public because you never know what the other guy wants, right, you want to be respectful.
[02:37.360 --> 02:41.920]  But among ourselves we don't do that, we never wear masks, we shake hands, we hug our friends
[02:41.920 --> 02:47.120]  and so forth. Not a single one of us has been sick, nothing, zero. However, the people I know
[02:47.120 --> 02:53.920]  here in town who have been the most fastidious about following the government's instructions
[02:53.920 --> 02:59.520]  and wearing a mask every second they've been out of the house and so forth, yeah, some of those
[02:59.520 --> 03:05.120]  have tested positive and at least one gentleman I know was hospitalized for three weeks with COVID-19.
[03:05.840 --> 03:10.720]  My observation there for what it's worth is following the government instructions aren't
[03:10.720 --> 03:19.760]  going to help you at all and perhaps, perhaps may make things worse. So John Hopkins has been
[03:19.760 --> 03:24.240]  a big player in this. Whenever you try and search for something on the internet, statistics or facts
[03:24.240 --> 03:28.880]  about SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19, John Hopkins is one of the very first things that comes up
[03:29.520 --> 03:34.560]  in your search results. So I thought this was interesting. This gal's name, Crystal Watson,
[03:34.560 --> 03:40.080]  she's a senior scholar at the Center for Health Security at the John Hopkins Bloomberg School
[03:40.080 --> 03:47.280]  of Public Health and she says, speaking of the virus, quote, it's just kind of everywhere.
[03:48.480 --> 03:54.640]  I love it. So yeah, she's right. It is everywhere and more than she knows because
[03:55.200 --> 04:00.160]  what the media is not talking about and what any of these health experts are not talking about
[04:00.160 --> 04:07.040]  is how many people actually have been infected with the virus beyond those we know about.
[04:07.040 --> 04:13.680]  Is it for every one we test that we know is positive, is it 10 more, 20 more, 30 more,
[04:13.680 --> 04:19.120]  40 more, 50 more, 60 more? Back at the beginning, when we were doing almost no testing,
[04:19.120 --> 04:24.640]  there were estimates as high as for every one person that tested, 80 other people had already
[04:24.640 --> 04:28.560]  been infected. Now that we're doing a ton of testing, I'm going to guess it's in the range
[04:28.560 --> 04:34.320]  of for every one person who's infected, there's 40 to 45 other people that are infected, what we
[04:34.320 --> 04:42.640]  know about versus what we don't know about. But because we don't know about, this is all speculation,
[04:42.640 --> 04:50.720]  but I think the important thing to keep in mind is it's 100% as much speculation for the experts
[04:50.720 --> 04:55.600]  as it is for you and I if you don't know if we're not testing. So how many people in that group over
[04:55.600 --> 05:00.000]  there that haven't been tested actually got infected? Yeah, I don't know. Fauci doesn't know.
[05:00.560 --> 05:05.920]  Carol Watson doesn't know and none of these people know. This one I find particularly,
[05:06.960 --> 05:15.920]  I don't know, amusing, ironic. Dr. Seo Yoon, who supervised a team of contact tracers in
[05:15.920 --> 05:22.560]  Massachusetts this spring said, quote, we were pretty successful and we're very proud of how
[05:22.560 --> 05:30.000]  the case numbers went down. Yeah, except from September 2nd until now as I'm doing this video,
[05:30.640 --> 05:38.800]  cases in Massachusetts are up 1500%. So I want to be very clear and I don't mean any offense to Dr.
[05:38.800 --> 05:44.240]  Yoon. Contact tracing had nothing to do with it. What he's doing is saying, well, me and my team
[05:44.240 --> 05:48.960]  were out contact tracing. We're so proud of our work because the cases aren't rising right now.
[05:49.680 --> 05:53.040]  Dr. Yoon's statement was about contact tracing and we're going to do a few more things about
[05:53.040 --> 05:58.880]  contact tracing here in just a moment. I just want to make clear that epidemiologists,
[05:58.880 --> 06:07.280]  communicable disease experts, they have pitched and the media has pitched it on their behalf.
[06:07.280 --> 06:14.240]  The contact tracing is some sort of a solution and it's not. Now there are some infections where
[06:14.240 --> 06:25.120]  contact tracing can work effectively. It's got a low rate of transmissibility and you have rapid
[06:25.120 --> 06:30.560]  testing. So it doesn't transmit readily from person to person. I mean, it does, but not with,
[06:30.560 --> 06:37.280]  for instance, the speed of SARS-CoV-2. It maybe doesn't have up to a 14-day incubation period
[06:37.840 --> 06:42.160]  and you can get tested and know by like the end of the day or the next morning,
[06:42.160 --> 06:48.160]  which is not at all what's going on here in the United States. Interesting story. A friend of mine,
[06:48.160 --> 06:51.760]  a couple weeks back, he wasn't feeling well. He went to the doctor and of course the doctor
[06:51.760 --> 06:58.000]  was going to be tested for COVID-19. So he takes the test. Like I said, it's been close to two weeks
[06:58.000 --> 07:04.800]  now. Never heard a peep, not positive, not negative, just never heard from them. So yeah,
[07:04.800 --> 07:10.160]  the testing is super efficient in the United States. So the real underlying point I want to make is
[07:10.160 --> 07:21.040]  that contact tracing with SARS-CoV-2 is not a viable tool to supposedly get out in front of
[07:21.040 --> 07:27.360]  the virus. Some viruses, contact tracing can accomplish that. Here it's just a waste of time
[07:27.360 --> 07:34.160]  and energy because we're never going to get out in front of SARS-CoV-2. It spreads too rapidly and
[07:34.240 --> 07:41.520]  it has too long an incubation period. I mean, I get epidemiologists and communicable disease experts.
[07:42.240 --> 07:49.280]  This is really their heyday, the last 10 months, right? This is some pretty heady stuff for them
[07:49.280 --> 07:54.400]  for the epidemiologists and communicable disease experts. So of course they're going to pitch,
[07:54.960 --> 07:59.440]  oh, guess what I have? I got this in my toolbox and I've got that in my toolbox and yeah,
[07:59.440 --> 08:03.360]  those things are tools in your toolbox and it is tools in the toolbox for
[08:04.320 --> 08:08.560]  certain viruses. The problem is they're telling the public, hey, look what I have in my toolbox,
[08:08.560 --> 08:16.800]  even though this doesn't work on that problem. Dr. Ogechika Olozi, if I'm pronouncing that
[08:16.800 --> 08:24.800]  correctly, Chief Medical Officer at Del Sol Medical Center in El Paso, quote, contact tracing is not
[08:24.800 --> 08:31.040]  going to save us. Yeah, right. Just like I said. What I'm about to share with you is the actual
[08:31.040 --> 08:37.200]  writing of the two reporters who wrote the article and it says, in North Dakota, state officials
[08:37.200 --> 08:42.960]  announced they could no longer have one-on-one conversations with everyone who may have been
[08:42.960 --> 08:49.840]  exposed. Aside from situations involving schools and healthcare facilities, people who test positive
[08:49.840 --> 08:57.200]  were advised to notify their own contacts, leaving residents largely on their own to follow the trail
[08:57.200 --> 09:04.560]  of the outbreak. Okay, so yeah, that's factual. But you've always been on your own. For the very
[09:04.560 --> 09:10.880]  reason I just said, if you've got, especially back in the early days where it was possible,
[09:10.880 --> 09:16.480]  we don't know, again, we don't know, but it seems very reasonable that for every one person who got
[09:16.480 --> 09:19.760]  tested back in the early days when virtually nobody was getting tested, for every one person
[09:19.760 --> 09:24.960]  that got tested, 80 were already infected. As far as contact tracing, which was non-existent in that
[09:24.960 --> 09:31.200]  day anyway, it was just beginning to ramp up, you were on your own, right? So if we go back, say,
[09:31.200 --> 09:36.480]  a month ago, we say for every one person tested who comes up positive, there's 40 or 45 people
[09:36.480 --> 09:41.760]  that are also infected, but nobody knows about them because they're asymptomatic or they just
[09:41.840 --> 09:47.040]  stayed home or whatever the case is. You're not contact tracing them either, right? So you cut
[09:47.040 --> 09:52.080]  this guy, you're contact tracing, and all of these people, you're not contact tracing. Yeah,
[09:52.080 --> 09:56.000]  we've always been on our own. Again, quoting the words of the two reporters,
[09:56.640 --> 10:02.160]  in Philadelphia City, officials acknowledged that they now must leave some cases untracked. Well,
[10:02.160 --> 10:07.680]  they were actually leaving the vast majority of cases untracked, but that's, we talked about that.
[10:08.240 --> 10:12.000]  Most people, they said, are catching the virus through friends and family.
[10:13.360 --> 10:20.080]  Golly gee whiz, you think? And it's been that way since day one. The only difference is now that
[10:20.080 --> 10:29.760]  they can't pretend to be having some sort of effective control over the virus. No, they can't
[10:29.760 --> 10:35.440]  even remotely claim that without looking like idiots. Now they're like, it's you people,
[10:35.440 --> 10:41.280]  friends and family. This is from Dr. Arnold S. Monto, a professor of epidemiology at the
[10:41.280 --> 10:46.960]  University of Michigan. Quote, we weren't supposed to get to this point. If you have five clusters
[10:46.960 --> 10:54.720]  going on at the same time, it's hard to say where it came from. Okay, so yeah, it's impossible to
[10:54.720 --> 11:00.240]  say where it came from if you have one cluster. It's impossible to say where it came from if you
[11:00.240 --> 11:05.920]  have one person test positive. You can guess if the person says, well, I was at the grocery store
[11:05.920 --> 11:10.400]  and I was at Home Depot and I was at Walmart and I was at my sister Mary's house and I picked up
[11:10.400 --> 11:19.520]  her kids from school. You're guessing. Kaylee Lingang, I'm probably pronouncing that wrong.
[11:19.520 --> 11:25.440]  She's a 21-year-old contact tracer in Grand Forks, North Dakota. And she said, quote,
[11:26.240 --> 11:34.720]  people are realizing that you can get it anywhere. People are realizing, like the light bulb just
[11:34.720 --> 11:38.640]  went on, you can get it anywhere. What, did you think you could only go and get it at the store?
[11:38.640 --> 11:43.760]  It's on sale? Yeah, of course you get it anywhere. Now, so one of the really funny things about this
[11:43.760 --> 11:49.680]  is she and a couple of her colleagues tested positive. So now she's trying to contact,
[11:49.680 --> 11:55.760]  she's a contact tracer, right? So she's trying to contact trace it. And she alleges that she
[11:55.760 --> 12:02.480]  knows she got it from her parents because several days earlier than she tested positive, her parents
[12:02.480 --> 12:09.600]  were exhibiting symptoms. That doesn't mean that's where she got it, right? So then she believes
[12:09.600 --> 12:15.520]  that that's it. Okay. My parents had it. They're symptomatic. I test positive. It's them. That's
[12:15.520 --> 12:21.200]  a presumption. There's no proof there, right? That's a presumption. Fair enough. So then she
[12:21.200 --> 12:25.200]  says to her parents, now she's a contact tracer, right? She's like trying to work with her parents
[12:25.200 --> 12:32.240]  to find out where they got it. She said, they have no idea. And that's pretty much how it always is
[12:32.240 --> 12:39.440]  with contact tracing. Again, the words of the two reporters, in earlier, quieter periods of the
[12:39.440 --> 12:46.480]  pandemic, people could ask a common question, quote, where did you get it? And often find
[12:46.480 --> 12:55.680]  tangible answers. No, ladies, they did not find tangible answers. They guessed just like this gal
[12:55.680 --> 13:00.480]  who is the contact tracer. She's guessing she got it from her parents because the parents are the
[13:00.480 --> 13:07.440]  visible ones. Oh, my parents had symptoms several days before I tested. It must be them. Doesn't
[13:07.440 --> 13:16.880]  mean it's them. There's no tangible answers. This whole construct is absurd. And the lion's share
[13:16.880 --> 13:23.600]  of the U.S. population is just like, well, yeah, okay. I think some of the early events sort of
[13:23.600 --> 13:28.160]  promoted this idea that the experts actually knew what they were talking about. I'll give you an
[13:28.160 --> 13:34.880]  example. When testing was not prevalent, they went in and they tested certain factories. So
[13:34.880 --> 13:42.400]  they would go into a factory with 300 people and 227 would test positive. And they would say,
[13:42.400 --> 13:49.600]  see, the outbreak is in the factory. What's your point? That's not science. That's not
[13:50.240 --> 13:58.560]  whiz-bang epidemiology. It's common sense. Somebody gets infected and it goes on for weeks
[13:58.560 --> 14:01.200]  and weeks and weeks and weeks and weeks and weeks because you're not testing, right?
[14:01.280 --> 14:08.480]  They're working shoulder-to-shoulder eight hours a day. And then suddenly health officials come in
[14:08.480 --> 14:12.800]  and say, well, we're going to test everyone in this factory. Oh, look, you all have it. That's
[14:12.800 --> 14:20.480]  not stunning science or sizzling epidemiological talent. That's common fucking sense. When I run
[14:20.480 --> 14:25.520]  into people who tell me masks work, I share a little bit of information with them and then I
[14:25.520 --> 14:29.840]  ask them to share a little bit of information with me. The information I share with them is that
[14:29.840 --> 14:37.040]  is that in 1920, the very first research was done concerning wearing masks during a pandemic
[14:37.040 --> 14:46.560]  was on the heels of the Spanish flu. And I point out that that study concluded that the unintended
[14:46.560 --> 14:53.440]  consequence of wearing masks during the Spanish flu was it actually caused more infections,
[14:54.320 --> 15:00.880]  not less. I then point out to them that in the hundred years since that study,
[15:02.080 --> 15:12.480]  not one single study has concluded that wearing a mask slows or halts the spread of a virus.
[15:14.160 --> 15:22.240]  Not one. So I ask them, those are the facts. So do you have one? Am I missing something? Because
[15:22.240 --> 15:28.320]  I'm pretty thorough in my research, right? Physiology is my bag. Research is my bag. So
[15:29.520 --> 15:36.400]  you have something for me. They never do because it doesn't exist. You can't come up with something
[15:36.400 --> 15:40.880]  that doesn't exist. I love it. One lady said, well, are you referring to the National Institutes of
[15:40.880 --> 15:49.280]  Health Study where they concluded that they don't know that masks don't help? As if an open question
[15:49.360 --> 15:53.200]  like, well, we don't know it might help. It's science. No, it doesn't work that way.
[15:53.200 --> 15:58.640]  But no, they're never able to answer. Well, yeah, here's a study that showed that wearing masks
[15:58.640 --> 16:05.680]  halts or slows the spread of a virus. In a hundred years, not one. So I share that story
[16:05.680 --> 16:14.560]  to draw this parallel. I think you should say to everyone you talk to about this pandemic,
[16:15.280 --> 16:23.200]  you should say in the history of mankind, but most specifically, we'll limit it to say what
[16:23.200 --> 16:31.600]  we call modern science, say the 20th and 21st centuries. Can you name a single viral outbreak,
[16:31.600 --> 16:37.520]  and I'm talking about that's readily contagious, not something like HIV, or hep C that requires
[16:37.520 --> 16:43.040]  the exchange of intimate bodily fluids. I'm talking about readily communicable, readily
[16:43.680 --> 16:54.000]  transmissible virus. Can you tell me one single case in the last 120 years in which government
[16:54.000 --> 17:07.440]  action halted the spread of a virus? I'll wait. Because the answer is none. So as I look at these
[17:07.440 --> 17:14.240]  less than intelligent people around me in this country, in America, that are like,
[17:15.040 --> 17:24.240]  we just need to do what the government says. Why? No government has ever taken any action
[17:24.240 --> 17:34.800]  in the history of mankind that has halted the spread of any virus ever. So based on that reality,
[17:35.440 --> 17:40.880]  why are people investing themselves in this? I don't get it. Is it that they're so fearful
[17:40.880 --> 17:47.920]  they have to cling to some sort of idiotic illusion? So here's the deal. Anybody with a
[17:47.920 --> 17:52.320]  brain understands that all these government measures since day one have been utterly absurd
[17:52.320 --> 18:00.000]  and nonsensical. They have cost God knows how many lives, but that's what these crazy dictatorial,
[18:00.000 --> 18:04.480]  lunatic governors have done, exercising emergency powers, which in terms of the
[18:04.480 --> 18:10.160]  virus essentially makes them the worst dictators the world has ever known. So what is there we can
[18:10.160 --> 18:14.560]  do about that? Oh, you're not going to like the answer to that because Americans are addicted
[18:14.560 --> 18:20.000]  to being comfortable. We just don't want anything to ruffle our feathers. We don't want to be
[18:20.000 --> 18:24.720]  uncomfortable about anything. Yeah, because we're Americans. We just love comfort. Yeah,
[18:24.720 --> 18:29.440]  we've lost the spirit of resistance. But if you want to stop this, the answer is mass
[18:29.440 --> 18:33.840]  civil disobedience. You tell the governors, Hey, look, I know you got these mandates,
[18:33.840 --> 18:45.520]  and here's your mandate right here. Stop doing it.